Geopolitics, Eastern Europeans position and reasoning and Western reality of the naive.

First I would like to explain the geopolitics of Eastern Europeans. I saw that Western Europeans don’t understand it. People in Western Europe can wonder and ask themselves why would Eastern Europeans do what they did and why they pushed geopolitics that they do. One of the reasons is that Eastern Europeans are indoctrinated to hate Russia but that is not the main reason for Eastern Europeans’ position. People don’t understand that Eastern Europeans didn’t have anything to lose. 

To make people understand Eastern Europeans’ geopolitical position I would like to use the example of Nord Stream, which is a great example of why Eastern Europeans do what they do. Nord Stream is a great example of it because Germany, so the EU, because the EU is controlled by Germany, decided to build Nord Stream. This decision was opposed by all Baltic countries and what happened? Germany built it anyway. Since Eastern Europeans are untermensch for Germany and overall Western Europe their interests, opinions etc… doesn’t matter. Eastern Europeans were slaves of Germany and Western Europe, so why would masters listen to their slaves? Western Europe didn’t care about Eastern Europe since if all Baltics states opposed Nord Stream and Germany decided to build it anyway against the interests of so many Eastern European Countries, why would any of those countries think in the current geopolitical situation their interests would matter at all?

That’s why Eastern Europeans were pushed into a position in which they had nothing to lose. Since if nothing would happen Eastern Europeans interests would still be ignored in the name of the interests of Germany. This situation in which Eastern Europeans had nothing to lose made them make a pact with the devil(USA). Since Eastern Europeans’ interests didn’t matter anyway, what is the worst that can happen? Eastern Europeans had nothing to lose and a lot to gain. So there is logic behind it. Nothing of it would happen if Germany so the EU would not treat the interests of Eastern Europeans with no regard.

I would also like to address why Germany’s Scholz is screwed by the USA and Eastern Europeans. I really don’t understand the naivety of Western Europeans in not understanding that the USA is holding too much power over narrative and public opinion. The things discussed on Duran programs and posts on the Durian pages are something that less than 5% of the population knows, I would even say more like 2 or 1 % of the population if not less. Most people don’t know history and don’t know how the world works. They live in the reality of the naive made by propaganda. If Scholz says a single good word about Putin the next day you will see WALL STREET JOURNAL, NEW YORK TIMES articles about pact Molotov–Ribbentrop comparing Scholz to Hitler making a pact with Stalin. How do you imagine Scholz and Germany back down now? Should they say they were lying all the time to their own population and that everything everyone said is a lie?

Nord Stream is just another lie that will be codified into our history like all other lies. People will be told Putin is bad, that he is Hitler. Just like they were told Saddam Hussein was bad and that he was Hitler without even knowing we put him in power and help him do whatever he wanted even atrocities and we even helped him with that as long as he was protecting the petrodollar. Just before the first War in Iraq the US helped Iraq use Chemical weapons against Iran and somehow we didn’t have a problem then, we even helped him commit atrocities. But a year or two years later we had to Invade Iraq because he was committing atrocities? It’s a joke but people don’t even know we put Saddam Hussein in power or that we help him commit atrocities. It’s not in our history books. Same lies about Muammar Gaddafi who was also put by us into power and we didn’t care what we did as long as he protected the petrodollar. Then suddenly Muammar Gaddafi became bad and became hitler. Funny similarity of this war with war in Libya was that were told that Muammar Gaddafi was giving viagra to his soldiers and that he was encouraging rapes. You can find exactly same article about Russia giving their soldiers viagra and encouraging mass rapes and people actually believed that stuff.

People believe a lot of lies. Why does anyone think those will be different? We believe lies about RMS Lusitania, some do for this day or don’t know about it. We believe in lies about Pearl Harbor and reasons why the USA used an atomic bomb on Japan to this day. We believed lies about the Gulf of Tonkin. We believe lies about the killing of JFK to this day. We believed lies about babies thrown out of incubators by Iraqis soldiers in Kuwait. We believed lies about 9/11. We believed lies about Iraq WMD. We believe Russia attacked Georgia even though an independent investigation order by the EU itself said Russia was attacked, does anyone know about it? People still believe Putin attacked Georgia and they will believe Putin blew up Nord Stream 2 and 1.

More than 95% of the population believe the official story regarding those events or don’t know about them at all. Why does anyone think this time it will be different?

“In reality very little was known about the proles. It was not necessary to know much. So long as they continued to work and breed, their other activities were without importance. Left to themselves, like cattle turned loose upon the plains of Argentina, they had reverted to a style of life that appeared to be natural to them, a sort of ancestral pattern. They were born, they grew up in the gutters, they went to work at twelve, they passed through a brief blossoming-period of beauty and sexual desire, they married at twenty, they were middle-aged at thirty, they died, for the most part, at sixty. Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbours, films, football, beer, and above all, gambling, filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult. A few agents of the Thought Police moved always among them, spreading false rumours and marking down and eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous; but no attempt was made to indoctrinate them with the ideology of the Party. It was not desirable 92 1984 that the proles should have strong political feelings. All that was required of them was a primitive patriotism which could be appealed to whenever it was necessary to make them accept longer working-hours or shorter rations. And even when they became discontented, as they sometimes did, their discontent led nowhere, because being without general ideas, they could only focus it on petty specific grievances. The larger evils invariably escaped their notice.”-Orwell 1984

“Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book has been re-written, every picture has been re-painted, every statue and street and building has been re-named, every date has been altered. And that process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.” -George Orwell, 1984