Be aware of false prophets. Here are my thoughts on Tucker Carlson, psyops, media control, cultural hegemony, and the cultural Zeitgeist.

First of all, I want to say that I do not agree with everything the author of this video is saying. I need to address the “Jew” talk. I know some members of our community may support those views, but I do not agree with them. I have already written about this before. Yes, among the oligarchs who rule and control us, there is a disproportionately large number of people who are Jewish. But we need to remember that they are not all Jews. These elites don’t view the world through the lens of race or religion, but through the lens of class. They use race and religion to divide us.

Yes, the Rothschilds are evil monsters, and they are Jewish. But at the same time, the Rockefellers are just as monstrous, and they were not Jewish at all. In fact, they were antisemites who supported Hitler and the Nazis. Similarly, the main figure behind the creation of the Federal Reserve was J. P. Morgan, who was not Jewish and was also an antisemite who supported Hitler.

So why single out Jews when we also have families like the Rockefellers or people like J. P. Morgan – who were not Jewish, even antisemitic – and yet just as evil as the Rothschilds? That’s why I don’t call the elites who rule and control us “Jews.” I call them capitalist oligarchs. Yes, there are disproportionately many Jews among them, but not all of them are Jewish. And, again, they do not see the world through the lens of race or religion but through the real lens we should all use: class.

All this black and white talk, this Jewish versus Christian versus Muslim talk, is designed to divide us. No matter if you are black or white, Jewish, Christian, or Muslim – you are ruled and controlled by the same capitalist oligarchs. And they don’t want you to understand that, because if you did, they would have a serious problem.

The capitalist ruling classes treat us all as their cattle. They want to create a multicultural society not because they care about diversity, but because mixing us makes it harder for us to unite. Whether their “cattle” (us) are black or white, Jewish, Christian, or Muslim doesn’t matter to them. What matters is that a divided and mixed herd is easier to control.

I’ve written about this before, but the best example is Martin Luther King Jr. Many say he was supported by Jews, but his main supporters were the Rockefellers – who, again, were not Jews. Why did they support him during the civil rights marches? Not because they cared about black people, but because those marches divided the working class. King, at that stage, was unintentionally helping them divide their “cattle” – us.

But at one point, King realized he was being used. He decided to organize a Poor People’s March to unite both the black working class and the white working class. He understood that, no matter your race, we are all ruled, used, and controlled by the same oligarchy. When he made that shift to seeing the world through a class lens, he lost the support of both the Jewish elites and the antisemitic Rockefellers who made up the oligarchy. Soon after, he was assassinated – before his first Poor People’s March could even take place.

This shows that they don’t care about whether their “cattle” are black or white. They want us mixed and divided not out of ideology, but because it makes us easier to control. That is why I reject the kind of “Jew talk” the author promotes. We must look at the world through a class lens, not race or religion. The elites want you to see it through race and religion because that keeps you easier to control.

Now, some of you may ask why I am promoting such things about Tucker Carlson, especially since I recently used a video from his channel in one of my posts.

This is a very deep dive into our Ponzi scheme pseudo-economy. It will be very long and still not a complete explanation.

I respect Richard Werner’s views, as presented in that interview, but I also understand that his views can be manipulated. I’ve also written before that I respect Michael Hudson the most, and I guarantee you Tucker Carlson will never invite him on his program. Do you know why?

Richard Werner can be invited because his work can be selectively used and manipulated. While I agree with much of what he says, he tends to single out only banks - especially the Federal Reserve - without addressing other capitalist monopolies and the broader systemic problems.

For example, in my recent post (linked here), I shared a video by Mark Goodwin about stablecoins and the crypto scam being promoted to extend the life of the dollar system. Richard Werner’s work can be co-opted to support this narrative. The logic goes: if our only problems are banks and the Federal Reserve, then tech giants like Google, or billionaires like Elon Musk with Tesla and SpaceX, Jeff Bezos with Amazon, and Mark Zuckerberg with Facebook, are not really the problem - because none of them work at the Fed or in banking. Do you see the issue?

That’s why Werner can be promoted: he gives people a scapegoat - the Fed and the banks - while leaving the door open for stablecoin scams and other distractions. Meanwhile, Michael Hudson understands the entire system and its underlying problems. He would directly call out tech moguls like Musk, Bezos, and Zuckerberg, as well as monopolies like Google. That’s exactly why he will never be promoted. So, while I’m glad Richard Werner was given a platform, I also understand why it happened - and why voices like Michael Hudson’s will always be excluded.

Now, about Tucker himself. I’ve been suspicious of him for a long time, and I’ve written about this before. I learned the truth about 9/11 years ago, and I remember Tucker’s role back then. He was part of managing the so‑called “opposition” and shaping the narrative.

One of my skills is reading people’s expressions. I’m not 100% accurate, but I’m good at sensing what people think and feel. From Tucker’s body language and especially his fake laugh, I can clearly see he’s full of it - and lying. His mannerisms make me very uncomfortable.

My suspicions grew after his interview with Putin, when Putin mentioned that Tucker had once wanted to join the CIA. That almost convinced me he’s controlled. Later, I discovered Tucker’s father had been in the CIA. Around the same time, I also learned Andrew Tate’s father was CIA. Do you really think it’s just a coincidence that such prominent cultural figures both had fathers in the CIA?

This ties into something I’ve been researching, and it connects with the work of Whitney Webb. How much of our culture is genuinely organic - and how much is managed and controlled? Do you really think the songs, movies, and cultural trends we see are simply the result of what people “like”?

A prime example, as Whitney Webb discusses, is gangster rap. This hits close to home for me, because when I was a kid, I was a skater and deeply into gangster rap - it was a dominant part of youth culture then.

This also connects back to the main video, where the author talks about Gary Webb. I’ve written many times about him and the narco economy he exposed, which is part of the same cultural manipulation we’re talking about here.

Here’s what the author said:

11:28

And look, a lot of black people are trying to blame the fact that they smoke crack on the CIA. And yeah, that's obviously stupid, but it's actually not stupid in terms of that's who was supplying the crack. That is how the crack and the cocaine was getting into Los Angeles - the CIA was running drugs for the Contras in order to fund their war.

The author says it’s stupid that Black people were blaming the CIA for using crack. What the author doesn’t understand is cultural control, which is something Whitney Webb’s work is now addressing.

“Gangster Rap,” which promoted crime, violence, and drugs, was not something that arose naturally - it was deliberately designed. Notice how this kind of music became popular at the exact same time that prisons in America started being privatized. As soon as crime and incarceration became profitable, a culture that glorified crime, violence, and drugs suddenly gained traction. Do you really think that’s a coincidence?

This kind of cultural control existed before and can be traced to earlier cultural phenomena. But the rise of gangster rap is the clearest example. As soon as prisons became privatized and profit-driven - where more prisoners meant more money - a culture that encouraged criminal behavior and drug use conveniently started to spread.

So when the author of the video says it’s “stupid” that black people blamed the CIA for using drugs, and claims the CIA only supplied the drugs, the author is wrong. The CIA was not only supplying drugs but also promoting a culture that glorified crime, violence, and drugs.

1:15:15

During the same time, the dealer who was implicated in Gary Webb's Dark Alliance, Ricky Ross, was tapped to become part of Death Row Records and helped set that up. This was the competitor on the West Coast to Diddy's Bad Boy Records on the East Coast.

There were allegations that the music industry had become tied up with the private prison industry. The claim was that there were efforts to promote violent music as a way to culturally engineer drug use, drug dealing, and to glorify a "gangster lifestyle" for African-American youth in these areas to fill up private prisons.

If you look at the overlap, the Music Corporation of America (MCA), then owned or run by Lou Wasserman, had ties to the CIA, and had ties to the PROMIS software scandal, where they were intimately tied up with Wackenhut (which I believe is now GEO Group), one of the biggest private prison companies in the U.S. These are all tied to the same network involving Iran-Contra and all of that, as I detail in my book.

So, I think if people actually interrogated the Epstein-Clinton relationship, and particularly the information on Mark Middleton, this would absolutely explode. But Republicans won't touch that aspect of the Epstein-Clinton relationship with a 10-foot pole, even though it would give them a lot of opportunity to point out how criminal the Clinton family is. They won't touch it because both parties were absolutely implicated in all of that stuff. It was really a continuation of the Reagan-Bush stuff, and in a lot of ways, Clinton was basically the continuation of the Reagan-Bush era, just pretending that he was a Democrat.

So again, all those black people accusing the CIA of making black communities take drugs are not “stupid,” as the author of the main video claims. It wasn’t just the CIA importing and distributing drugs to black neighborhoods, as he suggests. There was also a deliberate effort by the CIA to promote a cultural zeitgeist of “gangster rap” among black communities - to culturally engineer crime and drug use. This served two purposes: first, to create customers for the drugs the CIA was importing (and profit from them), and second, to increase incarceration rates, which brought in even more money through the private prison industry.

So, to people who claim that black people are simply “more stupid” or “more prone to violence,” I would say this: maybe there is some truth to studies showing differences in average IQ levels and while black people have lower IQ than white people at the same time Asians on average have higher IQ than Whites - but when it comes to violence in the black community, the situation is far more complex. What I do know is that the CIA and the deep state intentionally promoted a cultural zeitgeist designed to increase crime and violence in black communities.

This means what you see in black communities is not simply “because black people are black.” Their culture and social environment were deliberately engineered by the CIA and the deep state to look this way. Many people don’t understand this. They say that “black people are more prone to crime or violence,” and since they don’t know about the CIA’s and deep state’s role in shaping culture, they assume it’s just inherent.

But now that you know the CIA and deep state intentionally worked to culturally engineer these behaviors, you need to ask yourself: are these problems really because black people are “just being black”? Or are they the result of a deliberate effort by the CIA and deep state to make it this way?

Thanks to everyone who stuck with me until the end of my post. And, as always… 

“Knowledge will make you be free.”

― Socrates

+

“Knowledge isn’t free. You have to pay attention.”

― Richard P. Feynman

=

“Freedom is not free, you need to pay attention.”

― Grzegorz Ochman

Please pay enough attention, or we will all be screwed. God bless you all.