in

How the Empire will strike back against Donald Trump

In any analysis of contemporary international politics it pays to be cautiously pessimistic. As the default mode one can generally expect that any way in which things can go wrong to threaten the peace and security of the planet, they will. Anticipation of improvement is a chump’s bet.

Submitted by author, via Strategic Culture

That’s why the analyst’s gut instinct rebels at any indication that things overall may be moving in a positive direction, however haltingly or indirectly.

But consider:

  • Europe’s anti-Russia sanctions: American pressure on Europe with respect to trade with Iran, added to Trump’s new tariffs, feeds resentment across Europe, especially in powerful Germany, which especially objects to Washington’s threatening sanctions on companies participating in Nord Stream 2. It may be too soon to guess how soon the EU will pull the plug on anti-Russian sanctions, but there’s something in the air when even the likes of European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker can say that “Russia-bashing has to be brought to an end.”  Italy’s voice will be key.

At the epicenter of each one of these earthshaking developments is one man: Donald Trump.

It would be inaccurate to say that these are even moves of the US government, of which Trump is only in partial control. With the permanent government – not to mention some of his own appointees – seeking to undermine him at every step, Trump seems to be resorting to the one tool he has at his personal disposal: disruption.

Let’s remember that, especially in the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin, those who voted for Trump wanted something radically different from business as usual. They voted for him because they wanted a bull in a china shop, a wrecking ball, a human hand grenade, a big “FU” to the system.

Maybe that’s what we got.

To be sure, none of the foregoing itemized developments is dispositive. But taken together they point to a remarkable confluence of good omens, at least from the point of view of those who wanted to shake up, even shatter, the cozy arrangements that have guided the so-called “liberal global order.”

But those whose careers and privileges, and in some cases their freedom and even lives, depend on perpetuating that order will not go gentle into that good night. They are getting nervous. This means in particular the elements of the US-UK special services, their Democratic and GOP Never-Trump fellow travelers, the Trump-hating fake news media, and the bureaucratic nonentities in Brussels (not only at the European Commission but at NATO headquarters).

If past is prologue, the Empire will strike back – hard and dirty.

One is reminded of the past seven years of war in Syria, where every time the US indicated a willingness to disengage, or when Syrian forces had made major military gains, then – BAM! – a chemical weapons attack immediately and without evidence is attributed to government forces, followed by renewed cries of “Assad is killing his own people! Assad must go!” (This is a ploy that goes back at least the Bosnian war of the 1990s. Every time a negotiated ceasefire seemed to be taking shape, another “Serb mortar attack” on civilians took place, leading to calls for NATO military action.)

The question is not “if” there will be a provocation, rather it’s one of when, where and how. While it’s difficult to make predictions, especially about the future, it’s nonetheless possible to anticipate some possibilities:

  • FIFA World Cup 2018 in Russia (June 14 to July 15): Given the huge expense and effort Russia has put into the World Cup as a favorable showcase to the world, it will be a tempting target. Let’s remember that the unconstitutional ouster of Ukraine’s elected government took place as Putin’s attention was presumably distracted by his pride and joy, the 2014 Sochi Winter Olympics. The 2008 attack by Georgia’s then-president, Mikheil Saakashvili, on South Ossetia, was launched while the world’s eyes were focused on the Summer Olympics in Beijing. Both initiatives led to a strong counteraction by Moscow, leading in turn to worsened relations between Russia and the west – including Russia’s suspension from the G8 in 2014. (Though in the fevered imagination of western Russophobes, Putin was the one using the games as a cover, not the other way around.) A provocation could be directed against the FIFA events themselves – perhaps a terrorist attack by ISIS operatives reportedly being ferried out of the Middle East to Russia – or something elsewhere timed to coincide with matches being played all over Russia.
  • Ukraine: Regarding President Petro Poroshenko’s actions, everything must be put into the context of upcoming presidential elections in 2019. Poroshenko has to find a way to get into a runoff, presumably against Yulia Tymoshenko. The most beneficial thing he could do would be somehow to pull a rabbit out of his hat and achieve a peace deal in the Donbas. But chances of that are slim to none, as it would require flexibility from Kiev that Poroshenko can’t afford to show lest he be accused of being a Russian puppet. Conversely, he can up the ante with the Russians and hope the West will line up behind him. Perhaps the recent fake news murder fiasco regarding the still very much alive Arkady Babchenko was to have been one such ploy but it misfired. But there are other options, such as a provocation along the line of control in the Donbas (the newly delivered US Javelin missiles are handy, as is the Dutch MH17 report), maybe a covert attack on the Kerch bridge, as well as other less obvious possibilities.
  • Incident between NATO and Russian forcesNATO forces are stepping up provocative maneuvers on Russia’s doorstep in the Baltic and Black seas – purely to deter Moscow’s aggression, mind you. An incident could occur as any time, either by accident or on purpose. Either way, it would be the hostile Russians’ fault for putting their country so close to our bases and the venues of our military exercises.
  • Assassination: One of Putin’s well-known predilections is for killing, or at least attempting to kill, anyone who might displease him. Or like Assad with his chemical weapons, maybe Putin kills just for the sheer, malicious fun of it. The list of victims is long: Babchenko (except, not), the two Skripals (except, not them either), political opponents like Boris Nemtsov and Sergei Yushenkov, muckraking journalists like Anna Politkovskaya and Natalia Estemirova, former chekist Aleksandr Litvinenko, RT network founder Mikhail Lesin, crusading lawyers like Stanislav Markelov and Sergei Magnitsky, oligarch Boris Berezovsky, and so on. A well-timed rubout of a suitably visible figure would have a salubrious impact on any annoying moves towards east-west rapprochement. No evidence is needed – the mere identity of the victim would be irrefutable proof of Putin’s guilt.

Regarding the last item, assassination, it should always be kept in mind that in the end the man threatening to upset the applecart of the liberal global order isn’t Putin – it’s Trump. That suggests an ultimate solution that might become tempting if The Donald’s continued functioning at higher than room temperature becomes just too much to endure.

As Joseph Stalin is reputed to have remarked, “Death solves all problems. No man, no problem.” Trump, who for many powerful people is quite a problem indeed, has been recklessly compared to Jean-Marie Le Pen, Silvio Berlusconi, Vladimir Putin – even to Hitler and Mussolini. In an American context, to Andrew Jackson, Huey Long, and George Wallace. Let’s note that each of those three Americans was the target of assassination. Jackson (someone Trump is known to admire) survived by a failure of his attacker’s pistols, hailed by some at the time as miraculous. “The Kingfish” was killed. Wallace was crippled for life.

There is reason to think that Trump is well aware of the fate of the last American president who so threatened the habitual order of things and the entrenched, ruthless establishment that profits so mightily from it. He has repeatedly indicated his interest in releasing the full file on Jack Kennedy’s assassination, then backed off from it for undisclosed reasons. The shooting death of the president’s brother Robert Kennedy, who had he been elected president in 1968 would have had the opportunity to reopen the investigation into his brother’s murder, is back in the news with Robert Kennedy, Jr., expressing doubt about the official conclusion that his father was killed by Sirhan Sirhan.

If anyone thinks there is any length to which Trump’s enemies will not go, think again.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

What do you think?

27 points
Upvote Downvote

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
10 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
9 Comment authors
AM HantsAnthony PapagalloLinda JJJackwarmingmyth Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
AM Hants
Guest
AM Hants

Two things that are alleged to be in the planning, one is another chemical weapon, false flag in Syria, together with Ukraine planning to take out the European delegates, who are soon to visit Donbass. No doubt other false flags are in the planning.

Anthony Papagallo
Guest
Anthony Papagallo

If Trump were to be assasinated I believe it would spark civil breakdown and possibly even the end of the Union.

Linda JJ
Guest
Linda JJ

Excellent article thank you. We should all be praying for Trump and his safety.

Jack
Guest
Jack

Looking at this picture of G7 I cannot help thinking that except only one real statesman depicted there ( Mr. Trump himself) the rest do not deserve such a honorouble call they are simply stooges or puppets if you like. Personally I would advocate that this G7 or G6+1 as some now it calls should be dismantled.

warmingmyth
Guest
warmingmyth

Once again this author describes a false flag as a “provocation”. In the ENGLISH language, there is NO element of deception communicated by the word “provocation”. If you want to actually communicate with natural English speakers you must not use the word provocation in this context. Please look up the definition in English.

warmingmyth
Guest
warmingmyth

provocation ˌprɒvəˈkeɪʃ(ə)n/Submit noun noun: provocation; plural noun: provocations 1. action or speech that makes someone angry, especially deliberately. “you should remain calm and not respond to provocation” synonyms: goading, prodding, egging on, incitement, rousing, stirring, stimulation, prompting, inducement, encouragement, urging, inspiration, stimulus, pressure; More LAW action or speech held to be likely to prompt physical retaliation. “the assault had taken place under provocation” 2. the action of arousing sexual desire or interest, especially deliberately. “walking with deliberate provocation, she struck a pose, then giggled” 3. MEDICINE testing to elicit a particular response or reflex. “twenty patients had a high increase… Read more »

Stop Bush and Clinton
Guest
Stop Bush and Clinton

I wouldn’t rule out a “terrorist” strike on a Western soccer team at the World Cup to be blamed not on ISIS but on Russia directly — “The evil Russians thought this team could defeat them despite the fact that all the Russian players use doping, so they took out the possible competition. Only Russia could have done it because they organized the event, so they had master keys to all the rooms in which the crime happened.”

Atryne
Guest
Atryne

No one makes US President, except by permission. SO……. the hallaballo about Russiagate, Spygate and even Trumpgate are superfluous except to keep the idiots who watch MSM busy watching pundits reiterate non facts. The possiblility of Trump assassination is only as close as Mr. Trump is to ot following orders. He has a penchant for that, like a wayward son who in his toddler stage was never given to know NO. Those little darlings soon discover there really are no consequences to what they do except in very far fetched cirucmstances that almost never happen. Except, its like walking close… Read more »

GrannyGripes
Guest
GrannyGripes

YOU all spent 1 billion in slander, sadistic assaults, fraud and forgery against TRUMP
his family, his businesses, his employees, his supporters
and you used our Federal gov’ment to rig an election for Hillary

and you all LOST… that fact will be inked into history .

Aussie Joe Sarks
Guest
Aussie Joe Sarks

Trump nominates a woman to head the CIA, yeah, lets kill Trump! Trump supercharges the US economy, yeah, lets kill Trump! Trump responsible for record employment, yeah, lets kill Trump! Trump, perhaps the first and only Presidential candidate to deliver on his election promises, yeah, lets kill Trump. Trump gets an effective NK deal going, yeah, lets kill Trump. Yeah, lets kill Trump because he has a wildly different style to do-nothing Obama. Yep, bloody great snowflake liberals, what a great a solution you have for solving issues…utter freakin morons…

Robert De Niro shouts “F*** Trump” at 2018 Tony Awards show (Video)

Trump meets Kim: What to expect from historic meeting (Video)