Connect with us

Latest

News

Iranian court orders US to pay $245 million to victims of chemical weapons during Iran-Iraq War

The US backed Saddam Hussein’s war on Iran during the 1980s

The Duran

Published

on

4,438 Views

MOSCOW (Sputnik) – An Iranian court demanded the US administration to pay $245 million to the victims of chemical attacks carried out by Saddam Hussein’s forces during the Iran-Iraqi war of 1980-1988, Iran’s Judiciary spokesman Gholam Hossein Mohseni Eje’i said Sunday.

“A number of people who have been harmed during the chemical bombing have filed lawsuits and a court has issued decrees for 18 of them who have been harmed or died and estimated their ransom,” Mohseni Eje’i was quoted as saying by the Fars news agency.

In September 1980, Hussein started the invasion of Iran. The devastating war that followed only ended in 1988. An estimated 1.5 million people died in the conflict.

During the war Washington supported Iraq with monetary assistance, weaponry, intelligence, technology and also provided materials found by UN experts in the fragments of chemical weapons used by the Iraqi army in Iran.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
27 Comments

27
Leave a Reply

avatar
8 Comment threads
19 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
12 Comment authors
yooJohn R. NolanVera GottliebRonaldgmatch Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Melotte 22
Guest
Melotte 22

So is it $145 or $245 million?
Guys check before publishing.

Voltaire
Guest
Voltaire

The United States committed major war crimes by supplying Iraq with chemlical and biological weapons during the Iraq-Iran war

https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-09-30-iraq-ushelp-list_x.htm
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-09-30-iraq-ushelp_x.htm
http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=241

These banned weapons of mass destrujctyion were used by Saddam Hussein against the Iranians…

The United States was thus responsible for the death and maining of hundreds of thousands of Iranians…

The United States is worse than a terrorist state – THE US IS A MAJOR AND REPEATED WAR CRIMINAL and should pay Iran BILLIONS IN WAR REPARATIONS FOR ITS OBSCENE ILLEGAL WAR CRIMES and CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY….

Ronald
Guest
Ronald

And then the US provided the chemical weapons that Saddam used on the Kurds .
Hard to fathom the Kurds having any thing to do with America .

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

Attacking the Kurds riled up Israel….and AIPAC tightened the grip on US balls. Plus, Saddam could implicate the US AND Israel in helping CW crimes. Reagan papers explain how we helped him and advised Saddam to co-mingle with conventional weapons, then they took control of the media to keep it out of the news.

DarkEyes
Guest
DarkEyes

At that time and the years another known person was running around in Iraq to promote this war and CWs to Saddam: Mrs. Hillary R. Clinton.
What do you know!

Shahna
Guest

Britain too.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

Absolutely accurate assessment of the Useless State of Amnesia.
The most evil, degenerate nation on the earth, and, rest assured, her end is coming far sooner than most American citizens are willing to accept.

Punisher 1
Guest
Punisher 1

That is a good move. Not because I think they’ll get the money,I don’t. But because of the “symbolism” of it. It shows that the US isn’t the only country able to use court judgments to attack their enemies. For years now the US has used their internal US court system to claim they could use that to interfere in foreign countries. The Iranians are showing them that they aren’t the only ones to be able to do that.

Ronald
Guest
Ronald

You have it spot on , “the symbolism” of it allows its significance to be introduced into the media , and consciousness , world wide . It is also repeatable by different groups , and nations , BRICS , etc .

John Mason
Guest
John Mason

Now try to collect the money, best of luck.

Shahna
Guest

They don’t have to collect it – just demand it’s paid before any American business does any business in Iran. … The Iranians should extend this to Britain.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

Amazia is financially destitute, in trillions of dollars debt, for all her wars against any nation who has whatever Amazia wants, and is prepared to kill for. Amazia is the Sheriff of these psychotic tyrants, used to declare war on any who dare hold up the progress of those implementing the new world order, impede their global dictatorship. Unfortunately, those running the Middle Eastern governments are just as greed motivated, power crazed as the Amazians, English, etc., for nationalities, to these globalists, are irrelevant, we, the citizens, are just numbers in the machine. Those who have usurped control over our… Read more »

Shahna
Guest

The British provided the chemical weapons and the Americans provided the targeting co-ordinates.

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

And don’t hold your breath waiting for the payment to be effected.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

All the perverse, crazed leaders of Amazing-less will do is write Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, whoever, a cheque, which is worthless, but shifts responsibility for the funding of any re-building, compensation straight back to the nation to whom the cheque is written. For, assuredly, as with all bank transfers, there is no actual shifting of GOLD! The GOLD always stays in the hands of the bankers, is loaned, through promissory notes, to the respective governments, who then have to issue the money themselves, which, in the final analysis, means all is paid for by the citizens, the workers of said nation,… Read more »

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

There is a saying…no matter which way you turn, your fanny is always in the rear – i.e. you can’t win. Oh, yes we could if we really got together and stopped all that bickering and wasting time. I am sure you have read ‘Confessions of an Economic Hit Man’…which gives a good insight as to how Washington et all operate.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

And yet we are led to believe, by those who control the media, education systems, the churches, etc., that we are smarter than the ape? Money is a fantasy, an illusion, which has no intrinsic value, and could, this year, reach it’s use by date, to be replaced by the card. As for your fanny always being behind you, as a bloke I don’t have that issue, but, rest assured, none of the simple people can win, because we are too scared of taking responsibility for our own life. We have squandered our freedom, passed the buck, allowed power crazed… Read more »

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

We are too scared because we have been brainwashed to believe, that there is nothing one can do about anything, anyhow. We are being preached to remain passive and non violent while ‘they’ are armed to the teeth to fight us. I don’t buy this – I believe in “an eye for an eye” and we must not wait any longer.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

Fear is the devil’s tool! We have been intellectually deadened through the medications in our food, the coke, Mc.Poisons, artificial colored, preservitized, nutrition-less foods, violence based brain washing through the perennial Kill-em- All Westerns and war movies, from Follywood, and Amazia’s citizens have, generally, lost their back bone. In fact it is the western nations, all, who are now mindless, spineless, moral-less scum bags, grovelling at the feet of all we fear; self imposed terror, too scared to fight the real enemy, the one within. There is not time for another revolution, and no one would come anyway, if one… Read more »

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

When I said ‘they are armed to the teeth’, I most certainly did not refer to Muslims or such. Take a good look at how today’s police forces are ‘dressed’…armed to the teeth. These are the ‘they’ I am talking about. And ‘they’ will use their weapons against us any time, any place, any day.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

Yes, what you are declaring here is one hundred percent correct, and that is a rather scary situation, where the police are now a military branch, armed with the latest weapons of mass destruction, to be used against the citizens of Amazia, R’stralia, Well Bitten, in their Forth Reich! I do include the vatican military; fanatic moslems who have been intentionally shipped across the world; invading many nations, Holland, Germany, France, etc., forming an internal army which will be used by the vatican to slaughter all who will not become members of the New World Church, which will be controlled… Read more »

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

I’ll keep speaking up until I am six feet under. People might not always agree with my point of view – it is their prerogative, but I most certainly will continue to call it as I see it. I am still very capable of thinking for myself and this is what rubs so many the wrong way. Too bad. I totally mistrust the so-called ‘experts’, who – for the most part, seem intent on leading us down the wrong path. Always wonder who pays them.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

May God bless you for your integrity, your stance for sanity, and one is with you in our fight against the morons, demons, psychopaths and ‘religious’ lunatics who are intent on global dictatorship. Amazia is the gun of the beast; Cain was of his father, the devil, and there is no hope of reversing this oncoming storm, because the bulk of the population have no idea what is being done to them, by those they trusting elected. One suggests, behind all the chaos, we find the ‘church’, the mother of harlots, as it is the fortress of evil fighting against… Read more »

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

You know the saying…religion is the root of all evil.

John R. Nolan
Guest
John R. Nolan

Absolutely, ‘religion’, from Latin, ‘religio’, means a covering. A covering can provide protection from threats, but, it also can be a means to hide people from Truth, blind them to Light, allowing them to shift responsibility for their personal walk by getting artificial, money seeking intercessors, betwixt themselves and Truth, to supposedly guide them, Spiritually, into Heaven. Heaven is within, and each of us have to give account for how we conduct ourselves whilst here, in this life. Religion is, without doubt, the root of all evil, as it has been perverted into big business, with many intercessors. Satan wants… Read more »

gmatch
Guest
gmatch

We need a Nuremberg!

yoo
Guest
yoo

It Should be done, everyone is accountable for any life Loss
No-one should be set free of Murder.

Latest

Pelosi tries to prevent State of the Union address because of shutdown

Nancy Pelosi advised Mr. Trump not to deliver a live State of the Union speech, but the reason may be because she is unwilling to be exposed.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi tried what is perhaps a new stunt in the ongoing government shutdown saga (we hesitate to call it a “crisis”). She requested that President Trump either reschedule his yearly State of the Union address or – and she said this literally – deliver it in writing to Congress on January 29th, the date the speech is scheduled to occur.

“Sadly, given the security concerns and unless government re-opens this week, I suggest that we work together to determine another suitable date after government has re-opened for this address or for you to consider delivering your State of the Union address in writing to the Congress on January 29th,” Pelosi wrote in a letter to Trump.

The letter, which can be seen directly by clicking the hyperlink above, tries to essentially make this request the President’s fault because he refuses to take “no wall” for an answer.

The motive behind this attempt is interesting. Politico covered this story originally, and this publication is pretty far to the left and definitely not a Trump fan oasis. Yet in a rare random feat of journalism, the Politico article does appear to give some of the real reason why the Speaker of the House did this.

Publicly, Democrats plan to argue that the parties need to focus on addressing the shutdown, now the longest in U.S. history. They’re also concerned about security staff working through a major national event without being paid.

“This shutdown is ridiculous and the people tasked with protecting him and protecting us are not getting a paycheck,” said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), the House Rules Committee chair. “So it’s inappropriate to carry on with business as usual.”

But privately, Democrats also don’t want to give Trump a major platform to blame them for the shutdown when Trump’s demand for billions in wall funding has been the main driver, according to a Democratic lawmaker close to leadership. Trump has tried to pin the blame on the shutdown on Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, but public polls shows the public largely blames the president.

The announcement comes as a group of bipartisan House lawmakers in the Problem Solvers Caucus is set to meet with Trump on Wednesday to discuss border security. Trump, frustrated by his inability to secure any additional money for his border wall, has tried to peel off moderate Democrat support as Pelosi and Schumer dig in.

But Democrats are rallying fellow members to stay together. Schumer attended a closed-door caucus meeting with House Democrats just as Pelosi made the announcement on the State of the Union address on Wednesday. Her message was to stay unified in their opposition.

Politico was able to bury this bold-typed point in the rhetoric that “public polls largely blame the president.” However this may not exactly be the case.

There are indications that the 26-day long standoff is going to go the President’s way. While this is admittedly speculative, there seem to be solid factors on the President’s side of the argument that the Democrats do not have. Some are factual, and many are emotional and rhetorical:

  • Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell is standing firm, and has not wavered from the commitment to pass nothing that the President will not sign.
  • Some Democrat leaders are beginning to speak about border security – including the wall – as vital needs. This includes this representative from Southern California (!) Representative Katie Hill, who gave this interview on Fox News:

  • Where the argument is pragmatic and information-based, as Representative Hill notes, then the argument becomes quite compelling for a wall.
  • CNN turned down the opportunity to interview Dan Plante, a San Diego area TV reporter, about the border wall there because Mr. Plante said that the new wall that has been installed in that sector is hugely successful.
  • The level of information given by the Democrat opposition leaders, Pelosi and Chuck Schumer is essentially at the level of “no you can’t have it. Because!!” – in other words, septuagenarians acting like four-year olds. Really.
  • Talk show anchor Rush Limbaugh and his huge body of listeners are wildly in favor of the shutdown and everything the President is doing. It is very clear that the shutdown’s length is doing nothing to deter President Trump’s base. And as long as that holds true, he will not move a muscle.
  • President Trump is a businessman, not a politician. He is far more results-driven than the mainstream media can afford to admit. While they characterize him as insane, or a child, or throwing a tantrum, the President doesn’t really care. He knows what he wants, and he is prepared to be patient and wait the Democrats out.
  • The final sign we will offer on this list (though there are more) is that the Russia collusion narrative is back. When things go bad for the media on Trump, they try to pull out Russia. Maybe it is just a bad habit because it seems less and less effective each time it is tried.

The battle lines are tropes versus reality, and politics versus policy. It is too soon to be sure that this will go the President’s way and that the wall will go up, but patience and perseverance are beginning to expose cracks and weaknesses in the Democrat argument. Some of the US certainly does NOT care about a border wall. But those that do have not been shaken by all this – rather, they have been strengthened, plus they have facts on their side.

All the Pelosis and Schumers of the world can do is fret and complain and look like fools, and they seem to be doing exactly that.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Peak Stupidity: Deep State and mainstream media push ‘Trump is a spy’ nonsense (Video)

The Duran – News in Review – Episode 167.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the sheer stupidity of the entire ‘Trump is a Russian spy’ narrative being plastered all over the mainstream media, as neo-liberal shills and neocon war hawks continue to damage the Office of the United States President by insisting on pushing a made up story that a five year old child who waits for Santa Claus to bring Christmas gifts would have a hard time believing.

Meanwhile the real crime and real treason derived from a Comey-Clapper-Brennan Deep State plot to remove a democratically elected Trump from power, is being blacked out from the mainstream, neo-liberal news cycle.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

The Gateway Pundit lists the 35 times the FBI “deviated from standard practice” or committed crimes in an effort to exonerate Hillary Clinton and indict US President Donald Trump..


The FBI leadership under the Obama Administration took many actions that deviated from standard practice [i.e. were corrupt and criminal] in their efforts to exonerate Hillary from her crimes and then spy and frame candidate and then President Trump.  Today current members of the FBI are embarrassed to even turn on their TV’s as a result.

Time magazine of all places reported recently about the many efforts the FBI took related to Hillary exoneration and then the Trump framing.  These corrupt and criminal actions have taken a desperate toll on the current members of the FBI –

In normal times, the televisions are humming at the FBI’s 56 field offices nationwide, piping in the latest news as agents work their investigations. But these days, some agents say, the TVs are often off to avoid the crush of bad stories about the FBI itself. The bureau, which is used to making headlines for nabbing crooks, has been grabbing the spotlight for unwanted reasons: fired leaders, texts between lovers and, most of all, attacks by President Trump. “I don’t care what channel it’s on,” says Tom O’Connor, a veteran investigator in Washington who leads the FBI Agents Association. “All you hear is negative stuff about the FBI … It gets depressing.”

Of course the employees of the FBI are in a funk, their fearless and corrupt leaders, as well as leaders in Obama’s corrupt DOJ, went to extravagant links to exonerate the obvious criminal actions of Hillary Clinton, and then to do all they could to prevent candidate Trump from winning an election.  Then once the election was won by President Trump, they went to unheard of depths of deceit and corruption to attempt to remove him from office.

Here’s a list of the actions the Deep State FBI took in their recent criminal actions surrounding the 2016 Presidential election and since [the first 11 items are from the Time post noted above with comments in brackets] –

1 – Comey breached Justice Department protocols in a July 5, 2016, press conference when he criticized Hillary Clinton for using a private email server as Secretary of State even as he cleared her of any crimes
2 – Comey reopened the Clinton email probe less than two weeks before the election
3 – Andrew McCabe lied to the bureau’s internal investigations branch to cover up a leak he orchestrated about Clinton’s family foundation less than two weeks before the election and had lied for months about it
4 – FBI wasn’t adequately investigating “high-risk” employees who failed polygraph tests (but, in fact, putting them in charge of high-profile investigations, like Peter Strzok who failed his poly). In one instance, an FBI IT specialist with top-secret security clearance failed four polygraph tests and admitted to having created a fictitious Facebook account to communicate with a foreign national, but received no disciplinary action for that.
5 – The FBI’s miss of the Russian influence operation against the 2016 election, which went largely undetected for more than two years (The FBI had the chance to kill this Russian intrusion years before it reached crisis point in the election). Mueller’s Russia probe found that Moscow’s operation against the 2016 election first got under way in 2014, but the FBI failed to address it.
6 – The FBI was getting information it shouldn’t have had access to when it used controversial parts of the Patriot Act to obtain business records in terrorism and counterintelligence cases.
7 – The bureau missed the significance of the damaging 2015 hack of the DNC database [although others argue that the DNC was never hacked – due to the FBI’s lack of investigative process, we may never know what happened.] 8 – The bureau also sat on the disputed “dossier” prepared by former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele. [Which was then used for the entire case against Trump and anyone near him].
9 – The bureau’s decision to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page was influenced by politics.
10 – Text messages between FBI special agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page, which were critical of Trump.
11 – Comey broke with Justice Department rules and norms by assuming authority usually held by prosecutors and speaking in public about a case that did not produce criminal charges.
12 – Comey took copious notes and diligently informed others of all interactions with Trump while lying about having had any interactions with Obama, never taking notes or notifying anyone so even after having been warned of Mr. Steele’s motivations, even after having fired him for violating the rules, the FBI continued to seek his information—using Mr. Ohr as a back channel. This surely violates the FBI manual governing interaction with confidential human sources.
13 – FBI guidelines state that unverified information should not be submitted to the FISA court.
14 – They were passive, not proactive. The Obama administration “stood down” and watched these “activities” unravel. At worst, they possibly played a hand in creating circumstances to push the investigation forward into more serious stages that allowed for more intrusive techniques, such as spying. (The FBI is supposed to prevent crime, not watch it happen).
15 – John Brennan, James Clapper, Samantha Power, Loretta Lynch were all briefed by James Comey on the alleged Russian interference into the Trump campaign, yet the Trump campaign was left in the dark.
16 –FBI agents found Abedin deleting classified Clinton emails from her Yahoo account but failed to subpoena her devices. If they had, maybe they wouldn’t have had to reopen the case in 11th hour when NY agents found work emails on the laptop she shared with her perv husband.
17 – The FBI failed to notify Congress of the investigation into the Trump campaign for months rather than quarterly as was practice. [See Comey presentation to House Republicans in March 2017] 18 – The FBI did not pursue criminal charges when Clinton’s email archives were permanently deleted from her private server days after a subpoena for them was issued by a congressional committee investigating the 2012 attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi.
19 – The IG found that the FBI and DOJ during the MidYearExam probe of Hillary Clinton email server “did not require any witnesses to testify before the grand jury,” despite at least 3 witnesses lying to FBI agents.
20 – “[T]he 
Midyear team did not obtain search warrants to examine the content of emails in Mills’s or Abedin’s private email accounts and did not seek to obtain any of the senior aides’ personal devices.”
21 – IG Report: Nobody was listed as a subject of this [Clinton email] investigation at any point in time (So neither Hillary nor her top aides were formally under investigation by FBI at any time in 2015-2016, but the agents handling the issue thought it was a criminal action).
22 – The IG report indicates a strong pro-Clinton/anti-Trump bias in FBI investigators of Midyear and Operation Russian Collusion but it still went on without personnel changes or actions against the corrupt investigative team.
23 – The IG report found: “The MYE Team did not seek to obtain every device, including those of Clinton’s senior aides, or the contents of every email account through which a classified email may have traversed.”
24 – Manafort interviewed twice before joining the Trump team. If he was guilty of anything why did they allow him to join the Trump team?
25 – In 2008, a questionable person on McCain’s POTUS campaign caught the attention of FBI counterintelligence, and the FBI privately approached McCain. That questionable person was quietly removed from Team McCain but this same sensitivity was not provided to the Trump team.
26 – The corrupt Obama FBI and DOJ used the “salacious and unverified” opposition research called the Steele dossier to open a counterintelligence investigation and obtain warrants but it wasn’t even verified and it was created by the opposition party [DNC]. [Multiple sources] 27 – Unprecedented leaking to the press: 13 different individuals at the FBI were feeding a journalist information.
28 – Dan Bongino asks the question: How did Halper go from being a CIA informant to an FBI informant? And he’s right. It is a DEVIATION FROM THE STANDARD PRACTICE for law enforcement agencies to give up/share their asset.
29 – The “probable cause” arrest of George Papadopoulos is a deviation from the standard practice.
30 – Halper was a CHS (Confidential Human Source). FBI rules prohibit using a CHS to spy on Americans before an official investigation has been created.
31 -Stone and Caputo say they believe they were the targets of a setup by U.S. law enforcement officials hostile to Trump which was before an official investigation which again is a deviation from standard practice.
32 – The FBI interviewed Carter Page in March of 2016 about his Russian ties. Two months later, Comey is briefing the NSC about his concerns about Carter Page. Nothing of any note happened in those intervening months to cause a rise of concerns, so whatever concerns Comey had Comey had them before Page was hired on as an adviser. It was a DEVIATION FROM STANDARD PRACTICE for Comey to not have warned Trump about Page. Comey warns Obama instead who also takes no steps to warn Trump.
33 – Another deviation from the standard practice is to start an investigation without a crime.
34 – Planting the Isikoff article to be used in court to obtain a FISA warrant.
35 – Related to the FBI, it’s important to note that former DNI chief James Clapper limited the IC report for review to only 3 agencies rather than send the report out to all 17 agencies for review. This way he was able to control what was put into the report – another deviation from the standard practice.

This may only be a partial list of FBI abuses and actions taken with deviations from standard practice, if not clear cut crimes.  The gangsters who ran Obama’s FBI, from Mueller to Comey, are so corrupt, current and former agents are now embarrassed to be part of the once storied federal agency.  Quite frankly, it’s doubtful if the FBI can ever be trusted again!

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Trump’s wish to take the US out of NATO leaves NeoCons seething

The US President has seen the truth of the irrelevance of NATO, but there is enormous resistance to change.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

Tucker Carlson, Fox News and Russian and American news outlets alike have picked up the story that US President Donald Trump has on numerous occasions, opined that the United States would do well to depart from the North Atlantic Military Organization, or NATO.

This wish caused enormous fury and backlash from those opposed, which, oddly enough include both Democrats and Republicans. Their anger and alarm over this idea is such that the media networks through much of the US are alive with the idea of impeaching the President or bringing 25th Amendment proceedings against him for insanity!

Take a look:

Tucker Carlson, as usual, nailed it.

NATO was formed to make Western Europe secure in the face of a perceived Soviet threat. In 1991, the USSR collapsed and the threat of Ivan the Communist bad guy collapsed with it.

But 28 years later, NATO is still here. And, why?

Well, many “experts” continue to point at Russia as a threat, though after that statement no one seems honestly able to elucidate precisely how Russia would, in fact, threaten any nation, take over it, or conquer the world. Indeed, if anyone seems to understand the perversity of being in charge of the whole world, it seems to be Russia, as expressed by politician and LDPR leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky (see how this is so here).

Zhironovsky observed that China is the other nation that is running at full force, but viewing the problems the US is having with being the leader of the world, China stops short of trying to attain this position itself. The question becomes “What does a nation that rules the world actually do then?”

President Trump appears to be seeing the same question, or some similar variant based on the same theme. NATO serves no constructive purpose anymore. Despite the conflicts in Ukraine and Saudi Arabia and Yemen, Israel and Syria, there simply are no great threats in the world as it stands today. While there are certainly still wars, none of these wars represents an existential threat to the United States.

Why wouldn’t a US leader want out? In fact, there is further no existential threat to Europe from any present war, nor is there a threat from Russia itself. In fact, Russia has been entering into business relations with many European countries who wish to buy cheap and easily available Russian natural gas. Turkey purchased an S-400 antimissile system in addition to its US made Patriot battery.

There would seem to be very little in the way of concrete and reliable reasoning for the alliance to continue.

But the American Deep State and liberal establishment have come together to resist the US President in a truly furious manner, and it is revelatory of the hypocrisy of anti-Trump politics that American liberals, typically the “sing Kum-ba-yah peacenik” crowd, displays paroxysms of outrage and horror that NATO might be disbanded.

As the result of that, the American media is determined to choke off any possibility of one thinking, “well, what if we were to disband NATO?”

Why is this?

Simple. A lot of people make their living by preparing for the Russian “threat”, and it would mean the end of their work, the end of their money, and a great disruption in life. It does not matter that while this is true, these same people could conceivably apply their considerable skill sets to deal with real problems that face a world that no longer has a dipolar alignment, or to help prevent a real problem from arising from real situations, such as the recent and current Islamization of many European cities.

One of the great afflictions of American politics and policy has been that so much of it appears to be focused on “short term” or “no term” matters. We see this with the problems related to border security, the coming advent of AI-based automated processes that may furlough low-skilled workers in tremendous amounts in a short period of time. Rather than solve real problems, the elected representatives and media seem more content to oppose Donald Trump when he, as a businessman ought to do, makes a federal case out of what he sees on the horizon.

The Border Wall, for example, is a highly logical part of a properly handled set of immigration policies. But the very direct behavior of President Trump helped amplify the resentment the Democrats still hold against him for defeating Hillary Clinton in 2016, and so, the Democrats have effectively said “nuts!” to the needs of the nation and they take out their resentment on the nation by refusing to negotiate with the President about how to close the border.

NATO is another example. The alliance served its purpose. It is time for the alliance to end, or to be radically restructured in terms of new goals based in real, and not just flimsy rhetorical, needs.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending