Connect with us

Red Pill

News

We explain why Beyonce will have a very difficult time leaving Jay Z

Jay Z and Beyonce split up rumors are floating around the web. We explain why Beyonce may have a hard time finding a man with higher social value as Jay Z, given that the sexual value of a man is running opposite than that of a women.

Published

on

0 Views

We have been hearing a lot of gossip and rumors on the Interweb that Jay Z has been cheating on Beyonze and hooking up with some reality show chic named Casey Cohen as well as ultra hot superstar singer Rihanna.  We cannot know for sure what the hell is happening between the couple, and to be honest we could not give a shit about all these rumors.  What is of interest to us is that some sources say Beyonce is mulling over a divorce or separation from Jay Z, and this news can help us add some red pill knowledge and perspective to the discussion.  

Now most of the time a women as sexy as Beyonce would be able to swing branches to a new man with no difficulty whatsoever, but Jay Z is not your average man, he is an Apex Alpha superstar…and therein lies the rub for Beyonce.

First the background from the Huffington Post:

Last week, Life & Style magazine named “Princesses: Long Island” cast member Casey Cohen as one of several women who may be more than friends with Jay Z. Now, the reality star is slamming the rumors, claiming they are unsubstantiated.

According to TMZ, Cohen is denying the claims that she’s having any sort of affair with Beyonce’s husband of six years.

TMZ reports that Cohen’s lawyer has sent a cease and desist letter to Bauer Media stating that while Cohen acknowledges meeting Jay Z and Beyonce several times in her capacity as a hostess at New York’s 1Oak club, Cohen and Jay Z “have never been in love or intimate.” She’s also calling the article, “a foul and phony mistress-rumor.”

Life & Style had reported that the 44-year-old rapper has been seeing Cohen twice a month and would visit her when she was working. “They’ll slip away for an afterparty. She’ll hang out with him all night, flirting and touching him,” a source told the magazine.

Women would read this article from HuffPost and not be able to understand how Jay Z could even think of cheating on Beyonce with some hostess.  After all, its Beyonce, her social value is astronomical! This is correct thinking and spot on logic, from the mindset of a women. In other words, scratching your head wondering how you can cheat on someone of such high social value is exactly how women see the world. Now believing that men act, think and behave with the same rational that women act and behave is what the manosphere likes to dub as solipsism. 

The truth of the matter is that while women see success and social value as the ultimate quality in a mate, men see appearance and beauty as the qualities that they desire in a partner.

So with this in mind, Beyonce is in for a a real hard time trying to replace Jay Z, while the mayor of NY will easily find younger, hotter and sexier in record time (or if rumors are true already has).

Start with Jay Z.  Yes he has a high social value wife in Beyonce, but as time goes on, her beauty fades. Sure its great that she is talented and all that, but beauty trumps all, especially if you are dealing with an apex alpha male.  Why Cohen, who is, or was, simply a hostess? Answer is simple, who cares what she does.  She is 28, Jay Z is 44, she turns him on with her blonde bombshell looks, he says game on.  As much as women may not like to here the above, the biology and evolution of who we are is very real.  Stop the solipsism ladies and see the world as a man sees it.

Now Beyonce is also of super high social value, but for women a desirable men is successful men, and most women prefer men to be as successful or more successful then them. Jay Z fits this bill for Beyonce, but good luck finding another man as successful as Jay Z. The man is a superstar rapper, record company exec, sports team owner, fashion tycoon, and god knows what else. The only way for Beyonce to fulfil her hypergamy urges would be to leave Jay Z for Vladimir Putin. 

That is problem number one for Beyonce. Problem number two is this chart below:

SMV

As Beyonce gets older her sexual value diminishes, Jay Z…well he is working in reverse.

Basically Beyonce is stuck in a pickle, she is of such high social value that she would need a man of equal or higher social value than her own, while also fighting the biological wall that makes it more difficult to persuade men of great social value to pair up with her, rather than go younger and hotter (see chart above). If a man has very high social value and his sexual value is also increasing with time, then his options fall in the meat of the blue line bell curve, not the tapering tail end. Anything outside of that meaty area for a high social and sexual value male is a bad deal.

Now hopefully this could all be rumors, and love (with a little red pill) does and can conquer all, including hypergamy and sexual value, but knowing the truth about our biology and evolution is an important step towards accepting that men are success objects and women are sex objects.  This has helped our species survive and thrive for thousands of years and will never change. This biological reality serves us well and helps the thinking man understand the importance of faith and spirituality as a counter weight to our urges and instincts.

References:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/12/jayz-cheating-casey-cohen_n_5488895.html?utm_hp_ref=entertainment&ir=Entertainment

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
18 Comments

18
Leave a Reply

avatar
18 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
0 Comment authors
Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More Infos here: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb

[…]we prefer to honor numerous other world wide web websites on the net, even though they aren’t linked to us, by linking to them. Underneath are some webpages worth checking out[…]

trackback

3nvb54wnxd5cbvbecnv5ev75bc

[…]always a large fan of linking to bloggers that I appreciate but do not get lots of link love from[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/explain-beyonce-will-difficult-time-leaving-jay-z/ […]

trackback

Title

[…]although internet sites we backlink to below are considerably not associated to ours, we feel they’re truly really worth a go as a result of, so have a look[…]

trackback

Title

[…]usually posts some extremely interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[…]

trackback

Title

[…]very few web-sites that take place to become in depth below, from our point of view are undoubtedly nicely really worth checking out[…]

Latest

Is Silicon Valley Morphing Into The Morality Police?

Who gets to define what words and phrases protected under the First Amendment constitute hate — a catchall word that is often ascribed to any offensive speech someone simply doesn’t like?

The Duran

Published

on

Authored by Adrian Cohen via Creators.com:


Silicon Valley used to be technology companies. But it has become the “morality police,” controlling free speech on its platforms.

What could go wrong?

In a speech Monday, Apple CEO Tim Cook said:

“Hate tries to make its headquarters in the digital world. At Apple, we believe that technology needs to have a clear point of view on this challenge. There is no time to get tied up in knots. That’s why we only have one message for those who seek to push hate, division and violence: You have no place on our platforms.”

Here’s the goliath problem:

Who gets to define what words and phrases protected under the First Amendment constitute hate — a catchall word that is often ascribed to any offensive speech someone simply doesn’t like?

Will Christians who don’t support abortion rights or having their tax dollars go toward Planned Parenthood be considered purveyors of hate for denying women the right to choose? Will millions of Americans who support legal immigration, as opposed to illegal immigration, be labeled xenophobes or racists and be banned from the digital world?

Yes and yes. How do we know? It’s already happening, as scores of conservatives nationwide are being shadow banned and/or censored on social media, YouTube, Google and beyond.

Their crime?

Running afoul of leftist Silicon Valley executives who demand conformity of thought and simply won’t tolerate any viewpoint that strays from their rigid political orthodoxy.

For context, consider that in oppressive Islamist regimes throughout the Middle East, the “morality police” take it upon themselves to judge women’s appearance, and if a woman doesn’t conform with their mandatory and highly restrictive dress code — e.g., wearing an identity-cloaking burqa — she could be publicly shamed, arrested or even stoned in the town square.

In modern-day America, powerful technology companies are actively taking the role of the de facto morality police — not when it comes to dress but when it comes to speech — affecting millions. Yes, to date, those affected are not getting stoned, but they are being blocked in the digital town square, where billions around the globe do their business, cultivate their livelihoods, connect with others and get news.

That is a powerful cudgel to levy against individuals and groups of people. Wouldn’t you say?

Right now, unelected tech billionaires living in a bubble in Palo Alto — when they’re not flying private to cushy climate summits in Davos — are deciding who gets to enjoy the freedom of speech enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and who does not based on whether they agree with people’s political views and opinions or not.

You see how dangerous this can get — real fast — as partisan liberal elites running Twitter, Facebook, Google (including YouTube), Apple and the like are now dictating to Americans what they can and cannot say online.

In communist regimes, these types of folks are known as central planners.

The election of Donald Trump was supposed to safeguard our freedoms, especially regarding speech — a foundational pillar of a democracy. It’s disappointing that hasn’t happened, as the censorship of conservative thought online has gotten so extreme and out of control many are simply logging off for good.

A failure to address this mammoth issue could cost Trump in 2020. If his supporters are blocked online — where most voters get their news — he’ll be a one-term president.

It’s time for Congress to act before the morality police use political correctness as a Trojan horse to decide our next election.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Paul Craig Roberts: The Disintegration of Western Society

Feminists brought this madness onto themselves.

Paul Craig Roberts

Published

on

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts:


Radical feminists are now being banned by Twitter not because they hate men, which is perfectly OK as far as Twitter is concerned, but because they object to “transwomen.”

What is a “transwoman?” As far as I can understand, a “transwoman” is a male with a penis who declares himself to be a women and demands his right to use women’s toilette facilities along with the women who are using them.

The feminist, Meghan Murphy, twittered a statement and a question:

“Men are not women.”

“How are transwomen not men? What is the difference between men and transwomen?”

Twitter described this as “hateful conduct” and banned Meghan Murphy. https://quillette.com/2018/11/28/twitters-trans-activist-decree/

There you have it. Yesterday it was feminists who were exercising their special society-bestowed privileges to censor. Today it is the feminists who are being censored. As this insanity of “Western Civilization” continues, tomorrow it will be the transwomen who are censored and banned.

What precisely is afoot?

My readers, who have partially and some wholly escaped from The Matrix, understand that this is the further fragmentation of American society. Identity Politics has set men, women, blacks, Jews, Asians, Hispanics, and white people against one another. Identity Politics is the essence of the Democratic Party and the American liberal/progressive/left. Now, with the creation of “new” but otherwise nonexistent “genders,” although they are honored as real by the controlled whores who masquerade as a “Western media,” we witness radical feminists being silenced by men pretending to be women.

I sympathize with Meghan Murphy, but she brought this on herself and on the rest of us by accepting Identity Politics. Identity Politics gave Meghan a justification for hating men even, as she failed to realize, it provided the basis for moving her into the exploitative class that must be censored.

Where does this end?

It has already gone far enough that the American population is so divided and mutually hostile that there is no restraint by “the American people” on government and the elite oligarchs that rule. “The American people” are no longer a reality but a mythical creature like the unicorn.

The film, The Matrix, is the greatest film of out lifetime. Why? Because it shows that there are two realities. A real one of which only a few people are aware, and a virtual one in which eveyone else lives.

In the United States today, and throughout “Western Brainwashed Civilization,” only a handful of people exist who are capable of differentiating the real from the created reality in which all explanations are controlled and kept as far away from the truth as possible. Everything that every Western government and “news” organization says is a lie to control the explanations that we are fed in order to keep us locked in The Matrix.

The ability to control people’s understandings is so extraordinary that, despite massive evidence to the contrary, Americans believe that Oswald, acting alone, was the best shot in human history and using magic bullets killed President John F. Kenndy; that a handful of Saudi Arabians who demonstratively could not fly airplanes outwitted the American national security state and brought down 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers and part of the Pentagon; that Saddam Hussein had and was going to use on the US “weapons of mass destruction;” that Assad “used chemical weapons” against “his own people;” that Libya’s Gaddifi gave his soldiers Viagra so they could better rape Libyan women; that Russia “invaded Ukraine;” that Trump and Putin stole the presidential election from Hillary.

The construction of a make-believe reality guarantees the US military/security complex’s annual budget of $1,000 billion dollars of taxpayers’ money even as Congress debates cutting Social Security in order to divert more largess to the pockets of the corrupt military/security complex.

Readers ask me what they can do about it. Nothing, except revolt and cleanse the system, precisely as Founding Father Thomas Jefferson said.

Is Thomas Jefferson Alive and Well In Paris?

If this report is correct, pray the revolt spreads to the US.

https://www.infowars.com/video-french-police-remove-helmets-in-solidarity-with-yellow-vest-protesters/

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Google Employees debated burying conservative media in search

Google engineer Scott Byer falsely labeled The Daily Caller and Breitbart as “opinion blogs” and urged his coworkers to reduce their visibility in search results.

The Daily Caller

Published

on

Via The Daily Caller


  • Google employees debated whether to bury The Daily Caller and other conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election
  • “Let’s make sure that we reverse things in four years,” one engineer wrote in a thread that included a Google vice president
  • Google employees similarly sought to manipulate search results to combat Trump’s travel ban

Google employees debated whether to bury conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election in 2016, internal Google communications obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation reveal.

The Daily Caller and Breitbart were specifically singled out as outlets to potentially bury, the communications reveal.

Trump’s election in 2016 shocked many Google employees, who had been counting on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton to win.

Communications obtained by TheDCNF show that internal Google discussions went beyond expressing remorse over Clinton’s loss to actually discussing ways Google could prevent Trump from winning again.

“This was an election of false equivalencies, and Google, sadly, had a hand in it,” Google engineer Scott Byer wrote in a Nov. 9, 2016, post reviewed by TheDCNF.

Byer falsely labeled The Daily Caller and Breitbart as “opinion blogs” and urged his coworkers to reduce their visibility in search results.

“How many times did you see the Election now card with items from opinion blogs (Breitbart, Daily Caller) elevated next to legitimate news organizations? That’s something that can and should be fixed,” Byer wrote.

“I think we have a responsibility to expose the quality and truthfulness of sources – because not doing so hides real information under loud noises,” he continued.

“Beyond that, let’s concentrate on teaching critical thinking. A little bit of that would go a long way. Let’s make sure that we reverse things in four years – demographics will be on our side.”

Some of Byer’s colleagues expressed concern that manipulating search results could backfire and suggested alternative measures

One Google engineer, Uri Dekel, identified himself as a Clinton supporter but argued that manipulating search results was the wrong route to take.

“Thinking that Breitbart, Drudge, etc. are not ‘legitimate news sources’ is contrary to the beliefs of a major portion of our user base is partially what got us to this mess. MSNBC is not more legit than Drudge just because Rachel Maddow may be more educated / less deplorable / closer to our views, than, say Sean Hannity,” Dekel wrote in a reply to Byer.

“I follow a lot of right wing folks on social networks you could tell something was brewing. We laughed off Drudge’s Instant Polls and all that stuff, but in the end, people go to those sources because they believe that the media doesn’t do it’s job. I’m a Hillary supporter and let’s admit it, the media avoided dealing with the hard questions and issues, which didn’t pay off. By ranking ‘legitimacy’ you’ll just introduce more conspiracy theories,” Dekel added.

“Too many times, Breitbart is just echoing a demonstrably made up story,” Byer wrote in a reply to his original post. He did not cite any examples.

“That happens at MSNBC, too. I don’t want a political judgement. The desire is to break the myth feedback loop, the false equivalency, instead of the current amplification of it,” Byer added.

“What I believe we can do, technically, that avoids the accusations of conspiracy or bias from people who ultimately have a right and obligation to decide what they want to believe, is to get better at displaying the ‘ripples’ and copy-pasta, to trace information to its source, to link to critiques of those sources, and let people decide what sources they believe,” another Google engineer, Mike Brauwerman, suggested.

“Give people a comprehensive but effectively summarized view of the information, not context-free rage-inducing sound-bytes,” he added.

“We’re working on providing users with context around stories so that they can know the bigger picture,” chimed in David Besbris, vice president of engineering at Google.

“We can play a role in providing the full story and educate them about all sides. This doesn’t have to be filtering and can be useful to everyone,” he wrote.

Other employees similarly advocated providing contextual information about media sources in search results, and the company later did so with a short-lived fact check at the end of 2017.

Not only did the fact-check feature target conservative outlets almost exclusively, it was also blatantly wrong. Google’s fact check repeatedly attributed false claims to those outlets, even though they demonstrably never made those claims.

Google pulled the faulty fact-check program in January, crediting TheDCNF’s investigation for the decision.

A Google spokeswoman said that the conversation did not lead to manipulation of search results for political purposes.

“This post shows that far from suppressing Breitbart and Daily Caller, we surfaced these sites regularly in our products. Furthermore, it shows that we value providing people with the full view on stories from a variety of sources,” the spokeswoman told TheDCNF in an email.

“Google has never manipulated its search results or modified any of its products to promote a particular political ideology. Our processes and policies do not allow for any manipulation of search results to promote political ideologies.”

The discussion about whether to bury conservative media outlets isn’t the first evidence that some Google employees have sought to manipulate search results for political ends.

After Trump announced his initial travel ban in January 2017, Google employees discussed ways to manipulate search results in order to push back against the president’s order.

A group of employees brainstormed ways to counter “islamophobic, algorithmically biased results from search terms ‘Islam’, ‘Muslim’, ‘Iran’, etc,” as well as “prejudiced, algorithmically biased search results from search terms ‘Mexico’, ‘Hispanic’, ‘Latino’, etc.”

WATCH:

Trump speculated to The Daily Caller in September that Google and Facebook are trying to affect election outcomes.

“I think they already have,” Trump said, responding to questions about potential election interference by Google and Facebook.

“I mean the true interference in the last election was that — if you look at all, virtually all of those companies are super liberal companies in favor of Hillary Clinton,” he added.

“Maybe I did a better job because I’m good with the Twitter and I’m good at social media, but the truth is they were all on Hillary Clinton’s side, and if you look at what was going on with Facebook and with Google and all of it, they were very much on her side,” Trump continued.

Google this month corrected a “knowledge panel” about a Republican women’s group that labeled them “enablers.”

Google cited Wikipedia for the disparaging description, though a similar change made to Wikipedia’s page for the women’s group was corrected almost immediately. Google left up the digital vandalism for three weeks.

Google apologized in May after search results for the California Republican Party falsely listed “Nazism” as one of the state party’s ideologies.

Then, too, Google blamed manipulation of the party’s Wikipedia page for the inaccurate and disparaging description.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending