in ,

US Commits To “Indefinite” Occupation Of Syria; Controls Region The Size Of Croatia

Via Zerohedge

“We don’t want the Americans. It’s occupation” — a Syrian resident in US-controlled Raqqa told Stars and Stripes military newspaper. This as the Washington Post noted this week that “U.S. troops will now stay in Syria indefinitely, controlling a third of the country and facing peril on many fronts.”

Like the “forever war” in Afghanistan, will we be having the same discussion over the indefinite occupation of Syria stretching two decades from now? A new unusually frank assessment in Stars and Stripes bluntly lays out the basic facts concerning the White House decision to “stay the course” until the war’s close:

That decision puts U.S. troops in overall control, perhaps indefinitely, of an area comprising nearly a third of Syria, a vast expanse of mostly desert terrain roughly the size of Louisiana.

The Pentagon does not say how many troops are there. Officially, they number 503, but earlier this year an official let slip that the true number may be closer to 4,000

A prior New Yorker piece described the US-occupied area east of the Euphrates as “an area about the size of Croatia.” With no Congressional vote, no public debate, and not even so much as an official presidential address to the nation, the United States is settling in for another endless occupation of sovereign foreign soil while relying on the now very familiar post-911 AUMF fig leaf of “legality”.

Like the American public and even some Pentagon officials of late have been pointing out for years regarding Afghanistan, do US forces on the ground even know what the mission is? The mission may be undefined and remain ambiguously to “counter Iran”, yet the dangers and potential for major loss in blood and treasure loom larger than ever.

According to Stars and Stripes the dangerous cross-section of powder keg conflicts and geopolitical players means “a new war” is on the horizon:

The new mission raises new questions, about the role they will play and whether their presence will risk becoming a magnet for regional conflict and insurgency.

The area is surrounded by powers hostile both to the U.S. presence and the aspirations of the Kurds, who are governing the majority-Arab area in pursuit of a leftist ideology formulated by an imprisoned Turkish Kurdish leader. Signs that the Islamic State is starting to regroup and rumblings of discontent within the Arab community point to the threat of an insurgency.

Without the presence of U.S. troops, these dangers would almost certainly ignite a new war right away, said Ilham Ahmed, a senior official with the Self-Administration of North and East Syria, as the self-styled government of the area is called.

“They have to stay. If they leave and there isn’t a solution for Syria, it will be catastrophic,” she said.

But staying also heralds risk, and already the challenges are starting to mount.
So a US-backed local politician says the US can’t leave or there will be war, while American defense officials simultaneously recognize they are occupying the very center of an impending insurgency from hell — all of which fits the textbook definition of quagmire perfectly.

The New Yorker: “The United States has built a dozen or more bases from Manbij to Al-Hasakah, including four airfields, and American-backed forces now control all of Syria east of the Euphrates, an area about the size of Croatia.”

But in September the White House announced a realignment of its official priorities in Syria, namely to act “as a bulwark against Iran’s expanding influence.” This means the continued potential and likelihood of war with Syria, Iran, and Russia in the region is ever present, per Stripes:

Syrian government troops and Iranian proxy fighters are to the south and west. They have threatened to take the area back by force, in pursuit of President Bashar Assad’s pledge to bring all of Syria under government control.

Already signs of an Iraq-style insurgency targeting US forces in eastern Syria are beginning to emerge.

In Raqqa, the largest Syrian city at the heart of US occupation and reconstruction efforts, the Stripes report finds the following:

The anger on the streets is palpable. Some residents are openly hostile to foreign visitors, which is rare in other towns and cities freed from Islamic State control in Syria and Iraq. Even those who support the presence of the U.S. military and the SDF say they are resentful that the United States and its partners in the anti-ISIS coalition that bombed the city aren’t helping to rebuild.

And many appear not to support their new rulers.

We don’t want the Americans. It’s occupation,” said one man, a tailor, who didn’t want to give his name because he feared the consequences of speaking his mind. “I don’t know why they had to use such a huge number of weapons and destroy the city. Yes, ISIS was here, but we paid the price. They have a responsibility.”

Recent reports out of the Pentagon suggests defense officials simply want to throw more money into US efforts in Syria, which are further focused on training and supplying the so-called Syrian Democratic Forces (or Kurdish/YPG-dominated SDF), which threatens confrontation with Turkey as its forces continue making preparations for a planned attack on Kurdish enclaves in Syria this week.

Meanwhile, Raqqa is beginning to look more and more like Baghdad circa 2005:

Everyone says the streets are not safe now. Recent months have seen an uptick in assassinations and kidnappings, mostly targeting members of the security forces or people who work with the local council. But some critics of the authorities have been gunned down, too, and at night there are abductions and robberies.

As America settles in for yet another endless and “indefinite” occupation of a Middle East country, perhaps all that remains is for the president to land on an aircraft carrier with “Mission Accomplished” banners flying overhead?

Help us grow. Support The Duran on Patreon!


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Shaun Ramewe
Shaun Ramewe
December 16, 2018

Yeah well how else are the illegal-invading coward-pervert war-criminal ZioYanks gonna keep sneakily abetting their sicko terrorists, committing more heinous atrocities against innocents, plotting their false-flag chemical attacks and stealing sovereign pro-democracy Syria’s natural resources and national assets??!!!!

Reply to  Shaun Ramewe
December 16, 2018

Shaun, The ZioYank$$$ have been bought many years ago, from president to president, vice-president to vice-president, CIA and FBI directors to directors, political advisors to political advisors. They’ve done with that British creation, capitalism, their religion, way of living, way of killing, way of occupying, way of stealing, way of making slaves, way of making cheap labor… I count on you to add a few more of those great achievements, besides the «cleaning of the swamp». That special goo has for source a house, a white one… I’ll add to that the stolen land that has become the one of… Read more »

December 16, 2018

Given the fact that USA is unlawfully occupying Syrian territory – I hope it’s not too long before their military find out the hard way they’re now legitimate targets for the Syrian, Iranian and Russian military’s!.

Reply to  Normski1
December 17, 2018

Defiance comes in many forms and not necessarily violent. Marce the Syrian Army to the borders of Turkey and Iraq with weapons down and a declaration of said intent. Let us see what America does.

Brigitte Meier
Brigitte Meier
December 16, 2018

The US occupies eastern Syria in a frantic effort to disrupt China’s land route to the Mediterranean Sea and the alliance of Iraq with Iran and Syria. The wild card is Turkey – hence the CIA’s recent attempt to assassinate and/or oust Erdogan. Turkey is the alternative route for both China and Iran. The Syrian army is currently clearing terrorists out of Idlib. When that will be done, the Syrian army will move east. At that time the US will find itself squeezed from all sides. Iraq will support Iran and Syria. The Turks are already moving east to Manbij… Read more »

Tom Welsh
Tom Welsh
December 17, 2018

The AUMF is of course entirely illegal. It places the authority of the US Congress above those of the US Constitution, the UN Charter, and the Nuremberg Principles – not to mention assuming that the USA, for some undefined reason, is the lord and master of the whole Earth, and entitled to wage war anywhere and against anyone it pleases. That’s bad for everyone, but the US government has perhaps failed to notice that it is worst of all for the USA. Thanks to the psychotic morons placed in office by the corporations who own the USA, that nation’s wealth… Read more »

Tom Welsh
Tom Welsh
December 17, 2018

“So a US-backed local politician says the US can’t leave or there will be war…”

When reading these articles, it is fun to look for the weasel words and phrases that cleverly evade important issues.

Note here the careful use of the word “politician”, which avoids admitting that the person in question has no government position and has absolutely no political authority.

December 18, 2018

The WaPo’s article that it points to is interesting.I had a surprise reading its comments,practically all of furious americans with some degree of insight,with three or two pro-interventionist trolls who respond from the beginning to the end of 187 comments,like they always do in nationwide online news outlets.
Being from France ,I like to inform myself abroad,and so I used to have a look at The Nation,Mother Jones and could’nt grasp why they write so little about foreign wars and other secret operations.

FBI Docs Reveal: “Flynn Was Not Lying or Did Not Think He Was Lying”

Canada to Pay Heavy Price for Trudeau’s Groupie Role in US Banditry Against China