Connect with us
// (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});


Poetic justice for Hillary Clinton – new big league revelations

The FBI has re-opened its case against Hillary Clinton. Days before the election, this represents a ‘big league’ revelation that could change everything.




On occasion, political systems which are totally corrupt, can produce events, the results of which run contrary to intuition. Traditionally, justice is associated with political systems which value transparency, honesty, morality and deal out severe punishments to those who deviate from this trajectory. None of this can be associated with the people who surround Hillary Clinton, the most thoroughly corrupt individual to run as a major candidate for the presidency of the United States in recent history, if not ever.

But Friday’s events witnessed a profound exception which proves a dismal rule. From within the belly of the establishment beast, the FBI has re-opened the case against Hillary Clinton for her improper use of private email servers to conduct state affairs and the deletion of classified information in order to cover up her crimes. The official rationale for re-opening the FBI case against Clinton is that new emails have surfaced which are “pertinent to the investigation” according to FBI director James Comey.

Legally there is nothing too exotic about a closed case being re-opened in the light of new evidence being discovered. But when it comes to Hillary Clinton whose case Donald Trump rightly says was swept under the rug by the FBI, logic dictates that there is something more at hand.

In corrupt societies there are several examples of how the truth can get exposed in the name of justice.

  1. An individual has a personal moral revelation which disallows him or her from continually participating in the running of an unjust system. Such examples include Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden.
  2. Those who seek personal fame or monetary enrichment by exposing an erstwhile hidden scandal. Here one could point to Paula Jones who exposed the Bill Clinton scandal involving Monica Lewinsky.
  3. Someone looking to escape a country they find repressive will leak critical information in order to win sympathy with a foreign land in which one seeks asylum. There are countless examples of this throughout history. Think of example of a North Korean informant seeking asylum in Seoul.

Time will tell which one of these categories applies, but it is quite extraordinary that the FBI, the heart of the American law enforcement establishment, would do such a thing and do so just under two weeks before election day and shortly after Hillary Clinton’s 69th birthday. The timing is more than intriguing. Someone, somewhere in the FBI must have an axe to grind against the Clintons or some deeply person vendetta. It is highly likely that someone twisted the arm of Mr. Comey. I wouldn’t discount inter-organisational blackmail.

Perhaps someone has information on Mr. Comey or his associates and made an offer the heads of the FBI could not refuse. There is also a possibility that someone in the establishment has a reason to want Hillary Clinton away from power. Perhaps she is more feared than respected even in the place she nominally holds court. This is of course speculation, but speculation based on logic. The logic is informed by a lifetime of studying the banana republics which America is beginning to look like, contrary to the facetious optimism of Vladimir Putin.

There is however, something even more intriguing. In the FBI re-opening the case against Hillary Clinton there is not only a sense of justice in the air, there is a sense of poetic justice.

The Hillary Clinton campaign have been trying to score points against Donald Trump because he said the word ‘pussy’ to refer to the genitals of a woman. Now though, the FBI are investigating Hillary Clinton for very serious crimes due to emails brought to the attention of the FBI during their investigation into the sexual crimes committed against a minor by former Democratic Congressman Anthony Weiner.

How poetically just that after trying to tar Donald Trump as some sort of pervert, that Hillary Clinton’s campaign has taken a massive blow due to the investigation of an actual pervert, an alleged paedophile moreover! In many ways, this is one part Sophocles and one part Aristophanes. One doesn’t know whether to laugh or cry.

The mainstream media will try their best to downplay this latest bombshell. Therefore Donald Trump must continue to hammer this message home. Hillary Clinton is seismically corrupt. She makes Richard Nixon look like Jesus Christ.

There is another clear victor in this saga, beyond Donald Trump whose remarks about ‘Crooked’ Hillary have been vindicate. Julian Assange and Wikileaks have made Hillary Clinton’s email issue unavoidable. Leak after leak of embarrassing, incriminating and morally demolishing emails from Clinton and her associates have drawn the world’s attention to the systematic corruption and lies that Hillary Clinton bathes in on a daily basis.

Wikileaks may well have played a part in embarrassing the FBI about their erstwhile complacency in respect of Hillary Clinton’s mafia style politics. This is a further example of how new-media can change the world for the better and can even impact how the establishment treats the most deviant members of their own club.

As the days tick down until election day, things just got interesting….BIG LEAGUE!

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement // (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Notify of


Trump Has Gifted “No More Wars” Policy Position To Bernie Sanders (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 148.

Alex Christoforou



RT CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle and The Duran’s Alex Christoforou discuss how US President Donald Tump appears to have ceded his popular 2016 ‘no more wars’ campaign message and policy position to Bernie Sanders and any other US 2020 candidate willing to grad onto a non-interventionist approach to the upcoming Democrat primaries.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

“Is Bernie Stealing Trump’s ‘No More Wars’ Issue?” by Patrick J. Buchanan…

The center of gravity of U.S. politics is shifting toward the Trump position of 2016.

“The president has said that he does not want to see this country involved in endless wars… I agree with that,” Bernie Sanders told the Fox News audience at Monday’s town hall meeting in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.

Then turning and staring straight into the camera, Bernie added:

“Mr. President, tonight you have the opportunity to do something extraordinary: Sign that resolution. Saudi Arabia should not be determining the military or foreign policy of this country.”

Sanders was talking about a War Powers Act resolution that would have ended U.S. involvement in the five-year civil war in Yemen that has created one of the great humanitarian crises of our time, with thousands of dead children amidst an epidemic of cholera and a famine.

Supported by a united Democratic Party on the Hill, and an anti-interventionist faction of the GOP led by Sens. Rand Paul and Mike Lee of Utah, the War Powers resolution had passed both houses of Congress.

But 24 hours after Sanders urged him to sign it, Trump, heeding the hawks in his Cabinet and National Security Council, vetoed S.J.Res.7, calling it a “dangerous attempt to weaken my constitutional authorities.”

With sufficient Republican votes in both houses to sustain Trump’s veto, that should be the end of the matter.

It is not: Trump may have just ceded the peace issue in 2020 to the Democrats. If Sanders emerges as the nominee, we will have an election with a Democrat running on the “no-more-wars” theme Trump touted in 2016. And Trump will be left defending the bombing of Yemeni rebels and civilians by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia.

Does Trump really want to go into 2020 as a war party president?

Does he want to go into 2020 with Democrats denouncing “Trump’s endless wars” in the Middle East? Because that is where he is headed.

In 2008, John McCain, leading hawk in the Senate, was routed by a left-wing first-term senator from Illinois, Barack Obama, who had won his nomination by defeating the more hawkish Hillary Clinton, who had voted to authorize the war in Iraq.

In 2012, the Republican nominee Mitt Romney, who was far more hawkish than Obama on Russia, lost.

Yet, in 2016, Trump ran as a different kind of Republican, an opponent of the Iraq War and an anti-interventionist who wanted to get along with Russia’s Vladimir Putin and get out of these Middle East wars.

Looking closely at the front-running candidates for the Democratic nomination of 2020 — Joe Biden, Sanders, Kamala Harris, Beto O’Rourke, Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker — not one appears to be as hawkish as Trump has become.

Trump pulled us out of the nuclear deal with Iran negotiated by Secretary of State John Kerry and reimposed severe sanctions.

He declared Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization, to which Iran has responded by declaring U.S. Central Command a terrorist organization. Ominously, the IRGC and its trained Shiite militias in Iraq are in close proximity to U.S. troops.

Trump has recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, moved the U.S. Embassy there, closed the consulate that dealt with Palestinian affairs, cut off aid to the Palestinians, recognized Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights seized from Syria in 1967, and gone silent on Bibi Netanyahu’s threat to annex Jewish settlements on the West Bank.

Sanders, however, though he stands by Israel, is supporting a two-state solution and castigating the “right-wing” Netanyahu regime.

Trump has talked of pulling all U.S. troops out of Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet the troops are still there.

Though Trump came into office promising to get along with the Russians, he sent Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine and announced a pullout from Ronald Reagan’s 1987 INF treaty that outlawed all land-based intermediate-range nuclear missiles.

When Putin provocatively sent 100 Russian troops to Caracas — ostensibly to repair the S-400 anti-aircraft and anti-missile system that was damaged in recent blackouts — Trump, drawing a red line, ordered the Russians to “get out.”

Biden is expected to announce next week. If the stands he takes on Russia, China, Israel and the Middle East are more hawkish than the rest of the field, he will be challenged by the left wing of his party, and by Sanders, who voted “no” on the Iraq War that Biden supported.

The center of gravity of U.S. politics is shifting toward the Trump position of 2016. And the anti-interventionist wing of the GOP is growing.

And when added to the anti-interventionist and anti-war wing of the Democratic Party on the Hill, together, they are able, as on the Yemen War Powers resolution, to produce a new bipartisan majority.

Prediction: By the primaries of 2020, foreign policy will be front and center, and the Democratic Party will have captured the “no-more-wars” political high ground that Candidate Donald Trump occupied in 2016.

Do You Appreciate Reading Our Emails and Website? Let us know how we are doing – Send us a Thank You Via Paypal!

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading


Over 200 killed, hundreds injured in series of blasts at Sri Lankan hotels & churches

A series of bombings hit churches and hotels across Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday, killing more than 200 people.





Via RT…

A series of eight explosions rocked Catholic churches and luxury hotels in Sri Lanka as Christians began Easter Sunday celebrations, with over 200 killed and hundreds injured, media reported, citing police.

The blasts started at around 8:45am local time at St. Anthony’s Church in Colombo and St. Sebastian’s Church in Negombo, a Catholic-majority town outside of the capital. The Zion Church in Batticaloa on the eastern coast was also targeted. At around the same time, the Shangri-La, Cinnamon Grand and Kingsbury five-star hotels were also hit, police confirmed.

Two more explosions happened later in the day, targeting two more locations in Colombo. All attacks appear to have been coordinated.

At least 207 people were killed, Reuters reported, citing police. More than 450 were injured in the attacks.

Alleged footage of the aftermath, shared on social media, showed chaos and large-scale destruction inside at least one of the churches.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading


Mike Pompeo reveals true motto of CIA: ‘We lied, we cheated, we stole’ (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 147.

Alex Christoforou



The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris take a look at a Texas A&M University speech, and subsequent interview, with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

The former CIA Director admitted, ‘as an aside’ to the question asked, that the Intelligence agency he headed up before being appointed as the top US Diplomat had a motto “we lied, we cheated, we stole”…which, according to Pompeo, contained entire CIA training courses based on ‘lying, cheating and stealing.’

Pompeo finally speaks some truth.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading


Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...


Quick Donate

The Duran
Donate a quick 10 spot!


The Duran Newsletter