Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

News

Did Saudis, CIA Fear Khashoggi 9/11 Bombshell?

Jamal Khashoggi may have gleaned highly sensitive inside information on what actually happened on 9/11.

Published

on

4,959 Views

Authored by Finian Cunningham via The Strategic Culture Foundation:


The macabre case of missing journalist Jamal Khashoggi raises the question: did Saudi rulers fear him revealing highly damaging information on their secret dealings? In particular, possible involvement in the 9/11 terror attacks on New York in 2001.

Even more intriguing are US media reports now emerging that American intelligence had snooped on and were aware of Saudi officials making plans to capture Khashoggi prior to his apparent disappearance at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul last week. If the Americans knew the journalist’s life was in danger, why didn’t they tip him off to avoid his doom?

Jamal Khashoggi (59) had gone rogue, from the Saudi elite’s point of view. Formerly a senior editor in Saudi state media and an advisor to the royal court, he was imminently connected and versed in House of Saud affairs. As one commentator cryptically put it: “He knew where all the bodies were buried.”

For the past year, Khashoggi went into self-imposed exile, taking up residence in the US, where he began writing opinion columns for the Washington Post.

Khashoggi’s articles appeared to be taking on increasingly critical tone against the heir to the Saudi throne, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The 33-year-old Crown Prince, or MbS as he’s known, is de facto ruler of the oil-rich kingdom, in place of his aging father, King Salman.

While Western media and several leaders, such as Presidents Trump and Macron, have been indulging MbS as “a reformer”, Khashoggi was spoiling this Saudi public relations effort by criticizing the war in Yemen, the blockade on Qatar and the crackdown on Saudi critics back home.

However, what may have caused the Saudi royals more concern was what Khashoggi knew about darker, dirtier matters. And not just the Saudis, but American deep state actors as as well.

He was formerly a media aide to Prince Turki al Faisal, who is an eminence gris figure in Saudi intelligence, with its systematic relations to American and British counterparts. Prince Turki’s father, Faisal, was formerly the king of Saudi Arabia until his assassination in 1975 by a family rival. Faisal was a half-brother of the present king, Salman, and therefore Prince Turki is a cousin of the Crown Prince – albeit at 73 more than twice his age.

For nearly 23 years, from 1977 to 2001, Prince Turki was the director of the Mukhabarat, the Saudi state intelligence apparatus. He was instrumental in Saudi, American and British organization of the mujahideen fighters in Afghanistan to combat Soviet forces. Those militants in Afghanistan later evolved into the al Qaeda terror network, which has served as a cat’s paw in various US proxy wars across the Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia, including Russia’s backyard in the Caucasus.

Ten days before the 9/11 terror attacks on New York City, in which some 3,000 Americans died, Prince Turki retired from his post as head of Saudi intelligence. It was an abrupt departure, well before his tenure was due to expire.

There has previously been speculation in US media that this senior Saudi figure knew in advance that something major was going down on 9/11. At least 15 of the 19 Arabs who allegedly hijacked three commercial airplanes that day were Saudi nationals.

Prince Turki has subsequently been named in a 2002 lawsuit mounted by families of 9/11 victims. There is little suggestion he was wittingly involved in organizing the terror plot. Later public comments indicated that Prince Turki was horrified by the atrocity. But the question is: did he know of the impending incident, and did he alert US intelligence, which then did not take appropriate action to prevent it?

Jamal Khashoggi had long served as a trusted media advisor to Prince Turki, before the latter resigned from public office in 2007. Following 9/11, Turki was the Saudi ambassador to both the US and Britain.

A tentative idea here is that Khashoggi, in his close dealings with Prince Turki over the years, may have gleaned highly sensitive inside information on what actually happened on 9/11. Were the Arab hijackers mere patsies used by the American CIA to facilitate an event which has since been used by American military planners to launch a global “war on terror” as a cover for illegal wars overseas? There is a huge body of evidence that the 9/11 attacks were indeed a “false flag” event orchestrated by the US deep state as a pretext for its imperialist rampages.

The apparent abduction and murder last week of Jamal Khashoggi seems such an astoundingly desperate move by the Saudi rulers. More evidence is emerging from Turkish sources that the journalist was indeed lured to the consulate in Istanbul where he was killed by a 15-member hit squad. Reports are saying that the alleged assassination was ordered at the highest level of the Saudi royal court, which implicates Crown Prince MbS.

Why would the Saudi rulers order such a heinous act, which would inevitably lead to acute political problems, as we are seeing in the fallout from governments and media coverage around the world?

Over the past year, the House of Saud had been appealing to Khashoggi to return to Riyadh and resume his services as a media advisor to the royal court. He declined, fearing that something more sinister was afoot. When Khashoggi turned up in Istanbul to collect a divorce document from the Saudi consulate on September 28, it appears that the House of Saud decided to nab him. He was told to return to the consulate on October 2. On that same day, the 15-member group arrived from Riyadh on two private Gulfstream jets for the mission to kill him.

Official Saudi claims stretch credulity. They say Khashoggi left the consulate building unharmed by a backdoor, although they won’t provide CCTV images to prove that. The Turks say their own CCTV facilities monitoring the front and back of the Saudi consulate show that Khashoggi did not leave the premises. The Turks seem confident of their claim he was murdered inside the building, his remains dismembered and removed in diplomatic vehicles. The two private jets left the same day from Istanbul with the 15 Saudis onboard to return to Riyadh, via Cairo and Dubai.

To carry out such a reckless act, the Saudis must have been alarmed by Khashoggi’s critical commentaries appearing in the Washington Post. The columns appeared to be delivering more and more damaging insights into the regime under Crown Prince MbS.

The Washington Post this week is reporting that US intelligence sources knew from telecom intercepts that the Saudis were planning to abduct Khashoggi. That implicates the House of Saud in a dastardly premeditated act of murder.

But furthermore this same disclosure could also, unwittingly, implicate US intelligence. If the latter knew of a malicious intent towards Khashoggi, why didn’t US agents warn him about going to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul? Surely, he could have obtained the same personal documents from the Saudi embassy in Washington DC, a country where he was residing and would have been safer.

Jamal Khashoggi may have known too many dark secrets about US and Saudi intel collusion, primarily related to the 9/11 terror incidents. And with his increasing volubility as a critical journalist in a prominent American news outlet, it may have been time to silence him. The Saudis as hitmen, the American CIA as facilitators.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
21 Comments

21
Leave a Reply

avatar
9 Comment threads
12 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
16 Comment authors
MarthaTjoeIsabellabsamsinjohn vieira Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Bob Valdez
Guest
Bob Valdez

Oh, PLEEEASE! We already know who commited 9/11. Unfortunately, the ksa had nothing to do with it. If they did, the kingdom of saudi wahabbia would be a sheet of glass.

bsamsin
Guest
bsamsin

‘nothing’ is overstating it, but it was a minor role in the false flag contrived by ((( those mid-east guys ))) and their neocon partners in control of DC

Platon
Guest
Platon

Yeah, Zionists and you.

Jane Karlsson
Guest
Jane Karlsson

I dunno. I wonder whether the guy really is dead. I mean, if you want him dead just shoot him, right? Or poison him, not with novichok of course. Cutting up a fresh corpse means a lot of blood. Why on earth do it that way, unless you want a huge scandal. But maybe that’s the idea. A huge scandal, then the guy turns up like that Russian journalist. MbS is vindicated and the war in Yemen goes on. Which may be a cover for theft of its oil. Which may be necessary because Saudi doesn’t have anywhere near the… Read more »

Prometheus
Guest
Prometheus

I think the Sauds are more interested in building a pipeline through Yemen so they can ship their oil through the Gulf of Aden instead of the Hormuz Straits in case Iran closes shipping access to it, as they have intimated if the the US carry out their heinous sanctions. https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20180903-saudi-arabia-prepares-to-extend-oil-pipeline-through-yemen-to-arabian-sea/

Platon
Guest
Platon

The ways of the Khazar ‘Sons of the Desert’ are strange. Why did they not pay more attention to the GF waiting outside the Embassy? Because she has less importance to woman-hating cultures, (and America is one), than a dog.

A bone-saw was found in the luggage of one of the ‘tourists’ from SA who flew in for the day.
Perhaps he used it to clean his finger nails… afterwards.

Sally Snyder
Guest
Sally Snyder

Here is an article that explains how Washington justifies ignoring obvious human rights violations by Saudi Arabia:

https://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2018/09/how-washington-excuses-saudi-arabias.html

This shouldn’t be terribly surprising given that the United States defense industry is supplying arms to the Saudis and that Washington is clearly controlled by the American military-industrial complex.

Richard Steven Hack
Guest
Richard Steven Hack

We should be a little careful here. We seem to be relying on the Turks’ narrative of the events. I wouldn’t trust the Turks any further than I would the Saudis. I also don’t see any evidence that if the Saudis did kill this guy that anything is going to change in the US relations with SA. Everyone is speculating like mad that Trump is going to “drop the hammer” on SA. He’s already said – twice now – that he’s not going to risk $100 billion in arms sales to SA over a dead journalist – who isn’t even… Read more »

Normski
Member
Normski

You’re absolutely correct and the thing is – money talks and the Saudi’s have a lot of it!.

Platon
Guest
Platon

“May both your Balzac and your wallet be empty” – an old Arab curse.
It is the least you deserve for your perfectly depraved and amoral post.

Dave3200
Guest
Dave3200

I agree, especially since we don’t even know the guy is dead. In fact, I think he’s still alive – probably in SA custody somewhere. The fact that the cameras at the front door of the embassy didn’t see him leave doesn’t mean a thing. And, you’re correct, don’t trust the Turks on anything.

cstahnke
Guest
cstahnke

The issue is too obscure and convoluted. The world of spooks is full of factions and plots within plots. Maybe they shipped K of the the KSA posing as one of the 15 man group who came and went. As someone said–why believe the Turks? They are as deep into the spook game as the Saudis and the USA. I would wait to see if there’s any consequences in the medium term before saying anything.

Platon
Guest
Platon

Prince MoreBullShit, (Prince Edmund Blackadder would have called him prince Mini-Brain), is part of the Sorossian Talmudo-Satanist dimension of phenomena. Along with all the Clintons, all the Bushes, the Obamas, Bardack and Michael, the incipient Trump Dynasty, Porostinko of CIA Nulandistan, all the CIA covert creeps of the US Mass Media and Internet information and mind control. Superb article. Finian Cunningham, a warrior in the Armies of Light, goes from strength to strength. Thank you Duran. You guys are great. When I need a bitter laugh, I recall the utter rubbish Snopes, fount of awful rubbish, said about you. To… Read more »

Hoyeru
Guest
Hoyeru

The Saker has a very good article on the subject. http://thesaker.is/the-khashoggi-extortion-fiasco/ The Americans allowed the Saudies t continue so they can then blackmail Saudi Arabia in an extortion scheme. Easy money.

Justin Taua
Guest
Justin Taua

The more people persist with this false narrative about 911, the more it needs to be countered. It’s disapointing that Finian Cunningham, is part of this unrelenting chorus of scribes; continuing to perpetuate the biggest lie of the 21st Century. As a student of Mechanical Engineering, I subscribe to the academic, engineering and scientific view that the whole 911 Saga; was an inside job. The fact that officialdom and the mainstream continues to ignore the evidence; doesn’t lessen the case against why 911 is a monumental lie. But now, Mr Cunningham like others who prefer to accept the official lie… Read more »

john vieira
Guest

“…the USA alone, will be in the dock….” for damn sure…they forgot to get a “plane” for Building 3…damn oversight???…or does the word “intelligence” really not befit the community that operates under that “handle”???

bsamsin
Guest
bsamsin

absolutely! There are mountains of evidence that the official story is pure nonsense. Even a cursory investigation puts the lie to the false flag. Just a couple of examples:
** Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has done intensive investigation, and all the evidence shows that the official narrative is NOT backed by science.
** Christopher Bollyn has provided many video presentations, where he names names and connections, relative to the real perpetrators of the crime. Here is just one of those presentations:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVkCxsQWaDo

Tjoe
Guest
Tjoe

Here is the reasons RT permanently banned me. They are missing context but ask yourself if permanently blacklisted for these comments is just. RT is censoring big time. Hi, You were blacklisted. We have some rules for posting comments on our web site (http://rt.com/comment-posting-rules/), you should read them before you post your comment. Some of your comments: After Joomerica helped him to kill 100000 Iranians using CW. I offered 50/1 odds that the Dotard in Chief would get anything accomplished….looks like I’m winning. Israel said to…read the Oded Yinon plan. Murder, steal land and get stupid US to pay for… Read more »

Tjoe
Guest
Tjoe

comment 1….about Reagan papers exposing US and Israel giving CW components to Saddam and their cover up in ALL media.
comment 2…..comment on NK giving up nukes…they are believed to have 30.
comment 3….Oded Yinon is “a plan to attack 7 countries in 5 years” and the motivating event on 9.11.
comment 4….About Trump importing products from China.

ASK YOURSELF IF THESE ARE REASONS/POSTS TO BE PERMANENTLY BANNED AT RT.

Martha
Guest
Martha

[When the dust settles and real justice over 911 comes to the fore; the USA alone, will be in the dock and not Saudi Arabia.]
I hope you meant to write the “neo-cons aka the IsRaEl firsters and AIPAC, and every other Yewish sayanim will be in the dock.”
You HAVE heard of the Oded Yinon Plan for Greater Israel, have you not? If not, I suggest you do a quick study.

Isabella
Guest
Isabella

What strikes me as odd is that clearly Mr. Kashoggi was an intelligent and highly informed man. Thus, he knew his opponents well, including what they were capable of. By one report, he left his iPhone to which his Apple Mac watch was linked with his fiancee, outside the Embassy. He also left the names of two trusted allies she was to call if he did not return [if any of this is to be believed]. So — why did he go into the Embassy alone? Clearly he well knew the depths the Saudi’s will sink to. Clearly he had… Read more »

Latest

EU leaders dictate Brexit terms to Theresa May (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 115.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss how EU leaders have agreed on a plan to delay the the Article 50 process which effectively postpones Brexit beyond the 29 March deadline.

The UK will now be offered a delay until the 22nd of May, only if MPs approve Theresa May’s withdrawal deal next week. If MPs do not approve May’s negotiated deal, then the EU will support a short delay until the 12th of April, allowing the UK extra time to get the deal passed or to “indicate a way forward”.

UK PM Theresa May said there was now a “clear choice” facing MPs, who could vote for a third time on her deal next week.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Theresa May outlines four Brexit options, via Politico

In a letter to MPs, U.K. Prime Minister Theresa May set out the four options she believes the country has in light of Thursday’s decision by EU leaders to extend the Brexit deadline beyond next Friday.

The U.K. is faced with a four-way choice, May wrote late Friday.

The government could revoke Article 50 — which May called a betrayal of the Brexit vote; leave without a deal on April 12; pass her deal in a vote next week; or, “if it appears that there is not sufficient support” for a vote on her deal in parliament next week or if it is rejected for a third time, she could ask for an extension beyond April 12.

But this would require for the U.K. taking part in European elections in May, which the prime minister said “would be wrong.”

May wrote that she’s hoping for the deal to pass, allowing the U.K. to leave the EU “in an orderly way,” adding “I still believe there is a majority in the House for that course of action.”

“I hope we can all agree that we are now at the moment of decision,” she wrote.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

US media suffers panic attack after Mueller fails to deliver on much-anticipated Trump indictment

Internet mogul Kim Dotcom said it all: “Mueller – The name that ended all mainstream media credibility.”

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT


Important pundits and news networks have served up an impressive display of denials, evasions and on-air strokes after learning that Robert Mueller has ended his probe without issuing a single collusion-related indictment.

The Special Counsel delivered his final report to Attorney General William Barr for review on Friday, with the Justice Department confirming that there will be no further indictments related to the probe. The news dealt a devastating blow to the sensational prophesies of journalists, analysts and entire news networks, who for nearly two years reported ad nauseam that President Donald Trump and his inner circle were just days away from being carted off to prison for conspiring with the Kremlin to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

Showing true integrity, journalists and television anchors took to Twitter and the airwaves on Friday night to acknowledge that the media severely misreported Donald Trump’s alleged ties to Russia, as well as what Mueller’s probe was likely to find. They are, after all, true professionals.

“How could they let Trump off the hook?” an inconsolable Chris Matthews asked NBC reporter Ken Dilanian during a segment on CNN’s ‘Hardball’.

Dilanian tried to comfort the CNN host with some of his signature NBC punditry.

“My only conclusion is that the president transmitted to Mueller that he would take the Fifth. He would never talk to him and therefore, Mueller decided it wasn’t worth the subpoena fight,” he expertly mused.

Actually, there were several Serious Journalists who used their unsurpassed analytical abilities to conjure up a reason why Mueller didn’t throw the book at Trump, even though the president is clearly a Putin puppet.

“It’s certainly possible that Trump may emerge from this better than many anticipated. However! Consensus has been that Mueller would follow DOJ rules and not indict a sitting president. I.e. it’s also possible his report could be very bad for Trump, despite ‘no more indictments,'” concluded Mark Follman, national affairs editor at Mother Jones, who presumably, and very sadly, was not being facetious.

Revered news organs were quick to artfully modify their expectations regarding Mueller’s findings.

“What is collusion and why is Robert Mueller unlikely to mention it in his report on Trump and Russia?” a Newsweek headline asked following Friday’s tragic announcement.

Three months earlier, Newsweek had meticulously documented all the terrible “collusion” committed by Donald Trump and his inner circle.

But perhaps the most sobering reactions to the no-indictment news came from those who seemed completely unfazed by the fact that Mueller’s investigation, aimed at uncovering a criminal conspiracy between Trump and the Kremlin, ended without digging up a single case of “collusion.”

The denials, evasions and bizarre hot takes are made even more poignant by the fact that just days ago, there was still serious talk about Trump’s entire family being hauled off to prison.

“You can’t blame MSNBC viewers for being confused. They largely kept dissenters from their Trump/Russia spy tale off the air for 2 years. As recently as 2 weeks ago, they had @JohnBrennan strongly suggesting Mueller would indict Trump family members on collusion as his last act,” journalist Glenn Greenwald tweeted.

While the Mueller report has yet to be released to the public, the lack of indictments makes it clear that whatever was found, nothing came close to the vast criminal conspiracy alleged by virtually the entire American media establishment.

“You have been lied to for 2 years by the MSM. No Russian collusion by Trump or anyone else. Who lied? Head of the CIA, NSA,FBI,DOJ, every pundit every anchor. All lies,” wrote conservative activist Chuck Woolery.

Internet mogul Kim Dotcom was more blunt, but said it all: “Mueller – The name that ended all mainstream media credibility.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Canadian Lawmaker Accuses Trudeau Of Being A “Fake Feminist” (Video)

Rempel segued to Trudeau’s push to quash an investigation into allegations that he once groped a young journalist early in his political career

Published

on

Via Zerohedge

Canada’s feminist-in-chief Justin Trudeau wants to support and empower women…but his support stops at the point where said women start creating problems for his political agenda.

That was the criticism levied against the prime minister on Friday by a conservative lawmaker, who took the PM to task for “muzzling strong, principled women” during a debate in the House of Commons.

“He asked for strong women, and this is what they look like!” said conservative MP Michelle Rempel, referring to the former justice minister and attorney general Jody Wilson-Raybould, who has accused Trudeau and his cronies of pushing her out of the cabinet after she refused to grant a deferred prosecution agreement to a Quebec-based engineering firm.

She then accused Trudeau of being a “fake feminist”.

“That’s not what a feminist looks like…Every day that he refuses to allow the attorney general to testify and tell her story is another day he’s a fake feminist!”

Trudeau was so taken aback by Rempel’s tirade, that he apparently forgot which language he should respond in.

But Rempel wasn’t finished. She then segued to Trudeau’s push to quash an investigation into allegations that he once groped a young journalist early in his political career. This from a man who once objected to the continued use of the word “mankind” (suggesting we use “peoplekind” instead).

The conservative opposition then tried to summon Wilson-Raybould to appear before the Commons for another hearing (during her last appearance, she shared her account of how the PM and employees in the PM’s office and privy council barraged her with demands that she quash the government’s pursuit of SNC-Lavalin over charges that the firm bribed Libyan government officials). Wilson-Raybould left the Trudeau cabinet after she was abruptly moved to a different ministerial post – a move that was widely seen as a demotion.

Trudeau has acknowledged that he put in a good word on the firm’s behalf with Wilson-Raybould, but insists that he always maintained the final decision on the case was hers and hers alone.

Fortunately for Canadians who agree with Rempel, it’s very possible that Trudeau – who has so far resisted calls to resign – won’t be in power much longer, as the scandal has cost Trudeau’s liberals the lead in the polls for the October election.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending