Connect with us

Latest

Video

News

REVEALED: Democrat mix up? The FBI did in fact look into DNC servers (Video)

Roger Stone says that POTUS Trump is right, Russia probe is a witch-hunt.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

1,986 Views

Roger Stone Jr. appeared before the House Intelligence Committee in a secret testimony that we are sure will never see the light of day, and its a shame because what Stone says he stumbled upon during the closed door session is stunning.

Stone claims that an internal mixup occurred between Democrats lawmakers (and rapid Russia haters) Schiff and Speier from California.

According to The Gateway Pundit, the revelation revolves around the fact that Schiff and Speier both claim that the FBI was able to look at the DNC’s servers, which of course contradicts what both former-FBI Director James Comey and Homeland Security Secretary Johnson both asserted under oath.

Stone appeared on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight to explain what her heard during the closed door session….

Here is Roger Stones’ statement via Infowars…

When I made the case that I did not believe that the DNC had been hacked by the Russians, in fact, that I believed that it had not been hacked at all, and made the point that the Democratic National Committee had refused to allow the FBI to inspect is servers, instead using a paid-for IT firm called CloudStrike, I was corrected by Congress[woman] Jackie Speier of California, who informed me that she now knew that the DNC had, in fact, turn over their servers to the FBI. This was, essentially, seconded by Congressman Adam Schiff of California, this came to an extraordinary surprise to Trey Gowdy, the Republican from South Carolina. Mr. Gowdy pointed out, to his Democratic colleagues, that FBI Director James Comey and Homeland Security Secretary Johnson, had both testified – under oath – to the House Intelligence Committee, that the FBI had not been allowed to examine the DNC servers. This is a bombshell revelation, somebody is lying. It is either Congressman Schiff and Congress[woman] Speier, or, of course, it is Mr. Comey and Secretary Johnson.”

Here is the video of Roger Stone reporting on his testimony, and the shocking news that the FBI may have investigated the DNC server…

Read Roger Stone’s Opening Statement To Congressional Russia Investigators by Lucian Wintrich on Scribd.

The Gateway Pundit carried an exclusive interview with Stone moments after his testimony…

In an exclusive interview, a TGP sat down with Mr. Stone and discussed some of the finer details of the hearing and also touched briefly on the Alabama senate race, the slippery, snakelike DNC operative John Podesta, and the much gossiped about Guccifer 2.0. What follows is a penetrating looks at perhaps the largest political scandal in American history: the Democratic Party’s attempt to displace a sitting President.

Roger noted how nonsensical the committee is and how aggressive the Democrats present were, but the major takeaway is, as Roger noted, “very simply, this is a scandal without evidence. The Democrats are grasping at anything they can find, big or small, and are trying to make something out of nothing.”

Stone further commented on the level of delusion and the level of desperation that the Democrats are struggling with, stating:

“They’re trying to undermine and destabilize the Trump presidency with a continued narrative that was invented by John Podesta, which is revolving around the Russians colluding with the Trump campaign to affect the 2016 election. The Republicans were very clear that there’s a difference between the question of Russian interference in our election and Trump collusion, of which there is not, to this day, one iota of evidence.”

According to The Gateway Pundit the most important takeaway from the Roger Stone is the fact that there seems to be a lot of confusion within the ranks of the Democratic Party’s leadership as to what the facts truly are and a more probing look at the Russia narrative is required for any sort of closure to occur.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
colum
Guest
colum

They will drag things out to antiquity. They’ll wait until 2020 before resuging to narrative and praying people will listen. Odds are Trump (if not convenced to bow out of the running) will win again or a more solid republican will (GOP will want this). If by some fluke the GOP really buggers things up the DNC will be in by possibly the slimmist margin in history with a record turn out of independents. In any case the DNC will use the narrative to blinded the public so they can finish burying this story amongst others. After the next election… Read more »

Terry Ross
Guest
Terry Ross

Apart from what it means in regard to US militarism abroad, few foreigners care about the pantomime ensuing in the US.

colum
Guest
colum

I’m the same. Every western government is a farce. All governments are authoritarian, it’s just that ours pretend to care.

Trauma2000
Guest
Trauma2000

I care about the ‘pantomime’ because in 76 the U.$. subverted Australia’s democracy and the entire shenanigan was buried and never bought to public light.

So many people in Australia know so little about ‘The Dismissal’ that it’s disgusting. The same thing is happening in the U.$. The person that the people of America voted for is being attacked because he isn’t ‘part of the establishment.’

The FBI and Comey are in contempt of court by not investigating the very thing they are TASKED to do by U.$. law.

santiago
Guest
santiago

Trump IS part of the “establishment”, he is a puppet.

samo war
Guest
samo war

&

tom
Guest
tom

“Oh, what a tangled web we weave…when first we practice to deceive”.

André De Koning
Guest
André De Koning

By way of deception thou shalt do war (former Mossad motto, but ever since Herzl’s dream they used and employed it).

spoint
Guest
spoint

The Truth arrives once irrelevant.

Rick Manigault
Guest
Rick Manigault

What a Bunch of bs. What did the FBI find in the server?

TravelAbout
Guest
TravelAbout

No doubt it will be labeled classified under the guise of National Security.

Trauma2000
Guest
Trauma2000

It can’t be labeled classified as per National Security. It is a private company not involved in technology. The FBI hasn’t examined it. If they examined it they would find that the DNC HAD defrauded the American people of a fair and unbiased election.

Seán Murphy
Guest
Seán Murphy

Nothing: if they had it would be all over the MSM.

Rick Manigault
Guest
Rick Manigault

All they have is maniforts missteps which are starting to look overblown.

Keith Smith
Guest
Keith Smith

investigation is just to work out every detail of Trumps campaign so they can replicate it to win future elections, or at least nullify his tactics. This is why they are looking into every detail of Trumps campaign. If this was a business it would be like a rival company forcibly removing and looking at all your marketing data. burying search results on google wont work, people will just get used to re posting links again. the recent purge was just one attempt, make new accounts, make new handles, repost old info bring everybody up to speed again .dont let… Read more »

bluewater
Guest
bluewater

PROPAGANDA!!!!..Democrats and Republicans are all blackmailed and answer to the same BOSS and it is not TRUMP…
https://youtu.be/aSMLTYHbPCE

Trauma2000
Guest
Trauma2000

This is a ‘Storm in a Teacup’ which is threatening to drag the planet into World War 3 based on non-existant evidence. There IS NO evidence. If they had it they would have published it. Now, to the important part: There is NOTHING and NOONE that can prevent the FBI from examining data or evidence that a crime has been committed ON American soil. That is the job of the FBI and there are several laws specifically related to ACCESS to Evidence, Preservation of Evidence, Failure to DISCLOSE evidence, and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. These laws are… Read more »

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

Love it, thank you

richardstevenhack
Guest
richardstevenhack

I think the confusion may come from the fact that CrowdStrike allegedly DID turn over “certified true images” of the DNC servers to the FBI, as well as FireEye and Mandiant (which IIRC owns FireEye), two other infosec companies. So the FBI did have access to allegedly certified true images of the DNC servers. However, there are two points to be made: 1) Whether those images included all relevant data is unknown. For instance, did it include images of the DNC routers or other network infrastructure that might have a bearing on determining whether a hack took place. While router… Read more »

WeAreYourGods
Guest
WeAreYourGods

Completely irrelevant. The Russia meme, and the the continued scrutiny of those who promote the Russia meme is a circle jerk. As for Roger Stone who lied about having direct communication about the matter with Julian Assange to score political points…. He is what he obviously is, a political operative struggling to stay in the spotlight as some kind of broker of occult election information.

Andrew Pate
Guest
Andrew Pate

Did they check his lies out at the hearing? Doing it in secret who knows whats said. I dont trust the DNC because they have lied continually for 12 months that Russians hacked their servers with out any concrete evidence just hearsay.

Dennis Morrisseau
Guest

The “confusion” in the Dem ranks [ha ha] serves to protect them all a while longer……
but the END is coming to all this pretty soon.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

Editor’s note to Voice-to-Transcript Programmer: beware of ‘p’s and ‘b’s.
“(and rapid Russia haters) Schiff and Speier” = (and raBid Russia haters) Schiff and Speier.

Thank you,

pogohere
Guest

Gowdy Gowdy Gowdy “Before his election to Congress, Gowdy was the solicitor (district attorney) for the state’s Seventh Judicial Circuit, comprising Spartanburg and Cherokee Counties. From 1994 to 2000, he was a federal prosecutor for the U.S. Attorney for the District of South Carolina. In 2014, Gowdy became chairman of a House Select Committee to investigate the 2012 Benghazi attack. He was nicknamed The Hillary Slayer by Rolling Stone for his hardline stance against Hillary Clinton’s actions during the Benghazi case, and his critiques of Hillary Clinton’s email server during the 2016 campaign.[2][3] Gowdy pressed for the prosecution of Hillary… Read more »

Latest

‘Hell on Earth’: MSF doctor tells RT of rape, violence, inhumane conditions in Lesbos refugee camp

One toilet for over 70 people, rape, and mental health issues – a doctor from Doctors Without Borders (MSF) and an aid worker told RT about the dire conditions in the overcrowded Moria refugee camp in Greece.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

Via RT


One toilet for over 70 people, rape, and mental health issues – a doctor from Doctors Without Borders (MSF) and an aid worker told RT about the dire conditions in the overcrowded Moria refugee camp in Greece.

The overcrowded camp on the island of Lesbos, built to accommodate 3,100, houses around 9,000 people. “It’s a kind of hell on Earth in Europe,” Dr. Alessandro Barberio, an MSF clinical psychiatrist, said, adding that people in the camp suffer from lack of water and medical care. “It is impossible to stay there,” he said.

According to Barberio, asylum seekers are subjected to violence “during night and day.””There is also sexual violence”which leads to “mental health issues,” he said, adding that all categories of people at the camp may be subjected to it. “There is rape against men, women and children,” and the victims of sexual violence in the camp often have nightmares and hallucinations, Barberio told RT.

Asylum seekers in Moria “are in constant fear of violence,” and these fears are not groundless, the psychiatrist said. “Such cases [of violence] take place every week.”

There is “one toilet for 72 people, one shower for 84 people. The sanitation is bad. People are suffering from bad conditions,” Michael Raeber, an aid worker at the camp, told RT. They suffer from mental health problems because they are kept for a long time in the camp, according to Raeber.

“There is no perspective, they don’t know how their case will go on, when they will ever be able to leave the island.” The camp is a “place where there is no rule of law,” with rampant violence and drug addiction among the inhabitants, Raeber said.

In its latest report, MSF, which has been working near Moria since late 2017, criticized the unprecedented health crisis in the camp – one of the biggest in Greece. About a third of the camp population consists of children, and many of them have harmed themselves, and have thought about or attempted suicide, according to the group.

Barberio was behind an MSF open letter on the state of emergency in Moria, released on Monday, in which he writes that he has never “witnessed such overwhelming numbers of people suffering from serious mental health conditions.”

Calling the camp an “island prison,” he insisted that many of his patients in the camp are unable to perform basic everyday functions, “such as sleeping, eating well, maintaining personal hygiene, and communicating.”

A number of human rights groups have strongly criticized the conditions at the camp and Greece’s “containment policy”regarding asylum seekers.

Christina Kalogirou, the regional governor of the North Aegean, which includes Lesbos, has repeatedly threatened to shut down the facility unless the government improves the conditions. On Tuesday, government spokesman Dimitris Tzanakopoulos said that Greece will move 2,000 asylum seekers out of the severely overcrowded camp and send them to the mainland by the end of September.

Greece, like other EU states, is experiencing the worst refugee crisis since WWII. According to International Organization for Migration estimates, 22,000 asylum seekers have arrived in Greece since the start of this year alone.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Erdogan accepts Syria DMZ off-ramp, in deal with Putin (Video)

The Duran – News in Review – Episode 111.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The deal struck in Sochi averts a large scale Syria’s offensive on Idlib, as Turkey gives it guarantee to monitor what will effectively become a demilitarized zone.

According to the agreement, troops from Russia and Turkey will enforce a new demilitarized zone (DMZ) in Idlib, from which ISIS/Al Qaeda rebels will be required to withdraw by the middle of next month.

Speaking alongside Erdogan, Russian President Vladimir Putin said the 15 to 20 km-wide zone would be established by October 15th. The DMZ would require a complete “withdrawal of all radical fighters” from Idlib, including the rebranded Al-Qaeda affiliated Hay’et Tahrir al-Sham (HTS).

Putin also noted that heavy weapons would be withdrawn from the DMZ by all opposition forces by October 10th, which is a move supported by the Syrian government.

The Russian President described the agreement as a “serious result” further saying that “Russia and Turkey have confirmed their determination to counter terrorism in Syria in all its forms”.

Erdogan said both his country and Russia would carry out coordinated patrols in the demilitarized zone:

“We decided on the establishment of a region that is cleaned of weapons between the areas which are under the control of the opposition and the regime.”

“In return, we will ensure that radical groups, which we will designate together with Russia, won’t be active in the relevant area.”

According to Al Jazeera Iran’s foreign minister has hailed an agreement between Turkey and Russia to avert an assault on the Syrian rebel-held Idlib province, as an example of “responsible diplomacy”.

An agreement to halt plans for an offensive on the last major rebel-held stronghold was announced in the Black Sea resort of Sochi on Monday after a meeting between the Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

On his Twitter account, Zarif wrote: “Intensive responsible diplomacy over the last few weeks-pursued in my visits to Ankara & Damascus, followed by the Iran-Russia-Turkey Summit in Tehran and the meeting (in) Sochi-is succeeding to avert war in #Idlib with a firm commitment to fight extremist terror. Diplomacy works.”

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the agreement reached in Sochi, which for now avoids full scale conflict in Idlib, Syria. Who won, who lost, and which interests were met with the DMZ agreement?

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel

Via Xinhuanet

An anticipated Syrian military offensive on the northwestern province of Idlib is on hold after Turkey and Russia reached a deal following Ankara’s guarantee on behalf of the rebel groups, experts said.

The deal was reached Monday by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Sochi, Russia, as the two sides agreed to create a demilitarized buffer zone in Idlib, the last rebel stronghold.

This agreement brings Turkey to a position of giving a guarantee on behalf of the rebel groups, the experts said.

“Moscow is convinced that it would not be able to handle the burden of a humanitarian tragedy in case of a military offensive in Idlib,” said Metin Gurcan, a Turkish security analyst with the Istanbul Policy Center of Sabanci University.

Russia has also secured its airbases in northern Syria, including its airbase in Hmeymim as a guarantee by Turkey under the Sochi agreement, he said.

Gurcan recalled a trilateral summit of Turkey, Iran and Russia held in Iranian capital Tehran early September, which ended without agreement as Erdogan’s call for a ceasefire in Idlib was rejected by Moscow and Tehran.

Erdogan’s proposal for a ceasefire by all parties in Idlib was rejected by Putin on the grounds that those groups were not represented at the table there, he said.

“Now Turkey has given a guarantee on behalf of radical groups which Putin earlier said that ceasefire cannot be discussed because they were not represented at Tehran meeting,” Gurcan said.

Now everyone is curious how Turkey has given guarantee to Moscow and how will those radical groups accept a proposal for demilitarization by surrendering heavy weapons and withdrawing from the demilitarized zone, Gurcan noted.

“Ankara has given this promise relying on its military power on the ground and on its capacity to convince armed opposition groups,” he said.

Turkish army has reinforced its presence in Idlib in the past few months, and Turkey has 12 military outposts with 1,200-1,300 troops on the border line of the province separating the rebel stronghold from the pro-Iran militia-controlled South of Aleppo and the government-controlled southeast, Gurcan said.

Rebel groups, including the Free Syrian Army, in the region are gathered with Turkish backing under the banner of the “National Front for Liberation.”

Putin and Erdogan agreed on Monday in Sochi to create a 15-20 km buffer zone along the line of contact between rebels and regime troops by Oct. 15.

The agreement entails the “withdrawal of all radical fighters” from Idlib as well as “heavy weaponry from this zone,” Putin said at the joint press conference after signing the deal with Erdogan.

By the end of the year, transportation routes between the key port of Latakia and Aleppo as well as the city of Hama must be restored, Putin added.

The Russian leader also said all heavy weapons had to be withdrawn from the zone by Oct. 10, according to Erdogan’s proposal.

Ankara has been warning against any military offensive by Russia-backed Syrian regime forces in Idlib, warning that it would lead to a humanitarian crisis and refugee influx to the Turkish border.

Turkey and Russia, along with Iran, are guarantors of the Astana deal which declared ceasefire in four de-escalation zones in Syria, including Idlib.

Turkey will deploy more troops in Idlib province after the Sochi deal, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu said on Tuesday.

“We will need extra troop reinforcements. Turkey and Russia will patrol on the border areas. Civilians and moderate (opposition) will stay here,” Cavusoglu said.

Another outcome of the Sochi deal is that Turkey and Russia prevented a possible attack by the United States in Idlib, Naim Baburoglu from Aydin University said.

He recalled that the U.S. was giving signals that it wanted to intervene in the situation in Idlib, if Syrian government troops launch an assault on the rebel stronghold.

Washington recently threatened to take swift and decisive actions against any use of chemical weapons in Idlib.

“This agreement showed that the U.S. has room for maneuver only in the east of Euphrates and Manbij region,” Baburoglu said.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Pat Buchanan: “The Late Hit” On Judge Kavanaugh

Wha exactly is professor Ford’s case against Judge Kavanaugh?

Patrick J. Buchanan

Published

on

Authored by Patrick Buchanan via Buchanan.org:


Upon the memory and truthfulness of Christine Blasey Ford hangs the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, his reputation and possibly his career on the nation’s second-highest court.

And much more. If Kavanaugh is voted down or forced to withdraw, the Republican Party and conservative movement could lose their last best hope for recapturing the high court for constitutionalism.

No new nominee could be vetted and approved in six weeks. And the November election could bring in a Democratic Senate, an insuperable obstacle to the elevation of a new strict constructionist like Kavanaugh.

The stakes are thus historic and huge.

And what is professor Ford’s case against Judge Kavanaugh?

When she was 15 in the summer of ’82, she went to a beer party with four boys in Montgomery County, Maryland, in a home where the parents were away.

She says she was dragged into a bedroom by Brett Kavanaugh, a 17-year-old at Georgetown Prep, who jumped her, groped her, tried to tear off her clothes and cupped her mouth with his hand to stop her screams.

Only when Kavanaugh’s friend Mark Judge, laughing “maniacally,” piled on and they all tumbled off the bed, did she escape and lock herself in a bathroom as the “stumbling drunks” went downstairs. She fled the house and told no one of the alleged rape attempt.

Not until 30 years later in 2012 did Ford, now a clinical psychologist in California, relate, in a couples therapy session with her husband, what happened. She says she named Kavanaugh as her assailant, but the therapist’s notes of the session make no mention of Kavanaugh.

During the assault, says Ford, she was traumatized. “I thought he might inadvertently kill me.”

Here the story grows vague. She does not remember who drove her to the party. She does not say how much she drank. She does not remember whose house it was. She does not recall who, if anyone, drove her home. She does not recall what day it was.

She did not tell her parents, Ford says, as she did not want them to know she had been drinking. She did not tell any friend or family member of this traumatic event that has so adversely affected her life.

Said Kavanaugh in response, “I categorically and unequivocally deny this allegation. I did not do this back in high school or at any time.”

Mark Judge says it never happened.

Given the seriousness of the charges, Ford must be heard out. But she also needs to be cross-examined and have her story and character probed as Kavanaugh’s has been by FBI investigators as an attorney for the Ken Starr impeachment investigation of Bill Clinton, a White House aide to George Bush, a U.S. appellate judge and a Supreme Court nominee.

During the many investigations of Kavanaugh’s background, nothing was unearthed to suggest something like this was in character.

Some 65 women who grew up in the Chevy Chase and Bethesda area and knew Kavanaugh in his high school days have come out and spoken highly of his treatment of girls and women.

Moreover, the way in which all of this arose, at five minutes to midnight in the long confirmation process, suggests that this is political hardball, if not dirt ball.

When Ford, a Democrat, sent a letter detailing her accusations against Kavanaugh to her California congresswoman, Anna Eshoo, Ford insisted that her name not be revealed as the accuser.

She seemingly sought to damage or destroy the judge’s career behind a cloak of anonymity. Eshoo sent the letter on to Sen. Diane Feinstein, who held it for two months.

Excising Ford’s name, Feinstein then sent it to the FBI, who sent it to the White House, who sent it on to the Senate to be included in the background material on the judge.

Thus, Ford’s explosive charge, along with her name, did not surface until this weekend.

What is being done here stinks. It is a transparently late hit, a kill shot to assassinate a nominee who, before the weekend, was all but certain to be confirmed and whose elevation to the Supreme Court is a result of victories in free elections by President Trump and the Republican Party.

Palpable here is the desperation of the left to derail Kavanaugh, lest his elevation to the high court imperil their agenda and the social revolution that the Warren Court and its progeny have been able to impose upon the nation.

If Kavanaugh is elevated, the judicial dictatorship of decades past, going back to the salad days of Earl Warren, William Brennan, Hugo Black and “Wild Bill” Douglas, will have reached its end. A new era will have begun.

That is what is at stake.

The Republican Senate should continue with its calendar to confirm Kavanaugh before Oct. 1, while giving Ford some way to be heard, and then Kavanaugh the right to refute. Then let the senators decide.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending