“STAY ALERT: They Are Planning Complete FINANCIAL LOCKDOWN” – Whitney Webb FINAL 2024 Prediction (re-upload and update)

Two of my posts were removed, reuploaded, and edited by someone else. I do not care about people knowing that I posted or wrote anything. The only thing I ever wanted is to inform people, open their eyes, and at the same time, learn something myself from other people. Because while I know a lot, smart people know, just like Socrates said: “I know that I know nothing,” which made the Oracle of Delphi name Socrates the wisest man. I do not believe anything, and because of that, I want to know as much as I can so that I can understand. This way, I don’t have to believe or trust someone, and I cannot be lied to.

This video, which I posted in full version, is in my opinion the most important thing for us to understand what is coming.

4:02
“Something similar to the argument made for social media companies censoring content is that they are private companies, so they can restrict speech however they want. But we now know that their restrictions on private speech have been a result of public sector pressure.
Again, people need to keep in mind that this is a public-private partnership—this is the prevailing model in the United States. The digital dollar in the United States is also going to follow a public-private model. You’ll have the Federal Reserve, the central bank, working with the private banks that own the Fed, and the partnership between them will be the system. It’s not going to be all public or all private; it is a partnership.”

9:16
“I think there’s essentially a consensus that another significant financial crisis is likely in the next several years. If you’re one of the big banks and you know that’s going to happen, you probably want to avoid a scenario like 2008, where the public knew you were the source of the mismanagement and economic problems, which spawned movements like Occupy Wall Street. To avoid that, what’s the best way to absolve yourself of any blame for mismanaging or losing people’s money? If you can claim that hackers took it, then you’re absolved, and the hackers are to blame.
U.S. intelligence, or really any intelligence agency today, can frame anyone they want for a cyber attack. We know this from one of the last Wikileaks releases, Vault 7, where it was revealed that the CIA had hacking tools capable of placing the fingerprints of adversary states—or any group they wanted—into hacks that were actually conducted by the CIA itself. Essentially, it’s a tool to create cyber false flags for any purpose.
The current CIA director was in charge of the Carnegie Endowment when they created papers with the biggest private banks and central banks in the world about a potential cyber attack on the financial system and how that would push for merging data sharing between banks, the CIA, and intelligence agencies. I think one of the reasons they want this new system, which ultimately amounts to a control system, is because they see it as the ultimate form of risk management. By surveilling people constantly, they can turn their money on and off, along with their access to services, under the digital ID functionality. It’s a way to keep people in line that didn’t exist in feudal Europe, but they’re clearly moving toward that model.
It’s interesting because the UN essentially admits this. They talk about how the acceleration of the adoption of digital infrastructure is exacerbating the wealth gap and making billionaires even wealthier. But the billionaires and bankers are the ones designing these UN policies. People like Mark Carney, Mike Bloomberg, and Bill Gates are influencing these policies more than anyone. They admit the wealth gap is widening, yet we’re moving full steam ahead on these policies anyway.
So, it’s obvious this gap will continue to grow, and many of those designing and maintaining this technology will be in a very different class than the rest of us, who are having this system imposed on us. We’re not the ones designing it, and we don’t have a stake in the stakeholder capitalism model.”

Here is a fragment from the full version:

10:31
“During the COVID crisis, there was noticeable overlap between the World Economic Forum (WEF) and events like Event 201. People paid significant attention when the WEF launched its Cyber Polygon simulations, which were focused on cyberattacks. At the same time, Klaus Schwab, the well-known face of the WEF, predicted a “cyber pandemic” that he said would have consequences far more significant than COVID’s impact on society.
The idea of a cyberattack seems contradictory, considering that during the COVID era, society was pushed increasingly from the physical world into the digital world. Now, the digital world is under threat from these cyberattacks. The ultimate goal may be to use cyberattacks as a means of centralizing control over the digital world.
With these simulations, one might wonder: will this come in the form of a false flag hacker attack? Who will be the villain in this scenario? A key aspect often overlooked with Cyber Polygon and similar simulations is the involvement of big banks, and in some cases, even central banks. There’s a major banking theme here, suggesting that the ‘cyber pandemic’ could potentially target the financial system to a significant degree.”

People didn’t understand what this meant. CBDC is just part of it; it’s about CBDCs and digital ID. Fixing this imaginary economic/financial system and liquidating all hidden losses of this system is the goal. But to do that, they need to justify it to the public—they need a crisis. Even smart people can be manipulated.

My own father, who is really smart, wanted to disown me because I didn’t want to vaccinate. At work, I had a coworker from Morocco. Really smart and nice dude, but he was raised in the orthodox Islamic faith. He believed that everything written in the Quran was literally true. I was shocked by a really smart and nice dude thinking that wine and salt water cannot mix because it’s written in the Quran. I was also always wondering for almost the last 20 years how smart and nice people can be convinced two planes could pulverize three buildings just because it was written in The New York Times. I still don’t know how they do it, but I know why they do it. As one of the documentaries I posted said:

Human Resources Social Engineering In The 20th Century
Which, by the way, is in my opinion the most important documentary I’ve watched, and one of the worst received things I posted.
2:28
“From his experiments, Watson reached a radical conclusion that would come to define political and social engineering in the 20th century. He claimed that the driving force in society is not love, but fear.”

They do it to control the population through fear. Just like John Foster Dulles said (quoted from Michael Parenti):

“Now, what’s very interesting is when some people, like rulers, come out and actually give the real intent. They don’t talk about democracy and this and that. They tell you what their real interests are. Let me read you one of a member of the ruling class. He was a partner, senior partner, in one of the richest corporate law firms in America, in New York. It was called the Dulles brothers. His brother, Allen Dulles, served for a stretch as Director of the CIA. He himself, John Foster Dulles, was Secretary of State under Dwight Eisenhower. This is what he says. He actually comes out and says it.
He says, ‘In order to bring a nation to support the burden of maintaining great military establishments all over the world and at home, it is necessary to create an emotional state akin to war psychology. There must be the portrayal of external menace. This involves the development to a high degree of the hero nation versus the villain nation ideology and the arousing of the population to a sense of sacrifice. Once these exist, we have gone a long way on the path to war.’ And he’s being very positive about this. He’s saying this is a good thing, a clever thing. That’s John Foster Dulles. So they come out and they say it.”

Just like they elicited fear of Islam and terrorists after 9/11 to introduce the Patriot Act and remove all rights under the law. The next big step was COVID, which showed me how much control they gained over the population since 9/11 and the Iraq war. While the 9/11 and Iraq narrative was received well by most people in the U.S., at the same time in Europe, people didn’t fully take that bullshit narrative and there was resistance to it. COVID showed us that 20 years of brainwashing turned things upside down so that Europeans are now more brainwashed than people in the U.S.

Here’s a fragment from Zeitgeist: The Movie:

1:06:23 Zeitgeist
“One day, our grandchildren will look back on this time and ask how the war on terror was won. The entire U.S. ruling class, the ruling elite, came to see terrorism as the preferred means, indeed the only means, to provide social cohesion—to create an enemy image for society to keep it together. According to neo-con theory from Carl Schmitt, you have to have an enemy image in order to have a society. This is a very dangerous notion, as it means the entire social order—political parties, intellectual life, and politics in general—is based on a monstrous myth.”

And we live in that monstrous, mythical world of naivete, where two planes can pulverize three buildings, and Kennedy’s magic bullet can cause seven wounds in two people.

I started my journey with knowledge through physics. I was curious about it, partially because it was the only LAW that no one could break. All human laws are broken, people cheat and lie, but they cannot cheat or break the laws of physics—at least that’s what I thought. But I guess I was wrong. The laws of physics can be and are broken by the CIA and Western propaganda. So if even the laws of physics can be broken and bent and don’t matter, how else can you empirically prove something?

(WEF) events like Event 201 were a simulation of COVID before COVID happened. Some people may not know that, but I assume most people here are aware. If I hear from someone I trust and respect, like Whitney Webb, that the same people are doing a simulation of a cyber epidemic or hack connected to banks and financial systems, I am also aware of hidden losses in our economic system. I know in reality this system has been broken completely since 2008. The conclusion is that there will be some electronic attack—an imaginary hack, of course—but it doesn’t matter, just like the fact that two planes cannot pulverize three buildings doesn’t matter, since it will be written in our Western Quran, The New York Times.

Praise be to Allah—sorry, I meant praise be to blind Consumptionism!