Eric Zuesse
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
11 April 2025, by Eric Zuesse. (All of my recent articles can be seen here.)
Jewish nazism — that’s to say Jewish racist-supremacist expansionist nationalism, or “Zionism” — is now being enforced by the far-righting Israeli President Netanyahu against dissenters in his own military, though not yet as forcefully as Hitler did in his German variety of this ideology (he had such dissenters promptly executed; so, Netanyahu isn’t yet as extremist as Hitler was).
On April 10th, Israel’s liberal newspaper Haaretz headlined “Despite Threats, Nearly 1,000 Israeli Air Force Reservists Demand End of Gaza War, Hostage Deal: ‘Currently, the war serves mainly political and personal interests, not security interests,’ wrote active reservists and former senior officials in the letter that was published despite the Israeli Air Force Commander’s threats to oust signatories.” The next day, America’s New York Times published an article that appears to have lifted virtually all of its facts from the complete Haaretz report but failed to identify their source (other than a phone call the NYT did to an Israeli Major General who “said he had signed the letter” — so, the NYT’s article is all hearsay), and even Haaretz’s own report failed to link to the alleged “letter” that was their source; so, the only thing that we really have to go by, about this alleged letter, is the Haaretz allegations (since the letter itself isn’t available online in any language), which alleged “letter” I shall here summarize, from Haaretz’s article:
The letter urged ending now the war against Gazans if all 59 allegedly surviving Israeli hostages in Gaza are returned, and it had 970 signers from the Air Force, almost all of whom were retired, but Netanyahu — via his Israel Air Force Commander Tomer Bar —threatened all of them with expulsion from the Air Force, and so the current number is probably a few less than that, but isn’t yet known. (The NYT’s headline was misleadingly “Hundreds of Israeli Air Force Reservists Call for Halt to Gaza War”, and likewise in other ways softened the matter and thus protected Netanyahu, such as by saying, “The appeal reflected heightened concern about the fate of the hostages after a shaky cease-fire between Israel and Hamas collapsed in mid-March.” But, according to the Haaretz article, “The letter’s drafters criticized Bar harshly during one meeting for threatening to oust the signatories. They said this crossed a legal and moral red line and infringed on the reservists’ right to voice their political opinions. But Bar said this wasn’t a punishment. Rather, he said, ‘anyone who signs a text claiming that renewing the war is primarily political and undermines the hostages’ return isn’t capable of carrying out his missions in the reserves.’ Bar also charged that signing such a letter during wartime is illegitimate. He added that the Air Force is convinced its airstrikes aren’t hitting any hostages, and that in his view, military pressure on Hamas will further their release.” So, the amount of lying for Netanyahu was significantly more than the NYT indicates. Furthermore, the Haaretz article said “They also called on all Israeli citizens to mobilize to action and demand the end of the war and the return of all hostages. ‘Every day that passes puts their lives at risk,’ they wrote.)
There are lies that are basic, fundamental, to the nazi ‘justifications’ of Israel’s ethnic cleansing or genocide against the Gazans, and here are three of them:
1. It’s justified by the October 7th attack.
2. It’s not against the Gazans but only against Hamas.
3. God (in the Biblical myth Genesis 15:18-21) gave Gaza to only Jews and (in the Biblical myths such as Deuteronomy 7:1-2, 7:16, and 20:16-18) ordered Jews to exterminate all Palestinians; so, just like Hitler had told to the Pope’s emissary on 26 April 1933, about Jews, “I am doing what the Church has done for 1,500 years; I am simply finishing the job,” anyone who disagrees with this is disagreeing with God — and is therefore wrong.
Netanyahu focuses upon Jewish parts of the Bible, just like Hitler focused on Christian parts of the Bible, such as John 8:44, Matthew 23:31-38, Luke 19:27; and Paul, 1 Thes. 2:15-16.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s latest book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
I think the word you are looking for is Talmudism (Jewish supremacism), as in ‘Netanyahu enforces Jewish Talmudism (Jewish supremacism) in Israel.’
No, the Talmud is NOT Scripture for all Jews; ONLY the Torah is, and it was written many centuries earlier.
The Talmud is the primary source of Jewish religious law (halakha) and Jewish theology, and you can take that to the bank.
That’s false. The Jerusalem Talmud dates from around the year 500; the Babylon Talmud from around 600; and Judaism had started at around 1,000 BC. You are saying that the Talmud does not PRESUME judaism’s 613 laws, which are in the Torah, the Bible’s first five books, and that allegation isn’t only foolish it is illogical. The Talmud is NOT Scripture to Jews; it is the late teaching of rabbis after around a thousand years of existence already of the Torah, which IS Judaism’s Scripture, their “Word of God.” That is a historical fact, but you are denying it. Prior… Read more »
Taken from Wikipedia —
“The Talmud is the central text of Rabbinic Judaism and the primary source of Jewish religious law (halakha) and Jewish theology.” which is more or less, what I also said.
Maybe you can write to Wikipedia and hundreds of other mainstream websites, and tell them they are all wrong, Rabbi Zuesse!
The footnote that Wikipedia attaches to that statement is to a rabbi’s book which actually says, instead, that “although the Talmud is, to this day, the primary source of Jewish law, it cannot be cited as an authority for purposes of ruling.” In other words, it cannot be cited as being ANY source of Jewish law; and the reason for THAT is simple: this rabbi was lying to assert that the Talmud is “the primary source of Jewish law.” ONLY the 613 ‘laws oif God’ in the Torah are THAT. The stupid rabbi there might have been trying to justify his OWN frequent citations… Read more »
PS: I am no clergy person (nor believer) in any religion, but I am a historian of western religions, as of some other things (the things I write about). The issue here is one of historical reality, not of belief in any religion.
PS: According to Encyclopedia Brittanica: “The written Torah, in the restricted sense of the first five books of the Bible, is preserved in all Jewish synagogues on handwritten parchment scrolls that reside inside the ark of the Law. They are removed and returned to their place with special reverence. Readings from the Torah form an important part of Jewish liturgical services.” If that is so, every synagogue must have a Torah. I doubt whether every synagogue must have a Talmud. Furthermore, I doubt whether — if a synagogue DOES have a Talmud — the Talmud must be “on handwritten parchment… Read more »
Re “not yet as forcefully as Hitler did in his German […]”. I have to disagree – the Yahoo is far far worse than Hitler ever was.
How I DESPISE these jews…