in ,

3 years of dossier-impeach lies & Pelosi calls SOTU “a manifesto of mistruths” (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 458.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss US President Trump’s State of the Union speech.

Once again the US President scored a big win, and Nancy Pelosi looked like a spoiled child when, at the end of Trump’s speech, Pelosi stood and tore up her copy of the remarks he had handed her.

Pelosi later told reporters it was “the courteous thing to do, considering the alternative.”

Support Free Speech:

Subscribe to The Duran on YouTube – Find us on BitChute.

The Duran Audio Podcast:
Follow on Soundcloud – Subscribe on iTunes.

Via The Hill…

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday trashed President Trump’s raucous State of the Union address while huddling with rank-and-file Democrats, and explained why she dramatically ripped up his speech as he wrapped up his remarks.

“He shredded the truth so I shredded his speech,” Pelosi told House Democrats during a closed-door caucus meeting, according to sources in the room. Like she did the night before, she called his 90-minute address “a manifesto of mistruths.”

“You are supposed to talk about the State of the Union,” Pelosi continued, “not the State of your alleged mind.”

Trump, Pelosi said, “disrespected” the House chamber and used it as a “backdrop for a reality show… to give a speech that had no connection with reality.”

Wednesday’s private remarks marked the first time Pelosi had addressed the Tuesday night incident to House Democrats. Pelosi said she had not planned to tear up Trump’s speech, but she felt “liberated” when she did so. Her actions came after Trump, as he entered the chamber and ascended the dais, appeared to snub Pelosi by ignoring her extended hand.

“I didn’t go in there to tear up the speech, and I didn’t even care that he didn’t shake my hand. In fact, who cares?” Pelosi told her caucus, according to sources in the room. “But I’m a speed reader, so … I went like this through the speech. So I knew that it was a pack of lies.  I knew it was a pack of lies, but I thought, ‘Well, let’s see how it goes.’

“About a quarter through it I thought, ‘You know – he’s selling a bill of goods like a snake oil salesman. We cannot let this stand,’” she said. “So, somewhere along the way realizing what was coming, I started to stack my papers in a way that were tear-able.”

Democrats rallied behind Pelosi and her gesture the night before, erupting in a standing ovation in the meeting, lawmakers said.

“She ripped it from top to bottom,” said Rep. Lois Frankel (D-Fla.), speaking metaphorically of Pelosi skewering Trump’s speech.

Democrats were still fuming at Trump on Wednesday morning. They were furious not only about Trump insulting Pelosi in her own chamber, but also about his claims that he alone had fixed the economy and reversed what he called years of “American decline.”

Democrats griped that Trump had tried to erase from history eight years of economic growth under President Obama, who had inherited a financial crisis from his GOP predecessor.

Republicans directed their fury at Pelosi. Some called for her to be censured, something that would never happen since her party controls the chamber. Vice President Mike Pence, a former House colleague who stood next to Pelosi as she tore pages of the speech into pieces, described it as “a new low.”

“Speaker Pelosi had a tantrum. She disgraced herself. She dishonored the House,” Republican Conference Chair Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) said at a GOP leadership news conference Wednesday morning. “She showed once again she is an embarrassment and she is unfit for office.”

But Democrats blamed Trump’s apparent snub at the beginning for setting the tone.

“I think the president came for a campaign rally and his actions indicated he did not want to bring the country together. He wanted to count on division in order to get reelected,” said Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas).

The passive-aggressive exchanges between the president and Speaker have only inflamed partisan tensions on a day when the Senate — after a weeks-long impeachment trial — will vote mostly along party lines to acquit Trump.

Until Tuesday night, Trump and Pelosi had not seen each other since a contentious mid-October meeting at the White House on Syria in which the two traded insults. At that point, the House was only a few weeks into its impeachment inquiry.

The tensions have only deepened since Pelosi presided over the House votes in December to impeach Trump over his efforts to pressure the Ukrainian government to open investigations into his political opponents.

In the Wednesday gathering, Pelosi also individually thanked by name the seven Democratic impeachment managers, including lead prosecutor Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.). They, too, received a standing ovation.

One of those managers, Democratic Caucus Chairman Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), one of the party’s top messengers, defended the Speaker’s actions after the meeting.

“As far as I’m concerned, a shredder wasn’t available and she did what she needed to do,” Jeffries told reporters.


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 6, 2020

Just what did Pelosi expect, a warm hug from the guy she brought phony impeachment charges against? And talk about the pot calling the kettle black — the Democrats have spent three years dividing the country, not only along partisan lines, but also within their own constituency with their foolish identity politics “divide-and-conquer” strategy. If the Dems can’t offer Americans more than “anti-Trump” and identity politics, then the Party’s over.

Reply to  Janet
February 6, 2020

I agree, the (democratic) party is over. It became inevitable when Bill Clinton abandoned the principles of the party in the 1990’s, and embraced Phillip Goulds ideas, and the chickens have finally come home to roost. Sanders had his “Lincoln moment” in the palm of his hand at the 2016 convention. He could have walked away at THAT MOMENT, and used his momentum and huge and deeply committed base to start a truly viable party of real left policies, but he squandered the opportunity that was put in front of him. Gabbard (who’s rhetoric I honestly find highly suspect, in… Read more »

Reply to  oldandjaded
February 7, 2020

That was Hillary Clinton who was behind turning it into a “The Radical Marxist Bolshevik – Chaka Socialist Communists Democrats Party” since she studied under Saul Alinksy who she loved and wrote her college paper about him and his book.

Reply to  oldandjaded
February 8, 2020

I agree pretty much entirely with your post. I supported Bernie in 2016 and felt entirely betrayed when he endorsed Hillary – a Wall St protector – after howling against billionaires and Wall St for two years. It was more betrayal than I was willing to accept and I stopped support for Bernie. A candidate can lose honestly, but he cannot turn himself into a turncoat honestly. But the latter is just what Bernie did. Which leaves his issues as nothing but empty rhetoric to be rattled down whenever he has a chance. But they mean nothing. As to him… Read more »

February 7, 2020

Pelosi just shot “The Radical Marxist Bolshevik – Chaka Socialist Communists Democrats” in the head over that stunt and her statement afterwards.

Buzzfeed gets Zerohedge suspended from Twitter over coronavirus post (Video)

Trump’s State of the Union address: half MAGA rally, half Resistance Protest, full-on reality TV drama