Connect with us

Latest

News

Staff Picks

Newly released UN “Nazi Holocaust archives” show US & UK colluded with Third Reich to destroy Soviet Union

Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

25,571 Views

As Victory Day (May 9) approaches in Russia to commemorate the defeat of Hitler’s Nazi army, new United Nations archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust have finally been released, amid protests from the US and UK. Why?

The archives “damningly” show state collusion between the US, UK, and the Third Reich. The end goal between their collusion was not to end the Nazi Holocaust, but to defeat Soviet Union.

The parallels between WW2 history, as evidenced in the archive release, and how the US/EU and NATO are working with ISIS and neo-nazi Ukraine in order to destroy Russia, is proof to the point that the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Russia has been, and always will be, the eternal enemy of the western globalist elite.

The perpetuous war against Russia against the backdrop of the historic UN Nazi Holocaust archives, are discussed in a post entitled, “The Deep History of US, Britain’s Never-Ending Cold War On Russia” from the Strategic Culture on-line journal (www.strategic-culture.org), the


After decades of delaying, the United Nations finally released archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust. The source of those archives on Nazi war crimes were Western governments, including those in exile at the time of the war, such as the Belgian, Polish and Czechoslovakian. The time period covered is 1943-1949. Washington and London had long sought to halt the release. Why?

Notably, the landmark publication of the files last month was given scant Western media coverage. Surprisingly, perhaps, because the story that can be gleaned from the documents tells of a hidden history of the Second World War, namely the systematic collusion between the American and British governments and the Nazi Third Reich.

As a report in Deutsche Welle remarked on the released archives: «The files make clear that [Western] Allied forces knew more about the Nazi concentration camp system before the end of the war than has generally been thought».

This revelation points to more than just «knowledge» among the Western allies of Nazi-era crimes; it points more damningly to state collusion. This would also explain why Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

There has long been a controversial debate among Western nations about why the US and Britain in particular did not do more to bomb the Nazi infrastructure of death camps and railroads. Washington and London have often made the claim that they did know the full extent of the horror being perpetrated by the Nazis until the very end of the war when extermination centers such as at Auschwitz and Treblinka were liberated – by the Soviet Red Army, it should be noted too.

However, what the latest release of UN Holocaust files shows is that Washington and London were indeed well aware of the Nazi Final Solution in which millions of European Jews and Slavic people were being systematically worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers. So the question again is: why did the US and Britain not direct more of their aerial bombing campaign to destroy the Nazi infrastructure?

One possible answer is that these Western allies had a callous disregard for the Nazi victims. Washington and London establishments were themselves accused of harboring antisemitic prejudices, as can be seen from the scandals when both these governments spurned thousands of European Jewish refugees during the Second World War, in effect sending many of them to their deaths under the Nazi regime.

Not excluding the above factor of Western racist insouciance, there is a second more disturbing factor. That the Western governments, or at least powerful sections, were loath to hamper the Nazi war effort against the Soviet Union. Notwithstanding that the Soviet Union was a nominal «ally» of the West for the defeat of Nazi Germany.

This perspective harks to a radically different conception of the Second World War in contrast to that narrated in official Western versions. In this alternative historical account, the rise of the Nazi Third Reich was deliberately fomented by American and British rulers as a bulwark in Europe against the spread of communism. Adolf Hitler’s rabid anti-Semitism was matched only by his detest of Marxism and the Slavic people of the Soviet Union. In the Nazi ideology, they were all «Untermenschen» (subhumans) to be exterminated in a «Final Solution».

So, when Nazi Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and carrying out its Final Solution from June 1941 until late 1944, little wonder then that the US and Britain showed a curious reluctance to commit their military forces fully to open up a Western Front. The Western allies were evidently content to see the Nazi war machine doing what it was originally intended to do: to destroy the primary enemy to Western capitalism as represented by the Soviet Union. This is not to say that all American and British political leaders shared or were even aware of this tacit strategic vision. Leaders like President Franklin Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill appeared to be genuinely committed to defeating Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, their individual views must be set against a background of systematic collusion between powerful Western corporate interests and Nazi Germany.

As American author David Talbot documented in his book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA and the Rise of America’s Secret Government (2015), there were massive financial links between Wall Street and the Third Reich, going back several years before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Allen Dulles, who worked for the Wall Street law firm Sullivan and Cromwell and who later headed up the American Central Intelligence Agency, was a key player in the linkage between US capital and German industry. American industrial giants, such as Ford, GM, ITT and Du Pont were invested heavily in German industrial counterparts like IG Farben (manufacturer of Zyklon B, the poisonous gas used in the Holocaust), Krupp Steel and Daimler. American capital, as well as British, was thus integrated into the Nazi war machine and the latter’s dependence on the system of slave labor as provided by the Final Solution.

This would explain why the Western allies did so little to disrupt the Nazi infrastructure with their undoubted formidable aerial bombing capacity. Far more damning than mere inertia or indifference owing to racist prejudice towards the Nazi victims, what emerges is that the Americans and British capitalist elite were invested in the Third Reich. Mainly for the purpose of eliminating the Soviet Union and any kind of genuinely socialist global movement. Bombing Nazi infrastructure would have been tantamount to deleting Western assets.

To this end, as the war was drawing to a close and the Soviet Union looked poised to roll up the Third Reich singlehandedly, the Americans and British belatedly stepped up their war efforts from western and southern Europe. The goal was one of salvaging Western assets remaining in the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles, the director of the-soon-to-be-formed American Central Intelligence Agency, extricated top Nazis and their gold looted from Europe in secret surrender deals known as Operation Sunrise. Britain’s military intelligence MI6 was also involved in the clandestine American effort to salvage Nazi assets via ratlines. The bad faith on display to the Soviet «allies» heralded the chill of the ensuing Cold War that immediately followed the Second World War.

Significant and damning testimony of what was going down was given recently in a BBC interview by Ben Ferencz, the most senior surviving US prosecutor from the Nuremberg trials. At age 98, Ferencz was still able to lucidly recall how scores of Nazi war criminals were let off the hook by the American and British authorities. Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy». Patton’s candid expression of deeper animosity towards the Soviet Union than towards Nazi Germany was consistent with how the US and British ruling class had been colluding with Hitler’s Third Reich in a geo-strategic war against the Soviet Union and worker-led socialist movements arising across Europe and America.

In other words, the Cold War which the US and Britain embarked on after 1945 was but a continuation of hostile policy towards Moscow that was already underway well before the Second World War erupted in 1939 in the form of a build up of Nazi Germany. For various reasons, it became expedient for the Western powers to liquidate the Nazi war machine, along with the Soviet Union. But as can be seen, the Western assets residing in the Nazi machine were recycled into American and British Cold War posture against the Soviet Union. It is a truly damning legacy that American and British military intelligence agencies were consolidated and financed by Nazi crimes.

The recent release of UN Holocaust files – in spite of American and British prevarication over many years – add more evidence to the historical analysis that these Western powers were deeply complicit in the monumental crimes of the Nazi Third Reich. They knew about these crimes because they had helped facilitate them. And the complicity stemmed from Western hostility towards Russia as a perceived geopolitical rival.

This is not a mere historical academic exercise. Western complicity with Nazi Germany also finds a corollary in the present-day ongoing hostility from Washington, Britain and their NATO allies towards Moscow. The relentless build up of NATO offensive forces around Russia’s borders, the endless Russophobia in Western propagandistic news media, the economic blockade in the form of sanctions based on tenuous claims, are all deeply rooted in history.

The West’s Cold War towards Moscow preceded the Second World War, continued after the defeat of Nazi Germany and persists to this day regardless of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists. Why? Because Russia is a perceived rival to Anglo-American capitalist hegemony, as is China or any other emerging power that undermines that desired unipolar hegemony.

American-British collusion with Nazi Germany finds its modern-day manifestation in NATO collusion with the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine and jihadist terror groups dispatched in proxy wars against Russian interests in Syria and elsewhere. The players may change over time, but the root pathology is American-British capitalism and its hegemonic addiction.

The never-ending Cold War will only end when Anglo-American capitalism is finally defeated and replaced by a genuinely more democratic system.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
cortisol
Guest
cortisol

That is correct. USA/UK swooped in only in the very late stage, waiting as long as possible for SU to absorb maximum losses without the risk of German collapse. In this sense it was a timing game. Another thing is that USA had a plan to drop atomic bombs and firebomb Russian cities soon after the war end, only prevented by the lack of them. By 1950 it was too late with the advance in rocketry and first Soviet bomb. To date they have this plan, if there was no deterrent, they would do it immediately. Why they didn’t do… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I only came across the knowledge and links recently, but, look who fully supported Hitler, up until the Soviet Union sent him back to Berlin? The US and this is going to be a long winded ramble. Isn’t Hitler also part of the Rothschild family and whatever did happen to his frozen sperm, whilst Planned Parenthood and Josef Mengel were tweaking around with their eugenic’s programmes? I wonder how many leaders in the EU can be traced back to the sperm banks of elite NAZIs? WORST KEPT SECRETS OF THE BUMBLING BEAR – the CIA/NAZI marriage URL for this article:… Read more »

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

Nutter

Obama
Guest
Obama

The USA did not invent nukes. Germany had invented atomic bombs, but did not use it in Europe due to side effects. That was the reason, why the US could not bomb the Soviet Union immediately. The United States is the only country in the world that used nukes, namely Little Boy and Fat Man in order to defeat the powerful German ally “Japan”.

Max Werner
Guest
Max Werner

Why is Japan in quotes haha

Obama
Guest
Obama

Because I like Nippon!

strav
Guest
strav

The mere fact that france and uk retreated in 2weeks without putting up resistance is proof enough! Then staying out of europe for over 3yrs whilst the nazis were busy with the russians is the clincher!

al p
Guest
al p

They retreated because they got their asses kicked. Its what armies do in such circumstances. The real suspicions fact is why didn’t Hitler go in for the kill at Dunkirk? Because he was an Anglophile with wet dreams of dividing the globe between Germany & Britain

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

Hitler should have known that the zionists controlled Britain.

Edmund burke326
Guest
Edmund burke326

Don’t forget the collaboration of others like the Catholic Church who assisted the Ustasha in murdering Serbian people. A good reference is the “Falsifiers of History” published in 1948 by the USSR, which was an attempt to counteract a fresh wave of US/UK/French anti-Soviet propaganda that appeared in the western media following the seizure of Nazi documentation by the US.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

I remember that book

Laika Lammerink
Guest
Laika Lammerink

Occupied Germany – since 1918, and their boogieman/cannon fodder project Nazi Germany, was simply an affiliate of the Roth-child run British Empire and their U$ (1913/Fed). They did not control Stalin’s Russia.
They own and control the ‘money’ press, and therefore virtually the entire system, companies, (Protestant) churches, politicians (cr-ISIS actors), the ‘education’ system, media, whatever.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Wasn’t Lenin also related to the Rothschilds?

Who had a hissy fit when Tsar Alexander II lent a helping hand to Abraham Lincolne, when Great Britain and France were wanting to invade the US? Who then went on to take out the Royal Family of Russia?

How many children and grandchildren of both the Bolshevik and NAZI elite, can now be found in various positions of authority, either on various political stages or running, Government funded private schemes/organisations/institutions?

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

Like all bankers who got upended at the rise of the Bolsheviks, Sir Walter Rothschild would be despondent had he fallen into their hands. If there was a foreign connection when it comes to Lenin, that was a German one and it pertained to what seemed a mutual interest to Germany and the Russians: peace on the Eastern front. The difference was in the terms that each side had in mind. As for the Imperial Romanov dynasty, it has only itself to blame for its downfall. Moreover, many people are ignorant of the fact that the Bolsheviks were politically insignificant… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Treaty 1213 – The Vatican owns most of the planet. At the time, Great Britain was bankrupt and cut a deal with the Vatican, where the Crown handed over Great Britain and her colonies (including those that are now independent). The Treaty was never revoked.

The Vactican – Religious Capital.
Washington DC – Military Capital.
City of London – Economic Capital.

WWI – League of Nations
WWII – United Nations
WWIII – NWO Full Spectrum Domination

Treaty of 1213 – The Beginning of the Lie… http://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City… http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

john mason
Guest
john mason

So what this article is hinting at is for the world to be free of these global terrorists, US and UK is to annihilate them? Destroy the elite, Rothschild, Clinton, Blair, Bush and the like. Can live with that ideology.

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

That’s what the article suggested. Not the destruction of entire countries.

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

long live marxism-leninism-maoism, long live the people’s war

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

The Rotschilds would like that.

seby
Guest
seby

So the nazis were the isis of those times?

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

yep you got it pal. Same as how the “savage Injuns” were the ISIS of 19th century or the Savage Muslesm were the ISIS of the 13th, 14th, 15,th century. Nothing ever changes.

seby
Guest
seby

I didn’t know Anglo-American capitalism existed back then. Didn’t it start with the pilgrims landing on Plymouth Rock?

I think you’ve got confused about mercenary proxy armies or been reading Ripley’s Believe it or Not rather than real history books or UN archives. Maybe you’re a relative of louise mensch?

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Check out each Empire, each war and just who was behind them all and what they wanted. Whatever century you look into. New faces, new names, but, same old characters.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

Bingo! We have a winner.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Bolsheviks, NAZIs, ISIS, Taliban – you can never keep up with the name changes, but, all run on the same ideology, with the same masters pulling the strings.

Aussie battler
Guest
Aussie battler

Churchill grand strategic plan was for Russia And Germany
To bleed each other white and destroy each others forces ,
With the few divisions left fighting in the Ural Mountains .
The Brits would step in and take over the whole of Europe
like some ripe low hanging fruit,hence the desperation and
Panic when the Russians smashed the Germans in Kursk
With the ensuing retreat,that’s what promoted the US and
UK second Front,not to help the Russians but to stop them
From conquering the whole of Germany.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

Let’s not forget that Britain was begging on its knees for financial help from the U.S.

hestroy
Guest
hestroy

Gas chambers? Total bullshit.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

What gets me, is the fact, that nobody notices 27 million lost lives from the Soviet Union, together with Japan on the verge of surrender, when WWII was over and Washington DC goes an uses the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Negasaki. Whatever Stalin or Hitler did, not condoning, but, that was nothing, compared to two Japanese Islands being vapourised.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

Good article – needed to be expressed and presented to the western public

seby
Guest
seby

Another good article on subject of WW2 from November last year. No relation to the illuminati brigade who’ve charged into the comments section here.

Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/11/29/why-the-west-falsifies-the-history-of-world-war-ii.html

All reminds me of an excellent history lesson given by the wise Vladimir Putin to the Polish head who tried vainly to embarrass him and Russian/Soviet history a few years ago. Very worthwhile viewing, only a few minutes.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

I shall read the article ‘Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II’ with great interest. Thank you for passing that on to me. Regarding the video, yes, I have seen that. But I am always glad to see it again on how Putin instructs the ignorant public on facts. I admire Putin’s character in that he doesn’t lower himself to putting other people down but simply informs and correct the false accusations – Putin, the best statesman on this planet. How I wish the ignorant Sheeple could see the lies and demonization that western corporate mainstream media… Read more »

Herbert Dorsey
Guest
Herbert Dorsey

What this article leaves out is the large influence of the Catholic Church in assisting the fascists rise to power in Europe, leading to World War II, which is well documented in books like “The Vatican’s Holocaust”, “The Secret History of the New World Order” and “The Secret History of the Jesuits”. World War II was just another battle in the Jesuit’s long war against non-Catholics or heretics.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

also “Crimen Magnus”

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I have just replied to a similar comment.

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City
http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

Together with the link to the Treaty of 1213.

comment image

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

The Zyklon B was used to treat the lice infestation among the prisoners.

tiger
Guest
tiger

Zyklon B (& A) contain HCN, which kills anything that breathes. There are better ways to treat lice. Your excuse is poor.

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

So please share with me what they did used to treat the lice infestation’s in the work/prison camps.

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

Antoni Jaromin Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.. https://www.google.pl/?gws_rd=ssl

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable

Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis
batavian01
Guest
batavian01

Yes. Operation Unthinkable.

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

Alex! PAR 5 Should be ‘perpetual’.
Such a good article.
Typos deface it.

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

oh color me shocked.
Of course the whole point of WWII was to get Germany and The Soviet Union to fight so they can weaken each other and USA then to come in and take over. USA did the same thing with Iran and Iran war of 1980.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

Chalk that one up as an additional item to celebrate on Purim.

Brian Johnston
Guest
Brian Johnston

A superficial and misleading article, which completely fails to identify the true enemy of Christian civilization. The enemy in this “never ending war” is not Anglo-American capitalism, but the synagogue of Satan.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Ah, how we love a nice smelly trail of red herrings and unsubstantiated allegations. It’s fascinating to see how the holohoax is put centre stage in Mr Christoforou’s fantasy version of history, as if the sufferings of der juden should somehow have been made the primary motivating force behind western geopolitical manoueverings during WW2; even assuming that they existed as a result of the “monumental crimes and rabid antisemitism” which he lays at Germany’s door, which no-one seems to have claimed until long after the war was over. No. The simplest explanation for this period of history boils down to… Read more »

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

I enjoyed your reply. But I think many elements of Mr Christoforou’s article are consonant with yours.
Your weakest point is your final one. To deny that Russia has stood in the way of Anglo (later Anglo-zionist hegemony) is to deny reality. Russia has been thwarting plans since the Great Game was announced (at least). Or the time of Catherine the Second. One of the most productive buttons installed in the heads of Westerners (for their various ruling Gestapos) is the Russophobe button.

MH
Guest
MH

I’ve posted this before and am grateful for the opportunity to post it again. Perhaps one person will read it and take it to heart and understand the implications of it for our past and our future on this planet. Shortly after the war ended a German official, a ministerial official being interrogated was asked if he felt they could really have defeated the Allies and if not, what was the point of fighting. He replied that “the purpose of the war was to reduce the Slavic populations by some 30,000,000 – millions”. So, it seems there was a public… Read more »

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

essentially, yes, under capitalism people are reduced to a factor of production (labor) rather than actual humans marxist works go into this in good detail if you’re interested (any negative feelings you have about the term is due to the ideology being dangerous to the ruling class, just in case) i need to read up on how genocide factors in specifically to imperialist capitalism, but my hunch is that by reducing the population they can reduce the labor force, and thus reduce production figures in the affected country, making them more prone to shortages in food, consumer goods, and hampering… Read more »

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

total baloney regarding marxism. Marxism is a critique used to enable communism.

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

You’re referring to the Hongerplan, explained in detail by Tooze in The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy, London: Allen Lane, 2006. ISBN 0-7139-9566-1 – I recommend it.

kolokol
Guest
kolokol
Sep 2017 Calendar
Guest

It’s alluring not just engaging!

Rick0Shea
Guest
Rick0Shea

I figured this out for myself years ago.

cap960
Guest
cap960

And now US/UK are in Ukraine supporting yet again NAZI fanatics. This time though the world is been fooled to believe Russia is the enemy.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Not all the world, just the masses, who know no better.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

“Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy».” I beg to differ with this Ferencz as Patton had been disgusted by the stench of those ‘victims’ for whom, he wrote to his wife, he was forced to evict decent, civilsed Germans from their homes. As well as having to join Eisenhower at a synagogue where he added, the stench from the Rabbis caused him to lose his dinner that night. He was referring to the fake-Jews who were fleeing Russia.… Read more »

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

It was General MacArthur who was hand-in-hand with these degenerates:
https://geopolitics.co/2012/02/02/the-last-senseless-war/

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

This might come across off topic, but, in a random way it fits in. Why is Israel funding politicians that are also fully supportive of the NAZI Party in Ukraine? How do they compliment each other Mr Engel? Also, have a look at how much they receive from the agricultural industry. Now why would the agricultural industry of the United States, be so interested in stopping Russia from being the leading grain exporter and what has that got to do with North Korea? THE US BILL H.R. 1644 TO KILL RUSSIAN FOOD EXPORT AND CHINESE TRADE… Author of the bill:… Read more »

hvaiallverden
Guest
hvaiallverden

Jesus f….. christ I am feed up with this Nazi this and Nazi that, and if you continue I simply dont bother to come here anymore, like RT and the so called Not the fake news” aka the PC/Sore-ass infested and run MSM in Norway, you somehow never talk or writes about the total picture, only 50 shades of manure, and this “articles” is always followed by Israel is going to do something.

But hey. we live in an “free world” dont we, the choice is yours.

peace

John Bull
Guest
John Bull

The “historians” of the west don’t want you to know that the Jews essentially started the war against Hitler with a worldwide boycott of German goods in an effort to tank the German economy and only after did Hitler respond with a boycott of his own. The grandfathers of George H.W. Bush, J.P. Morgan, Henry Ford et. al. helped to finance and rearm Hitler as a hedge against Bolshevism. The German Army had Ford trucks. There is huge list of complicit acts by the west no one wants us to know.

JDESQ
Guest
JDESQ

This report fails to distinguish between the support given by FDR to Stalin’s call for a second front and Churchill’s repeated attempts to stall its opening. This was made clear by Elliott Roosevelt, who was eyewitness to those discussions, in “As He Saw it,” which should be required reading for all students of American History. Likewise, the role of Churchill, who feared as US-USSR condominium to decolonize the Asia and Africa, in enjoining a pliable Harry S. Truman into the Cold War, is essential to understanding the role of the UK and its intelligence services in today’s world.

etniks
Guest
etniks

The well researched book by Antony Sutton called WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER since the seventies has come to the same conclusion. The actual outcome is the REAL NAZIS were not German, but those financiers who pushed with their money to support Hitler and the Nazi regime. According to the research, the current European Monarchies were scared sh —less of what happened to their cousin the Russian Czar and his family all assassinated by the Soviet soldiers, and wanted to collapse the Soviet Union to stop the “bad example” given to their own European citizens. The current hate… Read more »

lossarrow57
Guest
lossarrow57

USSR and Germany were the best friends and allies until June 22, 1941, and Russia has benefited from this friendship and cooperation. https://www.facebook.com/KonradKrzysztofKowalski/posts/1809607946032326?hc_location=ufi 1. The truth is that the USSR (Russia) – made unprovoked, brutal and criminal aggression on Poland on September 17 (co-operation Germany-USRR lasted from 1 September: guiding aircraft and pursuing Polish submarines), – The Red Army made numerous war crimes during the aggression – The NKVD worked closely with the Gestapo for the next 1.5 years – The Soviet Union committed crimes on the Polish population from 1931 to 1941 – Katyn crimes have no other precedent… Read more »

Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz
Guest
Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz

This historic article could have been a bit easier to swallow if had stuck to the original premise – the coalition of the mentioned parties against the Russian and eliminate all those references, to Gas Chambers, Final Solution and millions and all the rest of the established agenda taking points that one is prevented to question.

SteveLaudig
Guest

” perpetuous”? you mean perpetual. Get a native English language editor, it’ll help your cred.

Philadelphian
Guest
Philadelphian

Exact opposite of historical reality. Look up Malta conference, and whom attended and how they divided up ALL of Europe.

RJohn
Guest

In his books Wall Street and the rise of Hitler and Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Anthony Sutton documents how Corporate America, (with U.S. Government blessing), made it all possible…people must understand, Wall Street bears allegiance to no-one but profit…All wars are Banker’s wars…alliances change…but only superficially. Dig a little deeper and you’ll find a most peculiar pattern.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

The ” Nazi death Camp” story does not stand up to scrutiny it may well be true that the Yanks and Brits double-crossed the Nazis, it fits their style. The age old “let’s you and him fight” theme. Why did Hess fly to England? Why was he murdered in Spandau? Why did Hitler allow the Brits to escape via Dunkirk? Why did Hitler go to war against England with fighter aircraft that were only good for twenty minutes of flight time over England? Whats with the ridiculous gas chamber stories and zyklon-B? “When American and British forces overran western and… Read more »

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

For more on this I suggest reading Yehudi Menuhin’s excellent book “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”.

al p
Guest
al p

OK so the Soviet Union was targeted and rightly so…separating the horrific suffering of the people murdered under Stalin by both the Nazis and the Soviets, Stalin was an inhumane douchebag who also received billions of dollars of capitalist funding.

So this articles attempt to demonize anti-soviet efforts blurs the line between reality and fiction.

The very imposition of Bolshevism upon Russia was an Imperial British conspiracy and the mass murder of the Czars family among hundreds of thousands other Slavic peoples was genocide on a massive scale far outlasting Hitler’s few years on the global stage.

brad kahn
Guest
brad kahn

The Holocaust wasn’t just the German Solution… It was the Capitalist Solution..! International Financiers.. Big Industrialists The real bourgeoisie.. Always planned to use fascism as a battering ram against Communism. Before and After the war..! Hence, all the fascists Allan Foster Dulles put in power. Duh. Interestingly, After the war… When the fascist clique around Tojo Was disgorged and disassembled.. The Japanese ruling class used the Yakusa for the exact same purposes. In case you were wondering how an enormously powerful criminal apparatus could be formed in Japan… and yet…you can’t find a cigarette butt on the sidewalk anywhere in… Read more »

Philip Andrews
Guest
Philip Andrews

Yes, there was collusion between the US and UK as per Mackinder, to help Germany and the SU destroy each other through military and economic exhaustion. This notion has been gaining ground for some years now thanks to the writings of the late Antony Sutton. However, having grown up entirely in the CW, I still would not have wanted the Red Army at the Channel, in France. No thank you. I’m glad the US got in when it did and met the Red Army on the Elbe. Would not have wanted the Soviet system in Western Europe.

Putin's baby
Guest
Putin's baby

No surprises here then…

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

I’m afraid that all this is old hat as can be demonstrated from contemporary records. Churchill broadcast to denounce nazi atrocities and promise vengeance long before D Day. Bombing murder factories was a non-starter, what could the Allies use, Bomber Command which area bombed in default of adequate night navigation and target finding devices and was out of range of Auschwitz? US day bombers based in Italy from 1943? Bombers that were so inaccurate they sometimes bombed the wrong country? Mosquito bombers? They could get to Auschwitz in 1943 but there were only about 30 in Italy and most were… Read more »

Latest

New Zealand enacts new weapons ban just six days after massacre

The American left is sure to pick this up and start screaming for an “assault weapons ban” because this supports their agenda so well.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

Reuters reported on Thursday, March 21 that the Prime Minister of New Zealand enacted a sweeping change, banning weapons of the type that were used in the massacre of at least fifty Muslims, who were gunned down on livestream while in Friday prayer services in Christchurch last week. We quote from the Reuters piece below, with added emphasis:

New Zealand will ban military-style semi-automatic and assault rifles under tough new gun laws following the killing of 50 people in its worst mass shooting, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said on Thursday.

In the immediate aftermath of last Friday’s shootings at two mosques in the city of Christchurch, Ardern labeled the attack as terrorism and said New Zealand’s gun laws would change.

“On 15 March our history changed forever. Now, our laws will too. We are announcing action today on behalf of all New Zealanders to strengthen our gun laws and make our country a safer place,” Ardern told a news conference.

“All semi-automatic weapons used during the terrorist attack on Friday 15 March will be banned.”

Ardern said she expected the new laws to be in place by April 11 and a buy-back scheme costing up to NZ$200 million ($138 million) would be established for banned weapons.

All military style semi-automatics (MSSA) and assault rifles would be banned, along with parts used to convert weapons into MSSAs and all high-capacity magazines.

Australia banned semi-automatic weapons and launched a gun buy-back after the Port Arthur massacre in 1996 in which 35 people were killed.

Ardern said that similar to Australia, the law would allow for strictly enforced exemptions for farmers for pest control and animal welfare.

“I strongly believe that the vast majority of legitimate gun owners in New Zealand will understand that these moves are in the national interest, and will take these changes in their stride.”

This is undoubtedly going to be real red meat (or perhaps real vegetables) for the anti-gun lobby in the United States. This is because New Zealand strongly resembled the US in terms of firearm rights and the penetration of numbers of guns in the populace of this remote island nation. Reuters continues, with statements that would probably surprise, even horrify some gun owners in the States, but which are doubtlessly useful for the application of pressure on such individuals:

New Zealand, a country of fewer than 5 million people, has an estimated 1.2-1.5 million firearms, about 13,500 of them MSSA-type weapons.

Most farmers own guns while hunting of deer, pigs and goats is popular. Gun clubs and shooting ranges dot the country.

That has created a powerful lobby that has thwarted previous attempts to tighten gun laws.

Federated Farmers, which represent thousands of farmers, said it supported the new laws.

“This will not be popular among some of our members but … we believe this is the only practicable solution,” a group spokesman, Miles Anderson, said in a statement.

The main opposition National Party, which draws strong support in rural areas, said it also supported the ban.

The changes exclude two general classes of firearms commonly used for hunting, pest control and stock management on farms.

“I have a military style weapon. But to be fair, I don’t really use it, I don’t really need it,” said Noel Womersley, who slaughters cpoliticalattle for small farmers around Christchurch.

“So I’m quite happy to hand mine over.”

To be absolutely fair, the attack on the mosques was an awful event, made the worse by the shooter’s deliberate attempts to politicize various aspects of what he was doing and what he “stood for” as an attack ostensibly against US President Donald Trump, some seven thousand miles away in the United States.

The immediate reaction of the people interviewed, some among them related or friends with the victims of the massacre, was to embrace the weapons reform laws:

Nada Tawfeek, who buried her father-in-law killed in the attacks, Hussein Moustafa, on Thursday, welcomed the ban.

“It’s a great reaction. I think other countries need to learn from her [Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern],” Tawfeek said.

Mohammed Faqih, a member of the Islamic clergy who flew in from California and attended the funerals for some victims on Thursday, said he was “extremely grateful” for the gun ban.

“I wish our leaders in the States would follow on her footsteps and do the same thing,” he said.

One can expect there to be quite the outcry among American liberals about gun control, especially if anything remotely resembling this event takes place or is thwarted in coming days in the US.

It may seem very cold and cruel to focus on the political angle of this story rather than the human tragedy that it is. However, in this situation we have seen signs that the most vile form of human tragedy has actually taken place – the murder of dozens of innocent people for a mere political point. Indeed this thought has been noted and vilified already, as Mr. R.X. Dentith, writing for the New Zealand website Spinoff here quoted:

American paleo-conservative Rush Limbaugh was one of the first to note: “There’s an ongoing theory that the shooter himself may, in fact, be a leftist who writes the manifesto and then goes out and performs the deed purposely to smear his political enemies, knowing he’s going to get shot in the process. You know you just can’t – you can’t immediately discount this. The left is this insane, they are this crazy. And then if that’s exactly what the guy is trying to do then he’s hit a home run, because right there on Fox News: ‘Shooter is an admitted white nationalist who hates immigrants.’”

…[P]eople like Limbaugh… can’t stomach the idea the terrorist action in Otautahi might be motivated by the kind of rhetoric Limbaugh helps disseminate – tend to think there is a culture war going on, and they are on the losing side.

This war has many names, and the enemy is easily identified: it is the battle against Cultural Marxism; the fight against Toxic Feminism; the resistance to Identity Politics; and the fear of the Great Replacement, the thesis at the heart of the terrorist’s own manifesto.

The Great Replacement thesis posits that the majority white European countries are being “invaded” by non-white, non-European peoples. Not just that, but due to declining birth rates in the West, this “invasion” constitutes a wholesale replacement of the white population over time.

Mr. Dentith tries further to knock down this notion of the Great Replacement. However, he misses a much more basic point.

Someone who goes and takes human lives and broadcasts them for any reason is not a mere political operative. The person who does this is a very sick, deranged human being indeed. Evil is certainly appropriately used here.

However, evil is often quite cunning, and despite the intellectual arguments about the reality or non-reality of any particular manifesto statement, in this case, the killer played the media with infernal intelligence, and they took the bait. It is possible that Prime Minister Ardern also took the bait, in this most awful of bad situations, and to give her credit, she took swift actions to try to “correct” what was wrong.

But the problem here was not the type of weapons used. The problem is the fact that they were used by a person who thought these fifty people’s lives were worth nothing more than a bit of policy change. One of the worst examples of human evil in recent times, this incident shouts to the world that there is a problem, but the problem remains unsolved, even though many people will hand over their firearms out of a genuine wish for compassion to those lost and the hope that somehow this action will prevent a future incident.

But the logic of this emotional reaction is nil. And what is worse is that the American Left knows this, but does not care. The movers and shakers of liberalism will likely milk the actions of sincerely horrified New Zealanders for all they are worth to try at affecting change in American constitutional rights.

And the innocent dead will not rest in peace, because the real problem has not even been examined.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Upstart Populist Party Shocks In Dutch Election Upset, 2 Days After Utrecht Attack

International reports have described the FvD as receiving “a surge of last-minute support” in the days following the Utrecht attack.

Published

on

Via Zerohedge…


Dutch voters have sent shock waves through Europe at the polls on Wednesday in the wake of Monday’s deadly Utrecht terror shooting, in which a now detained 37-year old Turkish man went on a terrifying tram killing spree which left three dead and three injured.

Euroskeptic party, Forum for Democracy (FvD), has emerged victorious in key provincial elections this week, paving the way to making it one of the two largest groups in the Dutch Senate, and representing growing Dutch frustration with the recent unprecedented refugee influx in Europe.

Newcomer Forum for Democracy party is led by 36-year-old Thierry Baudet, who is a critic of the EU and of the Netherlands’ immigration policies, via EPA

International reports have described the FvD as receiving “a surge of last-minute support” in the days following the Utrecht attack, which investigators have since described as having a “terror motive” based on a letter found in shooter Gokmen Tanis’ possession.

Forum for Democracy party leader Thierry Baudet had immediately placed ultimate blame  for the incident on the government’s “lax immigration policies” and provocatively stated a day before the elections (referencing his political rival)

If people want more deadly shootings like the one in Utrecht, then they have to vote for the VVD.

Baudet, riding a wave of renewed Euroskeptic sentiment, and whose party also wants to see more military spending, green initiatives, and an easing on income tax while greatly restricting the borders, said in the aftermath of Wednesday’s vote: “The voters in the Netherlands have spread their wings and shown their true power.”

Referencing the Utrecht attack and other deadly terror incidents on European soil, he added: “We have been called to the front because we have to. Because the country needs us.”

Three were killed and several injured in Monday’s Dutch tram terror attack, which raised the country’s emergency threat level to five as it was unfolding, its highest level.

Interestingly, the 36-year old Baudet and his party continued campaigning down to the last moments even as others stopped in the wake of Monday’s attack which rocked the Netherlands. According to Al Jazeera:

Following the lead of US President Donald Trump, Baudet opposes immigration and emphasises “Dutch first” cultural and economic themes. He opposes the euro and thinks the Netherlands should leave the European Union.

Baudet had continued campaigning when other parties stopped after Monday’s attack in Utrecht, in which a gunman shot three people dead on a tram. The populist leader blamed the incident on the government’s lax immigration policies.

The FvD is now set to take 12 seats in the upper house of parliament, which is equal to Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s conservative VVD Party, a scenario before this week considered unlikely according to many observers.

The FvD slightly outscoring the VVD means Rutte’s government has lost its majority for the 75-seat Senate ahead of upcoming May elections.

In a post-election speech on Wednesday, Baudet described further that what’s now being described in international media as “an upstart populist party [that has] shocked the Dutch political establishment” as punishing the arrogance of elites.

In his pro-Western civilization themed remarks, Baudet added, “We are standing in the rubble of what was once the most beautiful civilization in the world.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Will The Trump White House finally punish Facebook for censorship?

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 113.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris take a look at US President Trump’s tweet where he has said that he would be “looking into” a report that his social media chief, Dan Scavino Jr. has been censored by Facebook.

Are we finally about to see the Trump White House move to punish social media outlets for their blatant and bias censorship of alternative narratives that dare to stray from globalist neo-liberal and radical left ideology?

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

“Conservatives face a tough fight as Big Tech’s censorship expands”, authored by Donald Trump Jr., via The Hill…

As Big Tech’s censorship of conservatives becomes ever more flagrant and overt, the old arguments about protecting the sanctity of the modern public square are now invalid. Our right to freely engage in public discourse through speech is under sustained attack, necessitating a vigorous defense against the major social media and internet platforms.

From “shadowbans” on Facebook and Twitter, to demonetization of YouTube videos, to pulled ads for Republican candidates at the critical junctures of election campaigns, the list of violations against the online practices and speech of conservatives is long.

I certainly had my suspicions confirmed when Instagram, which is owned by Facebook, “accidentally” censored a post I made regarding the Jussie Smollett hoax, which consequently led to me hearing from hundreds of my followers about how they’ve been having problems seeing, liking or being able to interact with my posts. Many of them even claimed that they’ve had to repeatedly refollow me, as Instagram keeps unfollowing me on their accounts.

While nothing about Big Tech’s censorship of conservatives truly surprises me anymore, it’s still chilling to see the proof for yourself. If it can happen to me, the son of the president, with millions of followers on social media, just think about how bad it must be for conservatives with smaller followings and those who don’t have the soapbox or media reach to push back when they’re being targeted?

Thanks to a brave Facebook whistleblower who approached James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, we now know that Mark Zuckerberg’s social media giant developed algorithms to “deboost” certain content, limiting its distribution and appearance in news feeds. As you probably guessed, this stealth censorship was specifically aimed at conservatives.

Facebook appears to have deliberately tailored its algorithm to recognize the syntax and style popular among conservatives in order to “deboost” that content. “Mainstream media,” “SJW” (Social Justice Warrior) and “red pill” — all terms that conservatives often use to express themselves — were listed as red flags, according to the former Facebook insider.

Facebook engineers even cited BlazeTV host Lauren Chen’s video criticizing the social justice movement as an example of the kind of “red pills” that users just aren’t allowed to drop anymore. Mainstream conservative content was strangled in real time, yet fringe leftists such as the Young Turks enjoy free rein on the social media platform.

Despite the occasional brave gesture, politicians have been far too sluggish in recognizing the extent of the problem. But the Republican Party and the conservative movement are becoming more vigilant against the suppression of our speech, as we saw at last weekend’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC).

Silicon Valley lobbyists have splashed millions of dollars all over the Washington swamp to play on conservatives’ innate faith in the free-market system and respect for private property. Even as Big Tech companies work to exclude us from the town square of the 21st century, they’ve been able to rely on misguided conservatives to carry water for them with irrelevant pedantry about whether the First Amendment applies in cases of social media censorship.

Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) has been making a name for himself as a Republican prepared to stand up to Big Tech malfeasance since his time as Missouri’s attorney general. He delivered a tour de force interview with The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberly Strassel in front of the CPAC crowd, one that provided a clear-eyed assessment of the ongoing affront to the freedoms of conservative speech and expression.

Hawley demolished the absurd notion that “conservative principles” preclude taking action to ensure free debate online simply because Big Tech firms — the most powerful corporations in the world — are private companies.

Hawley pointed out that Big Tech companies already enjoy “sweetheart deals” under current regulations that make their malfeasance a matter of public concern. Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, for instance, allows them to avoid liability for the content that users post to their platforms. To address this problem, Hawley proposed adding a viewpoint neutrality requirement for platforms that benefit from Section 230’s protections, which were originally enacted to protect the internet as “a forum for a true diversity of political discourse.”

“Google and Facebook should not be a law unto themselves,” Hawley declared. “They should not be able to discriminate against conservatives. They should not be able to tell us we need to sit down and shut up!”

It’s high time other conservative politicians started heeding Hawley’s warnings, because the logical endpoint of Big Tech’s free rein is far more troubling than conservative meme warriors losing their Twitter accounts. As we’re already starting to see, what starts with social media censorship can quickly lead to banishment from such fundamental services as transportation, online payments and banking.

Left unchecked, Big Tech and liberal activists could construct a private “social credit” system — not unlike what the communists have nightmarishly implemented in China — that excludes outspoken conservatives from wide swaths of American life simply because their political views differ from those of tech executives.

There is no conservative principle that even remotely suggests we are obligated to adopt a laissez-faire attitude while the richest companies on earth abuse the power we give them to put a thumb on the scale for our political enemies.

If anything, our love of the free market dictates that we must do whatever is necessary to ensure that the free marketplace of ideas remains open to all.

Donald Trump Jr. is executive vice president at The Trump Organization.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending