US Secretary of State John Kerry is trying to pull another fast one…kind of like the fast one they all pulled right before bombing Libya into the stone age.
While at the United Nations, Kerry began arguing that it would be impossible to separate “moderate rebels” from Al Qaeda jihadists, as long as Al Qaeda was under attack. So Kerry want Russia and Syria to stop attacking Al Qaeda.
You heard that right…the same terror organisation that took down the WTC in 2001, is now under the protection of John Kerry and Co.
Here is what Kerry said…
Now, I have said to Russia many times it’s very hard to separate people when they are being bombed indiscriminately and when Assad has the right to determine who he’s going to bomb, because he can, quote, ‘go after Nusrah’ but go after the opposition at the same time because he wants to.
Why US kept Syria truce terms secret:
Syrian planes prohibited from flying over areas where al-Nusra is present
i.e. US protecting al-Qaeda pic.twitter.com/LQ6NuUZqSI
— the Lemniscat (@theLemniscat) September 22, 2016
The Ron Paul Institute adds some much needed logic to John Kerry’s twisted logic…
No wonder the United States insisted that its Syria ceasefire deal with Russia remain secret! It turns out that one of the US demands was that the Syrian air force must be prohibited from attacking al-Nusra Front (al-Qaeda in Syria).See Also
Does this make any sense? It seem much more logical to argue that the threat of being bombed alongside al-Qaeda would be the greatest incentive for “moderates” to separate themselves from al-Qaeda as soon as possible!
You would think Washington would tell its “moderates”: “You must cease and desist from fighting alongside al-Qaeda in Syria within the next 48 hours or you will yourselves become targets of Syrian, Russian, and coalition planes.”
Instead Washington argues that because its “moderates” refuse to separate from al-Qaeda the Russians and Syrians must stop attacking al-Qaeda!
George W. Bush famously said, “either you’re with us, or you are with the terrorists.” But what happens when Washington itself is “with the terrorists”?