in

Why Republicans Blew Their Big Opportunity to Win in 2024

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Eric Zuesse

There are so many ways that the Republican Party could have turned America’s political contests into a crushing defeat of Democrats in 2022 and especially in the upcoming 2024 races, but they chose instead to do what their mega-donors want them to do, which is to extend into the future the permanent-warfare U.S. economy that has poured trillions of U.S. taxpayer dollars into destroying Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, and now especially into destroying Ukraine, and thereby making the investors in corporations such as Lockheed Martin and ExxonMobil even richer than they were before, while the broad masses of the American people become even more indebted than they were before — and this increased debt is without even including into the actual total debt, from these wars, their Government’s consequently swelling debt-burden, the soaring federal deficits, which their children will need to pay, all of this debt having been created in order to transfer those trillions of dollars, from the public, into the rapidly rising wealth of the one-in-ten-thousand super-rich net beneficiaries of America’s permanent-warfare U.S. economy.

The Republicans could have called Ukraine “Biden’s war,” or “the Democrats’ war,” but instead voted for it themselves, and so turned it into America’s war — the war by the billionaires of both of this one-party-state’s nominal two political Parties (the Parties of both Democratic billionaires and Republican billionaires).

Ukraine, like Syria, and like Yemen, was Obama’s war (he started it in 2011-2014), and because Hillary Clinton was even more of a neoconservative than Obama was, Trump became our President who would get us out of those U.S.-created wars; and, because Trump instead installed people such as John Bolton and Mike Pompeo, who were even more neoconservative than Obama’s team had been, we got Biden as President in 2020, who continues the worst policies of both Obama and Trump.

Trump kept waffling about what his policies would be on Ukraine, but Biden is no different than the super-neocon Hillary Clinton would have been; and, so, Americans who refused to vote for either Hillary or Trump in 2016, ended up getting in 2020 Hillary’s policies under the name of Joe Biden — and, yet, still, the Republicans in Congress continued to vote for the permanent-war policies, and they failed to call Ukraine, and Syria, and the other U.S.-fed wars, “the Democratic Party’s wars.” No, their billionaires wouldn’t allow them to disengage from these sanctions, and coups, and invasions: America was to continue to be ‘fighting for democracy and human rights’ around the world while spending on ‘national defense’ (against nations that posed no danger to us — such as Ukraine, and Iraq, and Syria, and Iran) as much money each and every year as all of the 200 other nations in the world collectively spend on the their militaries.

Do America’s 900 military bases in foreign countries add anything to the safety of the American people? Where does all that money actually go?

Someone posted online his brief spoken summary of the past few decades of what America’s ‘fight for freedom and democracy’ around the world has actually been doing. It opens with his describing his response on 24 February 2022 when he first heard about Russia’s invading Ukraine that day, and felt — and still feels — that this invasion was “long overdue”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_UwUgc7ALQ

“What You Don’t Know About The War in Ukraine”

His historical account there is entirely truthful, though it is spoken much too fast, as-if he were instructed to keep it under six minutes.

—————

Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

15 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
penrose
penrose
March 7, 2023

Yes, it often appears that the Democrats and the Republicans are Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum(b).

Steve
Steve
March 7, 2023

As George Carlin once said: “Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.” People are easily duped. Many believe that voting Rep or Dem matters. It doesn’t, at least not much. The last time it mattered was probably before the Fed was created in 1913. Since then, politicians are increasingly selected, not elected, and it is big money that gets to do the selecting. Big money wants even more money, and takes it where it finds it. Predator powers are basically Ponzi schemes: they need other countries’ wealth to feed on,… Read more »

Crass
Crass
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
March 7, 2023

“The 1913 Fed event is way overblown.”  Really! Then why did Thomas Jefferson and James Madison pen these forewarnings! “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.” –Thomas Jefferson “History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” -James Madison I would be very surprised if Woodrow Wilson was not aware of these prophetic warnings. Nonetheless, he signed the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. A few years later he lamented:  “I am a… Read more »

Last edited 1 year ago by Crass
penrose
penrose
Reply to  Crass
March 7, 2023

Excellent summary of the situation. And is it possible – just possible – that the Fed actually “engineered” the depression of the 1930’s to help the War Monger and War Criminal Franklin Roosevelt along with his partner in crime Winston Churchill prepare the public for going to war? After all, many observe that WWII ended the depression.

Crass
Crass
Reply to  penrose
March 8, 2023

Ben Shalom Bernanke (Federal reserve chairman from 2006 to 2014) even admitted that the Federal Reserve private bank engineered the Wall Street Crash of 1929 which caused the Great Depression. 

” Let me end my talk by abusing slightly my status as an official representative of the Federal Reserve. I would like to say to Milton [Friedman] and Anna [Schwartz]: Regarding the Great Depression. You’re right, we did it. We’re very sorry. But thanks to you, we won’t do it again.

Ben Bernanke, “Remarks on Milton Friedman’s Ninetieth Birthday” (8 November 2002)

Last edited 1 year ago by Crass
penrose
penrose
Reply to  Crass
March 7, 2023

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws.”

Crass
Crass
Reply to  penrose
March 8, 2023

Indeed.

“Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws!” — Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

“I care not who controls a nation’s political affairs, so long as I control her currency” —Mayer Amschel Rothschild.

Last edited 1 year ago by Crass
Steve
Steve
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
March 7, 2023

I agree that Truman’s actions were highly consequential indeed, but so was the creation of the Federal Reserve System. That, to me, is the equivalent of infecting someone with AIDS, and I think this is where the rot started. From “The Creature from Jekyll Island” by G. Edward Griffin, page 23: What emerged was a cartel agreement with five objectives: stop the growing competition from the nation’s newer banks; obtain a franchise to create money out of nothing for the purpose of lending; get control of the reserves of all banks so that the more reckless ones would not be… Read more »

penrose
penrose
March 7, 2023

Perhaps we should mention that Douglas MacArthur wanted to nuke China and Truman put a stop to that idea. Good or bad decision by Truman?

Russian cauldrons, Bakhmut and Debáltsevo

Bakhmut heats up w/Brian Berletic and Gonzalo Lira (Live)