in ,

North Macedonia Is Being Used by NATO to Target Serbia and Russia

Its hasty accession into the alliance is only meant for weakening or preventing any Russian influence

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Submitted by InfoBrics, authored by Paul Antonopoulos, Research Fellow at the Center for Syncretic Studies…

The North Macedonian House of Representatives unanimously approved on Monday for their country to accept the NATO Accession Protocol, taking the former Yugoslav Republic a step closer towards accession into NATO which is expected to be completed and finalized in the spring. North Macedonia’s rapid accession into NATO is only possible because of the Prespa Agreement signed between Athens and Skopje in June 2018, bringing an end to the name dispute between the two countries that emerged in 1991 with the breakup of Yugoslavia.

The Prespa Agreement, named after a lake that traverses the borders of Greece, North Macedonia and Albania, defined exactly what was meant by “Macedonia” and “Macedonian.” For Greece, according to the agreement, these terms denote an area and people of Greece’s northern region, who continue the legacy of the Ancient Macedonian Hellenic civilization, history and culture, as well as the legacy of Alexander the Great. In reference to North Macedonia, these terms denote the modern territory of North Macedonia, the Slavic language and Slavic people with their own history and culture unrelated to the Ancient Macedonians. The agreement also stipulates the removal of North Macedonian irredentist efforts against Greek territory and to align them with UNESCO and Council of Europe’s standards.

With Greece no longer blocking North Macedonia’s attempts to join NATO and the European Union, no time has been wasted to elevate the Balkan country into the Atlanticist organization. There is no doubt that the Prespa Agreement, which caused political turmoil in Athens and Skopje, was signed only for North Macedonia’s rapid entry into NATO.

The acceleration of North Macedonia into NATO is not only a key priority for the organization to reduce Russian influence in the Balkans, but to continue pressurizing Serbia that was bombed by NATO in 1999 in response to the Serbian military operation against the “Kosovo Liberation Army” terrorist organization. North Macedonia, Serbia and Bosnia are the only non-NATO members remaining in the Balkans, however it is important to remember that Bosnia is effectively a U.S. protectorate, while North Macedonia has been trying to join NATO since 1995 when Yugoslavia was completely destroyed in all but name. Serbia has no such ambition to join NATO and is considered a problematic country as it is the only remaining bastion of Russian influence left in the Balkans and is preventing full Atlanticist hegemony over the region.

Syriza, the ruling Party of Greece at the time of the signing of the Prespa Agreement, knew full well that the Prespa Agreement was largely despised by the Greeks, but none-the-less pushed for it and signed it. It is very obvious that the Prespa Agreement was to accelerate North Macedonia primarily into NATO, especially as not only Syriza, but also the current ruling party of New Democracy is loyal to NATO, with North Macedonia’s entry into the EU being only a consolation prize for Western powers. Less than a month after signing the Prespa Agreement, North Macedonia received an invitation to join NATO on 11 July 2018 with the accession protocol made in February 2019. North Macedonia’s accession into the EU on the other hand has made no progress since the Prespa Agreement was made.

For the Atlanticists, a rapid accession into NATO to contain and weaken Russian influence in North Macedonia and to also further constrain and pressurize Serbia was a higher priority than formalizing the Balkan country into the European neoliberal order as an official member. Although North Macedonia will undoubtedly join the EU eventually, it is not a matter of urgency as making the country into a NATO member. The Prespa Agreement is highly unpopular in both countries as they both feel they have lost out and did not achieve their objectives of promoting their interests with the name issue. NATO was unwilling to risk the Prespa Agreement failing and the name issue re-emerging which would once again put on hold North Macedonia’s accession into the organization.

North Macedonia cannot contribute to NATO in any meaningful way as it is a poor country of just over two million people and not close to the Russian border like the tiny Baltic states. Its accession into NATO is only for the purpose of weakening or preventing any Russian influence in the country and to further isolate Serbia. Despite North Macedonia being an overwhelmingly Orthodox and Slavic country that had the potential to become another pro-Russia state in the Balkans alongside neighboring Serbia, since its separation from Yugoslavia in 1991, Skopje pursued a pro-Western policy and joined the NATO program Partnership for Peace as early as 1995 and became a European Union candidate a decade later. Why North Macedonia has pursued such a Western-centric policy since its separation with Yugoslavia is not clearly understood, but it is certainly understood why NATO has accelerated North Macedonia’s membership into its organization.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

10 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Olivia Kroth
February 14, 2020

That was to be expected. All European countries are being instrumentalized against Russia.

A rose by any other name....
A rose by any other name....
February 14, 2020

N. Macedonians acting like Poles. Might just as well have named the country Masochistdonia. Would’ve kept the Greeks happy anyway.

Thraxite
Thraxite
February 15, 2020

So hilarious to see NATO weakening itself with another failed economy and putsch government. It will also be another great drain on the other EU countries with its’ minuscule economy. GO EU the faster you get these terrible little countries in, the sooner you will have to disband.

Olivia Kroth
February 15, 2020

SERBIA:

The ‘Viktor’ Monument is back on its site after restoration

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 15, 2020

RUPTLY VIDEO: One of Belgrade’s most famous landmarks, ‘The Victor’ monument, was re-installed at its site in the Serbian capital’s Kalemegdan fortress, after four months of restoration. The project cost about 200,000 euros ($217,000) and lasted for 127 days. The statue is 4.25 (13.94 feet) metres high and weighs around 1.3 tons. The monument was erected in 1928 to commemorate ten years since the breakthrough of the Thessaloniki Front, marking Serbia’s victory over the Ottoman and Austro-Hungarian Empires during the Balkan Wars and the First World War. The bronze male figure, which was designated as a cultural heritage site in… Read more »

TravelAbout
TravelAbout
Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 15, 2020

What a striking difference to what is going on in the US as history is being shamed and scrubbed away by the wokers.

Olivia Kroth
February 17, 2020

TASS: Seventy-five Serbian troops to march in Victory Day parade on Moscow’s Red Square – Representatives of the Syrian army will take part in the ceremony of opening a memorial gallery, the Memory Road, at the Russian Armed Forces Cathedral being built to mark the 75th anniversary of the Victory in WWII BELGRADE, February 17. /TASS/. Russia expects Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic and troops from the Balkan country to take part in the military parade on Moscow’s Red Square on May 9 to mark the 75th anniversary of the Victory in WWII. “This year, we are celebrating the 75th anniversary… Read more »

Tame
Tame
February 28, 2020

This author doesn’t recognize the Macedonians as a separate and distinctive historical people. That’s the first major flaw. One can always spot ‘Hellenic’ propaganda when they refuse to recognize a historical nation that they have gone to great lengths to not only erase but to define out of existence by stealing their (the conquered people’s) one and only name. Stealing the Macedonians one and only name in the interests of conquest has not gone unnoticed. History will not look kindly upon these new ‘people’ (the ‘Hellenes’) whose State has a history of appropriating (and now it seems stealing) names not… Read more »

China Battles Coronavirus as the Global Economy holds its breath

Mexico’s Fight for National Banking Revives a Forgotten History