steve_brown
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
A theory is making the rounds that Israel has planned this conflict between the US and Iran for many years, where the US and Iran will be in conflict in a war of attrition to the end, to a point where both regimes either fail, or are so marginalized, to a point where Israel’s Greater Israel Project is ascendant as an aspiring global hegemon. (Think of this in terms of the manner in which the US engineered the Iran-Iraq war during the 1980’s while weaponizing and funding both sides.)
Personally I believe the above theory is unrealistic, and something of a false portrayal. Because if the US fails – which must include the terminally fraudulent US-led monetary system — that will take Israel down, too.
However, Israel may very well want to see the US weakened. That’s because anti-Israel sentiment is firming within the non-Zionist US populace. And anti-Zionist opinion among some prominent commentators — like Tucker Carlson and perhaps even the late Charlie Kirk — greatly worried the bosses in Tel Aviv. (Especially Carlson.)
Even though there are many Militant Extremist Zionist Jews resident in New York and Palm Beach, with great financial power, I think Israel would prefer to see the people of the United States at large marginalized and debased, rather than deal with a future Anti-Zionist issues in the US, during years to come.
Your thoughts please?
Steve Brown
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
The tiny-hats get off on screwing with people. It’s how they roll. So no matter how, where or when it’s all a game with those rats.
RE: “Your thoughts please? Steve Brown”
No thanks, as you would just delete or rewrite my comments, like you did on previous occasions, here on ‘The Duran.
You’re right, he should have written “except for the holy roman retrad: GROFAZ
GROFAZ!
Surely you mean gröfaz?
Yeah the paddy knows his kraut
The Hegelian dialectic is just a 10 dollar word (pretentious word used instead of a simpler one to sound more intelligent or important), for a very simple philosophical framework.
It simply means that someone comes up with and idea or proposition, and another person challenges its validity, and through through critical thinking and finding common ground, a new a new idea resolves the conflict, through reasoning.
Since I am not the author of this post, I cannot delete Holy Roman Fuehrer’s comments as I do with his comments on my own posts, but I congratulate you for having previously deleted this racist dickhead troll’s comments as I have done and as I hope everybody who posts on this site will do. However, I do agree with him in one way, because what you are calling “Hegelian dialectic” is a corrupted idea of Hegel that has nothing to do with Hegelian dialectical thinking as practiced by Hegel and Marx. The difference is that Hegel’s dialectic is dialectical… Read more »
Re: “but I congratulate you for having previously deleted this racist dickhead troll’s comments as I have done and as I hope everybody who posts on this site will do.”
It is shameful, that you are forced to resort to ad hominem attacks against me, as you are undoubtedly, an unimaginative intellectual pygmy Tony Wicher, which you unintelligently admitted to on your Bio-page, on ‘The Duran.
“I am an 80-year old retired philosopher living in the Southern California Mountains. I am a socialist, Marxist-Leninist.”.
It would be less shameful, to admit to been a Cross-dressing sodomite and a pedophile, that your unholy disclosure, Tony Wicher. Oy vey!
And before you go running to Alex Christoforou, like the little cry baby that you are, and demand —“I would delete them and ban “tim” and “Holy Roman Fuhrer from the Duran.”, remember, it is you who started this Tony Wicher, and it is you who is resorting to foul language like “racist dickhead troll’s comments”, which is unbecoming to use on ‘The Duran website, and certainly not the words a “philosopher” would ever use.
RE: “Please read some real Hegel or Marx or Engels before you say anything else about Hegelian dialectics. By the way, that isn’t easy.” The 1848 Communist Manifesto of Marx and Engels, was in large part plagiarised from Victor Considerant’s Principes du Socialisme: Manifeste de la démocratie au XIX siècle, first published in 1843. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, heavily plagiarised the French utopian socialist philosopher and economist, Victor Prosper Considerant work ‘Democracy Manifesto’, and published the remarkably similar ‘Communist Manifesto’, five years after Victor Prosper Considerant published ‘Democracy Manifesto’. If you were a real academic Tony Wicher, you would… Read more »
Taken from the foreword of Principles of Socialism: Manifesto of Nineteenth Century Democracy
‘A 2006 translation of Victor Considerant’s manifesto by Joan Roelofs. Scanned by Ismail, sent to him by the translator’
“Why is this document important?”
“First, as a matter of curiosity. There have been persistent rumors by scholars and activists that the 1848 Communist Mani-festo of Marx and Engels was in large part plagiarized from Victor Considerant’s Principes du Socialisme: Manifeste de la démocratie au XIX siécle, first published in 1843….”
Therefore, your whole ‘Marxist-Leninist’ ideology, was plagiarised from Victor Considerant’s Principes du Socialisme: Manifeste de la démocratie au XIX siècle, first published in 1843.
You have been following a plagiarised and corrupted ideology, all of your life, but were too stupid to ever realise this!
Worse still, the man doing the plagiarising, was the devil worshipping fiend, Karl Marx, and unfortunately for you, you have unwittingly sold your soul, but are obviously oblivious to this, but you will realise I have been speaking the truth, when you die.