The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
24 May 2026, by Eric Zuesse. (All of my recent articles can be seen here.)
On May 23rd, I headlined “Has Musk’s SpaceX already been publicly revealed as a Ponzi scheme?” Today, I call attention to a video explanation headlined “The SpaceX IPO… It’s Worse Than You Think”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-X6YzlY_8tM
May 21, 2026 #WisprFlowPartner #economics #stocks
SpaceX is about to go public at the largest valuation in history. And because of one quiet rule change, your retirement account is already a buyer of SpaceX stock.
You won’t get a vote on it. You won’t even get a heads up.
The mechanics of passive investing will just buy it for you, at peak valuation, from insiders who got their shares cheap years ago.
In this video, I’ll break down:
• How SpaceX is actually three separate businesses merged into one
• How Starlink quietly became the fastest-growing telecom company in human history
• The $250 billion xAI problem that turned a profitable company into a near $5 billion loss
• The new Nasdaq Fast Entry rule and how it bends the rules for SpaceX
• How “your 401k is the exit liquidity” for SpaceX, and what that actually means for your retirement account
Here it is:
0:00
Elon Musk is preparing the largest
0:02
initial public offering in human
0:03
history. At a $ 1.75 trillion target
0:06
valuation, SpaceX would be worth more
0:08
than every American defense contractor
0:10
combined. Worth more than the market
0:12
caps of Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Disney,
0:15
Nike, and Starbucks all put together and
0:17
worth more than the top 10 companies on
0:19
the London Stock Exchange combined. So,
0:21
if you’re wondering who the is
0:22
buying SpaceX, a company losing $5
0:25
billion per year at the largest IPO
0:27
valuation in history, well, the answer
0:29
is you. Because within a few weeks, your
0:32
retirement account is going to be one of
0:34
the biggest buyers of SpaceX stock,
0:36
whether you like it or not. And that’s
0:38
because NASDAQ quietly introduced a
0:40
brand new rule designed specifically to
0:42
make that happen. But before we get to
0:44
the rule, you need to understand why
0:46
this all matters. Because the only way a
0:48
nearly $2 trillion valuation makes any
0:51
sense is if SpaceX is actually the
0:53
company the public believes it to be.
0:55
But it’s not. If you ask 10 people on
0:57
the street what SpaceX sells, most will
0:59
say rockets. Some will say Mars stuff,
1:01
but both are wrong. SpaceX isn’t just a
1:04
rocket company. It’s actually three
1:05
businesses stacked on top of each other.
1:07
And the rocket business isn’t even the
1:09
most important one. There’s the good,
1:10
the bad, and the ugly that comes with
1:12
this company. And trust me, it gets
1:14
pretty ugly. So, let’s start there. It’s
1:16
the part of SpaceX that gets the most
1:18
attention and creates the least value.
1:22
XAI is mostly known for owning the
1:24
social media platform Twitter.
1:27
[clears throat]
1:27
Uh, sorry, I mean the social media
1:29
platform X. Anyways, it’s also the AI
1:32
lab Elon Musk founded in 2023 to compete
1:35
with OpenAI and Anthropic. And a few
1:38
months ago, SpaceX acquired XAI in an
1:40
all stock deal that valued the combined
1:42
entity at $1.25 $25 trillion with XAI
1:46
itself accounting for 250 billion of
1:48
that. If you’re wondering how it’s
1:50
allowed for one of Elon’s companies to
1:52
acquire another one of Elon’s companies,
1:54
the answer is I have no idea, but it
1:56
happened. So, with a $250 billion
1:59
valuation, you’d assume XAI is a
2:01
financially sound company, right? Or at
2:04
least close to it. Or at a minimum, that
2:06
the people who built it still work
2:08
there. Well, none of those things are
2:10
true. XAI was founded with 11
2:12
co-founders, researchers and engineers
2:15
from DeepMind, OpenAI, Google, and the
2:17
University of Toronto. It was a true
2:19
heavyweight team. But by 2025, the
2:22
company was burning more than a billion
2:24
dollars a month. And by March of this
2:25
year, every single one of the 11
2:27
co-founders had walked out from the
2:29
company. Then Elon on his own social
2:31
media platform publicly admitted that
2:34
XAI had to be rebuilt from the
2:36
foundations up, which is the polite way
2:38
of saying the CEO of SpaceX just paid
2:40
$250 billion for an asset that needs to
2:43
be rebuilt from scratch. And to say that
2:45
XAI is overvalued would still be a
2:48
massive understatement. OpenAI generates
2:50
around $ 24 billion in revenue annually
2:53
and is currently valued at around $850
2:56
billion. While Anthropic generates over
2:58
$30 billion annually and is valued
3:01
around $400 billion. But XAI who
3:04
estimates a billion in revenue was
3:06
bought for $250 billion. So the market
3:09
is pricing XAI like its Emirates, but in
3:11
reality it’s more like Spirit Airlines.
3:14
I like to look at XAI as the reverse
3:16
Jerome Powell piece of SpaceX. Instead
3:18
of printing cash, it burns whatever cash
3:20
the rest of the business generates. But
3:22
it’s also only one of the three
3:24
businesses inside SpaceX. The other two
3:27
businesses are the ones actually doing
3:28
the work. But before we get to the crown
3:30
jewel, let’s start with the one that
3:32
gives the company its name. [music]
3:36
This is the part most people picture
3:37
when they hear the name SpaceX. It’s the
3:40
rocket business. It launches things into
3:42
orbit. satellites for the US government,
3:44
cargo to the International Space
3:46
Station, crude missions for NASA, and a
3:48
lot of other satellites, which we’ll get
3:50
to in a minute. And the rocket business
3:52
at SpaceX generated roughly $4 billion
3:55
in revenue last year, which may sound
3:57
impressive until you compare it to the
3:58
$2 trillion valuation. Then it suddenly
4:01
doesn’t sound impressive at all,
4:03
especially when you realize the rocket
4:04
business represented only about a
4:06
quarter of SpaceX’s total revenue last
4:08
year. So, this brings us to the third
4:10
business. It’s the one most people don’t
4:12
think about when they hear the word
4:13
SpaceX, but it’s also the one that
4:15
investors care about most, and it’s the
4:17
one that’s paying the bills for
4:19
everything else. [music]
4:22
This is the crown jewel of SpaceX.
4:24
Starlink is a satellite internet
4:26
provider. It’s the answer to the
4:27
question, “What if Comcast but in
4:29
space?” Which sounds like the kind of
4:31
thing a venture capitalist tweets at
4:33
3:00 in the morning, except in this
4:35
case, Elon actually built it. And
4:37
Starlink launched in beta in 2020 and 6
4:40
years later it’s the fastest scaling
4:42
telecom company in human history. There
4:44
are now more than 10,000 Starlink
4:46
satellites in Earth’s orbit. Each one
4:48
beaming internet down to a little dish
4:49
that sits on your roof. The dish points
4:52
itself at the satellites. The satellites
4:54
talk to each other and somehow this
4:56
works. Here’s what entrepreneur and
4:58
podcast host Scott Galloway had to say
5:00
about Starlink.
5:02
And then the best product I think of the
5:04
last few years has been Starlink.
5:06
That’s amazing.
5:07
I just think it’s absolutely I’ve done
5:09
podcasts from planes. I can talk to my
5:12
sons on FaceTime. That product is, you
5:16
know, all airlines are flying the same
5:18
tin can, same routes, same bad food. A
5:21
real point of differentiation for them
5:22
and also in maritime. I think Starlink
5:26
is the best tech product. So power to
5:27
him. when they go public, is it an is
5:30
SpaceX an amazing company, or is it
5:32
overvalued? The answer is yes. Two can
5:35
be true at the same time.
5:36
Starlink has now grown to over 10
5:38
million active subscribers in roughly
5:40
150 countries. And in 2025, Starlink
5:43
alone brought in 11.4 billion in
5:45
revenue, which is roughly 61% of
5:48
SpaceX’s total revenue for the year. But
5:50
Starlink’s ability to generate revenue
5:52
isn’t even the most impressive part.
5:54
It’s the efficiency underneath that
5:56
revenue which blows my mind. Two years
5:58
ago, Starlink’s profit margins were
6:00
about 41%. This year, it’s now 63%.
6:04
Which means Starlink added over 20
6:05
points in margin expansion in just 2
6:08
years. So yeah, the margins aren’t just
6:10
good, they’re also accelerating. And
6:12
Starlink isn’t just for consumer
6:14
internet either. There’s a maritime
6:16
version that ships and yachts use, an
6:17
aviation version that commercial
6:19
airlines have started to roll out, and a
6:21
classified defense version called Star
6:22
Shield with contracts at the National
6:24
Reconnaissance Office and the Pentagon.
6:26
So, this is the real SpaceX. It’s a
6:28
satellite internet provider that prints
6:30
cash. A rocket business that’s doing
6:32
pretty good, but is valued like it’s
6:34
already colonized Mars. And after the
6:36
February merger, an AI lab that lights
6:39
roughly a billion dollars a month on
6:40
fire. And in 2025, Starlink and the
6:43
rocket business brought in roughly $8
6:45
billion in profits, which sounds great
6:48
until you remember XAI showed up to ruin
6:50
the party because the consolidated
6:52
company of SpaceX, which also now
6:54
includes XAI, ended up losing nearly $5
6:57
billion last year on roughly $18.5
7:00
billion in revenue. So, let’s go back to
7:02
the question from earlier. Who the
7:05
is buying SpaceX at a $1.75 trillion
7:09
valuation? And our answer to this
7:11
question from earlier still stands. It’s
7:13
you. And this is where the real story
7:15
for the SpaceX IPO actually is. It’s not
7:18
about rockets. It’s not about magic
7:20
satellites in space. It’s about the
7:22
financial system changing the rules
7:24
right before the biggest IPO in market
7:26
history. Because on May 1st of this
7:28
year, NASDAQ adopted something called
7:30
the fast entry rule. And with SpaceX
7:33
reportedly targeting a June date for
7:34
their initial public offering, the
7:36
timing for this new rule is extremely
7:38
convenient. But before we get into how
7:40
we’ve quietly changed the rules to roll
7:42
out the red carpet for SpaceX. …
9:13
Thank you to Whisper Flow
9:15
for sponsoring this video. And now back
9:18
to that red carpet we rolled out for
9:19
SpaceX and where it actually leads. The
9:22
NASDAQ 100 is the gold standard for
9:24
technology and growth companies. It’s
9:26
not only a badge of honor for companies
9:28
to be included in it, but there’s more
9:29
than 200 investment products with over
9:32
$600 billion in assets that track the
9:34
index. Which means once you’re included
9:36
in the index, it basically forces every
9:38
investment fund that follows the index
9:40
to automatically buy your stock, which
9:42
translates to billions of dollars of
9:44
investment capital. And under the old
9:46
rules, a newly listed company had to
9:48
wait at least three months before it
9:49
could be added to the NASDAQ 100 index.
9:52
That waiting period existed for a
9:54
reason. It gave the market time to
9:56
discover the actual price before passive
9:58
index funds were forced to buy in. But
10:00
the new fast entry rule cuts that
10:02
waiting period from 3 months to just 15
10:04
trading days. It’s 3 months of price
10:06
discovery compressed into 3 weeks, which
10:09
speeds up the process for SpaceX to get
10:11
that automatic demand coming in. But
10:13
this isn’t even the change that matters
10:15
most because there was also two other
10:16
rule changes. There also used to be a
10:19
minimum free float requirement to join
10:20
the NASDAQ 100. A company needed at
10:23
least 10% of its shares actually
10:25
available for the public to buy and
10:26
sell. SpaceX is targeting a free float
10:29
of 4 to 5%. Under the old rules, they
10:31
wouldn’t qualify. Under the new rules,
10:33
that minimum is gone, and SpaceX
10:36
suddenly qualifies. And then there’s
10:37
also the new hidden multiplier. This one
10:40
is the hardest to wrap my head around
10:41
because buried in the technical language
10:43
of the new rules is a hidden multiplier.
10:46
For companies with a free float under
10:48
20%, NASDAQ now treats the float as
10:50
three times bigger than it actually is.
10:52
Meaning a 4% float gets weighted as if
10:55
it were 12%. A 5% float gets weighted as
10:58
if it were 15%. Here’s what all this
11:00
basically means. We’ve bent the rules
11:02
and rolled out the red carpet for
11:04
SpaceX. We’ve changed the listing
11:06
requirement so that SpaceX can join the
11:08
index with just 5% of the company
11:10
actually trading publicly, a float level
11:12
that would have been an automatic
11:14
disqualification 6 months ago. We’ve
11:16
changed the price discovery timeline so
11:18
that SpaceX skips the standard 3-month
11:20
seasoning and gets dropped into the
11:22
index just 15 trading days after going
11:24
public. And we’ve changed the waiting
11:26
rule so that ETFs are now legally
11:28
required to treat SpaceX’s float as if
11:31
it were three times larger than it
11:32
actually is. meaning we’ve built
11:34
manufactured demand. And this is all
11:36
unfolding right now. But it’s not just
11:38
SpaceX. Open AAI and Anthropic are both
11:41
reportedly eyeing their own public
11:42
listings this year. And both will almost
11:44
certainly list with the same
11:45
configuration the new rules were quietly
11:48
tailored for. Meaning the NASDAQ didn’t
11:50
rewrite the rules for one company. It
11:52
rewrote them for a class of companies,
11:54
and SpaceX was just the first in line.
11:56
So NASDAQ cleared the runway for SpaceX.
11:58
The question now is who actually gets on
12:01
the plane? Which brings us to the retail
12:03
allocation part of the listing. Because
12:05
while most initial public offerings
12:06
allocate 5 to 10% of the offering to
12:08
retail investors, SpaceX is targeting
12:11
30%. And Brett Johnson, the CFO of
12:14
SpaceX, told a room full of bankers on
12:16
the record that retail is going to be a
12:18
critical part of the IPO and bigger than
12:21
any IPO in history because, in his
12:24
words, retail buyers have been
12:25
incredibly supportive of us and of Elon
12:28
for a long time. And we want to make
12:29
sure that we recognize that. Translated
12:32
out of corporate speak, the CFO of
12:34
SpaceX told a room of bankers that the
12:36
largest initial public offering in
12:38
history is going to dump 30% of its
12:40
supply on retail buyers and not because
12:43
retail buyers help with price stability,
12:45
not because they help with long-term
12:47
shareholder alignment, because they’re
12:48
loyal to Elon. And that’s how this story
12:51
unfolds. The buyers and sellers of
12:53
SpaceX don’t show up at the same time.
12:55
The buyers are forced in early. The
12:57
sellers are unlocked later. Shares move
12:59
from insiders sitting on a lowcost basis
13:02
to passive funds and retail whose
13:04
retirement accounts absorb them at peak
13:06
valuation. Portfolio manager George
13:08
Noble said it best. Your 401k is the
13:10
exit liquidity. Because if you have any
13:13
sort of retirement account holding US
13:15
stock index funds, then within a few
13:17
weeks of the SpaceX listing, you’re
13:19
going to own some stock and you won’t
13:20
have a vote on it. You won’t have a
13:22
choice in it. The mechanics of passive
13:24
investing will just buy it for you. So,
13:26
here’s the corrected version of SpaceX.
13:28
It’s a mashup of three businesses that
13:30
combined lost $5 billion last year,
13:33
listing at the largest IPO valuation in
13:35
human history, and we’re all going to be
13:37
buyers within a few weeks because of
13:39
manufactured demand. And there’s a
13:41
reason traditional financial media isn’t
13:43
covering it this way. It isn’t clickable
13:45
because SpaceX to go public at a nearly
13:47
$2 trillion valuation is a headline. But
13:50
NASDAQ quietly rewrote its floatwaiting
13:52
methodology to engineer passive fund
13:54
demand for an unprofitable company.
13:57
Well, that doesn’t quite roll off the
13:58
tongue as smooth.
…
——
MY COMMENTS:
To boil this all down: The NASDAQ 100 index coordinated with Elon Musk to change its rules so that automated index-fund buying (“manufactured demand”) of this stock will kick in almost immediately and without the previously required price-discovery, so that 30% of the stock’s buyers will be 401k and other index-fund buyers, people’s pension funds basically, thus guaranteeing an inflated price, and
12:51
The buyers and sellers of
12:53
SpaceX don’t show up at the same time.
12:55
The buyers are forced in early [by this automated buying]. The
12:57
sellers are unlocked later [to sell the stock at its peak]. Shares move
12:59
from insiders sitting on a lowcost [venture capital and megabank] basis [then selling it]
13:02
to passive funds and retail whose
13:04
retirement accounts absorb them at peak
13:06
valuation. Portfolio manager George
13:08
Noble said it best. Your 401k is the
13:10
exit liquidity. Because if you have any
13:13
sort of retirement account holding US
13:15
stock index funds, then within a few
13:17
weeks of the SpaceX listing, you’re
13:19
going to own some stock and you won’t
13:20
have a vote on it. You won’t have a
13:22
choice in it. The mechanics of passive
13:24
investing will just buy it for you. So,
13:26
here’s the corrected version of SpaceX.
13:28
It’s a mashup of three businesses that
13:30
combined lost $5 billion last year,
13:33
listing at the largest IPO valuation in
13:35
human history, and we’re all going to be
13:37
buyers within a few weeks because of
13:39
manufactured demand.
13:41
If that is correct, this could turn out to be the biggest Ponzi scheme ever. And the U.S. Government now is allowing it to happen. Have any Senators or congresspersons been investigating and exposing it BEFORE it happens, in order to PREVENT it? Why not? As of now, I cannot find evidence that any U.S. Senator or House member has formally called for a congressional investigation specifically into Nasdaq’s recent “fast entry” rule change in connection with the planned SpaceX IPO. Are all 435 Representatives, and all 100 Senators, simply corrupt? And what about the President?
——
—————
Investigative historian Eric Zuesse’s latest book, AMERICA’S EMPIRE OF EVIL: Hitler’s Posthumous Victory, and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is about how America took over the world after World War II in order to enslave it to U.S.-and-allied billionaires. Their cartels extract the world’s wealth by control of not only their ‘news’ media but the social ‘sciences’ — duping the public.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.