in ,

A delay in BREXIT Article 50 may be on its way (Video)

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris take a quick look at a BREXIT deal that may now be delayed well past the scheduled exit of March 29 of this years.

The mood has shifted considerably in the last week, from confidence that a no-deal Brexit was an inevitability, to a now ever present, public doubt that a Brexit will even take place as voted by the UK populace.

According to The Evening Standard, Peter Hargreaves, the billionaire who was the second biggest donor to the 2016 leave campaign, and veteran hedge fund manager Crispin Odey told Reuters they expect Britain to stay in the EU.

“I have totally given up. I am totally in despair, I don’t think Brexit will happen at all,” said Mr Hargreaves, 72, who is one of Britain’s wealthiest men and donated £3.2 million ($4.08 million) to the leave campaign.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via The Evening Standard

A backlog of at least six essential Bills that must be passed before Britain leaves the European Union has left ministers convinced the timetable will be extended.

They include the much-delayed Immigration Bill.

Even asking MPs to sit at weekends and cancel their half-term holiday in February may not provide enough time to avoid asking for a delay, several sources have disclosed.

A senior minister said: “The legislative timetable is now very very tight indeed.

“Certainly, if there was defeat on Tuesday and it took some time before it got resolved, it’s hard to see how we can get all the legislation through by March 29.”

The development comes as:

  • Senior ministers told the Standard that a majority of the Cabinet now support the idea of staging indicative votes in the Commons to see if a different Brexit plan is supported, despite Theresa May publicly opposing the idea.
  • Work and Pensions Secretary Amber Rudd refused three times on live radio to deny she would resign if the Prime Minister attempted a disorderly departure from the EU without securing a withdrawal deal.
  • Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt warned that “Brexit paralysis” was a risk if MPs vote down Mrs May’s deal on Tuesday but lack a majority for a different deal. He said it was clear that a no-deal Brexit would be blocked by Parliament following the landmark votes earlier this week.
  • An influential group of Cabinet ministers is understood to be pushing a Plan B designed to attract Labour support. Chancellor Philip Hammond, Mrs May’s de facto deputy David Lidington, Business Secretary Greg Clark, Justice Secretary David Gauke, and Ms Rudd, are said to support permanent membership of a customs union, which Labour has proposed.

A BBC analysis estimates the Government is heading for defeat on Mrs May’s withdrawal blueprint by a crushing margin of 228 votes next week.

Mrs May is committed to coming back to the Commons by Monday January 21 with proposals for a new way forward, opening the door to MPs to force votes on rival Plan Bs.

The prospect of a delay to the Article 50 process arises because in addition to the deal itself, MPs need to pass a Trade Bill, Agriculture Bill, Fisheries Bill, Healthcare Bill, a Financial services Bill – and an Immigration Bill.

It follows reports from Brussels this week that British officials have already “put out feelers” about whether the other 27 EU countries would be willing to approve a limited extension of the Article 50 process that set a two-year deadline for Britain to leave the bloc.

A senior Downing Street spokesman said Mrs May had been “very clear” that Britain would be leaving the EU on March 29 as planned.

A minister said there was “strong resistance” around the Cabinet table to any delay. “Nobody desires it,” they said. “We may have to sit down and really prioritise. But we would then be in an emergency crisis situation.”

Ministers think Mrs May will have to allow indicative votes on alternative plans – including a People’s Vote and a Norway deal – if she loses heavily.

But a senior Tory warned: “Junior ministers and PPS would feel very very aggrieved if they did not have a free vote.

“You would get some resignations. Ministers have got to think well the process would work.”

The Tory added: “I’m absolutely certain it’s being examined.”

No 10 sources said Mrs May “is not a fan” of the idea, however.

Speaking on Today, Ms Rudd has said she is “committed” to ensuring that the UK does not leave the EU without a withdrawal deal.

“This is a strong and great country, we will find a way to succeed,” she said. “But I do not think that no-deal would be good for this country and I’m committed to making sure we find an alternative.”

Business Secretary Greg Clark has previously hinted he would quit if the Government tried a no-deal exit, while Justice Secretary David Gauke has predicted a walkout of ministers in such circumstances.

Ms Rudd said it was “right” for the Government to make preparations for a no-deal Brexit, comparing it to wearing a seatbelt when driving a fast car.

Mr Hunt appeared to row back from previous comments that suggested he was relaxed about no-deal, by saying that he thought Parliament would block a disorderly departure.

He stressed that the public would see any failure to deliver Brexit as a “fundamental breach of trust” which the country would “regret for many, many generations”.

“If this deal is rejected, ultimately what we may end up with is not a different type of Brexit but Brexit paralysis,” he said. “And Brexit paralysis ultimately could lead to no Brexit.”

He warned Tory Eurosceptic hardliners against relying on the clock ticking down to the default option of a no-deal Brexit on March 29 if Mrs May’s deal is voted down.

“It’s now looking much less likely that Parliament would allow a no-deal outcome,” he said.

“We have seen from this week that Parliament has the ability to assert itself and to shape outcomes.”


The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 13, 2019

Brexit is dead!
Long live the Fourth Reich!

The dream of NWO point-man, Adolf Hitler, comes true.
England is on board and the Ukraine is being depopulated in keeping with the Third Reich policy of Lebensraum.
The Jew Elites and their Golem the USA are out of the closet and pulling the levers of power, when allowed to by their Jewish masters.

Cartoon villain, Terroresa May, inwardly rejoices. Just look at those teeth and the evil glint in the eye. Cruella De Ville and Lucezia Borgia move over!

January 13, 2019

If these MP’s would have taken the trouble to put down on paper at least a list of what they want the Brexit deal to include and what cannot be in it, even the EU would not have dared to block negotiations. As it is UK still holds the £40’b. Making it clear to the EU that UK will walk out the door without paying the EU will get Brussels to negotiate in a serious way. The deal should include a free trade agreement with the EU and what trade regulations that entails but without giving up sovereignty – the… Read more »

January 14, 2019

Surely when a government has failed in it’s stated duty it should be held accountable by the courts? It beggars belief that in a so-called democracy a government can blatantly sabotage something the people voted for that the government (and the elite they serve) didn’t expect or like? Yes I know the referendum itself was not legally binding, but I’m fairly sure that the activities surrounding Article 50 are. If ever a population needed resounding proof that the politicians do not serve them at all, Brexit has surely provided that for them.

Reply to  TEP
January 14, 2019

But they sabotaged it so artfully.

January 14, 2019

One or two points for Alexander to consider when he returns to this subject – which he’s bound to do soon. |Firstly please note that it’s Dominic GRieve not Gieve! However, you’re right about the comparative – let’s say – lack of gravitas of the main players. My own feeling is Grieve that is being used. He’s known to be one of the few utterly straight politicians – his father was an old school MP and he’s of the same mould. He’s ideal for the task. Anyone putting their trust in Rhys-Mogg will be disappointed – he’s about as wet… Read more »

Huawei Fires Executive Arrested On Espionage Charges In Poland

America’s Nightmare: The Sino-Russian Entente