The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

I get paid over $190 per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 15k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless .Heres what i have been doing…
.
.
.
.
MORE DETAILS—————-⫸ https://Cutt.ly/ew0dHvCY
Courts should only give advise in the matter of defense of rights, never ever to assist in prosecution of a defendant. If they do so, they are obviously biased and becoming part of the prosecution of the defendant.
The UK courts are nearing a Bleak House rerun.
US laws or “assurances” are irrelevant in this case. Julian Assange is a citizen of Australia and is only answerable to Australian law. Assange is not even answerable to the UK. Assange should be returned to Australia, because only Australia can prosecute him on the basis of its laws. And if he has not broken any of those laws, he must be released.