in ,

Emmanuel Macron stands in the way of Theresa May’s Brexit delay (Video)

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris take a look at Theresa May’s request to the EU to grant a Brexit extension until the end of June. The European Union appears to be split over how to respond to the UK PM’s extension request.

In the UK, May’s negotiations with Corbyn and Labour, on finding ways to bridge the gap between their respective Brexit deals, appears to have faltered.

May’s fragile grip on power has now been fully exposed for UK MPs and EU oligarchs to contemplate, as the no deal, April deadline fast approaches.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via Bloomberg

The European Union is split over how long to allow the U.K. to delay Brexit, as governments look at ways to “future proof” the decision and prevent a hard-line successor to Theresa May damaging the bloc.

May requested an extension to the U.K.’s membership of the EU until June 30, but the prime minister’s fragile grip on power is playing into the bloc’s response, officials said. The 27 national leaders will make a final decision at a summit in Brussels on Wednesday but remain at odds over the length of a Brexit postponement and what conditions to impose.

Many EU governments want to give a longer delay because they think May’s June 30 plan won’t give enough time for the British Parliament to agree on exactly the type of post-Brexit relationship with the EU it wants. But they’re worried about the U.K. disrupting EU business to try to win a better deal, and that’s causing several governments to think that a shorter period might be better.

While May on Friday promised “sincere cooperation” in her letter to EU President Donald Tusk, a French-led group of countries don’t believe that goes far enough, according to EU officials. Some want to be able to make it a clear condition of any extension that the EU will bring it to a halt if the U.K. interferes in EU business.

EU diplomats are working to find a balance of length and conditions before Wednesday’s summit that will satisfy the EU’s 27 remaining leaders, all of whom must agree to the extension offer. Tusk, who chairs the summits, favors a long extension, until March 2020, according to an EU official. That view is shared by European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker and other governments including Ireland, according to a diplomatic note seen by Bloomberg.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel would be more willing to accept May’s request for a June 30 end-date, while French President Emmanuel Macron is arguing against a lengthy extension without a clear plan to end the deadlock, officials said.

In her letter, May said the government would prepare for European Parliament elections — due to be held May 23-26 — in case the British Parliament hasn’t ratified the Brexit divorce deal in time. The aim would be to cancel the elections if a deal is done in time.

Political Calculus

May’s perilous position as premier, as well as her promise to resign if her Brexit deal is passed, has increased EU governments’ fears that a new harder-line prime minister could replace her before the end of the extension and seek to undermine EU business, officials said.

At the very least, one of the conditions will be that the divorce deal, struck in November, can’t be reopened. Leaders might also seek a commitment that the U.K. won’t vote on future EU budgets or the appointments of the next presidents of EU Commission and Council, which are due later in 2019.

EU officials said a tweet from prominent pro-Brexit member of May’s Conservative Party Jacob Rees-Mogg on Friday morning has added to their concerns.

“If a long extension leaves us stuck in the EU, we should be as difficult as possible,” he said. “We could veto any increase in the budget, obstruct the putative EU army and block Mr. Macron’s integrationist schemes.”


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
April 6, 2019

I can understand why Alex leans toward “This must have been planned all along” scenario but I disagree.
As someone once said “Never ascribe to conspiracy, that which can be put down to plain human stupidity”.
I think this is a case of stupidity, hubris and delusions of competence and power by May and her cohort (both in Britain and the EU).

Torquil Dick-Erikson
April 9, 2019

Both Alexes express amazement that the Conservative party has not yet got rid of May as leader. Well, one reason is that Jacob Rees-Mogg and the ERG tried to do that towards the end of last year, by holding an internal vote on it, but they failed (also due to bad timing, they held the vote before the Commons rejected her deal the first time. It would have been more effective if they had held the vote after her deal was rejected by the biggest Parliamentary majority in history). Under the Tory Party rules, if there is a leadership challenge… Read more »

Muellergate and the Discreet Lies of the Bourgeoisie

A Russian’s view of RussiaGate