The Elite’s Are About To SHOCK The World | Whitney Webb BlackRock Exposed (+my views)

7:03

“Christina Christalina, the Managing Director of the IMF, said last November that CBDCs can replace cash and offer resilience. What this actually means is that they are trying to replace cash with CBDCs, and they are going to do this through significant events because this goes all the way up the food chain.

The people behind many net-zero and Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) plans are essentially pushing for a transition from a free market capitalist model to a technocratic one. In this model, everything, including commodities, will be tokenized. Larry Fink, following BlackRock’s Bitcoin ETF approval, has been vocal about this “tokenization revolution.” The idea is to tokenize not only existing assets but also create new asset classes like natural assets, with initiatives like natural asset corporations making headlines.

There’s a major push to tokenize everything—turning lakes, forests, and even humans into assets that can be traded like financial products. This shift is being led by countries pursuing Agenda 2030, aiming to create a new financial system that is radically different from past ones. The geopolitical tension between BRICS nations and the West is real, but at higher levels, they seem to agree on these goals. Whether the agenda is led by Russia, China, or the U.S. and EU, the outcome remains the same: tokenizing everything and extending unprecedented surveillance.

Leaders like Mark Carney and Larry Fink, under the UN’s guidance, have discussed reimagining global institutions like the World Bank and IMF to use debt for financing SDGs. This includes debt-for-climate and debt-for-nature swaps, which are often framed as environmental protection but can be viewed as land grabs. While these justifications may appeal to the left, efforts to frame the agenda in ways that attract right-wing support are likely coming. For example, Fink has shifted his rhetoric from focusing on ESG to highlighting the potential profitability of tokenizing land and assets, enticing people with promises of wealth.

Ultimately, these efforts are aimed at pushing a system that will lead to mass surveillance, loss of privacy, and global governance. It’s critical to stay firm in opposition to these agendas and recognize who is pushing them. With the constant stream of misinformation, the key is understanding the broader goals of global control and saying “no.” Rather than trusting political figures or influencers, it’s essential to define and stick to personal red lines, especially as traditional political systems, such as U.S. presidential politics, continue to disappoint by offering a choice between the “lesser of two evils.” It’s clear that meaningful change won’t come from that model, and it’s time to consider new approaches.”

The Western economy is one big joke and bubble, but we need to remember that China is not better. When they opened up to capitalism, they also opened the door to this cancer. In the West, we had FTX—people remember that, right? Where are the losses caused by the FTX collapse? And that’s just one example. On the other hand, everyone has seen the ghost towns in China, which serve as good propaganda for the West, but that doesn’t change the fact that they exist and are real.

So, in the West, we have financial bubbles that caused losses which, in my opinion, are still hidden. Meanwhile, China’s housing market is also one big joke and bubble. Both sides are on the verge of breaking, but our Western overlords want China to break first so they can later blame the fallout in the West on China. As I mentioned in one of my last videos, there’s a significant chance they will disguise those losses behind a hack of the financial system. They could then use this to convince people to adopt digital IDs and CBDCs to protect themselves from future hacks, just as they did with vaccines.

People will be scared; they will not be able to access their money, and we all know what fear makes people do. After 9/11, fear of Islamic terrorists led to the acceptance of the removal of citizens’ rights, while after COVID, fear made people accept the erosion of free speech rights.

This is the final step of that “Great Reset” they have been talking about. What I never considered before, but is now possible, is that this Great Reset’s final step could be disguised behind a multipolar world. What if a multipolar world is what they truly want, similar to the situation during the Cold War? After the Cold War, they needed to create an enemy for society:

“The entire U.S. ruling class, the ruling elite, came to see terrorism as the preferred means, indeed the only means, to provide social cohesion—to create an enemy image for society to keep it together. According to neo-con theory from Carl Schmitt, you have to have an enemy image in order to have a society. This is a very dangerous notion, as it means the entire social order—political parties, intellectual life, and politics in general—is based on a monstrous myth.”

What if they decided that a terrorist is no longer a sufficient enemy image to maintain social cohesion and justify full control? What if they concluded that ending the Cold War was a mistake and now seek a similar threat to scare people and justify total control?

We must remember that the Cold War allowed the U.S. to do horrible things, justifying them by saying, “the other side does it.” I guess they miss that dynamic. Just imagine: “Shut up; we need to spy on Western citizens since China does it to its citizens, and we are at war, and we can’t lose.” What can’t be justified under that pretext?

4:45

The article discusses CBDCs extensively, highlighting that while crypto, DeFi, and other digital technologies are part of the conversation, the main focus is on CBDCs. This is the ultimate goal for these elite organizations. The misconception is that they are primarily interested in getting rich; in reality, they care more about control. They thrive on control.

“It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realise that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance.”

— George Orwell (1984)

Ignorance is straight! = Don’t do your own research! / Trust the science!