India-Pakistan conflict misconceptions, the encirclement of Iran, Greater Israel, Greater Turkey, and the secret weapon of our Empire — McJihad — i.e.,ideological manipulation.

– YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

India-Pakistan Conflict Misconceptions

I’ll start with an old video featuring the G.O.A.T. geopolitical analyst John Helmer, where he discusses the India-Pakistan conflict. In a recent post, I mentioned that I hold both John Helmer and Brian Beletic in high regard, but in my opinion, John Helmer is slightly better – and the India-Pakistan conflict is a great example of why.

Most geopolitical analysts present a similar version of events: they claim that Chinese weapons performed exceptionally well and that Pakistan won. This view is also supported by Brian Beletic. However, John Helmer stated earlier – though I couldn’t find the exact video – that Chinese weapons actually failed during the conflict and that Pakistan, overall, was losing badly.

At first, I wasn’t sure which analysis was correct, but over time, facts emerged that confirmed John Helmer’s version. I’ll share a quote from the main video attached to this post.

33:52

On the ground? Well, the answer was when Field Marshal Asim Munir, the real ruler of Pakistan – the chief of the military staff, the head of the army, and the head of military intelligence, which rules Pakistan more effectively and always has than the civilian governments—went to lunch at the White House with President Trump.

There has been no photograph to show the two of them together. It’s one of the few major lunches President Trump has had in which there was no attempt to record it, not even in a tweet. My understanding, from my sources – and I’ll come back to my Pakistani credentials if anyone wants to doubt me on this – is that Munir offered to resume the old strategic relationship the United States and Pakistan had in fighting the war in Afghanistan. Originally, remember, that was the war that Zbigniew Brzezinski and President Jimmy Carter constructed to fight the Soviets and bleed Soviet forces in Afghanistan in ’79. Pakistan was, let’s call it, the “Ukraine battlefield” for fighting that war. And Munir is basically saying to Trump at lunch, “We, the Pakistani military, wish to be your new fighting platform in your war against Iran.”

Iran’s eastern border with Balochistan is a very sensitive area, and Pakistan is offering to switch priorities for its military from China—as we’ve understood it for the last few years—to the United States. This is not yet a direct war, but it’s getting there. And the attempt on Trump’s part to escalate the trade war, starting with India, is an attempt to put immense new pressure on India to break its relationship, its military cooperation, and its long-standing military supply relationship with Russia and force it into the kind of relationship which the U.S. now thinks it has with the Pakistani military.

So, that has a military aspect to it. Let me explain. If the U.S. is at the same time asking and demanding that India stop importing Russian oil, what we can see escalating is direct military attacks on Russian tankers moving oil toward India. We’ve seen—and we’ve talked about it on this program before; I hope our audience will remember—that there have been a series of so-called “terrorism attacks,” undersea mine attacks, and possibly drone attacks on Russian tankers delivering oil to India or around the Mediterranean. The attacks we’ve seen so far have been mostly in the Mediterranean.

Do you think the Pentagon, after doing so much – as you said – to attack and obliterate the Yemeni Houthi operations which have effectively stopped shipping into the Israeli port of Eilat, hasn’t worked out that if India won’t capitulate to the secondary sanctions, they will be more reluctant than the Houthis? No. That’s what’s coming: a campaign of sabotage. Call it sabotage, call it terrorism, or call it plain warfare against India’s oil supply lines from Russia, and that will go into the Indian Ocean. From that experience—we’re talking futuristically, you understand, we’re talking speculatively—but this is my answer to your question: the United States, the Trump warfare machine, is now fighting simultaneously on several fronts at once, and to enforce the secondary sanctions, so-called “terrorism” will come.

It’s not just to stop the crude oil deliveries to India; it’s to stop the Indian refineries from turning the crude oil into petroleum products, refined petroleum, and then exporting them to Europe. Now, that’s something the Turks do, but their output of processed Russian crude into Turkish refined products exported to Europe is significantly smaller, and their capacity to expand that trade will be significantly smaller than the Indians’. The United States wants to disrupt that trade with the Indians—not yet with the Turks, but perhaps that will come, too.

Now I’ll use another source that I’ve cited before. As I mentioned earlier, it is part of the Western propaganda machine, constantly spewing the usual Western nonsense. However, we should remember that even if a source is a propaganda tool, that doesn’t mean it never tells the truth.

5:58

On May 10th, India targeted all 11 strategic Pakistani airbases and nuclear sites. Every time Pakistan reported an earthquake, these were not natural events; they were the result of Indian BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles hitting Pakistan’s nuclear sites. The sheer power of multiple BrahMos missiles shook the earth, causing an earthquake.

Now we are also hearing news about possible nuclear leaks near the Kirana Hills region. An Egyptian air force plane has landed in Pakistan carrying a large amount of boron, because boron is commonly used to absorb radioactive leaks. So, first the earthquake tremors, then the arrival of a U.S. Department of Energy aircraft, followed by an Egyptian air force plane carrying boron. All these dots connect to convey only one story: India has destroyed Pakistani nuclear sites, and one of them is leaking. That is the reason a ceasefire was initiated.

In the beginning, I wasn’t sure if that was true, and it was interesting that none of these facts were ever mentioned in the West. What made me believe it might be true was the same point John Helmer highlighted in the fragment I quoted earlier – something also mentioned by this guy in another video about the meeting between Pakistan’s military leader and Trump.

Now, let’s think about it: if China’s weapons performed so well and Pakistan actually won the India-Pakistan conflict, then why did Pakistan’s military leader go to the White House to meet Trump instead of going to Beijing to celebrate their victory and the success of Chinese weapons? This made me consider that what this guy is saying about Pakistan’s nuclear weapons might be true. It would make sense that if India had managed to destroy Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, Pakistan would rush to the Americans with its tail between its legs, asking them to pressure India to stop the conflict.

In my opinion, Trump claiming that he stopped the conflict between India and Pakistan is one of the rare instances where he was actually telling the truth. However, we shouldn’t give him too much credit, because—as I mentioned in my earlier post – America was the one that started this conflict in the first place.

As we all know, America is behind global terrorism, especially Islamic terrorism. They created Al-Qaeda, ISIS, and other radical Islamist groups, which I call McJihad. Pakistan has long been a base for these American-made Islamist terrorists, who were then used to attack India – giving India the excuse it needed to retaliate against Pakistan. At the time, Pakistan was getting too close to China, even though it was supposed to remain a tool of the West, just as before. This was even confirmed by Pakistan’s Foreign Minister in videos I’ve shared previously.

Pakistan’s Khawaja Asif: ‘We Did the Dirty Work for the U.S. and Britain'” | Kashmir Tension

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

You admit, sir, that Pakistan has had a long history of backing, supporting, training, and funding these terrorist organizations.

Well, we have been doing this dirty work for the United States for about three decades, you know, and for the West, including Britain.

So that’s your argument, that even though, no, that was a mistake and we suffered.

We wanted Pakistan to do our dirty work again, and that’s why we used our McJihadists to carry out terrorist attacks on Indian territory – giving India an excuse to strike Pakistan. The goal was to scare Pakistan into abandoning China, moving closer to us again, and resuming its role as our proxy.

Of course, this angered India. After destroying Pakistan’s nuclear weapons, India wanted something in return—I suspect they hoped to seize some Pakistani land. But the Americans ordered them to stop the conflict. The outcome speaks for itself: the leader of Pakistan’s military went to the White House to meet Trump. And who does Pakistan share a border with? Iran. Which brings us to the larger strategy—the encirclement of Iran.

The encirclement of Iran

Now I am looking at Iran on a map. Let’s point out all the countries that share borders with Iran:

1. Iraq – occupied by the West, where we also have our McJihadists.
2. Turkey – a NATO member, also full of our McJihadists.
3. Armenia and Azerbaijan – as we’ve seen from recent events and the so-called “Trump corridor” deal, this border is also being prepared against Iran.
4. Turkmenistan – I’ve also heard that the West is now stirring trouble there, getting our McJihadists ready for conflict with Iran.
5. Afghanistan – anyone who thinks that since the West left Afghanistan we have no influence there is naive; our McJihadists are still present and ready.
6. Pakistan – I don’t even need to explain, since the entire previous section on the India-Pakistan conflict already showed how our McJihadists in Pakistan are being prepared for Iran.

Now imagine Iran’s position. How do you think they feel? Which of their borders are not compromised? Iran has been encircled, and the West is clearly preparing for conflict.

As I mentioned before regarding Putin and Iran, I want to preface this by saying that I admire Putin and consider him a great leader, as I’ve stated many times. But no one is perfect, and I say this not because I have a bad opinion of him, but because I fear he may be willing to sacrifice Iran to the West in exchange for a stronger position for Russia within BRICS.

Russia is in a peculiar position: Europe and the West do not see it as a truly European state, while BRICS members and Eastern countries like China do not see it as an Asian state, but rather as a leftover of Western imperialism. As I’ve noted before, China is playing a double game with Russia. This is why China still hasn’t recognized the territories annexed by Russia and why it hasn’t built the second Siberia pipeline. If China fully supported Putin’s Russia, they would have recognized those territories, and as soon as Nord Stream was destroyed and Russia’s energy exports to Europe were blocked, China would have built Siberia-2, which would have helped Russia immensely. But they didn’t.

China sees Russia as a European state ruling over vast Asian lands populated by people of Asian ethnicity. From China’s perspective, this is nothing but a leftover of Western imperialism. In fact, one Western propaganda source even claimed that China has special documents prepared in case Russia collapses, laying out a plan to annex Russia’s eastern territories. Even though this was said by Western propaganda, it makes sense. I suspect China does have such intentions, because if they see Russia as a European state ruling over Asian land and Asian people, why would they accept that situation? From their view, these territories are part of Asia and should be ruled by Asians, not by a European state left over from Western imperialism.

So, if Russia were to lose and collapse, China could move to take over Russia’s eastern regions—ending what it sees as Western imperial leftovers, while “freeing” those Asian lands and peoples from European rule. This explains China’s double game against Russia: why it hasn’t recognized the annexed territories and why it didn’t build the second Siberia pipeline immediately after Russia lost its European energy markets.

Greater Israel and Ideological manipulation

There are two main positions regarding Israel and the West. One argues that Israel controls the West, while the other says that Israel is a tool of the West. I personally ascribe to the second position: Israel is a tool of the West. It functions as a Western beachhead in the Middle East—our “unsinkable aircraft carrier” in the region.

Israel’s role is to control and oppress the Middle East on behalf of the West. After all, how else would you ensure the loyalty of, for example, Saudi Arabia? Israel’s function is to guarantee that countries like Saudi Arabia remain loyal. And if they don’t, we can unleash our attack dog—Israel—on them, allowing it to seize Saudi land, some of which is claimed as part of the so-called “Greater Israel.”

Another role of Israel is fostering and managing our McJihad. It is almost laughable when we hear that Arabs and radical Islamists want to destroy Israel, while groups like ISIS or Al-Qaeda—our McJihad—have never attacked Israel. Israel not only oppresses the Middle East in our name but also manages our McJihad, which serves as a weapon to destabilize both the Middle East and, more broadly, the entire Mackinder “World-Island” of Eurasia.

Today, the Israeli state is nothing more than a reconstruction of Nazi Germany – simply replacing the German Aryan race with the Jewish Aryan race, and substituting Arabs as new Untermensch in place of the former Untermensch (Slavs and Jews).

#Netanyahu says progressive left and “radical #Islam” against #Israel 🟪🗞️🇺🇸🗽 #news #politics

Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.

The rot that has pervaded the intellectual hub of free societies and this vilification of Israel, the Jewish people, and Western values has been propagated by a systemic alliance between the ultra-progressive left and radical Islam. It must be resolutely fought by civilized societies to safeguard their future. – Benjamin Netanyahu

Now let’s replace the words “Israel” and “Jewish” with “Germany” and “German,” “ultra-progressive left” with “communism,” and “Islam” with “Jews.”

The rot that has pervaded the intellectual hub of free societies and this vilification of Germany, the German people, and Western values has been propagated by a systemic alliance between communists and Jews. It must be resolutely fought by civilized societies to safeguard their future.

Does that not sound like something Adolf would say? The irony of history is that the victims of Nazi Germany and Hitler are now fulfilling the dreams of Nazi Germany and Hitler by creating a fascistic, racist ethnostate—conquering and enslaving their Untermensch in the form of Arabs, and seizing their Lebensraum in Gaza to build a Greater Israel, just as the Nazis and Hitler sought to create a Greater Reich. The real irony is that all the Nazi and Hitler fanboys spend their time hating Jews, while Jews are actually making their beloved leader’s dream come true. Honestly, all the Nazi and Hitler fanboys should just get circumcised, swap their swastikas for Stars of David, and head to Gaza to fulfill their dreams of enslaving Untermensch and securing Lebensraum. I wonder why they don’t do it. Maybe their hatred of Jews and Israel actually comes from jealousy—because Israel is the one fulfilling Hitler’s and their own dreams.

Anyway, the West created this recreation of a Nazi state for the Jewish people because we needed a state that wouldn’t have moral qualms about killing and oppressing Arabs in our name. Israel is our attack dog, the one we use to threaten the entire Middle East. If an Arab state dares to stop listening to the West, we tell them: Look, we have Israel here—a fascist, racist ethnostate full of people eager to kill and enslave all Arabs. You’d better obey us, or we’ll unleash them on you and help them build their Greater Israel on your land.

If Israel hadn’t been indoctrinated with Nazi ideology and molded into a fascistic, racist ethnostate like Nazi Germany, its people wouldn’t view Arabs as subhuman animals—and they wouldn’t be so willing to kill in our name. That’s exactly why we shaped them this way. We had to brainwash Israel with Nazi-style indoctrination so they would see Arabs as their Untermensch, their Amalek, who must be slaughtered in our name. If you want a reliable attack dog, you have to train it so that it has no hesitation in attacking. That’s what we did: we trained the Israeli population to become sociopathic tools of Western power, just as the Nazis trained Germans to view others as expendable.

So it’s not that Israel controls the West—it’s that the West needed a sociopathic attack dog in the Middle East. One that would have no problem oppressing, killing, and enslaving Arabs on our behalf. To achieve that, we had to ensure that they saw Arabs not as people but as animals. The Nazi indoctrination in Israel, and the fact that Israelis are taught to see Arabs as less than human, is no accident—it was intentional. It was the work of our Western capitalist empire of evil, training its Middle Eastern attack dog into a nation and population that sees nothing wrong with enslaving, exploiting, and slaughtering its enemies.

As Michael Parenti reminds us, we should always ask: Cui bono? Who benefits? Not just in terms of money, but in terms of power. Who benefits from the existence of a European-style ethnostate, filled with brainwashed people who see Arabs as animals and are willing to enslave, oppress, and kill them? Clearly, it is our Western capitalist empire of evil, furthering its goal of controlling the Middle East to control energy resources of the world.

Greater Turkey , McJihad and Ideological manipulation

I’ve already touched on McJihad in relation to the India-Pakistan conflict, and on ideological manipulation with regard to Greater Israel. Now let’s consider it in the context of Turkey. We use both the aspiration of a “Greater Turkey” and McJihad to destabilize the Mackinder World-Island—that is, Eurasia.

We have already encircled Iran with states working alongside us, many of them filled with our McJihad. Our goal is to destroy Iran, while at the same time helping Turkey build its vision of a Greater Turkey, which we will later use against both Russia and China.

The strategy is to connect Turkic nations such as Turkey, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, and then use them as instruments in Kazakhstan against Russia, and among the Uyghurs against China. All of this was explained in a video I shared previously.

The Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP) is a secretive force that some thought was virtually non-existent, but it’s now rising to prominence as part of the rebel coalition that toppled Assad in Syria. They’ve released a series of propaganda videos showing step-by-step preparations for what became the final successful push. The videos show them fighting on the front lines against Assad’s forces, firing off a rocket near the city of Saraqib, and engaging in explosive gun battles while entering Latakia, a strategic port city. Then, they show a victory, rolling in on tanks and being cheered by the public.

TIP was founded in the 1990s with a footprint in Afghanistan and Pakistan. For the last decade, they’ve been based in Syria. Their field commander is Abu Muhammad, also known as Zahid. Years ago, TIP members escaped from China, where they faced severe oppression and human rights abuses, often fleeing with their families. Since then, they’ve set up villages and training camps in Syria, made inroads with militant groups like Hayat Tahrir al-Sham which led the recent offensive, and built a vast fighting force.

After Syria, their target is China. TIP has always been clear about their end goal: independence, to liberate their homeland of East Turkistan from the Chinese occupiers.

Why do you think Putin supported Assad, and why does China have a problem with the Uyghurs? Putin supported Assad because he wanted to stop our McJihad, and China has a problem with the Uyghurs because they know the Uyghurs are part of our McJihad, which we plan to use against them.

After we destroy Iran, northern Iran will go to Turkey for their Greater Turkey project, creating a land bridge between Turkey and Turkmenistan. This will establish an “Islamic wall” of McJihad between Russia and the Middle East, and between China and the Middle East. Then our McJihad forces will move into Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan so they can later “liberate” their Turkish brethren from the supposed oppression of Russia in Kazakhstan and China in Uyghur lands—while in reality serving our Empire in its fight against two of our enemies.

That’s why it makes me laugh when people in the West say Arabs and Islam are our enemies. This is pure brainwashing, indoctrination, and manipulation. The West has been trained to adopt a mindset similar to that in Israel—viewing Arabs and Muslims as animals—so that when the time comes, there will be no moral objection to oppressing, enslaving, and slaughtering them. In reality, radical Islam was created, controlled, and used as a secret weapon of our Western capitalist empire of evil.

People in the West are indoctrinated to see Arabs and Muslims as enemies through the “clash of civilizations” narrative, making them willing to commit atrocities in the name of our empire. Our empire is framing this as an ideological battle: good Christians and Jews defending Judeo-Christian European values versus evil Arabic Muslim “barbarians,” who are portrayed as animals that must be conquered, enslaved, and slaughtered—as Benjamin Netanyahu said, “It must be resolutely fought by civilized societies to safeguard their future.”

Meanwhile, the reality—that our Western capitalist empire created radical Islam, controls it, and manipulates it as a weapon—is omitted. We are told they are our enemies, so we can never admit that we manufactured them, manipulated them, and are exploiting them for our own benefit as our weapon.

Thanks to everyone who stuck with me until the end of my post. And, as always… 

“Knowledge will make you be free.”

― Socrates

+

“Knowledge isn’t free. You have to pay attention.”

― Richard P. Feynman

=

“Freedom is not free, you need to pay attention.”

― Grzegorz Ochman

Please pay enough attention, or we will all be screwed. God bless you all.

“The purpose of propaganda is to make one set of people forget that other sets of people are human”

― Aldous Huxley

“And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed—if all records told the same tale—then the lie passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past’ ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past.”

— George Orwell

“There is no better breeding ground for the bacteria of falsehood and legend than fear of the truth and lack of will.”

— Józef Piłsudski

“All forms of tribal and national hatred are foreign to us. Fighters for freedom from all countries and nations are our brothers. We know how to pay tribute to every great idea, no matter in which language it was born, and we know how to honor every poet and thinker, regardless of the nation that produced them.”

— Józef Piłsudski