Connect with us

Latest

News

Staff Picks

Newly released UN “Nazi Holocaust archives” show US & UK colluded with Third Reich to destroy Soviet Union

Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

25,071 Views

As Victory Day (May 9) approaches in Russia to commemorate the defeat of Hitler’s Nazi army, new United Nations archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust have finally been released, amid protests from the US and UK. Why?

The archives “damningly” show state collusion between the US, UK, and the Third Reich. The end goal between their collusion was not to end the Nazi Holocaust, but to defeat Soviet Union.

The parallels between WW2 history, as evidenced in the archive release, and how the US/EU and NATO are working with ISIS and neo-nazi Ukraine in order to destroy Russia, is proof to the point that the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Russia has been, and always will be, the eternal enemy of the western globalist elite.

The perpetuous war against Russia against the backdrop of the historic UN Nazi Holocaust archives, are discussed in a post entitled, “The Deep History of US, Britain’s Never-Ending Cold War On Russia” from the Strategic Culture on-line journal (www.strategic-culture.org), the


After decades of delaying, the United Nations finally released archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust. The source of those archives on Nazi war crimes were Western governments, including those in exile at the time of the war, such as the Belgian, Polish and Czechoslovakian. The time period covered is 1943-1949. Washington and London had long sought to halt the release. Why?

Notably, the landmark publication of the files last month was given scant Western media coverage. Surprisingly, perhaps, because the story that can be gleaned from the documents tells of a hidden history of the Second World War, namely the systematic collusion between the American and British governments and the Nazi Third Reich.

As a report in Deutsche Welle remarked on the released archives: «The files make clear that [Western] Allied forces knew more about the Nazi concentration camp system before the end of the war than has generally been thought».

This revelation points to more than just «knowledge» among the Western allies of Nazi-era crimes; it points more damningly to state collusion. This would also explain why Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

There has long been a controversial debate among Western nations about why the US and Britain in particular did not do more to bomb the Nazi infrastructure of death camps and railroads. Washington and London have often made the claim that they did know the full extent of the horror being perpetrated by the Nazis until the very end of the war when extermination centers such as at Auschwitz and Treblinka were liberated – by the Soviet Red Army, it should be noted too.

However, what the latest release of UN Holocaust files shows is that Washington and London were indeed well aware of the Nazi Final Solution in which millions of European Jews and Slavic people were being systematically worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers. So the question again is: why did the US and Britain not direct more of their aerial bombing campaign to destroy the Nazi infrastructure?

One possible answer is that these Western allies had a callous disregard for the Nazi victims. Washington and London establishments were themselves accused of harboring antisemitic prejudices, as can be seen from the scandals when both these governments spurned thousands of European Jewish refugees during the Second World War, in effect sending many of them to their deaths under the Nazi regime.

Not excluding the above factor of Western racist insouciance, there is a second more disturbing factor. That the Western governments, or at least powerful sections, were loath to hamper the Nazi war effort against the Soviet Union. Notwithstanding that the Soviet Union was a nominal «ally» of the West for the defeat of Nazi Germany.

This perspective harks to a radically different conception of the Second World War in contrast to that narrated in official Western versions. In this alternative historical account, the rise of the Nazi Third Reich was deliberately fomented by American and British rulers as a bulwark in Europe against the spread of communism. Adolf Hitler’s rabid anti-Semitism was matched only by his detest of Marxism and the Slavic people of the Soviet Union. In the Nazi ideology, they were all «Untermenschen» (subhumans) to be exterminated in a «Final Solution».

So, when Nazi Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and carrying out its Final Solution from June 1941 until late 1944, little wonder then that the US and Britain showed a curious reluctance to commit their military forces fully to open up a Western Front. The Western allies were evidently content to see the Nazi war machine doing what it was originally intended to do: to destroy the primary enemy to Western capitalism as represented by the Soviet Union. This is not to say that all American and British political leaders shared or were even aware of this tacit strategic vision. Leaders like President Franklin Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill appeared to be genuinely committed to defeating Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, their individual views must be set against a background of systematic collusion between powerful Western corporate interests and Nazi Germany.

As American author David Talbot documented in his book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA and the Rise of America’s Secret Government (2015), there were massive financial links between Wall Street and the Third Reich, going back several years before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Allen Dulles, who worked for the Wall Street law firm Sullivan and Cromwell and who later headed up the American Central Intelligence Agency, was a key player in the linkage between US capital and German industry. American industrial giants, such as Ford, GM, ITT and Du Pont were invested heavily in German industrial counterparts like IG Farben (manufacturer of Zyklon B, the poisonous gas used in the Holocaust), Krupp Steel and Daimler. American capital, as well as British, was thus integrated into the Nazi war machine and the latter’s dependence on the system of slave labor as provided by the Final Solution.

This would explain why the Western allies did so little to disrupt the Nazi infrastructure with their undoubted formidable aerial bombing capacity. Far more damning than mere inertia or indifference owing to racist prejudice towards the Nazi victims, what emerges is that the Americans and British capitalist elite were invested in the Third Reich. Mainly for the purpose of eliminating the Soviet Union and any kind of genuinely socialist global movement. Bombing Nazi infrastructure would have been tantamount to deleting Western assets.

To this end, as the war was drawing to a close and the Soviet Union looked poised to roll up the Third Reich singlehandedly, the Americans and British belatedly stepped up their war efforts from western and southern Europe. The goal was one of salvaging Western assets remaining in the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles, the director of the-soon-to-be-formed American Central Intelligence Agency, extricated top Nazis and their gold looted from Europe in secret surrender deals known as Operation Sunrise. Britain’s military intelligence MI6 was also involved in the clandestine American effort to salvage Nazi assets via ratlines. The bad faith on display to the Soviet «allies» heralded the chill of the ensuing Cold War that immediately followed the Second World War.

Significant and damning testimony of what was going down was given recently in a BBC interview by Ben Ferencz, the most senior surviving US prosecutor from the Nuremberg trials. At age 98, Ferencz was still able to lucidly recall how scores of Nazi war criminals were let off the hook by the American and British authorities. Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy». Patton’s candid expression of deeper animosity towards the Soviet Union than towards Nazi Germany was consistent with how the US and British ruling class had been colluding with Hitler’s Third Reich in a geo-strategic war against the Soviet Union and worker-led socialist movements arising across Europe and America.

In other words, the Cold War which the US and Britain embarked on after 1945 was but a continuation of hostile policy towards Moscow that was already underway well before the Second World War erupted in 1939 in the form of a build up of Nazi Germany. For various reasons, it became expedient for the Western powers to liquidate the Nazi war machine, along with the Soviet Union. But as can be seen, the Western assets residing in the Nazi machine were recycled into American and British Cold War posture against the Soviet Union. It is a truly damning legacy that American and British military intelligence agencies were consolidated and financed by Nazi crimes.

The recent release of UN Holocaust files – in spite of American and British prevarication over many years – add more evidence to the historical analysis that these Western powers were deeply complicit in the monumental crimes of the Nazi Third Reich. They knew about these crimes because they had helped facilitate them. And the complicity stemmed from Western hostility towards Russia as a perceived geopolitical rival.

This is not a mere historical academic exercise. Western complicity with Nazi Germany also finds a corollary in the present-day ongoing hostility from Washington, Britain and their NATO allies towards Moscow. The relentless build up of NATO offensive forces around Russia’s borders, the endless Russophobia in Western propagandistic news media, the economic blockade in the form of sanctions based on tenuous claims, are all deeply rooted in history.

The West’s Cold War towards Moscow preceded the Second World War, continued after the defeat of Nazi Germany and persists to this day regardless of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists. Why? Because Russia is a perceived rival to Anglo-American capitalist hegemony, as is China or any other emerging power that undermines that desired unipolar hegemony.

American-British collusion with Nazi Germany finds its modern-day manifestation in NATO collusion with the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine and jihadist terror groups dispatched in proxy wars against Russian interests in Syria and elsewhere. The players may change over time, but the root pathology is American-British capitalism and its hegemonic addiction.

The never-ending Cold War will only end when Anglo-American capitalism is finally defeated and replaced by a genuinely more democratic system.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
cortisol
Guest
cortisol

That is correct. USA/UK swooped in only in the very late stage, waiting as long as possible for SU to absorb maximum losses without the risk of German collapse. In this sense it was a timing game. Another thing is that USA had a plan to drop atomic bombs and firebomb Russian cities soon after the war end, only prevented by the lack of them. By 1950 it was too late with the advance in rocketry and first Soviet bomb. To date they have this plan, if there was no deterrent, they would do it immediately. Why they didn’t do… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I only came across the knowledge and links recently, but, look who fully supported Hitler, up until the Soviet Union sent him back to Berlin? The US and this is going to be a long winded ramble. Isn’t Hitler also part of the Rothschild family and whatever did happen to his frozen sperm, whilst Planned Parenthood and Josef Mengel were tweaking around with their eugenic’s programmes? I wonder how many leaders in the EU can be traced back to the sperm banks of elite NAZIs? WORST KEPT SECRETS OF THE BUMBLING BEAR – the CIA/NAZI marriage URL for this article:… Read more »

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

Nutter

Obama
Guest
Obama

The USA did not invent nukes. Germany had invented atomic bombs, but did not use it in Europe due to side effects. That was the reason, why the US could not bomb the Soviet Union immediately. The United States is the only country in the world that used nukes, namely Little Boy and Fat Man in order to defeat the powerful German ally “Japan”.

Max Werner
Guest
Max Werner

Why is Japan in quotes haha

Obama
Guest
Obama

Because I like Nippon!

strav
Guest
strav

The mere fact that france and uk retreated in 2weeks without putting up resistance is proof enough! Then staying out of europe for over 3yrs whilst the nazis were busy with the russians is the clincher!

al p
Guest
al p

They retreated because they got their asses kicked. Its what armies do in such circumstances. The real suspicions fact is why didn’t Hitler go in for the kill at Dunkirk? Because he was an Anglophile with wet dreams of dividing the globe between Germany & Britain

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

Hitler should have known that the zionists controlled Britain.

Edmund burke326
Guest
Edmund burke326

Don’t forget the collaboration of others like the Catholic Church who assisted the Ustasha in murdering Serbian people. A good reference is the “Falsifiers of History” published in 1948 by the USSR, which was an attempt to counteract a fresh wave of US/UK/French anti-Soviet propaganda that appeared in the western media following the seizure of Nazi documentation by the US.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

I remember that book

Laika Lammerink
Guest
Laika Lammerink

Occupied Germany – since 1918, and their boogieman/cannon fodder project Nazi Germany, was simply an affiliate of the Roth-child run British Empire and their U$ (1913/Fed). They did not control Stalin’s Russia.
They own and control the ‘money’ press, and therefore virtually the entire system, companies, (Protestant) churches, politicians (cr-ISIS actors), the ‘education’ system, media, whatever.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Wasn’t Lenin also related to the Rothschilds?

Who had a hissy fit when Tsar Alexander II lent a helping hand to Abraham Lincolne, when Great Britain and France were wanting to invade the US? Who then went on to take out the Royal Family of Russia?

How many children and grandchildren of both the Bolshevik and NAZI elite, can now be found in various positions of authority, either on various political stages or running, Government funded private schemes/organisations/institutions?

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

Like all bankers who got upended at the rise of the Bolsheviks, Sir Walter Rothschild would be despondent had he fallen into their hands. If there was a foreign connection when it comes to Lenin, that was a German one and it pertained to what seemed a mutual interest to Germany and the Russians: peace on the Eastern front. The difference was in the terms that each side had in mind. As for the Imperial Romanov dynasty, it has only itself to blame for its downfall. Moreover, many people are ignorant of the fact that the Bolsheviks were politically insignificant… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Treaty 1213 – The Vatican owns most of the planet. At the time, Great Britain was bankrupt and cut a deal with the Vatican, where the Crown handed over Great Britain and her colonies (including those that are now independent). The Treaty was never revoked.

The Vactican – Religious Capital.
Washington DC – Military Capital.
City of London – Economic Capital.

WWI – League of Nations
WWII – United Nations
WWIII – NWO Full Spectrum Domination

Treaty of 1213 – The Beginning of the Lie… http://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City… http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

john mason
Guest
john mason

So what this article is hinting at is for the world to be free of these global terrorists, US and UK is to annihilate them? Destroy the elite, Rothschild, Clinton, Blair, Bush and the like. Can live with that ideology.

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

That’s what the article suggested. Not the destruction of entire countries.

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

long live marxism-leninism-maoism, long live the people’s war

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

The Rotschilds would like that.

seby
Guest
seby

So the nazis were the isis of those times?

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

yep you got it pal. Same as how the “savage Injuns” were the ISIS of 19th century or the Savage Muslesm were the ISIS of the 13th, 14th, 15,th century. Nothing ever changes.

seby
Guest
seby

I didn’t know Anglo-American capitalism existed back then. Didn’t it start with the pilgrims landing on Plymouth Rock?

I think you’ve got confused about mercenary proxy armies or been reading Ripley’s Believe it or Not rather than real history books or UN archives. Maybe you’re a relative of louise mensch?

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Check out each Empire, each war and just who was behind them all and what they wanted. Whatever century you look into. New faces, new names, but, same old characters.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

Bingo! We have a winner.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Bolsheviks, NAZIs, ISIS, Taliban – you can never keep up with the name changes, but, all run on the same ideology, with the same masters pulling the strings.

Aussie battler
Guest
Aussie battler

Churchill grand strategic plan was for Russia And Germany
To bleed each other white and destroy each others forces ,
With the few divisions left fighting in the Ural Mountains .
The Brits would step in and take over the whole of Europe
like some ripe low hanging fruit,hence the desperation and
Panic when the Russians smashed the Germans in Kursk
With the ensuing retreat,that’s what promoted the US and
UK second Front,not to help the Russians but to stop them
From conquering the whole of Germany.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

Let’s not forget that Britain was begging on its knees for financial help from the U.S.

hestroy
Guest
hestroy

Gas chambers? Total bullshit.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

What gets me, is the fact, that nobody notices 27 million lost lives from the Soviet Union, together with Japan on the verge of surrender, when WWII was over and Washington DC goes an uses the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Negasaki. Whatever Stalin or Hitler did, not condoning, but, that was nothing, compared to two Japanese Islands being vapourised.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

Good article – needed to be expressed and presented to the western public

seby
Guest
seby

Another good article on subject of WW2 from November last year. No relation to the illuminati brigade who’ve charged into the comments section here.

Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/11/29/why-the-west-falsifies-the-history-of-world-war-ii.html

All reminds me of an excellent history lesson given by the wise Vladimir Putin to the Polish head who tried vainly to embarrass him and Russian/Soviet history a few years ago. Very worthwhile viewing, only a few minutes.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

I shall read the article ‘Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II’ with great interest. Thank you for passing that on to me. Regarding the video, yes, I have seen that. But I am always glad to see it again on how Putin instructs the ignorant public on facts. I admire Putin’s character in that he doesn’t lower himself to putting other people down but simply informs and correct the false accusations – Putin, the best statesman on this planet. How I wish the ignorant Sheeple could see the lies and demonization that western corporate mainstream media… Read more »

Herbert Dorsey
Guest
Herbert Dorsey

What this article leaves out is the large influence of the Catholic Church in assisting the fascists rise to power in Europe, leading to World War II, which is well documented in books like “The Vatican’s Holocaust”, “The Secret History of the New World Order” and “The Secret History of the Jesuits”. World War II was just another battle in the Jesuit’s long war against non-Catholics or heretics.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

also “Crimen Magnus”

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I have just replied to a similar comment.

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City
http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

Together with the link to the Treaty of 1213.

comment image

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

The Zyklon B was used to treat the lice infestation among the prisoners.

tiger
Guest
tiger

Zyklon B (& A) contain HCN, which kills anything that breathes. There are better ways to treat lice. Your excuse is poor.

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

So please share with me what they did used to treat the lice infestation’s in the work/prison camps.

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

Antoni Jaromin Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.. https://www.google.pl/?gws_rd=ssl

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable

Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis
batavian01
Guest
batavian01

Yes. Operation Unthinkable.

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

Alex! PAR 5 Should be ‘perpetual’.
Such a good article.
Typos deface it.

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

oh color me shocked.
Of course the whole point of WWII was to get Germany and The Soviet Union to fight so they can weaken each other and USA then to come in and take over. USA did the same thing with Iran and Iran war of 1980.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

Chalk that one up as an additional item to celebrate on Purim.

Brian Johnston
Guest
Brian Johnston

A superficial and misleading article, which completely fails to identify the true enemy of Christian civilization. The enemy in this “never ending war” is not Anglo-American capitalism, but the synagogue of Satan.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Ah, how we love a nice smelly trail of red herrings and unsubstantiated allegations. It’s fascinating to see how the holohoax is put centre stage in Mr Christoforou’s fantasy version of history, as if the sufferings of der juden should somehow have been made the primary motivating force behind western geopolitical manoueverings during WW2; even assuming that they existed as a result of the “monumental crimes and rabid antisemitism” which he lays at Germany’s door, which no-one seems to have claimed until long after the war was over. No. The simplest explanation for this period of history boils down to… Read more »

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

I enjoyed your reply. But I think many elements of Mr Christoforou’s article are consonant with yours.
Your weakest point is your final one. To deny that Russia has stood in the way of Anglo (later Anglo-zionist hegemony) is to deny reality. Russia has been thwarting plans since the Great Game was announced (at least). Or the time of Catherine the Second. One of the most productive buttons installed in the heads of Westerners (for their various ruling Gestapos) is the Russophobe button.

MH
Guest
MH

I’ve posted this before and am grateful for the opportunity to post it again. Perhaps one person will read it and take it to heart and understand the implications of it for our past and our future on this planet. Shortly after the war ended a German official, a ministerial official being interrogated was asked if he felt they could really have defeated the Allies and if not, what was the point of fighting. He replied that “the purpose of the war was to reduce the Slavic populations by some 30,000,000 – millions”. So, it seems there was a public… Read more »

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

essentially, yes, under capitalism people are reduced to a factor of production (labor) rather than actual humans marxist works go into this in good detail if you’re interested (any negative feelings you have about the term is due to the ideology being dangerous to the ruling class, just in case) i need to read up on how genocide factors in specifically to imperialist capitalism, but my hunch is that by reducing the population they can reduce the labor force, and thus reduce production figures in the affected country, making them more prone to shortages in food, consumer goods, and hampering… Read more »

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

total baloney regarding marxism. Marxism is a critique used to enable communism.

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

You’re referring to the Hongerplan, explained in detail by Tooze in The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy, London: Allen Lane, 2006. ISBN 0-7139-9566-1 – I recommend it.

kolokol
Guest
kolokol
Sep 2017 Calendar
Guest

It’s alluring not just engaging!

Rick0Shea
Guest
Rick0Shea

I figured this out for myself years ago.

cap960
Guest
cap960

And now US/UK are in Ukraine supporting yet again NAZI fanatics. This time though the world is been fooled to believe Russia is the enemy.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Not all the world, just the masses, who know no better.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

“Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy».” I beg to differ with this Ferencz as Patton had been disgusted by the stench of those ‘victims’ for whom, he wrote to his wife, he was forced to evict decent, civilsed Germans from their homes. As well as having to join Eisenhower at a synagogue where he added, the stench from the Rabbis caused him to lose his dinner that night. He was referring to the fake-Jews who were fleeing Russia.… Read more »

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

It was General MacArthur who was hand-in-hand with these degenerates:
https://geopolitics.co/2012/02/02/the-last-senseless-war/

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

This might come across off topic, but, in a random way it fits in. Why is Israel funding politicians that are also fully supportive of the NAZI Party in Ukraine? How do they compliment each other Mr Engel? Also, have a look at how much they receive from the agricultural industry. Now why would the agricultural industry of the United States, be so interested in stopping Russia from being the leading grain exporter and what has that got to do with North Korea? THE US BILL H.R. 1644 TO KILL RUSSIAN FOOD EXPORT AND CHINESE TRADE… Author of the bill:… Read more »

hvaiallverden
Guest
hvaiallverden

Jesus f….. christ I am feed up with this Nazi this and Nazi that, and if you continue I simply dont bother to come here anymore, like RT and the so called Not the fake news” aka the PC/Sore-ass infested and run MSM in Norway, you somehow never talk or writes about the total picture, only 50 shades of manure, and this “articles” is always followed by Israel is going to do something.

But hey. we live in an “free world” dont we, the choice is yours.

peace

John Bull
Guest
John Bull

The “historians” of the west don’t want you to know that the Jews essentially started the war against Hitler with a worldwide boycott of German goods in an effort to tank the German economy and only after did Hitler respond with a boycott of his own. The grandfathers of George H.W. Bush, J.P. Morgan, Henry Ford et. al. helped to finance and rearm Hitler as a hedge against Bolshevism. The German Army had Ford trucks. There is huge list of complicit acts by the west no one wants us to know.

JDESQ
Guest
JDESQ

This report fails to distinguish between the support given by FDR to Stalin’s call for a second front and Churchill’s repeated attempts to stall its opening. This was made clear by Elliott Roosevelt, who was eyewitness to those discussions, in “As He Saw it,” which should be required reading for all students of American History. Likewise, the role of Churchill, who feared as US-USSR condominium to decolonize the Asia and Africa, in enjoining a pliable Harry S. Truman into the Cold War, is essential to understanding the role of the UK and its intelligence services in today’s world.

etniks
Guest
etniks

The well researched book by Antony Sutton called WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER since the seventies has come to the same conclusion. The actual outcome is the REAL NAZIS were not German, but those financiers who pushed with their money to support Hitler and the Nazi regime. According to the research, the current European Monarchies were scared sh —less of what happened to their cousin the Russian Czar and his family all assassinated by the Soviet soldiers, and wanted to collapse the Soviet Union to stop the “bad example” given to their own European citizens. The current hate… Read more »

lossarrow57
Guest
lossarrow57

USSR and Germany were the best friends and allies until June 22, 1941, and Russia has benefited from this friendship and cooperation. https://www.facebook.com/KonradKrzysztofKowalski/posts/1809607946032326?hc_location=ufi 1. The truth is that the USSR (Russia) – made unprovoked, brutal and criminal aggression on Poland on September 17 (co-operation Germany-USRR lasted from 1 September: guiding aircraft and pursuing Polish submarines), – The Red Army made numerous war crimes during the aggression – The NKVD worked closely with the Gestapo for the next 1.5 years – The Soviet Union committed crimes on the Polish population from 1931 to 1941 – Katyn crimes have no other precedent… Read more »

Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz
Guest
Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz

This historic article could have been a bit easier to swallow if had stuck to the original premise – the coalition of the mentioned parties against the Russian and eliminate all those references, to Gas Chambers, Final Solution and millions and all the rest of the established agenda taking points that one is prevented to question.

SteveLaudig
Guest

” perpetuous”? you mean perpetual. Get a native English language editor, it’ll help your cred.

Philadelphian
Guest
Philadelphian

Exact opposite of historical reality. Look up Malta conference, and whom attended and how they divided up ALL of Europe.

RJohn
Guest

In his books Wall Street and the rise of Hitler and Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Anthony Sutton documents how Corporate America, (with U.S. Government blessing), made it all possible…people must understand, Wall Street bears allegiance to no-one but profit…All wars are Banker’s wars…alliances change…but only superficially. Dig a little deeper and you’ll find a most peculiar pattern.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

The ” Nazi death Camp” story does not stand up to scrutiny it may well be true that the Yanks and Brits double-crossed the Nazis, it fits their style. The age old “let’s you and him fight” theme. Why did Hess fly to England? Why was he murdered in Spandau? Why did Hitler allow the Brits to escape via Dunkirk? Why did Hitler go to war against England with fighter aircraft that were only good for twenty minutes of flight time over England? Whats with the ridiculous gas chamber stories and zyklon-B? “When American and British forces overran western and… Read more »

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

For more on this I suggest reading Yehudi Menuhin’s excellent book “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”.

al p
Guest
al p

OK so the Soviet Union was targeted and rightly so…separating the horrific suffering of the people murdered under Stalin by both the Nazis and the Soviets, Stalin was an inhumane douchebag who also received billions of dollars of capitalist funding.

So this articles attempt to demonize anti-soviet efforts blurs the line between reality and fiction.

The very imposition of Bolshevism upon Russia was an Imperial British conspiracy and the mass murder of the Czars family among hundreds of thousands other Slavic peoples was genocide on a massive scale far outlasting Hitler’s few years on the global stage.

brad kahn
Guest
brad kahn

The Holocaust wasn’t just the German Solution… It was the Capitalist Solution..! International Financiers.. Big Industrialists The real bourgeoisie.. Always planned to use fascism as a battering ram against Communism. Before and After the war..! Hence, all the fascists Allan Foster Dulles put in power. Duh. Interestingly, After the war… When the fascist clique around Tojo Was disgorged and disassembled.. The Japanese ruling class used the Yakusa for the exact same purposes. In case you were wondering how an enormously powerful criminal apparatus could be formed in Japan… and yet…you can’t find a cigarette butt on the sidewalk anywhere in… Read more »

Philip Andrews
Guest
Philip Andrews

Yes, there was collusion between the US and UK as per Mackinder, to help Germany and the SU destroy each other through military and economic exhaustion. This notion has been gaining ground for some years now thanks to the writings of the late Antony Sutton. However, having grown up entirely in the CW, I still would not have wanted the Red Army at the Channel, in France. No thank you. I’m glad the US got in when it did and met the Red Army on the Elbe. Would not have wanted the Soviet system in Western Europe.

Putin's baby
Guest
Putin's baby

No surprises here then…

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

I’m afraid that all this is old hat as can be demonstrated from contemporary records. Churchill broadcast to denounce nazi atrocities and promise vengeance long before D Day. Bombing murder factories was a non-starter, what could the Allies use, Bomber Command which area bombed in default of adequate night navigation and target finding devices and was out of range of Auschwitz? US day bombers based in Italy from 1943? Bombers that were so inaccurate they sometimes bombed the wrong country? Mosquito bombers? They could get to Auschwitz in 1943 but there were only about 30 in Italy and most were… Read more »

Latest

EXPLOSIVE: Michael Cohen sentencing memo exposes serial liar with nothing to offer Mueller (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 38.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris take a quick look at the Michael Cohen sentencing memo which paints the picture of a man who was not as close to Trump as he made it out to be…a serial liar and cheat who leveraged his thin connections to the Trump organization for money and fame.

It was Cohen himself who proudly labelled himself as Trump’s “fixer”. The sentencing memo hints at the fact that even Mueller finds no value to Cohen in relation to the ongoing Trump-Russia witch hunt investigation.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via Axios

Special counsel Robert Mueller and federal prosecutors in New York have each submitted sentencing memos for President Trump’s former personal attorney Michael Cohen, after Cohen pleaded guilty in two different cases related to his work for Trump and the Trump Organization.

The big picture: The Southern District of New York recommended Cohen serve a range of 51 to 63 months for four crimes — “willful tax evasion, making false statements to a financial institution, illegal campaign contributions, and making false statements to Congress.” Mueller, meanwhile, did not take a position on the length of Cohen’s statement, but said he has made substantial efforts to assist the investigation.

Southern District of New York

Mueller investigation

Michael J. Stern, a federal prosecutor with the Justice Department for 25 years in Detroit and Los Angeles noted via USA Today

In support of their request that he serve no time in prison, Cohen’s attorneys offered a series of testimonials from friends who described the private Michael Cohen as a “truly caring” man with a “huge heart” who is not only “an upstanding, honorable, salt of the earth man” but also a “selfless caretaker.”

The choirboy portrayed by Cohen’s lawyers stands in sharp opposition to Cohen’s public persona as Trump’s legal bulldog, who once threatened a reporter with: “What I’m going to do to you is going to be f—ing disgusting. Do you understand me?”

Prosecutors focused their sentencing memo on Cohen as Mr. Hyde. Not only did they detail Cohen’s illegal activities, which include millions of dollars of fraud, they also recognized the public damage that stemmed from his political crimes — describing Cohen as “a man who knowingly sought to undermine core institutions of our democracy.”

Rebuffing efforts by Cohen’s attorneys to recast him as a good guy who made a few small mistakes, prosecutors cited texts, statements of witnesses, recordings, documents and other evidence that proved Cohen got ahead by employing a “pattern of deception that permeated his professional life.” The prosecutors attributed Cohen’s crimes to “personal greed,” an effort to “increase his power and influence,” and a desire to maintain his “opulent lifestyle.”

Perhaps the most damning reveal in the U.S. Attorney’s sentencing memo is that Cohen refused to fully cooperate. That’s despite his public relations campaign to convince us that he is a new man who will cooperate with any law enforcement authority, at any time, at any place.

As a former federal prosecutor who handled hundreds of plea deals like Cohen’s, I can say it is extremely rare for any credit to be recommended when a defendant decides not to sign a full cooperation deal. The only reason for a refusal would be to hide information. The prosecutors said as much in their sentencing memo: Cohen refused “to be debriefed on other uncharged criminal conduct, if any, in his past,” and “further declined” to discuss “other areas of investigative interest.”

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Canada to Pay Heavy Price for Trudeau’s Groupie Role in US Banditry Against China

Trudeau would had to have known about the impending plot to snatch Huawei CFO Wanzhou and moreover that he personally signed off on it.

Published

on

Authored by Finian Cunningham via The Strategic Culture Foundation:


You do have to wonder about the political savvy of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his government. The furious fallout from China over the arrest of a senior telecoms executive is going to do severe damage to Canadian national interests.

Trudeau’s fawning over American demands is already rebounding very badly for Canada’s economy and its international image.

The Canadian arrest – on behalf of Washington – of Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer of Chinese telecom giant Huawei, seems a blatant case of the Americans acting politically and vindictively. If the Americans are seen to be acting like bandits, then the Canadians are their flunkies.

Wanzhou was detained on December 1 by Canadian federal police as she was boarding a commercial airliner in Vancouver. She was reportedly handcuffed and led away in a humiliating manner which has shocked the Chinese government, media and public.

The business executive has since been released on a $7.4 million bail bond, pending further legal proceedings. She is effectively being kept under house arrest in Canada with electronic ankle tagging.

To add insult to injury, it is not even clear what Wanzhou is being prosecuted for. The US authorities have claimed that she is guilty of breaching American sanctions against Iran by conducting telecoms business with Tehran. It is presumed that the Canadians arrested Wanzhou at the request of the Americans. But so far a US extradition warrant has not been filed. That could take months. In the meantime, the Chinese businesswoman will be living under curfew, her freedom denied.

Canadian legal expert Christopher Black says there is no juridical case for Wanzhou’s detention. The issue of US sanctions on Iran is irrelevant and has no grounds in international law. It is simply the Americans applying their questionable national laws on a third party. Black contends that Canada has therefore no obligation whatsoever to impose those US laws regarding Iran in its territory, especially given that Ottawa and Beijing have their own separate bilateral diplomatic relations.

In any case, what the real issue is about is the Americans using legal mechanisms to intimidate and beat up commercial rivals. For months now, Washington has made it clear that it is targeting Chinese telecoms rivals as commercial competitors in a strategic sector. US claims about China using telecoms for “spying” and “infiltrating” American national security are bogus propaganda ruses to undermine these commercial rivals through foul means.

It also seems clear from US President Donald Trump’s unsubtle comments this week to Reuters, saying he would “personally intervene” in the Meng case “if it helped trade talks with China”, that the Huawei executive is being dangled like a bargaining chip. It was a tacit admission by Trump that the Americans really don’t have a legal case against her.

Canada’s foreign minister Chrystia Freeland bounced into damage limitation mode following Trump’s thuggish comments. She said that the case should not be “politicized” and that the legal proceedings should not be tampered with. How ironic is that?

The whole affair has been politicized from the very beginning. Meng’s arrest, or as Christopher Black calls it “hostage-taking”, is driven by Washington’s agenda of harassment against China for commercial reasons, under a legal pretext purportedly about Iranian sanctions.

When Trump revealed the cynical expediency of him “helping to free Wanzhou”, then the Canadians realized they were also being exposed for the flunkies that they are for American banditry. That’s why Freeland was obliged to quickly adopt the fastidious pretense of legal probity.

Canadian premier Justin Trudeau has claimed that he wasn’t aware of the American request for Wanzhou’s detention. Trudeau is being pseudo. For such a high-profile infringement against a senior Chinese business leader, Ottawa must have been fully briefed by the Americans. Christopher Black, the legal expert, believes that Trudeau would had to have known about the impending plot to snatch Wanzhou and moreover that he personally signed off on it.

What Trudeau and his government intended to get out of performing this sordid role for American thuggery is far from clear. Maybe after being verbally mauled by Trump as “weak and dishonest” at the G7 summit earlier this year, in June, Trudeau decided it was best to roll over and be a good little puppy for the Americans in their dirty deed against China.

But already it has since emerged that Canada is going to pay a very heavy price indeed for such dubious service to Washington. Beijing has warned that it will take retaliation against both Washington and Ottawa. And it is Ottawa that is more vulnerable to severe repercussions.

This week saw two Canadian citizens, one a former diplomat, detained in China on spying charges.

Canadian business analysts are also warning that Beijing can inflict harsh economic penalties on Ottawa. An incensed Chinese public have begun boycotting Canadian exports and sensitive Canadian investments in China are now at risk from being blocked by Beijing. A proposed free trade deal that was being negotiated between Ottawa and Beijing now looks dead in the water.

And if Trudeau’s government caves in to the excruciating economic pressure brought to bear by Beijing and then abides by China’s demand to immediately release Meng Wanzhou, Ottawa will look like a pathetic, gutless lackey to Washington. Canada’s reputation of being a liberal, independent state will be shredded. Even then the Chinese are unlikely to forget Trudeau’s treachery.

With comic irony, there’s a cringemaking personal dimension to this unseemly saga.

During the 197os when Trudeau’s mother Margaret was a thirty-something socialite heading for divorce from his father, then Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, she was often in the gossip media for indiscretions at nightclubs. Rolling Stones guitarist Keith Richards claims in his autobiography that Margaret Trudeau was a groupie for the band, having flings with Mick Jagger and Ronnie Wood. Her racy escapades and louche lifestyle brought shame to many Canadians.

Poor Margaret Trudeau later wound up divorced, disgraced, financially broke and scraping a living from scribbling tell-all books.

Justin, her eldest son, is finding out that being a groupie for Washington’s banditry is also bringing disrepute for him and his country.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

US Commits To “Indefinite” Occupation Of Syria; Controls Region The Size Of Croatia

Raqqa is beginning to look more and more like Baghdad circa 2005.

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


“We don’t want the Americans. It’s occupation” — a Syrian resident in US-controlled Raqqa told Stars and Stripes military newspaper. This as the Washington Post noted this week that “U.S. troops will now stay in Syria indefinitely, controlling a third of the country and facing peril on many fronts.”

Like the “forever war” in Afghanistan, will we be having the same discussion over the indefinite occupation of Syria stretching two decades from now? A new unusually frank assessment in Stars and Stripes bluntly lays out the basic facts concerning the White House decision to “stay the course” until the war’s close:

That decision puts U.S. troops in overall control, perhaps indefinitely, of an area comprising nearly a third of Syria, a vast expanse of mostly desert terrain roughly the size of Louisiana.

The Pentagon does not say how many troops are there. Officially, they number 503, but earlier this year an official let slip that the true number may be closer to 4,000

A prior New Yorker piece described the US-occupied area east of the Euphrates as “an area about the size of Croatia.” With no Congressional vote, no public debate, and not even so much as an official presidential address to the nation, the United States is settling in for another endless occupation of sovereign foreign soil while relying on the now very familiar post-911 AUMF fig leaf of “legality”.

Like the American public and even some Pentagon officials of late have been pointing out for years regarding Afghanistan, do US forces on the ground even know what the mission is? The mission may be undefined and remain ambiguously to “counter Iran”, yet the dangers and potential for major loss in blood and treasure loom larger than ever.

According to Stars and Stripes the dangerous cross-section of powder keg conflicts and geopolitical players means “a new war” is on the horizon:

The new mission raises new questions, about the role they will play and whether their presence will risk becoming a magnet for regional conflict and insurgency.

The area is surrounded by powers hostile both to the U.S. presence and the aspirations of the Kurds, who are governing the majority-Arab area in pursuit of a leftist ideology formulated by an imprisoned Turkish Kurdish leader. Signs that the Islamic State is starting to regroup and rumblings of discontent within the Arab community point to the threat of an insurgency.

Without the presence of U.S. troops, these dangers would almost certainly ignite a new war right away, said Ilham Ahmed, a senior official with the Self-Administration of North and East Syria, as the self-styled government of the area is called.

“They have to stay. If they leave and there isn’t a solution for Syria, it will be catastrophic,” she said.

But staying also heralds risk, and already the challenges are starting to mount.
So a US-backed local politician says the US can’t leave or there will be war, while American defense officials simultaneously recognize they are occupying the very center of an impending insurgency from hell — all of which fits the textbook definition of quagmire perfectly.

The New Yorker: “The United States has built a dozen or more bases from Manbij to Al-Hasakah, including four airfields, and American-backed forces now control all of Syria east of the Euphrates, an area about the size of Croatia.”

But in September the White House announced a realignment of its official priorities in Syria, namely to act “as a bulwark against Iran’s expanding influence.” This means the continued potential and likelihood of war with Syria, Iran, and Russia in the region is ever present, per Stripes:

Syrian government troops and Iranian proxy fighters are to the south and west. They have threatened to take the area back by force, in pursuit of President Bashar Assad’s pledge to bring all of Syria under government control.

Already signs of an Iraq-style insurgency targeting US forces in eastern Syria are beginning to emerge.

In Raqqa, the largest Syrian city at the heart of US occupation and reconstruction efforts, the Stripes report finds the following:

The anger on the streets is palpable. Some residents are openly hostile to foreign visitors, which is rare in other towns and cities freed from Islamic State control in Syria and Iraq. Even those who support the presence of the U.S. military and the SDF say they are resentful that the United States and its partners in the anti-ISIS coalition that bombed the city aren’t helping to rebuild.

And many appear not to support their new rulers.

We don’t want the Americans. It’s occupation,” said one man, a tailor, who didn’t want to give his name because he feared the consequences of speaking his mind. “I don’t know why they had to use such a huge number of weapons and destroy the city. Yes, ISIS was here, but we paid the price. They have a responsibility.”

Recent reports out of the Pentagon suggests defense officials simply want to throw more money into US efforts in Syria, which are further focused on training and supplying the so-called Syrian Democratic Forces (or Kurdish/YPG-dominated SDF), which threatens confrontation with Turkey as its forces continue making preparations for a planned attack on Kurdish enclaves in Syria this week.

Meanwhile, Raqqa is beginning to look more and more like Baghdad circa 2005:

Everyone says the streets are not safe now. Recent months have seen an uptick in assassinations and kidnappings, mostly targeting members of the security forces or people who work with the local council. But some critics of the authorities have been gunned down, too, and at night there are abductions and robberies.

As America settles in for yet another endless and “indefinite” occupation of a Middle East country, perhaps all that remains is for the president to land on an aircraft carrier with “Mission Accomplished” banners flying overhead?

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending