Connect with us

Red Pill

News

Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Department officials have made fifteen documented visits to Ukraine in the last year

U.S. State Department officials have jetted in and out of Kiev fifteen times this calendar year, and that’s just what is documented in the State.gov official web site. Add in John McCain, CIA operatives, and Blackwater trips to Kiev and we start to realise that maybe the U.S. is the country that is truly invading Ukraine.

Published

on

0 Views

Travel announcements are curated from he U.S. Department of State web site.

Keep in mind this does not count trips by staff from the White House, Congress or the CIA. That means we are not counting trips by John “Crazy Eyes” McCain, or the super “not so” secret undercover trips of CIA Director John O. Brennan.

We are also not counting E.U. Brussels official trips to Ukraine, European Heads of State trips to Ukraine, or Hunter Biden weekend party benders with business partner Oligarch Igor Kolomoisky in Dnipropetrovsk.

This also does not count all the official, and unofficial, trips by Ukraine government officials, PM Arseniy “Yatz” Yatsenyuk, or President Petro “Choco-King” Poroshenko to Washington or Brussels during the year.

Let’s take a look at the real Ukraine invasion  

Starting from a couple of months before the coup (prep work no doubt), up to today’s triumphant western regime change fiasco.

  1. October 21-25, 2013
    Deputy Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Thomas O. Melia, will lead an interagency delegation to Kyiv, Ukraine for the sixth meeting of the U.S.-Ukraine Political Dialogue/Rule of Law Working Group, October 21-25. The delegation will include Paige Alexander, Assistant Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development and Catherine Newcombe, Regional Director of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development program.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/10/215711.htm
  2. November 3-4, 2013
    Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland will travel to Budapest, Hungary; Istanbul and Adana, Turkey; and Kyiv, Ukraine. On November 3-4, in Kyiv, she will meet with senior government officials and parliamentarians from multiple political parties and discuss bilateral issues as well as Ukraine’s European aspirations.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/10/216048.htm
  3. November 12-15, 2013
    Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Ira Forman will visit Ukraine November 12-15, 2013 for meetings with religious, government, and community leaders to discuss and encourage efforts to combat anti-Semitism and promote religious freedom. In addition to Kyiv, the Special Envoy will travel to Dnipropetrovsk and Lviv to visit Jewish heritage sites and the campus of the Ukrainian Catholic University. In Dnipropetrovsk, he will tour the Menorah Cultural and Community Center and meet with local government officials. In Kyiv, SEAS Forman will meet the Chief Rabbi of Ukraine, tour Babyn Yar, and meet with representatives of Jewish organizations and scholars of Holocaust studies programs.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/11/217330.htm
  4. December 5, 2013
    In Kyiv, Ukraine on December 5, Assistant Secretary Nuland and Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Nisha Biswal will participate in the Ministerial meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and meet with civil society representatives from across the OSCE region. Assistant Secretary Nuland will also engage in bilateral meetings with Ukrainian officials, parliamentary leaders, and civil society.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/218212.htm
  5. February 6, 2014
    In Kyiv, Assistant Secretary Nuland will meet with government officials, opposition leaders, civil society and business leaders to encourage agreement on a new government and plan of action that can put Ukraine back on track toward fulfilling the aspirations of the Ukrainian people for democracy, respect for human rights, European integration and economic growth.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/01/221059.htm
  6. February 25-26, 2014
    Deputy Secretary of State William Burns will travel to Istanbul, Turkey on February 24, and to Kyiv, Ukraine from February 25 to 26. In Kyiv, he will consult with key Ukrainian leaders, the business community, and civil society on U.S. support for Ukraine’s efforts to secure a stable, democratic, inclusive, prosperous future. He will also honor the memory of the victims of the tragic events of last week. He will meet with a range of political, business, and civil society representatives, including Acting President Turchynov, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, and the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada, and will urge the new government to take all steps necessary for free and fair presidential elections in May.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/02/221936.htm
  7. March 3, 2014
    On March 3, Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland will travel to Kyiv, Ukraine, to join Secretary Kerry for his meetings on March 4. She will then accompany Secretary Kerry to Paris, France, and Rome, Italy.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/222800.htm
  8. March 4, 2014
    In Kyiv on March 4, Secretary Kerry will meet with senior representatives of Ukraine’s new government, leaders of the Rada, and members of civil society. The Secretary will reaffirm the United States’ strong support for Ukrainian sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and the right of the Ukrainian people to determine their own future, without outside interference or provocation.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/222726.htm
  9. March 19, 2014
    Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs Carlos Pascual will travel to Ukraine, Belgium and Moldova from March 19-25. In Ukraine, Special Envoy Pascual will meet with senior officials of the Ukrainian Government and co-chair a meeting of the U.S.-Ukraine Energy Security Working Group, which will focus on efforts to increase Ukraine’s energy security.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/223701.htm
  10. March 20-22, 2014
    Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy R. Sherman will travel to Ukraine from March 20-22 to meet with senior Ukrainian officials and representatives of civil society. Under Secretary Sherman will reaffirm the United States’ strong support for the Ukrainian people and for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/223725.htm
  11. May 11, 2014
    U.S. Department of State’s Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Richard Stengel will travel to Kyiv, Ukraine; Riga, Latvia; and Brussels, Belgium on May 12-16. Under Secretary Stengel will use his trip to stress the need for greater regional engagement to support Ukraine’s upcoming May 25 elections, push back against efforts to delegitimize them and ensure that all Ukrainians are given the chance to decide their future for themselves.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/05/225947.htm
  12. May 14-16, 2014
    Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism (SEAS) Ira Forman will travel to Kyiv, Dnepropetrovsk, Istanbul, Ankara, Jerusalem, and Tel Aviv from May 14-28, 2014. SEAS Forman is scheduled to meet with Jewish communal leaders and government officials in Kyiv and Dnepropetrovsk from May 14-16 to assess the situation facing Jewish communities in Ukraine and reaffirm U.S. support for the Ukrainian people.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/05/226054.htm
  13. October 5, 2014
    On October 5, Assistant Secretary Nuland will travel to Kyiv, Ukraine, where she will discuss the U.S. commitment to assist ongoing reform efforts in Ukraine, the status of the conflict in eastern Ukraine, and U.S. support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity with senior Ukrainian government leaders. Assistant Secretary Nuland will also meet with a broad spectrum of political leaders, civil society groups, regional government officials, and student groups.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/10/232580.htm
  14. November 17-20, 2014
    Coordinator Macon Phillips of the Bureau of International Information Programs will travel to Ukraine November 17 – November 20. On November 19, Coordinator Phillips will speak about strategic communications at the Kyiv Post’s annual Tiger Conference, “Ukraine One Year After The EuroMaidan Revolution.” Coordinator Phillips will also visit the future site of the Kyiv American Center, and meet with members of the Embassy’s youth council, civil society, and the media.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/11/234080.htm
  15. November 20-23, 2014
    November 20-23, Assistant Secretary Nuland will accompany Vice President Joe Biden on his visits to Kyiv, Ukraine, and to Istanbul, Turkey.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/11/234174.htm

Given how often U.S. State Department officials are jetting in and out of Kiev, we thought we would help them out a bit with some accommodation ideas courtesy of AirBnB.

And since money is no obstacle (thank you US taxpayer), we recommend these three slick pads…so that Kerry, Nuland and entourage can live in comfort and style, while they plan out their next ATO, WW3 moves.

For city living, how about this 200m2, Khreschatik corner appt. at $108 a night.
Sleeps 4…maybe Yatz can Yarosh can sleep over as well?

06c86d68_original

Our how about this entire house outside Kiev city limits, at $2,500 a night.

It sleep like 20 people, so party on! Downside is that Nuland will need to grab a taxi to get to Maidan and pass out her signature cookies to passerbys.

7bf4734b_original

Finally this AirBnB “House on the River” rental might just be the perfect combination of location, luxury and coolness…it even comes with it’s own camouflage boat. And the price, at $899 a night it’s a steal! Sleeps 10 and has 4.5 baths.

232e1bcf_original

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
36 Comments

36
Leave a Reply

avatar
36 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
24 Comment authors
DEMOCRACIAoAZARDMerallesDJSirimadraqcRazzy_CaT_laDy Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Sharan116
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

Ilyanathepirate
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

jcalabra
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

lindbergh123
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

alexaboco
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

MartinaHolst
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

sasha031
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

DonH3347
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

DMeralles
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

DJSiri
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

madraq
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

cRazzy_CaT_laDy
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

falluja05
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

darkyannos
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

donegalclaret
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

BungeeWedgie
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

turnermx
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

GBabeuf
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

Ms_S_Mckay
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

tteall
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

DjJEM
Guest

#natojunta #ukraine Stell dir mal vor #Russland würde das in #Deutschland auch so machen, was die US NATO Junta… http://t.co/4Hcwt9hPTS

brainspirations
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

maryhellebreker
Guest

http://t.co/dnyf9obKXG Who is really invading #Ukraine!

DEMOCRACIAoAZAR
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

DEMOCRACIAoAZAR
Guest
trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb

[…]the time to study or check out the subject material or sites we’ve linked to below the[…]

trackback

xcmwnv54ec8tnv5cev5jfdcnv5

[…]check beneath, are some entirely unrelated websites to ours, having said that, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

trackback

Title

[…]please take a look at the web-sites we comply with, like this 1, because it represents our picks from the web[…]

trackback

Title

[…]The data mentioned within the article are a few of the ideal available […]

trackback

Title

[…]just beneath, are several entirely not associated sites to ours, nevertheless, they’re certainly worth going over[…]

trackback

Title

[…]just beneath, are numerous totally not associated internet sites to ours, however, they’re surely really worth going over[…]

trackback

Title

[…]always a large fan of linking to bloggers that I like but really don’t get quite a bit of link love from[…]

trackback

Title

[…]check below, are some totally unrelated internet sites to ours, on the other hand, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

trackback

Title

[…]always a major fan of linking to bloggers that I adore but do not get a whole lot of link appreciate from[…]

trackback

Title

[…]Here are several of the websites we recommend for our visitors[…]

trackback

Title

[…]The info mentioned inside the write-up are several of the most beneficial offered […]

Latest

Is Silicon Valley Morphing Into The Morality Police?

Who gets to define what words and phrases protected under the First Amendment constitute hate — a catchall word that is often ascribed to any offensive speech someone simply doesn’t like?

The Duran

Published

on

Authored by Adrian Cohen via Creators.com:


Silicon Valley used to be technology companies. But it has become the “morality police,” controlling free speech on its platforms.

What could go wrong?

In a speech Monday, Apple CEO Tim Cook said:

“Hate tries to make its headquarters in the digital world. At Apple, we believe that technology needs to have a clear point of view on this challenge. There is no time to get tied up in knots. That’s why we only have one message for those who seek to push hate, division and violence: You have no place on our platforms.”

Here’s the goliath problem:

Who gets to define what words and phrases protected under the First Amendment constitute hate — a catchall word that is often ascribed to any offensive speech someone simply doesn’t like?

Will Christians who don’t support abortion rights or having their tax dollars go toward Planned Parenthood be considered purveyors of hate for denying women the right to choose? Will millions of Americans who support legal immigration, as opposed to illegal immigration, be labeled xenophobes or racists and be banned from the digital world?

Yes and yes. How do we know? It’s already happening, as scores of conservatives nationwide are being shadow banned and/or censored on social media, YouTube, Google and beyond.

Their crime?

Running afoul of leftist Silicon Valley executives who demand conformity of thought and simply won’t tolerate any viewpoint that strays from their rigid political orthodoxy.

For context, consider that in oppressive Islamist regimes throughout the Middle East, the “morality police” take it upon themselves to judge women’s appearance, and if a woman doesn’t conform with their mandatory and highly restrictive dress code — e.g., wearing an identity-cloaking burqa — she could be publicly shamed, arrested or even stoned in the town square.

In modern-day America, powerful technology companies are actively taking the role of the de facto morality police — not when it comes to dress but when it comes to speech — affecting millions. Yes, to date, those affected are not getting stoned, but they are being blocked in the digital town square, where billions around the globe do their business, cultivate their livelihoods, connect with others and get news.

That is a powerful cudgel to levy against individuals and groups of people. Wouldn’t you say?

Right now, unelected tech billionaires living in a bubble in Palo Alto — when they’re not flying private to cushy climate summits in Davos — are deciding who gets to enjoy the freedom of speech enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and who does not based on whether they agree with people’s political views and opinions or not.

You see how dangerous this can get — real fast — as partisan liberal elites running Twitter, Facebook, Google (including YouTube), Apple and the like are now dictating to Americans what they can and cannot say online.

In communist regimes, these types of folks are known as central planners.

The election of Donald Trump was supposed to safeguard our freedoms, especially regarding speech — a foundational pillar of a democracy. It’s disappointing that hasn’t happened, as the censorship of conservative thought online has gotten so extreme and out of control many are simply logging off for good.

A failure to address this mammoth issue could cost Trump in 2020. If his supporters are blocked online — where most voters get their news — he’ll be a one-term president.

It’s time for Congress to act before the morality police use political correctness as a Trojan horse to decide our next election.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Paul Craig Roberts: The Disintegration of Western Society

Feminists brought this madness onto themselves.

Paul Craig Roberts

Published

on

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts:


Radical feminists are now being banned by Twitter not because they hate men, which is perfectly OK as far as Twitter is concerned, but because they object to “transwomen.”

What is a “transwoman?” As far as I can understand, a “transwoman” is a male with a penis who declares himself to be a women and demands his right to use women’s toilette facilities along with the women who are using them.

The feminist, Meghan Murphy, twittered a statement and a question:

“Men are not women.”

“How are transwomen not men? What is the difference between men and transwomen?”

Twitter described this as “hateful conduct” and banned Meghan Murphy. https://quillette.com/2018/11/28/twitters-trans-activist-decree/

There you have it. Yesterday it was feminists who were exercising their special society-bestowed privileges to censor. Today it is the feminists who are being censored. As this insanity of “Western Civilization” continues, tomorrow it will be the transwomen who are censored and banned.

What precisely is afoot?

My readers, who have partially and some wholly escaped from The Matrix, understand that this is the further fragmentation of American society. Identity Politics has set men, women, blacks, Jews, Asians, Hispanics, and white people against one another. Identity Politics is the essence of the Democratic Party and the American liberal/progressive/left. Now, with the creation of “new” but otherwise nonexistent “genders,” although they are honored as real by the controlled whores who masquerade as a “Western media,” we witness radical feminists being silenced by men pretending to be women.

I sympathize with Meghan Murphy, but she brought this on herself and on the rest of us by accepting Identity Politics. Identity Politics gave Meghan a justification for hating men even, as she failed to realize, it provided the basis for moving her into the exploitative class that must be censored.

Where does this end?

It has already gone far enough that the American population is so divided and mutually hostile that there is no restraint by “the American people” on government and the elite oligarchs that rule. “The American people” are no longer a reality but a mythical creature like the unicorn.

The film, The Matrix, is the greatest film of out lifetime. Why? Because it shows that there are two realities. A real one of which only a few people are aware, and a virtual one in which eveyone else lives.

In the United States today, and throughout “Western Brainwashed Civilization,” only a handful of people exist who are capable of differentiating the real from the created reality in which all explanations are controlled and kept as far away from the truth as possible. Everything that every Western government and “news” organization says is a lie to control the explanations that we are fed in order to keep us locked in The Matrix.

The ability to control people’s understandings is so extraordinary that, despite massive evidence to the contrary, Americans believe that Oswald, acting alone, was the best shot in human history and using magic bullets killed President John F. Kenndy; that a handful of Saudi Arabians who demonstratively could not fly airplanes outwitted the American national security state and brought down 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers and part of the Pentagon; that Saddam Hussein had and was going to use on the US “weapons of mass destruction;” that Assad “used chemical weapons” against “his own people;” that Libya’s Gaddifi gave his soldiers Viagra so they could better rape Libyan women; that Russia “invaded Ukraine;” that Trump and Putin stole the presidential election from Hillary.

The construction of a make-believe reality guarantees the US military/security complex’s annual budget of $1,000 billion dollars of taxpayers’ money even as Congress debates cutting Social Security in order to divert more largess to the pockets of the corrupt military/security complex.

Readers ask me what they can do about it. Nothing, except revolt and cleanse the system, precisely as Founding Father Thomas Jefferson said.

Is Thomas Jefferson Alive and Well In Paris?

If this report is correct, pray the revolt spreads to the US.

https://www.infowars.com/video-french-police-remove-helmets-in-solidarity-with-yellow-vest-protesters/

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Google Employees debated burying conservative media in search

Google engineer Scott Byer falsely labeled The Daily Caller and Breitbart as “opinion blogs” and urged his coworkers to reduce their visibility in search results.

The Daily Caller

Published

on

Via The Daily Caller


  • Google employees debated whether to bury The Daily Caller and other conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election
  • “Let’s make sure that we reverse things in four years,” one engineer wrote in a thread that included a Google vice president
  • Google employees similarly sought to manipulate search results to combat Trump’s travel ban

Google employees debated whether to bury conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election in 2016, internal Google communications obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation reveal.

The Daily Caller and Breitbart were specifically singled out as outlets to potentially bury, the communications reveal.

Trump’s election in 2016 shocked many Google employees, who had been counting on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton to win.

Communications obtained by TheDCNF show that internal Google discussions went beyond expressing remorse over Clinton’s loss to actually discussing ways Google could prevent Trump from winning again.

“This was an election of false equivalencies, and Google, sadly, had a hand in it,” Google engineer Scott Byer wrote in a Nov. 9, 2016, post reviewed by TheDCNF.

Byer falsely labeled The Daily Caller and Breitbart as “opinion blogs” and urged his coworkers to reduce their visibility in search results.

“How many times did you see the Election now card with items from opinion blogs (Breitbart, Daily Caller) elevated next to legitimate news organizations? That’s something that can and should be fixed,” Byer wrote.

“I think we have a responsibility to expose the quality and truthfulness of sources – because not doing so hides real information under loud noises,” he continued.

“Beyond that, let’s concentrate on teaching critical thinking. A little bit of that would go a long way. Let’s make sure that we reverse things in four years – demographics will be on our side.”

Some of Byer’s colleagues expressed concern that manipulating search results could backfire and suggested alternative measures

One Google engineer, Uri Dekel, identified himself as a Clinton supporter but argued that manipulating search results was the wrong route to take.

“Thinking that Breitbart, Drudge, etc. are not ‘legitimate news sources’ is contrary to the beliefs of a major portion of our user base is partially what got us to this mess. MSNBC is not more legit than Drudge just because Rachel Maddow may be more educated / less deplorable / closer to our views, than, say Sean Hannity,” Dekel wrote in a reply to Byer.

“I follow a lot of right wing folks on social networks you could tell something was brewing. We laughed off Drudge’s Instant Polls and all that stuff, but in the end, people go to those sources because they believe that the media doesn’t do it’s job. I’m a Hillary supporter and let’s admit it, the media avoided dealing with the hard questions and issues, which didn’t pay off. By ranking ‘legitimacy’ you’ll just introduce more conspiracy theories,” Dekel added.

“Too many times, Breitbart is just echoing a demonstrably made up story,” Byer wrote in a reply to his original post. He did not cite any examples.

“That happens at MSNBC, too. I don’t want a political judgement. The desire is to break the myth feedback loop, the false equivalency, instead of the current amplification of it,” Byer added.

“What I believe we can do, technically, that avoids the accusations of conspiracy or bias from people who ultimately have a right and obligation to decide what they want to believe, is to get better at displaying the ‘ripples’ and copy-pasta, to trace information to its source, to link to critiques of those sources, and let people decide what sources they believe,” another Google engineer, Mike Brauwerman, suggested.

“Give people a comprehensive but effectively summarized view of the information, not context-free rage-inducing sound-bytes,” he added.

“We’re working on providing users with context around stories so that they can know the bigger picture,” chimed in David Besbris, vice president of engineering at Google.

“We can play a role in providing the full story and educate them about all sides. This doesn’t have to be filtering and can be useful to everyone,” he wrote.

Other employees similarly advocated providing contextual information about media sources in search results, and the company later did so with a short-lived fact check at the end of 2017.

Not only did the fact-check feature target conservative outlets almost exclusively, it was also blatantly wrong. Google’s fact check repeatedly attributed false claims to those outlets, even though they demonstrably never made those claims.

Google pulled the faulty fact-check program in January, crediting TheDCNF’s investigation for the decision.

A Google spokeswoman said that the conversation did not lead to manipulation of search results for political purposes.

“This post shows that far from suppressing Breitbart and Daily Caller, we surfaced these sites regularly in our products. Furthermore, it shows that we value providing people with the full view on stories from a variety of sources,” the spokeswoman told TheDCNF in an email.

“Google has never manipulated its search results or modified any of its products to promote a particular political ideology. Our processes and policies do not allow for any manipulation of search results to promote political ideologies.”

The discussion about whether to bury conservative media outlets isn’t the first evidence that some Google employees have sought to manipulate search results for political ends.

After Trump announced his initial travel ban in January 2017, Google employees discussed ways to manipulate search results in order to push back against the president’s order.

A group of employees brainstormed ways to counter “islamophobic, algorithmically biased results from search terms ‘Islam’, ‘Muslim’, ‘Iran’, etc,” as well as “prejudiced, algorithmically biased search results from search terms ‘Mexico’, ‘Hispanic’, ‘Latino’, etc.”

WATCH:

Trump speculated to The Daily Caller in September that Google and Facebook are trying to affect election outcomes.

“I think they already have,” Trump said, responding to questions about potential election interference by Google and Facebook.

“I mean the true interference in the last election was that — if you look at all, virtually all of those companies are super liberal companies in favor of Hillary Clinton,” he added.

“Maybe I did a better job because I’m good with the Twitter and I’m good at social media, but the truth is they were all on Hillary Clinton’s side, and if you look at what was going on with Facebook and with Google and all of it, they were very much on her side,” Trump continued.

Google this month corrected a “knowledge panel” about a Republican women’s group that labeled them “enablers.”

Google cited Wikipedia for the disparaging description, though a similar change made to Wikipedia’s page for the women’s group was corrected almost immediately. Google left up the digital vandalism for three weeks.

Google apologized in May after search results for the California Republican Party falsely listed “Nazism” as one of the state party’s ideologies.

Then, too, Google blamed manipulation of the party’s Wikipedia page for the inaccurate and disparaging description.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending