in ,

Tucker Carlson Exposes US Government Involvement in Saudi 9/11 Coverup

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

For years the families of 9/11 victims have been perusing a lawsuit against the Saudi Arabian government, believing it was associated with the attacks that left over 2,000 dead.

Despite the overwhelming evidence that supports this theory, the United States government has prevented the declassification of critical documents. This includes the identification of the official that is believed to have assisted two of the 9/11 hijackers. Last week, however, the FBI revealed his name, by accident. His name is Mussaed Ahmed al-Jarrah. He worked at the Saudi Embassy from 1999 to 2000.

These allegations have escaped the headlines of the mainstream media. That is, until prime time cable host Tucker Carlson decided to report on it.

Bellow is a short transcript coming from and and interview between Tucker Carlson and Brett Eagleson:

Carlson: Something is going on here. They’re lying for a reason. And what is that? And I’m so I don’t know the answer, but there is one. What do you think it is?

EAGLESON: Tucker, it’s disgusting. I lost my dad on 9/11. There are thousands of other people who have lost loved ones and family members and to find out, you know, we know the Saudis are murderous thugs. Okay. That’s one thing.

But to find out that our own government is taking their side in court, they are submitting in private briefings. The C.I.A. and the Department of Justice are submitting in-camera private briefings to the judge behind our backs. Nobody can see it.

Then they have this blunder where this guy’s name come out. What’s so secret about that? His name came out and the sky is not falling. Pandora’s Box is not open. Who is this guy Jarraha?

He was living and working in Washington, D.C. He was traveling all over the country. He was coordinating with the hijackers… Why is this case shrouded in secrecy? Why are you the only one talking about this? This should be dominating news. This should be headline news. It’s 9/11. It’s the largest attack on America’s soil, and our government is siding with the Saudis.

Why would the United States government attempt to cover this up? The reason is somewhat complex, but it is not all that absurd.

Nixon was forced to terminate the Bretton Woods system in 1971 after he realized the US could no longer support its promise to exchange gold for the dollar, and vise versa. Due to the dollar now longer being backed by gold, the dollar risked being overthrown as the world’s reserve currency. In response, Nixon made a deal with the Saudis. The United States would supply weapons to the Saudis, and in exchange the Saudis would agree to sell oil in the dollar while also depositing all oil profits in US banks.

Wether or not this was a bad decision or not, it did keep the dollar afloat. If Saudi Arabia were to dump this agreement, we could see an economic crisis worse than anything we have ever experienced in the past. Surely, if the American people discovered Saudi Arabia had a hand in the 9/11 attacks, the least the government would be forced to do is to stop selling weapons to them.

Does that justify the government’s reaction to these allegations? No, of course not. However, when dealing with this issue, it is important that we be aware of these facts if we are to adequately handle this situation in a reasonable matter.

1 1 vote
Article Rating
Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

22 points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BobValdez
BobValdez
May 24, 2020

Saudi Arabia had little to do with 9/11. If they had, the desert there would be blackened glass and us companies would be pumping the oil.

Terry R
Terry R
Reply to  BobValdez
May 24, 2020

It is not the oil that is required but dollar recycling. If US simply got the oil it would not prop up the dollar. It is the sales of Saudi oil in dollars and the redepositing of those foreign funds in US banks which is what is required.

Torben Erik S. Jensen
Torben Erik S. Jensen
Reply to  Terry R
May 24, 2020

Right – US dollar is not based on US export or production but export/import minus. The dollar are based on DEBT not surplus. Minus on export or public sector, demands more printing of dollars. there you go.

Steve Holmes
Steve Holmes
May 24, 2020

The 1973 OPEC deal brokered by Kissinger is part of the petrodollar equation, and it included GOLD. A small amount of physical gold was given to SA per barrel in exchange for buying down the price of oil. That is why we aren’t paying $10/gallon for gas in the US. The gold in Ft Knox and the NY FED probably ALL belongs to SA at this point, and by 911, we had probably run out of gold to sell, public records of reserves being nonsense. That explains why SA did 911, why Bush Jr dumped zillions of barrels of SA… Read more »

Fred Bloggs
Reply to  Steve Holmes
May 25, 2020

That’s a bit of a grim synopsis mate! Not that I disagree with your premise. Nation shall rise up against nation, There shall be famine and pestilence The end of the world is nigh etc etc. I, however, am a bit more optimistic about the future and man’s ability to work through and solve their differences peacefully. Small wars are inevitable over resources but I don’t believe it’s Armageddon time yet. Interesting read though, thanks.

Forearmed
Forearmed
May 24, 2020

Of course the government took the Saudi’s side because it would come out in court, that they really did not have anything to do with 911. Those Saudis were stooges used by the Bush administration to be used as dupes to be made responsible for the carnage at the twin towers. In other words my friends, it has already been proven that it was the Israeli Mosad who actually had access to the towers as an appointed cleaning crew, which came in the early hours after the regular cleaning crew left. That is when the explosive devices were planted. Yes… Read more »

Bennie Campbell
Bennie Campbell
Reply to  Forearmed
May 25, 2020

Exactly, you hit it on the head and this is something, I think about every single day, while the rest of us are still unbelievably walking around in a fog, business as usual, like it couldn’t happen again. Israeli intelligence were a major player involved in 9/11, if you mention this fact, they will try to silence your voice by labeling you Antisemitic.😡

Eric Zuesse
May 24, 2020

Why does this article not even link to the Tucker Carlson interview? Why was it even published? It offers no evidence, only undocumented assertions. Though I believe those assertions because I have investigated these matters on my own and know the documentation, no reader who doesn’t already believe what this article says will or should accept it, because it offers no evidence. It’s incompetent.

Tjoe
Tjoe
Reply to  Eric Zuesse
May 25, 2020

A&E for 911 Truth has provided real proof of demolitions used. No wise person can ignore the jump to guys with box-cutters on airplanes, that brought down a tower that was not even hit. Saudi’s were the patsy’s and were always intended to be thrown under the bus by Israel and US NEOCONs.

Tjoe
Tjoe
May 25, 2020

Wow….the author is so naive. Saudi’s were part of the WYC demolitions but it was Israel that master minded and provided the demolition expertise….probably also supplying small nukes. Clearly A&E for 911 Truth has well proven demolitions in tower 7 and the other 2 fell exactly the same. But what is missed is WHEN the planning for this “motivating event” went in the top of the Pentagone…..it was when the fruits of the Jewess Monica honey trap became and embarrassment (and impeachment) to President Bill BUT HIS WIFE SCORED POINTS WITH MOO SOD coup, Then continued by helping to facilitate… Read more »

oompadda
oompadda
May 25, 2020

If you want the facts visit https://www.ae911truth.org/

Reports: UK to cut Huawei’s involvement in 5G network

Trump: "I Have A Chance To Break The Deep State"