Connect with us

Red Pill

News

Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Department officials have made fifteen documented visits to Ukraine in the last year

U.S. State Department officials have jetted in and out of Kiev fifteen times this calendar year, and that’s just what is documented in the State.gov official web site. Add in John McCain, CIA operatives, and Blackwater trips to Kiev and we start to realise that maybe the U.S. is the country that is truly invading Ukraine.

Published

on

0 Views

Travel announcements are curated from he U.S. Department of State web site.

Keep in mind this does not count trips by staff from the White House, Congress or the CIA. That means we are not counting trips by John “Crazy Eyes” McCain, or the super “not so” secret undercover trips of CIA Director John O. Brennan.

We are also not counting E.U. Brussels official trips to Ukraine, European Heads of State trips to Ukraine, or Hunter Biden weekend party benders with business partner Oligarch Igor Kolomoisky in Dnipropetrovsk.

This also does not count all the official, and unofficial, trips by Ukraine government officials, PM Arseniy “Yatz” Yatsenyuk, or President Petro “Choco-King” Poroshenko to Washington or Brussels during the year.

Let’s take a look at the real Ukraine invasion  

Starting from a couple of months before the coup (prep work no doubt), up to today’s triumphant western regime change fiasco.

  1. October 21-25, 2013
    Deputy Assistant Secretary for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Thomas O. Melia, will lead an interagency delegation to Kyiv, Ukraine for the sixth meeting of the U.S.-Ukraine Political Dialogue/Rule of Law Working Group, October 21-25. The delegation will include Paige Alexander, Assistant Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development and Catherine Newcombe, Regional Director of the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Overseas Prosecutorial Development program.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/10/215711.htm
  2. November 3-4, 2013
    Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland will travel to Budapest, Hungary; Istanbul and Adana, Turkey; and Kyiv, Ukraine. On November 3-4, in Kyiv, she will meet with senior government officials and parliamentarians from multiple political parties and discuss bilateral issues as well as Ukraine’s European aspirations.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/10/216048.htm
  3. November 12-15, 2013
    Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism Ira Forman will visit Ukraine November 12-15, 2013 for meetings with religious, government, and community leaders to discuss and encourage efforts to combat anti-Semitism and promote religious freedom. In addition to Kyiv, the Special Envoy will travel to Dnipropetrovsk and Lviv to visit Jewish heritage sites and the campus of the Ukrainian Catholic University. In Dnipropetrovsk, he will tour the Menorah Cultural and Community Center and meet with local government officials. In Kyiv, SEAS Forman will meet the Chief Rabbi of Ukraine, tour Babyn Yar, and meet with representatives of Jewish organizations and scholars of Holocaust studies programs.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/11/217330.htm
  4. December 5, 2013
    In Kyiv, Ukraine on December 5, Assistant Secretary Nuland and Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Nisha Biswal will participate in the Ministerial meeting of the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and meet with civil society representatives from across the OSCE region. Assistant Secretary Nuland will also engage in bilateral meetings with Ukrainian officials, parliamentary leaders, and civil society.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2013/218212.htm
  5. February 6, 2014
    In Kyiv, Assistant Secretary Nuland will meet with government officials, opposition leaders, civil society and business leaders to encourage agreement on a new government and plan of action that can put Ukraine back on track toward fulfilling the aspirations of the Ukrainian people for democracy, respect for human rights, European integration and economic growth.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/01/221059.htm
  6. February 25-26, 2014
    Deputy Secretary of State William Burns will travel to Istanbul, Turkey on February 24, and to Kyiv, Ukraine from February 25 to 26. In Kyiv, he will consult with key Ukrainian leaders, the business community, and civil society on U.S. support for Ukraine’s efforts to secure a stable, democratic, inclusive, prosperous future. He will also honor the memory of the victims of the tragic events of last week. He will meet with a range of political, business, and civil society representatives, including Acting President Turchynov, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, and the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada, and will urge the new government to take all steps necessary for free and fair presidential elections in May.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/02/221936.htm
  7. March 3, 2014
    On March 3, Assistant Secretary Victoria Nuland will travel to Kyiv, Ukraine, to join Secretary Kerry for his meetings on March 4. She will then accompany Secretary Kerry to Paris, France, and Rome, Italy.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/222800.htm
  8. March 4, 2014
    In Kyiv on March 4, Secretary Kerry will meet with senior representatives of Ukraine’s new government, leaders of the Rada, and members of civil society. The Secretary will reaffirm the United States’ strong support for Ukrainian sovereignty, independence, territorial integrity, and the right of the Ukrainian people to determine their own future, without outside interference or provocation.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/222726.htm
  9. March 19, 2014
    Special Envoy and Coordinator for International Energy Affairs Carlos Pascual will travel to Ukraine, Belgium and Moldova from March 19-25. In Ukraine, Special Envoy Pascual will meet with senior officials of the Ukrainian Government and co-chair a meeting of the U.S.-Ukraine Energy Security Working Group, which will focus on efforts to increase Ukraine’s energy security.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/223701.htm
  10. March 20-22, 2014
    Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy R. Sherman will travel to Ukraine from March 20-22 to meet with senior Ukrainian officials and representatives of civil society. Under Secretary Sherman will reaffirm the United States’ strong support for the Ukrainian people and for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/03/223725.htm
  11. May 11, 2014
    U.S. Department of State’s Under Secretary for Public Diplomacy and Public Affairs Richard Stengel will travel to Kyiv, Ukraine; Riga, Latvia; and Brussels, Belgium on May 12-16. Under Secretary Stengel will use his trip to stress the need for greater regional engagement to support Ukraine’s upcoming May 25 elections, push back against efforts to delegitimize them and ensure that all Ukrainians are given the chance to decide their future for themselves.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/05/225947.htm
  12. May 14-16, 2014
    Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Anti-Semitism (SEAS) Ira Forman will travel to Kyiv, Dnepropetrovsk, Istanbul, Ankara, Jerusalem, and Tel Aviv from May 14-28, 2014. SEAS Forman is scheduled to meet with Jewish communal leaders and government officials in Kyiv and Dnepropetrovsk from May 14-16 to assess the situation facing Jewish communities in Ukraine and reaffirm U.S. support for the Ukrainian people.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/05/226054.htm
  13. October 5, 2014
    On October 5, Assistant Secretary Nuland will travel to Kyiv, Ukraine, where she will discuss the U.S. commitment to assist ongoing reform efforts in Ukraine, the status of the conflict in eastern Ukraine, and U.S. support for Ukraine’s territorial integrity with senior Ukrainian government leaders. Assistant Secretary Nuland will also meet with a broad spectrum of political leaders, civil society groups, regional government officials, and student groups.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/10/232580.htm
  14. November 17-20, 2014
    Coordinator Macon Phillips of the Bureau of International Information Programs will travel to Ukraine November 17 – November 20. On November 19, Coordinator Phillips will speak about strategic communications at the Kyiv Post’s annual Tiger Conference, “Ukraine One Year After The EuroMaidan Revolution.” Coordinator Phillips will also visit the future site of the Kyiv American Center, and meet with members of the Embassy’s youth council, civil society, and the media.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/11/234080.htm
  15. November 20-23, 2014
    November 20-23, Assistant Secretary Nuland will accompany Vice President Joe Biden on his visits to Kyiv, Ukraine, and to Istanbul, Turkey.
    http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/11/234174.htm

Given how often U.S. State Department officials are jetting in and out of Kiev, we thought we would help them out a bit with some accommodation ideas courtesy of AirBnB.

And since money is no obstacle (thank you US taxpayer), we recommend these three slick pads…so that Kerry, Nuland and entourage can live in comfort and style, while they plan out their next ATO, WW3 moves.

For city living, how about this 200m2, Khreschatik corner appt. at $108 a night.
Sleeps 4…maybe Yatz can Yarosh can sleep over as well?

06c86d68_original

Our how about this entire house outside Kiev city limits, at $2,500 a night.

It sleep like 20 people, so party on! Downside is that Nuland will need to grab a taxi to get to Maidan and pass out her signature cookies to passerbys.

7bf4734b_original

Finally this AirBnB “House on the River” rental might just be the perfect combination of location, luxury and coolness…it even comes with it’s own camouflage boat. And the price, at $899 a night it’s a steal! Sleeps 10 and has 4.5 baths.

232e1bcf_original

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
36 Comments

36
Leave a Reply

avatar
36 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
24 Comment authors
DEMOCRACIAoAZARDMerallesDJSirimadraqcRazzy_CaT_laDy Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Sharan116
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

Ilyanathepirate
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

jcalabra
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

lindbergh123
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

alexaboco
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

MartinaHolst
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

sasha031
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

DonH3347
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

DMeralles
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

DJSiri
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

madraq
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

cRazzy_CaT_laDy
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

falluja05
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

darkyannos
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

donegalclaret
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

BungeeWedgie
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

turnermx
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

GBabeuf
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

Ms_S_Mckay
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

tteall
Guest

RT @EnaLolena: Who’s really invading Ukraine? US State Dept. officials have made 15 documented visits to Ukraine in the last year http://t.…

DjJEM
Guest

#natojunta #ukraine Stell dir mal vor #Russland würde das in #Deutschland auch so machen, was die US NATO Junta… http://t.co/4Hcwt9hPTS

brainspirations
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

maryhellebreker
Guest

http://t.co/dnyf9obKXG Who is really invading #Ukraine!

DEMOCRACIAoAZAR
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Who is really invading Ukraine? US State Dept officials have made 15 official visits to Ukraine this year http://t.co/wrZ…

DEMOCRACIAoAZAR
Guest
trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb

[…]the time to study or check out the subject material or sites we’ve linked to below the[…]

trackback

xcmwnv54ec8tnv5cev5jfdcnv5

[…]check beneath, are some entirely unrelated websites to ours, having said that, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

trackback

Title

[…]please take a look at the web-sites we comply with, like this 1, because it represents our picks from the web[…]

trackback

Title

[…]The data mentioned within the article are a few of the ideal available […]

trackback

Title

[…]just beneath, are several entirely not associated sites to ours, nevertheless, they’re certainly worth going over[…]

trackback

Title

[…]just beneath, are numerous totally not associated internet sites to ours, however, they’re surely really worth going over[…]

trackback

Title

[…]always a large fan of linking to bloggers that I like but really don’t get quite a bit of link love from[…]

trackback

Title

[…]check below, are some totally unrelated internet sites to ours, on the other hand, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

trackback

Title

[…]always a major fan of linking to bloggers that I adore but do not get a whole lot of link appreciate from[…]

trackback

Title

[…]Here are several of the websites we recommend for our visitors[…]

trackback

Title

[…]The info mentioned inside the write-up are several of the most beneficial offered […]

Latest

Lori Loughlin’s daughter was aboard USC official’s yacht in Bahamas when mom was charged

Lori Loughlin’s daughter was on the yacht of USC’s Board of Trustees when her mom was accused in scheme.

The Duran

Published

on

Via Fox News


Lori Loughlin’s daughter Olivia Jade Giannulli was spending spring break on a University of Southern California official’s yacht when her mother was accused Tuesday of involvement in a college admissions scheme, reports said.

Giannulli, 19, was on Rick Caruso’s luxury yacht Invictus in the Bahamas, a report said. Caruso is chairman of USC’s Board of Trustees.

Giannulli, who currently attends USC, was with Caruso’s daughter Gianna and several other friends, the outlet reported.

“My daughter and a group of students left for spring break prior to the government’s announcement yesterday,” Caruso told TMZ. “Once we became aware of the investigation, the young woman decided it would be in her best interests to return home.”

Loughlin’s daughter has since returned to Los Angeles to face the allegations that could result in her getting expelled from USC.

USC’s Board of Trustees will not decide the status of Giannulli and the other students involved in the case, but rather, the university’s president will make the decisions, according to TMZ.

Business deals in jeopardy?

Giannulli is a YouTube beauty vlogger and social media star, but in the midst of her mother’s charges, she may lose the lucrative brand-sponsorship deals she has landed over the years, Variety reported.

HP, having cut ties with Giannulli, said in a statement, “HP worked with Lori Loughlin and Olivia Jade in 2017 for a one-time product campaign. HP has removed the content from its properties.”

Giannulli also cut brand deals with partners including Amazon, Dolce & Gabbana, Lulus, Marc Jacobs Beauty, Sephora, Smashbox Beauty Cosmetics, Smile Direct Club, Too Faced Cosmetics, Boohoo, and Unilever’s TRESemmé, the report said.

Giannulli’s rep declined to comment, Variety reported. Estée Lauder Companies, which owns Smashbox and Too Faced, also declined to comment, while the other brands or companies the magazine reached out to did not immediately respond to their requests for comment.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

$250M Lawsuit Against CNN Imminent; Covington High MAGA Student Suffered “Direct Attacks”

CNN will be the second MSM outlet sued over their reporting of the incident, after Sandmann launched a $250 million lawsuit against the Washington Post in late February. 

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


CNN is about to be sued for more than $250 million for spreading fake news about 16-year-old Covington High School student Nicholas Sandmann.

Sandmann was viciously attacked by left-leaning news outlets over a deceptively edited video clip from the January March for Life rally at the Lincoln Memorial, in which the MAGA-hat-wearing teenager appeared to be mocking a Native American man beating a drum. Around a day later, a longer version of the video revealed that Sandmann did absolutely nothing wrong – after the media had played judge, jury and executioner of Sandmann’s reputation.

CNN will be the second MSM outlet sued over their reporting of the incident, after Sandmann launched a $250 million lawsuit against the Washington Post in late February.

Speaking with Fox News host Mark Levin in an interview set to air Sunday, Sandmann’s attorney, L. Lin Wood, said “CNN was probably more vicious in its direct attacks on Nicholas than The Washington Post. And CNN goes into millions of individuals’ homes. It’s broadcast into their homes.”

They really went after Nicholas with the idea that he was part of a mob that was attacking the Black Hebrew Israelites, yelling racist slurs at the Black Hebrew Israelites,” continued Wood. “Totally false. Saying things like that Nicholas was part of a group that was threatening the Black Hebrew Israelites, that they thought it was going to be a lynching.”

Why didn’t they stop and just take an hour and look through the internet and find the truth and then report it?” Wood asked. “Maybe do that before you report the lies. They didn’t do it. They were vicious. It was false. CNN will be sued next week, and the dollar figure in the CNN case may be higher than it was [against] The Washington Post.”

Watch: 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Rand Paul refuses to support emergency declaration, deepening problem

Rand Paul gives a principled reason for his refusal, and he cannot be faulted for that, but it leaves the borders open and unsafe.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

Senator Rand Paul indicated he will vote to terminate President Trump’s National Emergency Declaration on Sunday. This continues a story that seems to want no resolution.

Weeks ago, the seed to this news piece started this way:

One 35-day partial government shutdown and almost three weeks later, the debate over a statistically tiny amount of money in the US budget for the building of a border wall drags on with no solution. On February 15th, if there is no agreement that is to President Trump’s satisfaction, the government will once again descend into a partial shutdown.

And on February 15th, the President signed a continuing resolution to keep the government open through the rest of the fiscal year. This CR gave sharply limited authority of funds with regards to the border wall. This prompted the President to take it a step farther and declare a National Emergency.

This is because very few people in the US government actually desire a solution to close and secure the American-Mexican border. In fact, what we see is a government that is largely aligned against the will of its citizens.

President Trump has made repeated statements and speeches in which he outlines a fair array of facts concerning the problems experienced in the US by illegal border crossings of both people and controlled substances.

However, the issue of border security remains something that Congress only supports with words. We saw this in action both last week and the week before with the Democrat led House of Representatives voting 245-182 to terminate the National Emergency declaration. While this was to be expected in the House, on March 3rd, libertarian Senator Rand Paul, a known strong supporter of President Trump, nonetheless penned an Op-Ed piece on Fox News in which he said he planned to also vote against the National Emergency in the Republican-led Senate (emphasis added):

In September of 2014,  I had these words to say: “The president acts like he’s a king. He ignores the Constitution.  He arrogantly says, ‘If Congress will not act, then I must.’

Donald J. Trump agreed with me when he said in November 2014 that President Barack Obama couldn’t make a deal on immigration so “now he has to use executive action, and this is a very, very dangerous thing that should be overridden easily by the Supreme Court.”

I support President Trump. I supported his fight to get funding for the wall from Republicans and Democrats alike, and I share his view that we need more and better border security.

However, I cannot support the use of emergency powers to get more funding, so I will be voting to disapprove of his declaration when it comes before the Senate.

Every single Republican I know decried President Obama’s use of executive power to legislate. We were right then. But the only way to be an honest officeholder is to stand up for the same principles no matter who is in power…

There are really two questions involved in the decision about emergency funding:

  • First, does statutory law allow for the president’s emergency orders,
  • and, second, does the Constitution permit these emergency orders?

As far as the statute goes, the answer is maybe — although no president has previously used emergency powers to spend money denied by Congress, and it was clearly not intended to do that.

But there is a much larger question: the question of whether or not this power and therefore this action are constitutional. With regard to the Constitution, the Supreme Court made it very clear in Youngstown Steel in 1952, in a case that is being closely reexamined in the discussion of executive power.  In Youngstown, the Court ruled that there are three kinds of executive order: orders that carry out an expressly voiced congressional position, orders where Congress’ will is unclear, and, finally, orders clearly opposed to the will of Congress.

To my mind, like it or not, we had this conversation.  In fact, the government was shut down in a public battle over how much money would be spent on the wall and border security.  It ended with a deal that Congress passed and the president signed into law, thus determining the amount.

Congress clearly expressed its will not to spend more than $1.3 billion and to restrict how much of that money could go to barriers.  Therefore, President Trump’s emergency order is clearly in opposition to the will of Congress.

Moreover, the broad principle of separation of powers in the Constitution delegates the power of the purse to Congress.  This turns that principle on its head.

Some are attempting to say that there isn’t a good analogy between President Obama’s orders or the Youngstown case. I disagree. Not only are the issues similar, but I think Youngstown Steel implications are even more profound in the case of emergency appropriations. We spent the last two months debating how much money should be spent on a wall, and Congress came to a clear conclusion: $1.3 billion. Without question, the president’s order for more wall money contradicts the will of Congress and will, in all likelihood, be struck down by the Supreme Court.

In fact, I think the president’s own picks to the Supreme Court may rebuke him on this.

Regardless, I must vote how my principles dictate. My oath is to the Constitution, not to any man or political party. I stand with the president often, and I do so with a loud voice. Today, I think he’s wrong, not on policy, but in seeking to expand the powers of the presidency beyond their constitutional limits. I understand his frustration. Dealing with Congress can be pretty difficult sometimes. But Congress appropriates money, and his only constitutional recourse, if he does not like the amount they appropriate, is to veto the bill.

This statement by Rand Paul is extremely – and painfully – fair. It marks not the actions of a liberal but of someone who is trying to do things truly “by the book.” He cannot be faulted for this.

But his “Nay” is very poorly placed because it comes in the context of a Congress that is full of people far less committed to the vision of America and its sovereignty than he or the President are. One of the reasons stated for lax border security is that cutting off illegal immigration also cuts off very cheap labor for several industries. Some of those industry leaders donate lavishly to political campaigns, ergo, corruption.

Rand Paul, in trying to fight for what is right by the letter of the law, may be correct, but in the short term it appears to exacerbate the problem of the porous US-Mexico border.

President Trump is trying to do the right thing in the company of a Congress who does not want this, for various reasons. Some of it is because some Congressmen and women are petty, Nancy Pelosi and Charles Schumer being the crabby National Grandparents in this aspect. But add to the “resist Trump because he is Trump” lobby those people who gain from illegal immigration in the short term, and those like the new socialist crop of Congressional members who are ready to change the very nature of the United States into something like their cannabis-induced dream of Sweden (which didn’t even work in Sweden!) and we see that border security is every bit the uphill climb that President Trump has shown it to be.

The government shutdown did one very good thing: It got the American focus on the border and some opinions on the matter moved – at least among the American people.

But since when did our representatives and senators really represent us, the American people?

It has been a long, long time.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending