in ,

Leaked documents about Malaysian Boeing MH17

Yana Yerlashova and Max van der Werff discuss the leaked documents about the case of the Malaysian Boeing MH17.

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

Via Bonanza Media…

Bonanza Media published a new video with more explanations on the leaked documents from our previous newsletter. You can check it out here:

Complete documents of all 4 leaks plus a new one can be downloaded as one folder with separate PDF-files by clicking this link. [Total file size 3 Mb – link expires February 29]

Regarding the authenticity of the leaked document ‘Operation Avanella’, conducted by the AFP, the Australian police issued a following statement:

Some of the documents recently distributed without permission are documents of the Australian Federal Police, prepared as part of the investigation being carried out by the Joint Investigation Group (JIT).

Regarding the authenticity of a leaked letter report about BUK positions in Russia and Ukraine made by Dutch Intelligence.

Last time we published an incomplete document in English that is based on a Dutch original. Now you can also see what the original looks like.

The Dutch MIVD sent Bonanza Media a following statement on the authenticity of this leaked document:

We do not comment on the request below. For further questions, we refer you to the OM, which you have already included in this question.

The Dutch Prosecution Service response to Bonanza Media was:

In the run-up to the MH17 court case, various documents appear in the media that refer to the JIT investigation. Although we understand that there are questions, the Dutch OM does not make statements about these documents. Questions about evidence will be answered in court because that is the only place where we want to speak freely about this.

NEW LEAK.

On the same day the document from MIVD was written (21 September 2016) a supplementary letter was made about another Buk Telar that was not mentioned in the main letter.

The Buk Telar mentioned in this document was closest to the point where the Malaysian Boeing was shot down, but MIVD explains this Telar could not have been the murder weapon, because it was heavily damaged.

More images on social media of this Telar’s location:

48°5’58.00″N 37°45’13.00″E

As you can see the Dutch military did a thorough job locating relevant Buk Telar positions in the conflict area in which MH17 was shot down. Let’s not forget that MIVD is a professional organization with contacts at highest NATO levels and with access to satellite images of ESA and many other sources.

Based on the information presented, the main conclusion we make is this: The Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service on 21 September 2016 (ONE WEEK before the JIT press-conference on 28th September 2016!) had no information from any reliable source that any Russian Buk-M1 had crossed the border with Ukraine during any time during the conflict.

It will be interesting to follow the court proceedings and study the evidence presented from other sources such as social media, and sources that base their conclusions on social media. Could it be that they are better informed than the military professionals who are trained and specialized to know these kind of things?

Regarding a Record of Interview with a witness refuting the claim Ukrainian Air Force did not fly.

We also published a Dutch version.

A quick reminder of what the witness saw and heard himself:

– 2 fighter jets in the sky, which circled over the town a few minutes before the Boeing went down.
– a loud bang over his head
– a HORIZONTAL white trail
– The Boeing coming down

Here’s the witness. His name is Boris. We were able to trace him during our first trip to Donbass this year. Thank you all who supported us financially to make it happen!

Boris agreed to an interview and his new testimony complies with what he said to the JIT. We are in the process of making a report about Boris MH17 story.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Please keep us going! Donation options:

https://www.patreon.com/bonanzamedia

https://www.paypal.me/bonanzamedia

Bank transfer: M.B.W. van der Werff
IBAN NL77 INGB 00076630 89

You can subscribe here and never miss a newsletter.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

17 Points
Upvote Downvote
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
45 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
LOL
LOL
February 25, 2020

I think it’s cute that that Ukrainian BUK in the photo had patriotic blue jugs and yellow canisters. Probably vodka in the jug and laughing gas in the canisters. Maybe even chlorine gas, to suggest a Russian chemical attack on MH17. Syria’s ‘benevolent jihadi intervention’ began 2 years before, so monkey see, monkey do after all.

Joe
Joe
February 25, 2020

And do you think that the JIT are going to listen to “Boris” when they have ignored official Russian submissions to the “inquiry? No, the so called investigation is a whitewash – – they’ve already made up their minds who to blame and it’s not the real culprits, the Ukronazis.

AMHants
AMHants
Reply to  Joe
February 25, 2020

Ukraine, using the Lewis Carol script ‘sentence first, verdict later’ may remain deaf and dumb. However, looking forward to the trial on 9 March 2020, when substantiated and factual evidence, from the defence team, is presented in a court of law.

So true
So true
Reply to  Joe
February 25, 2020

The Ukronazis were guilty of so much more that was whitewashed by their ‘enablers’, that it would go against the laws of probability to assume they weren’t involved somehow.

Oops
Oops
Reply to  So true
February 26, 2020

I think one of their ‘enablers’ just down voted me.

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  Oops
February 26, 2020

Now you got your plusses back. I always go around giving a plus to nice people, whose opinion I value. Cheers!

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 26, 2020

Came back and saw that you even got ” plusses” now. Cheers. We are going upwards at the DURAN, not downwards.

Smoking Eagle
Smoking Eagle
Reply to  Joe
February 26, 2020

I think the real culprits were standing in the shadows behind the Ukronazis telling them what to do.

AMHants
AMHants
February 25, 2020

Murdoch’s Australian TV Channel, produced a documentary on MH17, including a recorded transcript from the brave farmers and miners, over in Eastern Ukraine. They had a conversation, stating the MH17 had gone down, but, it was no them who were responsible. They were responsible for hitting the two military jets, shadowing the plane. A groundsman, stated three military jets took off, on that day. One loaded with air to air missiles. It returned with an empty load. The pilot, who later committed suicide, was rambling that they took out the wrong plane. The BBC deleted the witness statement video, where… Read more »

Smoking Eagle
Smoking Eagle
Reply to  AMHants
February 25, 2020

“Ukraine provided a video, showing the route the BUK took, featuring elderberry bushes, in full bloom, in July 2014, completely ignorant of the fact, nature would not have had elderberry bushes, in full bloom during that period.” Now that is totally priceless, AM. This is the kind of thing that happens when you remove nature study and ecology from the curriculum and have people in charge who are either ignorant or else think that we are. I watched a video (don’t know if it was from the BBC, though), where Ukrainian on-the-ground witnesses spoke about two military jets they saw… Read more »

AM Hants
AM Hants
Reply to  Smoking Eagle
February 25, 2020

Also, do you remember the BBC showing Building 7 being taken out on 9/11. Only it was 20 minutes prior to it happening?

MH17 Inquiry: The Elderberry Bush
Episode 2 of the investigative series by the MH17 Inquiry Youtube channel… off guardian 2016 07 09 MH17 Inquiry Into The Elderberry Bush.

Not sure if the Duran except links.

Kolomoysky: Sorry about the MH17 – but it is a trifle – ENG SUBS… You Tube dot com v=c3IgPGsdfG0

Smoking Eagle
Smoking Eagle
Reply to  AM Hants
February 26, 2020

I didn’t see it on the news when it happened 20 minutes before it happened but I read plenty of commentary on the pre-event afterwards.

Thanks for the links. I have posted links here before and they have been accepted.

AMHants
AMHants
Reply to  Smoking Eagle
February 26, 2020

Cheers and nice to know links are accepted. Was not sure.

Walking like a duck
Walking like a duck
Reply to  AMHants
February 25, 2020

BBC is state-sponsored yellow journalism. Time to flush it down the loo.

Smoking Eagle
Smoking Eagle
Reply to  Walking like a duck
February 26, 2020

I find this really sad because I grew up in a relatively sane time when the BBC programmes started in the late morning and ended about 10:30/11:00 at night. Cricket, football, gardening shows, operas, symphonies, plays, children’s programmes like Bill and Ben the Flowerpot Men, Saturday night variety shows, and David Attenborough’s Zoo Quest. No stupid Hollywood stuff. No ridiculous US cartoons. That was basically it. Just the BEEB, no BBC 1, 2, 3 or 4, and no advertising. And then as more people bought TVs, it gradually turned into a brainwashing selling and government propaganda machine. But what western… Read more »

AMHants
AMHants
Reply to  Smoking Eagle
February 26, 2020

Used to love ‘watch with mother’ and ‘Jackanory’ back in the days of innocence, laughter, humour, freedom of speech and when you could watch and enjoy ‘rag bands’ and view the ‘Black and white’ minstrels as entertainers, whilst eating Robinson jam sandwiches, and not be viewed as a racist. When toddlers were allowed to listen to nursery rhymes and have the works of Enid Blyton, on their reading shelves, when ma or pa read them a bedtime story. Then along came the EU, outside funding to the BBC, including EU funding and he founder of Common Purpose, David Bell, found… Read more »

Frank van den Kommer
Frank van den Kommer
Reply to  AMHants
March 6, 2020

As a Dutchman I very much support the suggestions that it is an international set-up. The Dutch have conformed themselves to support the international anti-Russia campaign as a very obedient NATO partner and make every effort to support this Anglo-Saxon conspiracy. The Dutch government is supported in every department by a Dutch (CIA controlle) ‘Nudging’ company (BiN.nl), which hides behind an innocent facade as a ‘consultancy agency’, (but it does bear the national coat of arms in its logo …..). I think that there are more psychologists and media expers working for JIT than forensic experts to ensure that this… Read more »

Something's Rotten in the Rada
Something's Rotten in the Rada
February 25, 2020

That pilot’s alleged suicide is extremely suspicious. What was his name, Voloshin?

Yes, Voloshin, just checked it. What a memory. (self-pat on the back)

AM Hants
AM Hants
Reply to  Something's Rotten in the Rada
February 25, 2020

‘…In 2015, a key witness, Evgeny Agapov, an aviation armaments technician with the Ukrainian Air Force, testified that on July 17, 2014, a Ukrainian Sukhoi Su-25 jet aircraft piloted by Voloshin “set out for a military task” and returned without munitions. Agapov has also claimed that the pilot returned from the sortie very agitated and told his colleagues that the plane was “in the wrong place at the wrong time.” The testimony fuelled a narrative that MH17 might have been downed by a Ukranian plane with an air-to-air missile, however, this was not backed by the material evidence available. READ… Read more »

Wesaf
Wesaf
Reply to  Something's Rotten in the Rada
March 14, 2020

Any ideas what happened to the Spanish Air Traffic Controller.Not sure but think his name was Carlos,he wrote a report and then vanished.

John C Durham
February 26, 2020

I was following the event closely at the time on the internet. For a short time “a Spanish Flight Controller, working in Ukraine talked about two Ukrainian AirForce planes which flew close to the Boeing craft. He was shocked to report the Boeing was going down right after the planes got very close and then pulled away from the Boeing. I believe that a missile was reported by the Spanish Controller by his instruments. Only the Russians presented information on an Ukrainian aircraft that was close to the plane. I take Boris’ testimony and see that he confirms that the… Read more »

Muddy Waters Blues
Muddy Waters Blues
Reply to  John C Durham
February 26, 2020

I suspect the Spanish controller story might have been thrown into the mix by the Ukrainians posing as Russians (under CIA direction even) to cast doubt on all evidence straying from their script.

They do that you know. They do it quite often in fact. Muddying the waters, in layman’s terms. Either that or they just ‘disappeared’ this Spaniard. They do that too.

Smoking Eagle
Smoking Eagle
Reply to  Muddy Waters Blues
February 26, 2020

The CIA’s habit of muddying the waters sets the believers against the disbelievers and once everyone is arguing over who’s right and who’s wrong the CIA has won. Divide and conquer. They must have Aesop’s Fables on CIA bookshelves: The Father and his Quarrelling Sons: Divide and rule/United we stand A father whose sons constantly quarrelled, asked them to bring him a bundle of sticks and then challenged each in turn to break the bundle over their knees, which they found impossible. He then split the bundle and showed how each individual stick could easily be broken. “United you are… Read more »

AMHants
AMHants
Reply to  Smoking Eagle
February 26, 2020

Do not forget, NATO was finishing ‘Operation Breeze’ on that day. An exercise focused on air traffic control, with an Aegis destroyer as part of the group. Wonder why they never released their radar data, to help with the investigation? Not forgetting the US satellite system was shown to have been active, when the MH17 went down and recorded events. Why didn’t the US provide the DSB with satellite data? Why was their no forensic analysis on the shrapnel fragments, found in the entry and exit holes? It would have provided the factual evidence as to what missile was used.… Read more »

Hmmm
Hmmm
Reply to  AMHants
February 26, 2020

They actually even had the audacity to publish the serial number of the alleged missile. Then the Russians eventually located the USSR log showing the very missile shipped to Ukraine in the 80’s.

Why no forensic analysis demanded on the log? Adjacent ink analysis and dating, handwriting analysis. Are these obscure techniques only known to the Forensic Files TV series?

Govert
Govert
Reply to  Hmmm
February 27, 2020

Have the shown documents been handed over for forensic analysis? There was another funny thing in what was published of them on TV, the missile was manufactured almost a year after it had been shipped to Ukraine.

Govert
Govert
Reply to  AMHants
February 27, 2020

Who told you “the US did not provide the DSB with satellite data”? (Instead of DSB, read JIT).

Smoking Eagle
Smoking Eagle
Reply to  John C Durham
February 26, 2020

It is tragic that they killed a planeload of innocent people, but I am really glad that they failed to get President Putin. Putin says that he’s escaped multiple assassination attempts, and that he and the late Fidel Castro (who also faced many CIA attempts on his life) had conversations about personal security. I hope Fidel was a good teacher.

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  Smoking Eagle
February 26, 2020

I am also very glad that Putin’s plane changed its route and escaped the assassination attempt.

AMHants
AMHants
Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 26, 2020

Didn’t he have a phone call with Obama, whilst flying through Swiss airspace, just before changing flight paths? Following a very successful BRICS summit?

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  AMHants
February 26, 2020

I do not know where the phone call came from. His security service and pilots were warned somehow. The Russian secret services are very secretive, they won’t tell.

AMHants
AMHants
Reply to  John C Durham
February 26, 2020

Carlos, the Spanish Air Traffic Controller and whatever happened to him? Did you know, the female air traffic control officer, was given annual leave the following day? Never to return and despite being responsible for the flight, whilst in Ukrainian airspace, she was never interviewed? I wonder why? What plane were they expecting, due back from a very successful BRICS summit? Similar colouring and flight image of MH17. Why did Kolomoiskys apologise for taking out the wrong flight? Koloimoisky, the Ukrainian oligarch, who had control of Ukraine’s aviation industry and Air traffic control. The Head of the European Jewish Community,… Read more »

Je Me Souviens
Je Me Souviens
Reply to  AMHants
February 26, 2020

Far too many steaming piles of fascist manure lying around in that black earth called Ukraine. The weeds are prolific.

Govert
Govert
Reply to  AMHants
February 27, 2020

Carlos? After being expelled from Ukraine in May 2014, two months before “MH17”, was imprisoned for fraud in Spain, now probably lives in Romania. The impostor never was an air traffic controller.

Olivia Kroth
February 26, 2020

TASS: Kremlin says new data on MH17 crash in Ukraine demonstrates that Russia was right — Dmitry Peskov has commented on the leaked document of the Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service MOSCOW, February 18. /TASS/. New revelations about the MH17 crash in Ukraine in 2014 just go to prove that the Russian side was right, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Monday, commenting on the leaked document of the Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service saying that the incident took place in the region where no Buk missile systems were deployed at the time of the tragedy. “It once… Read more »

AMHants
AMHants
Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 26, 2020

Do like Dmitry Peskov.

Does anybody remember the Russian General, holding a press conference, using Russian satellite data, a few days after the MH17, where it mentioned the military jets?

Olivia Kroth
Reply to  AMHants
February 26, 2020

I also like Russian press speaker Dmitry Peskov. He is doing a good job, speaks perfect English and also has humour.

Joop
Joop
Reply to  AMHants
February 26, 2020

@AM Hants,

Yes, I do remember. Would you like to know what I’m also remember? I will tell you.

After the Russian pressconference on 21 july 2014, I kept an eye on the English Wikipedia page of the SU-25. What do you think happened? There was a person with the initials “BLLCT” who was monitoring/controling the service ceiling of that jetfighter. By telling people this page was under a Russian bot attack, he kept the service ceiling at 7,000 meters. The Dutch Wikipedia page of the simular jetfigher removed all technical specifications.

Govert
Govert
Reply to  AMHants
February 27, 2020

I remember. The “satellite data” is now refuted by this “leaked” MIVD document above. Like the alledged “strange deviation” was silently refuted by their own radar data in Fall 2016 (and many other sources before that by the way). Like the military jets narrative was refuted by that very same radar data and destroyed by the now leaked “eye witness” report. I like these “leaks”. Electric bycicle seller Van der Werff is doing a great job.

Je Me Souviens
Je Me Souviens
Reply to  Olivia Kroth
February 26, 2020

JIT = OPCW = WADA. They’ve all been exposed as tools and fools.

Govert
Govert
February 26, 2020

Regarding this “eye witness” report, well, what “Boris proves is that – contrary to the many accusations of ignoring “eye witness evidence” by the investigators – at least one “eye witness” was heard. If this “Boris” is not lying, we have the confirmation that the sky was overcast, even “rather heavily overcast”; according to him “no sun could be seen because of the clouds.” So what does this mean for all the “eye witness” stories that claim to have seen the airliner (flying at an altitude of 10 kilometers, far above the clouds) being attacked by fighter jets? Anyway, “Boris”… Read more »

Joop
Joop
Reply to  Govert
February 26, 2020

It seems quite clear to me! If they can use this picture as evidence for the launch of a BUK missile, where are the clouds?

comment image

Govert
Govert
Reply to  Joop
February 26, 2020

Over-exposure. The other photo clearly shows the overcast sky.

Joop
Joop
Reply to  Govert
February 27, 2020

Okay, so the other picture was under exposed!

Frank van den Kommer
Frank van den Kommer
March 6, 2020

Why was there a time lock on the documents?
I just found this site, want to read those docs, but they’re gone ! 🙁

Any one who downloaded them and wants to share them with me ?

CIA & BND spy scandal shakes Switzerland neutrality (Video)

Indigenous Communities Revolt Against Eco-Colonialists: Trudeau Crumbles Under His Own Liberalism