Feminism’s next target, the evil Patriarchy that is Lego

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Is their no topic, entity, institution, or tradition that feminism will not go after.  Even the most playful of objects are no match for the wrath of oppressed girl power.  Target…Lego.

The building blocks that we all remember playing with in our youth that brought out our creativity and imagination during more innocent times is another tool of suppression wielded by the evil that is the Patriarchy.

The L.A. Times Opinion piece by Charlotte Allen gives us the details:

Lego, the Danish manufacturer of colorful plastic bricks, has finally caved, er, responded to years of feminist carping over supposed gender stereotyping in its “minifigures” and now has a boxed set of “female scientists” that’s presumably marketed to little girls (or at least to their feminist mothers).

The yellow-skinned, knob-headed plastic females in the set, which Lego titles “Research Institute,” look exactly like male Lego figures, except they sport bouffant hairstyles that, besides Bruce Jenner, no man would be caught dead with. By putting together the lady astronomer (with telescope), the lady chemist (with miniature lab) and the lady paleontologist (with a magnifying glass and dinosaur skeleton), little girls — inspired by their plastic role models — will presumably develop cravings to enter STEM fields when they grow up and thus cure the chronic underrepresentation of women in those fields.

Ok, so on order to get the feminist monkey off their back, Lego took all the male figure’s body and glued on a female head on top, everyone happy.  Now all the little girls playing with Lego can pursue a career at Google or Facebook writing code for the next disappearing photo chat app.  

World problems solved, right…WRONG. As with anything feminist related, giving in to their demands is only the beginning.  For a feminist it is not enough to kill their target, they want to drink their blood with a straw.

This new, politically correct set hasn’t put an end to the feminist complaints about Lego after the company, whose market research had revealed that 90% of its users were boys and men, in 2011 launched a line specifically for little girls called “Friends.” The Friends minifigures — which today are Lego’s fourth-best-selling line, were slender instead of silo-shaped, came in skin tones that matched a range of actual human skin tones and wore stylish outfits in girly shades of pink and purple. Instead of messing around in the chem lab, the Friends engaged in — and continue to engage in — such distinctly non-STEM careers as hairdressing, taking care of horsies and running pastry shops.

Feminists hate the Friends line. A 2012 petition on accused Lego of promoting “body dissatisfaction” and demanded that Friends be discontinued. Other feminists asserted that the Friends line promoted eating disorders.

But even the Lego female scientists haven’t managed to placate the feminists. For it seems that at the same time that the chemist, the astronomer and the paleontologist made their debuts, Lego introduced a Bavarian pretzel girl, a diner waitress, a grandma with shopping bag and a lady robot among its regular minifigures, which got the complaints about sexism back in gear. Helen Czerski wrote on June 6 for the Guardian:

“Denmark, where Lego is based, is famed for being better at gender equality than most other countries. Yet this year, it has produced a toy range that has traditional alpha male heroes and traditional helpless (and bossy) females. That is undoubtedly damaging to both young boys and young girls, and also to the future of society.

“All right, Lego, maybe it’s not your job to dictate culture and produce female mountain climbers. But then don’t dictate culture by making female pretzel girls. Lego is modular. It is perfectly designed for avoiding this issue, because you can just make all the bits (hair, spears, burgers etc.) and let children put them together for themselves. Why impose the stereotypes on them at all?

“If only Lego had left out pretzel and diner girls and added a female mountain climber and a female constable.”

Sigh. You just can’t please a feminist.

Yes, you can never please a feminist, because when dealing with a feminist their is zero accountability, zero responsibility and full entitlement.

The ironic part about the entire argument put forth by Ms. Helen Czerski is that Lego should not dictate to society what gender roles are, or how the sexes differ. Lego, as an independent company in a free market system, has no right to dictate how the toys they spend money on to produce and sell should look and appear…let us, as entitled feminists, dictate this for you.

In a feminist world their is no biology, no gender differences, no evolution. Men are exactly the same as women except for the pee-pee and wee-wee.

Funny how the “Friends” minifigures line sold so well. 



The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Hillary wants to distance herself from Obama, while also distancing her wealth from the IRS

Did Obama just restart the Iraq war?