Now Reading
Iraq’s Kurdish regions may end up under Turkish rule

Iraq’s Kurdish regions may end up under Turkish rule

Turkey’s President┬áRecep Tayyip Erdogan has promised heavy sanctions against parts of northern Iraq, should Kurdish secessionists go through with their threat to hold a referendum for “independence” in two days time.

With leaders of the separatist movement declaring that they will proceed with the referendum in spite of the US, Russia, Turkey, Iran and Iraq all opposing such a move, Turkey is already working on the details of its contingency plan.

Historically, Turkey’s relations with Iraqi Kurdish groups has been better than its relations with those in Syria, as the latter are openly aligned with the PKK, a Turkish based group classified by most countries as a terrorist organisation. In spite of this, Turkey is steadfastly opposed to Kurdish separatism in all areas, including in Iraq.

The Iraqi Kurds stand in defiance of the international community in holding their referendum which non-Kurds in the area are set to boycott. Turkey’s National Security Council has held meetings in order to develop a response that based on the language used in the Turkish press and by Turkish officials, implies a stronger response than mere economic sanctions or even economic boycott.

One of Turkey’s deputy Prime Ministers,┬áBekir Bozdag offered the following statement on the situation,

“We have discussed all options in the event of the referendum taking place and if it doesn’t. Turkey takes this matter seriously and will act to protect its national security interests”.

This is similar language to that which Turkey used prior to commencing operation Euphrates Shield and also Turkey’s less talked about military intervention in northern Iraq.

While both Euphrates Shield and Turkish involvement in the Iraqi conflict were opposed by Damscus and Baghdad, the issue of Turkey intervening in a Kurdish separation zone presents more dubious legal realities.

While any country’s intervention in the borders of another state must be done with the consent of the state which is being entered or else be authorised by the United Nations, if the Kurds vote for separation, the area could become a partial no-man’s-land, albeit on legal Iraqi territory, thus making the matter instantly turn from an area of black-and-white to one of grey.

Turkey could then make the argument that a renegade entity which legitimately threatens regional security is operating on Iraq soil and invoke the Caroline Test in order to legally justify a military presence.

Iraq would be caught between a rock and a hard place were such a thing to happen. On the one hand, Iraq does not want to see its territorial integrity threatened by Kurdish militants and does not need to fight another armed conflict on yet another front.

On the other hand, Iraq has already expressed its anger over previous Turkish incursions into Iraqi territory and a further incursion would likely not be popular in Baghdad, even given the different circumstance. In the longer term, if the Turkish presence became semi-permanent, Iraq would still have effectively lost an oil rich part of its legal territory, thus making Iraq a country that has been the victim of poor fortune more than just about any other over the last 30 years.

See Also

In reality though, if nothing and no one prevented Turkey from going into Syria and Iraq previously, without a legal mandate, surely nothing is going to prevent Turkey from going into a would be Kurdish entity in Iraq. This intervention could be legally justified as an uncontrollable Kurdish entity on Turkey’s border does post genuine concerns not just for Turkish security, but also for the security of Iran, Iraq and Syria. Each of these countries have Kurdish populations, among which, are secessionists. While political differences exist between various Kurdish factions from state to state, it is not hard to extrapolate a domino effect based on a blood and soil nationalism which trumps pre-existing party political differences.

As for the wider international reaction, one only needs to remember that in 1974 when Turkey illegally invaded Cyprus, none of the major powers did anything to stop this. While the invasion of Cyprus was and remains totally unjustified, such a move against Kurdish forces is again, far from black-and-white. The key point here is that if no one stopped the invasion of Cyprus and today no country does anything meaningful to end the Turkish occupation of Cyprus, who is going to do so in respect of self-proclaimed Kurdish regions of Iraq? The short answer is: no one. Furthermore, while nuclear Israel is the only nation in the region and the wider world in favour of Kurdish “independence”, Turkey has historically been and remains one of the few countries in the region that isn’t subject to regular Israel treats, invasions and bullying. Indeed, throughout most of the 20th century, Tel Aviv and Ankara had good relations. This dynamic will simply not change over the Kurdish issue.

Beyond all of this, there is also a farcical nature to the Kurdish adventurism in Iraq. After years of legal autonomy in Iraq both under both the Ba’ath Party and under more recent post-2003 governments, Kurds in Iraq may find themselves going backwards in this respect.

If they pull the trigger on “independence”, Turkey might well send in the tanks, drones and troops and occupy that portion of Iraq.

In this sense, the Kurds in Iraq may be unconsciously voting to forfeit their autonomous status in Iraq, only to join Turkey as a land under military rule. It is both ironic and surreal.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
samo war
Guest
samo war

kurdistan is mosad ?

Have a cigar!
Guest
Have a cigar!

If it destroys Assad’s cannon the it is not Syria’s TOW missile. Besides, Syrian Arab Army does not using TOW missiles.
And you samo war, you are full of crap.

Gio Con
Guest
Gio Con

And if Turkey does invade and occupy N. Iraq, will the West slap sanctions against it as they did when Russia peacefully and legally annexed the Crimea?

Jets
Guest
Jets

I guess, the answer to your question is a big “NO”. We have seen it before

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

“when Russia peacefully and legally annexed the Crimea?”

Russia DID NOT “annex” Crimea….look up the definition if you must! While I agree with most of your comment, I cant let that point slip by. Using the same term as the West only gives credence to its lie.

TravelAbout
Guest
TravelAbout

As bad as the constant use of the word regime in describing the freely elected government of President Assad by the presstitues.

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

I agree 1000%. The term “regime” should be applied to the US instead.

Screwloose
Guest
Screwloose

The most historically-accurate description for the US would indeed be ‘fascist regime’. Used in its strictest sense: ‘a government controlled by financial and other corporations’ the US is now, sadly, a textbook example of Fascism. Politicians are totally dependent on ‘campaign contributions’ to maintain their cushy positions and further grow their unexplained millions. By tolerating overt political corruption, the American people lost the wondrous Constitutional Republic which the staggeringly far-sighted Founders left in their care. Worse; those in control have no loyalty to the US and are cynically looting the people’s accrued wealth through deliberate currency inflation and manipulated interest… Read more »

bluewater
Guest
bluewater

Accurate..IT WAS ALWAYS THE PLAN by Rothschild/Rockefeller puppets of SOROS,BUSH,CLINTON,OBAMA to destroy the country ……THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS!!!!
comment image
comment image

Screwloose
Guest
Screwloose

That statement alone should have qualified Sssssssoros (H/T Suzanne) for the ‘known terrorists’ list – or even a drone target.

Plenty of foreign leaders have died for far less. I don’t recall Quadaffi ever saying anything as threatening – even after Reagan killed his son – planning a non-banker-issued gold-linked dinar was his fatal error.

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal
Screwloose
Guest
Screwloose

The now-widespread use of the word ‘annexed’ originated from Nato’s lie-machine and was instantly adopted by their compliant presstitutes. (They’ve now been ordered to upgrade their fake propaganda to the endlessly regurgitated: ‘Crimea was invaded and seized’…) Annexation is usually understood to mean – ‘land taken by force and added to a country’s own territory’ – hardy the case when an autonomous state’s referendum-backed elected parliament asks to reunite with its historic motherland. Crimea was still shown as a province of Russia on the UN’s own definitive map, as all land borders were frozen at the end of WW-II –… Read more »

VeeNarian (Yerevan)
Guest
VeeNarian (Yerevan)

Surely, it is time for the region to solve the Kurdish issue once and for all? If they do not, then the Kurds will be used by Israel, US and the EU, the “superior and civilized” West, to divide, rule and suppress the whole of the Arab, Turkic and Iranian world. Unless the Arab/Turkic/Iranian world stoop to the barbarism of the West, when they implemented the “Final solution” for their Jewish population, the Kurds will not go away. They will continue to preserve their separate language, culture, traditions and aspirations. The whole Muslim world has to step up to the… Read more »

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

The communities of India have had a more cohesive sense of community than the Arabs, even without adding Turks and Iranians to this mix. The fact that they haven’t been able o make any serious effort to collaborate on various endeavors explains why the divisions exist even today.

FlorianGeyer
Guest
FlorianGeyer

Another well written and logical opinion of the future for the Kurds who in their quest for more power will lose all the power they currently have.

Michalis Kane
Guest
Michalis Kane

Turkey is in its way to be cut I to pieces. And Kurdistan will play a leading role.

hvaiallverden
Guest
hvaiallverden

No, I still dont trust any Turk. I see this as the “solution” witch Turkics and uISISa agrees, this have been the goal from day one, expanding Turkish territory, and Kurds and Turks are the same people, this war, is just smoke and mirrors. Syria will loose this area, to Turks, with the curtice of the Russians, to have an perfect excuse of making “peace”. The continuing ethnic cleansing is an issue nobody touches, why, huh, the Turks have never bothered about that, since they are in same page regarding wiping out the natives, the Turks is “good” at that,… Read more »

Copyright DRN Media PLC 2019. RSS: http://theduran.com/feed

Scroll To Top