in ,

Assange’s US extradition hearing begins: What’s it all about and how did we get here?

A London court is set to begin hearings to determine whether or not jailed WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will be extradited to the US on charges of conspiracy where he faces life in prison.

Assange has languished in London’s top security Belmarsh Prison since he was dragged from London’s Ecuadorian Embassy by British police in April last year and subsequently slapped with 18 charges under the US Espionage Act, which could see him sentenced to up to 175 years in prison.

The Australian journalist and whistleblower had, for the seven years prior, been living in the London embassy, where he had sought asylum after skipping bail in relation to a Swedish sexual assault investigation, which he and his lawyers maintain was politically motivated (and which was later dropped).

Now, Assange’s fate is hanging in the balance in the Woolwich Crown Court with Judge Vanessa Baraitser hearing arguments for and against his extradition. The hearing is expected to last until Friday.

Assange’s lawyers have long argued that he would not receive a fair trial in the US and that the case against him is purely political, amounts to criminalizing the legitimate activities of journalists, and poses a threat to free speech.

WikiLeaks was founded in 2006 but came to prominence in 2010 when it published a classified video showing a US military helicopter killing around 12 people, including two Reuters journalists.

The video was part of a massive cache of military material leaked to the whistleblower site by former army intelligence analyst Chelsea Manning, who served seven years in prison before her 35-year sentence was commuted by former President Barack Obama in 2017.

Manning was jailed again in 2019 (and remains behind bars) for refusing to testify against WikiLeaks, saying she would rather “starve to death.”

Assange’s critics say that his activities do not amount to journalism and pose a threat to the national security of the US. During the 2016 US presidential election, WikiLeaks angered the US establishment, releasing leaks from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) which showed party leaders trying to restrain Bernie Sanders. Some Democrats claimed the publication was harmful to Hillary Clinton’s bid for the presidency and accused Assange of working with Russia to undermine her campaign.

Doctors who have visited Assange at Belmarsh have given stark public warnings about the deterioration of his health. This month, in their fourth letter to date, a group of more than 100 doctors warned the UK government that he could die in prison, having “effectively been tortured to death.” A similar assessment had previously been reached by Nils Melzer, the UN special rapporteur on torture, who concluded after visiting him that Assange was exhibiting “all the symptoms typical of prolonged exposure to psychological torture.”

A request in October by Assange’s legal team to have his extradition hearing postponed to allow more time to prepare the case was denied. His team has also consistently complained about a lack of access to the prison and said Assange was denied tools he needed to prepare his case, including a laptop and access to certain documents.

News reports last week claimed that US President Donald Trump had offered Assange a pardon if he would publicly say that Russia had nothing to do with the DNC leaks — but it turned out that Assange had already reportedly offered a US official “definitive proof” during a 2018 meeting that Russia was not behind the leaks.

The London court will not decide whether Assange is guilty of any crime, but will examine whether the US request for his extradition meets the requirements of a 2003 treaty. His team maintains that because the case is politically-motivated, the treaty should prevent his extradition.

After this week, the hearings will be postponed again until May 18.

Help us grow. Support The Duran on Patreon!


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

12 Points
Upvote Downvote
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 24, 2020

But it’s not political, it’s just a convenient turn of events. Kind of like two bullets to the head is a convenient form of suicide. Drop the nuke Wikileaks. Give all the details you have on America to Iran and South America, especially Mexico. See the US squirm.

Olivia Kroth
February 24, 2020

“The London court will not decide whether Assange is guilty of any crime, but will examine whether the US request for his extradition meets the requirements of a 2003 treaty. His team maintains that because the case is politically-motivated, the treaty should prevent his extradition.”

I hope and pray that poor Assange will not be extradited to the USA. That will be the end. He will be finished off in some obscure torture prison – never to be seen or heard of again.

Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 24, 2020

What does that first line say…Jullian Assange ‘is’ guilty!? Only way they can say they aren’t deciding guilt is if guilt is proven…WHAT GUILT HAS BEEN PROVEN !? Assanges guilt is still assumed iirc and even then. There is absolutely no grounds for a legit extradition lest we are all for Guantanimo under ‘assumed’ convictions. I’ll see you there Olivia.

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  cudwieser
February 24, 2020

You will see me where, cudwieser, in Guantanamo? I am not going! No way I am going to Guantanamo. If you mean London, unfortunately, I cannot go, do not have the time, I live in France and will fly to Moscow next week.

Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 24, 2020

I was being semi humorous. If Jullian is extradited on the grounds he’s supposedly being held in prison for then we’re all guilty of knowing something we shouldn’t and it’ll set a precident of basically lifing someone of the street for as much as being different.

The Hidden Tyranny In Trump’s America

Smearing Bernie Sanders