The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
The world’s most famous and highly honored investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, on 8 February 2023, headlined at his blog “How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline”, and described in remarkable detail not only the Biden Administration’s starting in December 2021 the planning for the operation to blow up the Nord Stream pipelines, but the considerable lead-up to Biden’s decision in December to authorize it. Hersh also described there Biden’s concerns starting in June 2021 which had produced that decision by him. He also described in detail how that operation was carried out, and the crucial involvement of the Norwegian Government — which means also Norway’s King — in assisting that operation.
When the article became published, at that blog, there was much expectation, among the relatively few people who got to learn about it and who read it, that major news media would follow up by doing their own investigations in order either to verify or else disconfirm what Hersh had reported.
There was also, virtually universally, among individuals who had read the article, an expectation that the European nations which now were paying more than twice as high prices for energy as before the termination of those pipelines, that there would be official investigations in order to either confirm or disprove Hersh’s allegations.
But none of those expectations were fulfilled: Not only did all of the world’s major ‘news’-media not do those follow-up investigations, but none of the Governments of the harmed European countries did either.
As-of today, Hersh’s account is all that we have (except for a few obviously bogus and some even ludicrous stories, such as that Ukrainian amateurs had done it).
Then, on 11 April 2023, the renowned investigative journalist Jonathan Cook headlined at Mint Press News and at his blog, “WHY THE MEDIA DON’T WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT THE NORD STREAM BLASTS” and reported about the stunning lack of news-coverage of Hersh’s remarkable blockbuster, and about the total disinterest of not only all of the mainstream news media but all of the Governments and countries that were paying perhaps as high as a trillion dollars in losses on account of that successful blow-up operation.
Now, over a month after Jonathan Cook’s article that urged an end to this — what by then was clearly a massive cover-up — the total black-out continues. There still is no follow-up.
All of this had started with Hersh’s journalistic narrative of who and how that operation was done; but, by now, the world DOES have extremely important and persuasive ADDITIONAL evidence regarding that account; and it is this:
The longer this black-out continues, the higher becomes the probability that Hersh’s account is true and accurate. Perhaps this additional evidence is ‘only circumstantial’, but sometimes circumstantial evidence can amount so high — higher each and every day now — and so is increasingly likely to become decisive, so that it can even, ultimately, exceed in certainty, the strictest courtroom standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Has the black-out now continued long enough, so that, by now, reasonable persons will conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Hersh’s account was “true” — that his narrative constitutes the actual history behind the event?
I think that it has.
What I find especially remarkable in this regard, is that, even after all of the time since 8 February 2023, no one has yet brought forth any evidence which is contrary to anything in Hersh’s narrative. Biden and others have said it was false, but no evidence has yet been presented against anything in Hersh’s account. Obviously, if any such contrary evidence existed, the motivation and means to bring it forth, to the public, would almost certainly already have been presented.
I therefore am now willing to say that Hersh’s account has been proven, beyond a reasonable doubt, to have been true.
Any lack of prosecutions at this stage will consequently constitute intensification of the black-out. This massive crime is thus growing larger, now, every day, day-by-day. It has become a crime by the press, against the public, and also by the Government officials in the harmed countries, such as Germany — and no longer ONLY a crime by the perpetrators of those blow-ups.
A reasonable person can, by now, conclude that Hersh presented on 8 February 2023 a true and accurate description of how this crime was done. But, furthermore: the mounting crimes by those press-organizations, and by the Government officials of the harmed countries, are, by now, indisputable, and are piling higher and higher, each and every day. The clock is ticking, as the impunity of the gangsters who are responsible for these crimes against the public become, each and every day, more and more stark. These are Governments and press-organizations that need to be taken down and replaced. They cannot be accepted within a democracy. This fact is clear, by now. The only remaining big question has become how to do it. It’s not only an international problem: it is also a national one, internal within many countries. The myth that these are ‘democracies’ has been shattered. We are now in extraordinary circumstances.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s new book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
I believe your general premise to be correct. I however do not believe anything will be done about it. The western populations are generally misinformed and frankly apathetic. America is once again fixated on the next election as if Trump will actually change anything. He will not. The establishment has started pushing him since they have realized that Biden will not make it this time around and they would rather back a clearly compromised Trump than Kennedy. The Durham report dropped at a very convenient time for Trump and yet there are no charges against all of those that perpetrated… Read more »
Connor Kennedy is anti-Russia but RFK Jr. is definitely not. An important thing about the Kennedy family is that they publicly support each other regardless of their internal disagreements. Also: RFK Jr. is going public about his disagreement with his son in order to avoid antagonizing American ‘patriots’: He is telling them: “We can disagree about this and still both be good people.” It’s a smart move on his part.
“We can disagree about this and still both be good people.”
Do not agree with this sentiment. His son is a POS and I hope he has a slow painful death for backing the scum that is decimating the Ukrainian male population. Sorry, that is the way it is.
otoh, I would not be happy if people judged me based on my parents views. My mom is a leftist extremist imo and nothing I can say or do will change it so I don’t bother anymore. Regarding his son being good people, I agree with your sentiment, he is a pos.
What are you demanding: That Presidential candidate RFK Jr. publicly condemn his son for risking his life by fighting in the armed forces of the country that this candidate is hoping to lead? He’d be a fool to do that.
He fought for Ukraine. Did not know RFK Jr. was candidate to lead Ukieland.
RFK Jr. is a candidate to become U.S. Commander-in-Chief. If he condemned his son for joining the U.S. military, wouldn’t that condemnation be stupid — creating a political argument that his political opponents would use against him? And how would you feel about that if you were in the U.S. military and RFK Jr. were tagged as being against the U.S. armed forces? I wouldn’t vote for such a stupid candidate as that.
Dude do you know how to read? What the F does going to fight for Ukraine have to do with joining the US military?
You don’t read very much it seems. I made no demands. Don’t reply to me again unless you’re going to read my comments please.
Pardon me — I was intending there to be referring to Joe. And, apparently, he knew it, because he was responding to it.
L.O.L. Now that remark, is IMHO, funny as hell. I was born in Germany, parents migrated in 1953 to the country where I live and grew up in. Nearly all my life, I have been victimised and suffered racial abuse by adults, even school teachers, for being Born in Germany. Did not matter one iota, that I was not even born during WW 2, the hatred was based simply because I was ethnicly German born. Thus way back in the 50’s the racism was heavily practiced, as it still is in the 21 Century today. We see it evey day,… Read more »
There is lots of bigotry against Germans, especially from Jewish conservatives such as Daniel Goldhagen, who blames Hitler’s Holocaust on “the Germans” even though many who perpetrated it were NOT Germans, and even though many Germans privately opposed it though were too terrified by the Nazis to say it openly. And some heroic Germans even risked their lives opposing it.
The advantage of an RFK Jr. Presidency is that Bobby is already well steeped in all the scandals and cover-ups by the alphabet agencies, the media, the pharma and corporations. Nord- Stream is just one more of these sinister conspiracies by the so- called ‘democracies’.
I trust that Bobby will use his presidential power to dismantle and prosecute the deep state trash… before they try to off him.
I seem to recall some family members gaslighting him publicly. From Politico:
We love Robert F. Kennedy Jr., but he is part of a misinformation campaign that’s having heartbreaking—and deadly—consequences.
By KATHLEEN KENNEDY TOWNSEND, JOSEPH P. KENNEDY II and MAEVE KENNEDY MCKEAN May 08, 2019
Yes, and RFK Sr. was a neocon. But JFK was transiting away from that. RFK Jr. is the most anti-imperialistic of all the Kennedys. And the most progressive of them all. This was why I was urging him in 2012 to primary against Obama for the Democratic nomination. The ONLY thing that I have disagreed with him about is censorship: he thinks that “the Koch brothers” should be prosecuted for lying about (denying that fossil-fuels usage is causing) climate change. I am 100% against ANY censorship. But only a fool will vote ONLY for a candidate who agrees 100% with… Read more »
I’m optimistic that you’re optimistic. Cheers.
Thank you, Ayumu, I am happy to hear that. RFK Jr. is an enormously courageous man. And he has been consistently well-intentioned, even though he lacks understanding that ALL censorship is anti-democracy and ought to be opposed — even censorship against “the Koch brothers” and other advocates for global burnout. Anyway: no one is perfect. And, of all of the people who have thus far indicated an interest in becoming the next U.S. President, he is the ONLY one who isn’t horrible, and he is extremely good. So, as long as he keeps on the fight, there is hope. But… Read more »