in ,

Is China Turning away from the New World Order?

Has China, in recent years, drifted away from the very globalist institutions that once praised it? This is a very difficult question to answer, but an important one to say the least. Many western populists and anti-elitists have been extremely critical of the Chinese regime and have often linked it to the very same globalists they continue to bash. Is this an accurate description of China?

Before answering that question, it is important to remember that regardless of international affiliation, China is still a dangerous anti-Christian autocracy. In other words, China is still an enemy.

Many may be familiar with the interview in 2009 in which billionaire George Soros called for a new world order led by China. “I think this would be the time, because you really need to bring China into the creation of a new world order – financial world order,” said Soros. “They are kind of reluctant members of the IMF. They play along, but they don’t make much of a contribution because its not their institution. Their share is not commeasurate – their voting rights are not commeasurate – to their weight. So I think you need a new world order that China has to be part of the process of creating it, and they have to buy in. They have to own it the same way as I said United States owns, the Washington consensus… the current order, and I think this would be a more stable one where you would have a coordinated policies.” In other words, Soros wanted a new world order in which China would replace the US as its leader. This would lead to a more “stable” world order.

Soros’ plan would make sense. In the light of growing opposition to the western-centered world order, the globalists could use China to implement a new world order seen as the liberator of evil western imperialism.

In recent years, however, Soros has been caught spitting a much different narrative about China. According to Yahoo News, Soros claimed in front of an audience on the margins of the World Economic Forum in Davos that “China is not the only authoritarian regime in the world but it is the wealthiest, strongest and technologically most advanced… This makes Xi Jinping the most dangerous opponent to open societies.” The term “open society” is often used by Soros to describe nations compliant with the globalist agenda.

If what Soros had said was genuine (which it very well may not be), China went from being the heir to the United States as the leader of the globalist world order to the Chinese president being “the most dangerous opponent to open societies.” What happened?

One theory is that the coronavirus pandemic has ruined China’s image across the world, making it impossible for it to be seen as the great liberator of western imperialism. The elites may have decided that a Chinese centered world order would be no more popular than the current order. This may have pushed China away, leading to Soros’ recent attack on the Chinese president.

Another theory is that China may simply have decided that it does not want to comply with the agenda of the globalists. The Chinese government may see itself as powerful enough to overcome the west and its elites. If this is the case, it may explain why Soros decided to attack the Chinese president personally, rather than go after China as a whole.

More evidence to suggest that the elites may have turned their backs on China comes from the recent revelations of an investigation into the origins of the coronavirus. The information pointing to the idea that the coronavirus was created in a Chinese lab has been public for over a year since the publishing of this article. The elites have desperately tried to cover up this information, especially due to the fact there is evidence to suggest the American government along with Dr. Fauci also had a hand in creating Covid-19. Recently, however, it was CNN that broke the story of the investigation. The leaking of the Fauci emails soon followed, and were published by the media. These emails proved that Fauci believed it was possible the coronavirus did originate from a Chinese lab at the same time that he was calling anyone who believed this theory “crazy.” It seems that the American elites did not try very hard (if at all) to cover up these allegations. To confirm this even further, Facebook announced it will no longer censor posts that question the origins of Covid-19.

These efforts may be an attempt by the American elites to shift even more blame onto the Chinese government. If this is true, it would be safe to conclude that China has indeed broken with the new world order.

Despite this, it is important we do not jump to any strict conclusions. The evidence provided in this article is surely not enough to confirm one side or the other. There is a lot more evidence that was not contained in this article that can point to either side. Therefore, any comments providing further evidence would be greatly appreciated.

Help us grow. Support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
18 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Keff
Keff
June 9, 2021

It is always amusing to see Westerners grapple with the idea of what China is. For years it was easy to just dismiss it as simply Communist. Then now they claim it is Capitalist with a Communist veneer. Limited to just these two terms how are they going to understand such a vastly different culture? I sympathize, In the West there is so little information and even less interest in things Chinese. People seem content with stereotypical caricatures of the strange yellow man. For those who are a little bit interested, let me just give a a few pointers in… Read more »

Last edited 7 days ago by Keff
Helga I. Fellay
Helga I. Fellay
Reply to  Keff
June 9, 2021

With all the China bashing I have read so far, this is the first article which includes the word “anti-Christian.” Why assume everyone not Christian must therefore be “anti”-Christian? That’s globalist thinking – if you are not with us, you must be against us. Wouldn’t the word non-Christian have been a better choice? And re: “China has been Communist for just 70 years, but she has been Confucian for 2200 years.” Why would it be impossible to be a communist Confucian? We in the West have been “democracy” only for a relatively short time. We have been under the dictatorship… Read more »

Helga I. Fellay
Helga I. Fellay
Reply to  Malcolm Harris
June 10, 2021

Most Christians are not Catholic. How is China treating Protestants and other Christian denominations. The fact that China insists the Catholic church accept local (communist) leaders may have something to do with the fact that the Catholic hierarchy takes its orders directly from Rome, a foreign nation that is part of the Western Alliance. Catholics have to follow their orders without questioning them, the same way Chinese have to accept the orders from their government without questioning them. I can understand that the Chinese government wants to keep informed, should the orders from Rome be in direct conflict with the… Read more »

Eddy
Eddy
Reply to  Malcolm Harris
June 10, 2021

A very wise and prescient decision.Wester history is full of alleged Christians underming and destroying local culture and turning their peoples against their own Govt.Take a good look at South America for an example. Even in my own country Australia, the so called Christians have a he’ll of a lot to answer for.

Keff
Keff
Reply to  Malcolm Harris
June 10, 2021

The CCP doesn’t care if people worship God or Jesus. It does care, however, if they take their ultimate earthly authority to be something outside its control like the Pope. If that is being anti-Christian, then all the Protestants and Anglicans and any non-Catholic would also be “Anti-Christian”? The CCP is extremely prickly about their authority, yes I am all in agreement. The CCP is extremely paranoid about losing bits of its territory, absolutely. But is the CCP Anti-Christian? Certainly not. Beware not to let your anti-China predispositions colour the actions of the CCP. why you have anti-China predispositions are… Read more »

Keff
Keff
Reply to  Helga I. Fellay
June 10, 2021

“Why would it be impossible to be a communist Confucian? “. You are absolutely right. It is this simplistic binary thinking that sets back so many of us. Just because China is super obsessed about order and unity that she imposes draconian rules on religious organisations to be not answerable to outside parties, this is misconstrued to be Anti-Christian. It was this very term that goaded me to write this comment. It is like saying “if the USA imposes income tax on its citizens even if they are living overseas, then therefore the USA is Anti-Emigration”. WTF? The USA doesn’t… Read more »

Last edited 6 days ago by Keff
Eddy
Eddy
Reply to  Helga I. Fellay
June 10, 2021

Hello, you forget, or deliberately ignore the FACT if it wasn’t for continual Western involvement a nd their total destruction of the Chinese Governce and dynasty, there would not have been a Alleged civil war and no starvation, nor communism.All events brought about by selfish,self centre Westeners in their race to control and grab as much of the Chinese riches for themselves.

Beatus
Beatus
June 9, 2021

Who cares what Soros thinks about China? That is irrelevant.

Dan
Dan
June 10, 2021

I began thinking that when I heard they are now encouraging its citizen to have three children. I thought: that’s not the way to depopulate. Then I thought: if they can’t make it work with 1.5B they may as well give up because I doubt any more will help. Then I thought: what if they are planning on replacing every citizen in the world with their own? Then I stopped thinking because my head was about to explode. It’s hellishly hot these days…

Helga I. Fellay
Helga I. Fellay
Reply to  Dan
June 10, 2021

I don’t think they are “encouraging” them to have 3 children, it’s simply no longer against the rules. Three children keeps the population constant. After the one child rule, which depopulated, followed by the two child rule, which still depopulated but to a lesser degree, China has achieved the balance it needed to maintain. Which means their current policy regarding population is not in tune with the Western NWO policy, which is instant depopulation via disease and toxic “cures.”

Helga I. Fellay
Helga I. Fellay
June 10, 2021

I don’t believe China was ever a part of the New World Order, only the part that enriched China beyond measure. Now, that this part is coming, or has come, to its close, China will not want any part of OUR NWO, the idiots who are destroying the US and Europe, among other nations.

Eddy
Eddy
Reply to  Helga I. Fellay
June 10, 2021

Question is, Why would China want to be part of the alleged N.W.O. in the first place ?

Eriknielsen
Eriknielsen
June 13, 2021

The whole desperation of Soros and Western Elite is OBOR. From Soros praising in 2009, President Xi threw a wrench in the TPTB machine with the start of OBOR in 2013, and President Putin’s show of Kalibr missiles in 2015 and show of advanced nuclear hypersonic and EW systems in 2018 was the straw that finally broke the Western Elite’s back. OBOR is an open system wealth win win creator for all nation involved which outperform Western closed finance systems capitalism, liberalism, communism and colonialism. The Western Elite cant control and make their One World Government on open systems, and… Read more »

Major Drought Creating Food Shortages? Traders Bet on $100 Oil as Commodities Soar!

Ron Paul: The Coming Biden/Putin Train-Wreck Summit