in ,

BREAKING: Afghan President ready for dialogue with Pakistan

The statement signals a willingness on the part of Kabul to engage in a meaningful region wide peace process in the medium term.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

While Donald Trump’s troop surge sees more US soldiers pouring into Afghanistan against the wishes of all the major players in the region as well as against the wishes of the Taliban who now control over half of the country by conservative estimates, events on the ground appear to be moving in a direction that is preparing the country for a dialogue and reconciliation process with key players which hitherto had been the biggest stumbling bloc to a countrywide return to peace and normalcy.

Today, Afghanistan’s President Ashraf Ghani stated,

“From here, I have a message for Pakistan: We are ready for comprehensive political talks. Peace with Pakistan is in our national agenda”.

Between 1996 and 2001, Pakistan maintained normal relations with the generally isolated Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan, the Taliban government that controlled the country after the fall of the Islamic State of Afghanistan (no relation to the terrorist group commonly known as ISIS or Daesh) which was established in 1992.

Today, the Taliban form what could be accurately described as a moderate rebel movement which opposes the central government, albeit one that is at time fragmented and which includes extreme elements.

In spite of this, leading Taliban factions continue to receive genuine popular support from substantial portions of Afghanistan’s largely Pasthun majority.

Russia, China and Pakistan have been calling for a ceasefire to take hold over the country which would allow members of the Taliban to sit down at the negotiating table with the fragile government in Kabul in order to bring the nation stability and coordinate a united front against ISIS terrorists who now operate in parts of the country and are opposed by the government and Taliban alike. Even Iran whose natural sympathies lie with Afghanistan’s Shi’a minority is becoming increasingly supportive of an inclusive peace process as advocated by China, Russia and Pakistan.


The Afghan government has previous sought Russian assistance in helping to foment and oversea a peace process, one which would almost inevitably drawn on the generally good will towards both Russia and even more so China which exists in Islamabad.

Recently, Afghanistan’s Ambassador to Russia, Abdul Qayyum stated,

“We would like Russia to help the Afghans as well in order to achieve safety and peace in Afghanistan … We want the relations with Russia to be very good, despite the fact that there have been some problems throughout history.

We wanted the US troops and troops of other Western countries, which have close relations with Afghanistan, to leave Afghanistan long ago. We have now very powerful troops. They fight against terrorism, against Taliban, against Daesh. We can do this”.

READ MORE: Afghanistan seeks Russia’s aid while Russia defends Pakistan against Trump’s accusations

In this sense it is becoming increasingly clear that the very Afghan government Trump’s troop surge is supposed to protect, is becoming as tired of endless war as other parties inside and out of Afghanistan.

With all sides calling for a peaceful compromise solution to a conflict which has raged since 2001, US foreign policy is a clear outlier in respect of the general regional consensus over how to best draw the conflict to a close.

READ MORE: America’s mixed up Taliban policy amounts to ‘kill for peace’

If Afghanistan engages in direct talks with Pakistan, this could be the key element necessary to foster an atmosphere of trust and pragmatism between the Kabul government and Taliban leaders. Any peaceful solution to the conflict in Afghanistan requires the active diplomatic participation of Pakistan. Today’s statement from the Afghan President makes such a move more likely.

This also opens the door for a wider cooperative effort for peace that could reasonably include oversight by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) which includes as members, neighbour Pakistan, Tajikistan and China. Russia is a founder member while Afghanistan has been an observing state since 2012. This SCO also includes India. Ideally, the organisation could give a collective assurance to both Pakistan and elements in Afghanistan that India does not seek to undermine the regional status quo in the Pakistan-Afghan border regions.

Although the words from the Afghan President are a statement of intent rather than an announcement of an agreement, it is a statement that if put into action, could have wide reaching consequences for regional stability.


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

117 Points
Upvote Downvote
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
September 1, 2017

In other words, the biggest impediment to some kind of local compromise (maybe solution) is the presence of the US…..
And as we glance across the vast super-continent of Eurasia we see a similar theme; in Korea, South China Sea, Iraq, Syria, Israel, Ukraine….

It can be called the ‘Reverse Monroe Doctrine’ – ie; USA out of Eurasia.
And it’s gaining popularity.

Reply to  Simon
September 2, 2017

” ‘Reverse Monroe Doctrine’ ”
I do believe that you have just coined a new saying.I like it.

September 2, 2017

America invaded Afghanistan under the 9/11 lie, claiming that that inside job led by US-Israeli dual citizens was the work of Al Qaeda under an Afghan based Osama with the protection of the Taliban. America has spent trillions in this caper at the cost of thousands of Americans and perhaps millions of Afghans. Justice would call for the hanging of the criminals and huge compensation to Afghans. Instead America demands to be left with some control of Afghanistan. The author speaks of ‘peace and normalcy’. Mattis has now announced that the US intends to work with Pakistan to attack “terrorists”,… Read more »

Suzanne Giraud
Suzanne Giraud
Reply to  sarz
September 3, 2017

Very succinctly weighted, including all the ‘elements’..

September 2, 2017

“We wanted the US troops and troops of other Western countries, which have close relations with Afghanistan, to leave Afghanistan”
Music to my ears .The US will not go away gracefully expect much turmoil , but this post is good news for the peace and future prosperity of Afghanistan . Let the Afghanistan government along with it’s citizens decide what happens to Afghanistan .Everyone else that does not promote peace ,OUT .

An inside look at post-coup Ukraine

CONFIRMED: Philippines armed forces will NOT bomb ISIS besieged mosque