The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Eric Zuesse
The latest (October 17th) issue, of the leading medical journal, The Lancet, provides the most detailed analyses and ratings ever, of the healthcare that is provided in each of 204 countries. These ratings are based on a comprehensive set of 42 ratios, such as, “Mortality from breast cancer for females aged 20–64 years” divided by “Incidence of breast cancer for females aged 20–64 years.” All 42 ratios are effectiveness-of-treatment measures. That is the only scientific way to measure the quality of a nation’s healthcare.
Here, in order, are the top 113 countries, those that score above 54, on a scale where the top score is 96 and the bottom score is 22 — which latter country (not shown here) is Central African Republic, which rated 1 or 0, totally lacking, on a number of categories. These 113 countries are listed according to their total score. So, any country that isn’t listed here can reasonably be considered to have very poor quality medical care:
SCORE: COUNTRY (and rank)
96: Japan — world’s best medical care
95: Iceland — world’s second-best medical care
94: Norway — world’s third-best medical care
93: San Marino, Switzerland
92: Andorra, Singapore
91: Finland, France, Luxembourg, Monaco
90: Canada, Ireland, Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden
89: Australia, Italy, South Korea
88: UK (ranked as #21)
87: Belgium (#22)
86: Austria, Germany
84: Denmark, Portugal
83: Malta, N.Z.
82: Czech Republic, Estonia, Kuwait, USA
81: Israel (#33)
80: Cyprus, Greece, Qatar
79: Costa Rica, Croatia, Taiwan
78: Bermuda (#40)
76: Peru, Puerto Rico
75: Lebanon (#43)
74: Chile, Colombia
73: Cuba, Poland
72: Hungary, Thailand
71: Oman, Panama
70: Albania, China, Iran, Jordan, Latvia, Lithuania, Romania
69: Greenland, Russia, Turkey, Uruguay
68: Tunisia (#63)
67: Malaysia, Maldives
66: Brunei, Libya, Montenegro, Sri Lanka
65: Brazil (#70)
64: Bosnia, Ecuador, Guam, Saudi Arabia
63: Bulgaria, Paraguay, Serbia, UAE
62: Armenia, Cape Verde, Cook Islands, El Salvador, Moldova, Namibia, Seychelles
61: Argentina, Bahamas, Barbados, Bahrain, Mexico, North Macedonia, Palestine, Venezuela
60: Antigua, Northern Mariana Islands, South Africa, Vietnam
59: Kazakhstan, Rwanda, St. Lucia
58: Botswana, Iraq, Morocco, Syria
57: Jamaica, Nicaragua, Ukraine
56: Georgia, Malawi, Mauritius, Trinidad
55: Philippines, Sao Tome
To find the fields of strength and of weakness in the healthcare that is provided in each country, see the tables that are presented on pages 11-16 of the pdf of the article, which pages also show the detailed ratings of each of the 204 nations’ medical care. However, that article provides no rankings, but only scores. The rankings that are shown in the present article are derived from the scores in that article, but are not shown in that article. That article presents the countries only in alphabetical order: it provides no rank-order of them. For example: the United States was one of the four countries that were ranked lower than 28 countries, such that the next lower-ranked country, after those four, Israel, ranked as being #33; and, therefore, the U.S. ranked somewhere among #s 29 and 32 among the 204 nations, or, roughly, as being ranked as number 30 or 31.
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of They’re Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records, 1910-2010, and of CHRIST’S VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.


Having lived in and/or visited many of the countries in the top 10. It is difficult to reconcile how France has scored so high. Finland is orders of magnitude better than France with a distinct emphasis on a holistic approach to health whereas France is completely conventional and drug based. Just that in and of itself leads to different outcomes in terms of overall heath and the need for interventions. The only thing that I can imagine brings Finland down is alcoholism in the country.
I agree. These ratings are laughable. Albania better than Bulgaria???? has anyone been to Albania before writing this article? Then there is Croatia; only a couple of days ago pharmaceutical companies threaten Zagreb of not supplying any more medicine unless they paid up their outstanding debt. They dont have enough medical staff due to cut backs and migration. I try and save the best for last. In October 2019 the Johns Hopkins University listed countries in order of preparedness for a pandemic and the best was the US as No 1 and the UK as No 2. Just shows you… Read more »
Bit hard to find pages 16-17 when the page numbers run from 1250 to 1284!