in ,

Threat to wipe out North Korea: Trump is not an isolationist but a confused megalomaniac

The US president’s reckless emphasis on nation-state reiterates the ugly power politics which negates liberal internationalism.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

When American President Donald Trump threatened to “completely destroy North Korea” in his inaugural speech at the United Nations General Assembly last Tuesday, September 19, it certainly marked the end of an era in the history of liberal internationalism. And the irony is that it was one of Trump’s predecessors – Woodrow Wilson – who had striven hard for internationalism harmony after the world witnessed the macabre outcome of the First World War (1914-18) and played a key role in the formation of the now defunct League of Nations in 1920.

Almost a century since Wilson’s liberal beliefs had offered the devastated world some hope, Trump in effect demolished the idea of international brotherhood in his speech at the UN, the successor to the League. The international body might still continue to function physically, but when the leader of the world’s only superpower threatens to wipe out an entire country to punish its rogue leadership, then one can conclude with confidence that the soul of internationalism is fast nearing its end. And that’s not a good news for this planet.

Trump’s speech marked by contradiction

Trump’s speech at the UN GA had a touch of contradiction. He strongly reiterated the power of the nation-state while praising the international body at the same time. But that Trump’s praise for the UN was more of a lip service became evident when he welcomed the idea of putting the interests of one’s own country above the rest. This is a prescription of the nasty power politics – the political realism which had taken the world to disaster more than once. As the leader of the most powerful nation, Trump’s conduct was reckless and is certain to open the floodgates for the medium and lesser powers to imitate.

The current president of the US is either ignorant of the repercussions that his words can have internationally or he is not bothered at all. Before his advent to power, Trump gave the impression that he was more interested to make the US retreat from the role of an international policeman and address its own domestic issues more to become “great again”.

Trump is not an isolationist as many had thought earlier

But as time is unfolding, one sees Trump is not at all an isolationist but a confused megalomaniac whose stand is absurd and inconsistent. When it comes to a key issue like climate change – something touches the interest of the entire human race – Trump doesn’t hesitate to pull his country out and also slam emerging powers like China and India for filling up its empty shoes. But when it comes to Pyongyang’s nuclear provocations, Trump takes the US back to the role of the policeman and issues the most dangerous threat one can imagine from the podium of the world’s biggest international organisation. This absurd unilateralism is extremely dangerous, even more than Kim Jong-un’s sinister ambitions.

It is being seen today that more and more countries are turning hyper-nationalistic and caring little for international obligations. One’s nationalism is a threat for another and if the tendency is not checked through international institutions and mechanisms, then disaster will not be far. The US, being the most powerful state, needed to don a mantle of responsibility in these tough times and promote liberal internationalism through bodies like the UN. The North Korean problem should have been handled with patience and peace but Trump didn’t care for either. Instead of taking a leaf out of Wilson’s book, Trump more imitated the “We will bury you” threat which was issued by Nikita Krushchev, the leader of the former Soviet Union, aimed at the West in Poland in 1956. It also came a close second to the same Soviet leader’s outbursts at the UN GA session in 1960 during which he had allegedly banged his shoe against the desk to protest against the West.

Krushchev was removed from leadership by the Soviets themselves soon after because he had caused the country far too much embarrassment on the international stage. How far behind is Trump in earning dishonour to own his country which he wants to make great again?

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
S.M. De Kuyper
S.M. De Kuyper
September 25, 2017

Trump is ahead of the crowd to be denied any ownership of US leadership credentials speaking to the questions put to us readers of The Duran about what happened to Kruchev for threatening the globe at an UN meeting of the General Assembly years ago. Russia replaced the shoe banging leader quite soon. Read the Duran news.

FlorianGeyer
FlorianGeyer
Reply to  S.M. De Kuyper
September 25, 2017

Really.

Brian De Paolo
Brian De Paolo
September 25, 2017

Exactly when did the US actually police the world…what they did was force themselves on other less powerful or no power nations for there Banking Corporate Empire….and once the USSR went down they the US went Rogue…sure they are the most powerful country in the world…but its spread out all over the place and that don’t make them so powerful unless they use nukes….Trump is simply lip service….stand or kneel for the flag is bullshit…soldiers died for freedom so that people could have rights and if that right is to protest then so be it…while people are debating this crap… Read more »

Gonzogal
Gonzogal
Reply to  Brian De Paolo
September 26, 2017

“in time the US, Britain and Israel (the real Axis of Evil) will recognize them and put a US military base in the area.”
They already have 7 bases inside Northern Syria
http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13950703001196
https://sputniknews.com/military/201707151055580633-pentagon-wants-expand-syrian-war/

Murray Smith
Murray Smith
Reply to  Brian De Paolo
September 26, 2017

You have to understand what “policing” means in America. The best way is to look at how they police their own people – they concentrate on the vulnerable and the ethnic minorities and exploit them. If they don’t conform immediately they get shot. Even if they conform sometimes they still get shot. Policing in the USA is about quotas – resource gathering from those too weak to defend themselves. Now they even use the same equipment.

Le Ruse
Le Ruse
Reply to  Murray Smith
September 26, 2017

Murray.. You’re wrong ! Police in America isn’t racist ?? They shoot anyone, regardless of his ethnic make up or skin colour ??
e.g. White australian women shot by cop? See @ http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-18/justine-damond:-what-we-know-about-the-us-shooting/8718478

Vtran
Vtran
Reply to  Le Ruse
September 26, 2017

But that is a crime …. U$ american citizens donned out on combat gear, every one of them a volunteer murdering Millions, hundreds of Millions in foreign lands is deemed by U$ Americans as NO CRIME

John R Balch Jr
John R Balch Jr
September 26, 2017

The United States has been at war with one country or another since December 7, 1941. So what difference does this one make. It is all about control of the world and its minerals, be its gas, oil, gold or what ever. The United States could careless about the people living in these countries, they are just in the way.

Vtran
Vtran
Reply to  John R Balch Jr
September 26, 2017

Wrong …. a better list for reference American Indian nations (1776 onwards, American Indian Genocide; 1803, Louisiana Purchase; 1844, Indians banned from east of the Mississippi; 1861 onwards, California genocide; 1890, Lakota Indians massacre), (1a) Canada (1812-1814); (2) Mexico (1836-1846; 1913; 1914-1918; 1923), (3) Nicaragua (1856-1857; 1894; 1896; 1898; 1899; 1907; 1910; 1912-1933; 1981-1990), (4) American forces deployed against Americans (1861-1865, Civil War; 1892; 1894; 1898; 1899-1901; 1901; 1914; 1915; 1920-1921; 1932; 1943; 1967; 1968; 1970; 1973; 1992; 2001), (5), Argentina (1890), (6), Chile (1891; 1973), (7) Haiti (1891; 1914-1934; 1994; 2004-2005), (8) Hawaii (1893-), (9) China (1895-1895; 1898-1900; 1911-1941;… Read more »

Vtran
Vtran
September 26, 2017

Well this is Novel … U$ Americans CITIZENS actually declare WAR against another nation ….

Usually U$ Americans, everyone a volunteer, donned out in combat gear Invade another country without being at WAR ,… and supported by 320 + Million U$ Americans in U$ America waving / portraying little flags !

Turkey and Iran conduct massive military drills near Kurdish regions of Iraq

The German election is a disaster for France’s Macron: Here’s why