Now Reading
4 implications of the latest Astana Agreement on Idlib, Syria

4 implications of the latest Astana Agreement on Idlib, Syria

The Astana Group has concluded a meeting whose primary result was the establishment of a new so-called ‘de-escalation zone’ to cover Idlib Governorate. While the agreement was made jointly with Russia, Iran and Turkey, in respect of Idlib, Turkey is going to take the lead as Turkish forces and proxies already have a substantial presence in Idlib, following on from Turkey’s Operation Euphrates Shield.

Many are commenting that this development is somehow a ‘surrender’ to Turkey and its jihadist proxies. This has clearly concerned many who seek a full restoration of Syrian sovereignty. As the full restoration of Syrian sovereignty over the entirety of its territory is the only just and legal resolution to the conflict, it is important not to see the developments at Astana as something which will forever threaten such a thing from occurring in the future.

In the broader sense, however, the new Idlib de-escalation zone is about something more strategic and wide reaching.

The fact that Syria, the so-called ‘opposition’, Russia, Iran and Turkey all agreed to the new de-escalation zone, means there is far more than meets the eye in respect of the latest agreement. As with all previous zones established by the Astana Group, the United States and its western/Gulf Arab allies were not involved.

Here are the major implications regarding this controversial de-escalation zone: 

1. Legitimising an anti-Kurdish Turkish presence in Syria 

While Turkey maintains occupational troops and proxies in Syria (against the letter of international law), Turkey’s withdrawal of support for so called opposition forces in Syria, is a fact that is not going to change. Even the Arab states of the Persian Gulf who have spent substantial sums of money on trying to overthrow the Syrian government, now admit that President Bashar al-Assad isn’t going anywhere. Furthermore, Israel’s clear panic over the fact that the Arab Socialist Ba’ath party will remain in power in Damascus, is a de-facto admission on the part of Tel Aviv, that Israel also didn’t get its wish in Syria.

The war against terrorists in Syria is one which Syria is on the cusp of winning outright and no one is so foolish as to not understand this. While America’s neo-con Ambassador to the UN Nikki Haley once again uttered the infamous ‘Assad must go’ mantra, history shows that if anything, this will do more damage to Nikki Haley’s ambitions than to those of Syria’s President.

If anyone assumes that Erdogan is more foolish than Nikki Haley, they are making a wildly incorrect assumption.

Meanwhile, more moderate voices in Washington including Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and to a degree Donald Trump, have all but conceded that Assad has won. During the election campaign, Trump indicated his desire to see Assad beat the terrorists and at an emotional level, it does not seem Trump has changed sides.

The next big question-mark for Syria therefore, is not ‘Assad’ versus the jihadists working for regimes whose mantra had been ‘Assad must go’, rather the issue is Syria versus the Kurdish proxies of the United States.

READ MORE: Syria, Turkey and the Kurds–A Devil’s Triangle that only Russia can navigate

Of all the major powers which are part of the Syrian conflict, legal or otherwise, Turkey is without a doubt the most anti-Kurd. Turkey sees the presence of a would-be semi or fully-independent Kurdish entity anywhere along its borders as a grave threat to its national security. To this end, Turkey has stated that it will not allow an independent Kurdish entity to form on its borders in a clear warning to the United States.

This has the potential to put Turkey completely at odds with the United States, should the US come out and unambiguously call for a Kurdish state in Syria, something which looks increasingly likely as this would be the only way that the US could maintain a presence in Syria without facing tremendous opposition on many fronts.

As many nationalist Kurds seek to create a Kurdish entity on Syrian territory which hugs the Turkish border from Iraq to the sea, Idlib is geographically well placed to launch attacks upon or otherwise stop any would-be Kurdish march west.

With Turkey now having a legitimised presence in Idlib, Turkey can do the lion’s share of the fighting against the Kurds without a great deal of ambiguity over its position. This would allow Syria to concentrate on working with her international partners like Russia, China and Iran on rebuilding the infrastructure of the majority of Syria, while allowing Russia to remain formally agnostic on the Kurdish nationalist issue.

2. Policing the un-policeable 

While most eyes have been on Deir ez-Zor and to a degree Raqqa, Idlib has turned into an actual civil war, not between the dwindling number of armed Syrian extremist Sunnis and the government, but a civil war among terrorist groups.

For months, various factions of al-Qaeda, the FSA and Muslim Brotherhood as well as sub-factions of each group have been fighting and killing one another in manners which are incredibly violent. Just yesterday, a so-called judge from an al-Qaeda faction was brutally murdered by members of a rival Salafist terror group.

In this sense, unless one was going to wage total war form the air on Idlib, something which could produce the deeply negative effect of killing civilians, Syria and Russia seems partly content for the terrorist factions of Idlib to continue killing each other before cleaning up the proverbial mess.

It is not clear if Turkey wants to get its hands dirty in this mess. It would appear that Turkey wants to save its soldiers and jihadist loyalists for a fight with the Kurds. This after all is a fight which actually matters most to Turkey. In this sense, Turkey’s proxies in Idlib, are best thought of as mercenaries who will fight whatever battle Turkey asks them to fight, so long as various agreements regarding funds and supplies are maintained. As many are ethnic Turkmen, there will be no love lost between Themistocles and Kurds.

In this sense, while perhaps Turkey along with her Astana partners may attempt to go after some of the warring factions of jihadists, in the short term, it is likely that Turkey will merely try to contain the jihadist civil war in Idlib, making sure that it doesn’t spill over into other areas of interests to Turkey and her Astana partners.

3. Strengthening Russo-Turkish cooperation at the expense of America’s relationship with Turkey 

As the United States continues to grow further from Turkey, Russia seeks to continue to display symbolic victories of the Ankara-Moscow partnership, whose success has defied not only expectations but also history.

See Also

Coming shortly after the completion of the S-400 defensive missile system sale from Russia to Turkey, the Idlib de-escalation zone is in this sense, a geo-political signpost of Russo-Turkish partnership, one whose long term geo-political implications are more far reaching than they are in respect of the situation on the ground in Syria.

4. The first step in Syria-Turkey reconsecration

In many ways, the most long term development to come out of the latest Astana talks, is that Turkey and Syria have quietly taken their first small step towards reconciliation.

With Syria signing off on the agreement, it means that Syria has quietly legitimised a Turkish presence in Syria, one which is clearly not aimed at regime change, but one which will certainly become one that fends off Kurdish nationalist advances, something that is in the interests of both Turkey and Syria.

While both Presidents Assad and Erdogan are insistent that they do not seek dialogue with one another, this agreement paves the way for such a thing in the future. Ultimately, the two will have to speak again. However, this process will be slow and gradual. It will almost certainly only be possible with the intervention of countries which can speak with both Assad and Erodgan. Such countries are of course Russia and Iran. In this sense, the latest Astana talks have quietly accomplished this goal.

CONCLUSION: 

In the short term, the Idlib de-escalation zone will not change the overall realities on the ground in Syria. At the moment, several jihadist terrorist groups are too busy killing one another in Idlib to meaningfully impact the salutation in the wider Syrian conflict.

In the medium term, Turkey now has something of a legitimate mandate to attack Kurdish forces in Syria without having to invoke the Caroline Test or having to specifically coordinate such military moves against the Kurds with Damascus.

In the long term, Turkey and Russia have yet again solidified the fact that their partnership can produce more visible results than what remains of Turkey’s alliance with its fellow NATO members.

Finally, the fact that Syria has agreed to the creation of the de-escalation zone in Idlib, means that the gradual process of reconciling Erdogan’s Turkey with Assad’s Syria, has quietly taken its first small step.

As both Assad and Erdogan will almost certainly be in charge of their countries for the foreseeable future, it will be essential for some sort of reconciliation to eventually occur. While the world is arguing over the short term effects of the latest deal to come out of Astana, they have ignored the most important long term development, which is actually a good thing, as it avoids the kind of publicity that could make any gradual Turkish-Syrian reconciliation regress.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Terry Ross
Guest
Terry Ross

Seems that pragmatism is winning in Syria. This is something that the US has not learned as it has traditionally resorted to brute military force and economic arm twisting.

RoseCShade
Guest
RoseCShade

(Make $99/hr with Google)(Get-paid-weekly by Google)(what’s more, carry on with a financially solid life…)
last monday I got a new range Land Rover Range Rover since getting a cheque for $12899 this last 4 weeks . this is definitely the most comfortable work I have ever had . I started this seven months/ago and straight away was bringin in over $85, per-hour . look at this web-site
!si297:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleOnlineEasyBusinessGoldOpportunities/find/jobs ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!sa87..,.

KindraKCurrie
Guest
KindraKCurrie

(Make $99/hr with Google)(Get-paid-weekly by Google)(what’s more, carry on with a financially solid life…)
on friday I bought range Land Rover Range Rover after earning $12817 this-last five weeks . with-out a doubt this is the easiest-work I’ve ever had . I started this eight months/ago and almost straight away started to bring in minimum $85, per hour . check out here
!gf207:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleBioHighestPayJobsGetNow/find/jobs ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!gf207..,..

BrendaRBrown
Guest
BrendaRBrown

(Get Now $99 per hour with Google Easy Jobs){what’s more, carry on with a financially solid life…}
last tuesday I got Land Rover Range Rover after I been earnin $12184 this month . this is certainly my favourite job Ive ever done . I started this five months/ago and pretty much immediately started to earn minimum $75 per-hour . look at here now
!si292d:
➽➽
➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleNetJobsFutureWorkFromHome/more/cash ★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫★★✫★✫:::::!ss92l..,…..

niveb
Guest
niveb

It is impossible for any state desiring to be sovereign to ally itself with the USA. The US ruling class expects its ‘allies’ to submit to it when required. The rulers of many countries-Jordan for example, Poland and the UK- are quite happy with such an arrangement that guarantees them powerful assistance in maintaining power domestically should those that they exploit revolt. The US sees its relationships with Latin America as the model for the rest of the world. It forgets that the basis of its dictation in Latin America was always racist-the rulers that it propped up and defended… Read more »

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Beautifully insightful, Mr. Garrie. Some hilarious bloopers snuck their way in, however. My favorites: 1. Themistocles and Kurds and 2. Syria-Turkey reconsecration. And some caveats. One that goes back to previous articles, Is the US really supporting the SDF/Kurds or will they drop them?, is, to my mind, by no means clear. Nikki Haley’s, as I see it, incantation, “not with Assad”, is basically code for “I support official Israeli policy, which wants a Syraq Kurdistan. This week there was a lot of on-the-ground confusion about the SDF. The blockade of Deir Ezzor was lifted by the SAA, and *then*… Read more »

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

“If they are not determined to stay, they will have to leave and say, “look, we did our best…, and it just wasn’t good enough. Assad won, so the Russians won, and without going for all-out war, we were not able to stop them.”” The US will NEVER say in ANY way that they were beaten, “lost, were not good enough”. It is not even in their vocabulary. How in the world could the “indispensable” nation with the “world’s greatest military” lose to the small SAA and its allies? They wont stand for the humiliation! Plus, because they are fighting… Read more »

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Fair enough as an assessment, Gonzugal. There are aspects of this that I don’t think are appropriate to discuss publicly, such as what you suggest with what the US would have to tell Israel concerning Syria. I don’t understand why the US would have to say anything: the facts on the ground speak for themselves. And, while there are many,many crazies in Israel, there are not as many stupid people. You do seem to agree, however, that neither US nor Israeli invincibility is a law of nature. Speaking of nature, I am reminded of Edgar Allen Poe’s “Maelstrom” story: two… Read more »

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

Interesting illustration of your point. Thank you.

“They can “accomodate” to the new natural phenomenon, but they cannot escape the maelstrom, no matter how much they scream and threaten.” And like the “second brother”, they survive….only to come back and fight again, or by trying to set up a client state (Kurds) to do their bidding and continue the war for them.

GeorgeG
Guest
GeorgeG

Chuckle… — I guess I need a different image again. “Come back and fight again”: sure, that is theoretically possible if the “boxing ring” remains the same. The way I see it — of course, it might still take some time, but not too long, to see the shape of the new universe, even though it is already far more than just an “idea” –they — US, Israhell et al. — will not even exist as they are in the new universe. Just imagine and trace back the long succession of empires: first, we know that they always collapse, but… Read more »

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

“they — US, Israhell et al. — will not even exist as they are in the new universe”

I will change an expression in my response: “From your keyboard to gods ears” 🙂

Daisy Adler
Guest
Daisy Adler

Al-Qaeda in Idlib denounced the establishment of the de-escalation zone and vowed to continue fighting against the country’s army. Make their day, by turning them to dust.

samo war
Guest
samo war

world peace is mafia ?

Copyright DRN Media PLC 2019. RSS: http://theduran.com/feed

Scroll To Top