in ,

IISS Research: Europe cannot defend itself without U.S.

Submitted by Adomas Abromaitis…


International research institutes very often provide assessments which cause just a revolution in the thinking of ordinary people and even politicians. Such reports give impetus to decisive actions and revision of existing strategies and politics.

One of such reports is “Defending Europe: scenario-based capability requirements for NATO’s European members” made by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS). An independent open-source high-level assessment of how the defence of Europe, would look if the United States had left NATO and did not contribute militarily has been published in May.

Though it is stated that research paper “does not intend to predict future conflicts nor the intentions of any of the actors involved”, it gives Europe the reasons to rethink situation and take some actions.

The 50-page report applies scenario analysis to generate force requirements, and assesses the ability of NATO’s European member states to meet these requirements.

The experts give two scenarios for the development of events in the absence of financial support from the U.S. The first scenario examined deals with the protection of the global sea lines of communication (SLOCs). In this scenario, the United States has withdrawn from NATO and has also abandoned its role of providing global maritime presence and protection, not just for its own national interest but also as an international public good. It thus falls to European countries to achieve and sustain a stable maritime-security environment in European waters and beyond, to enable the free flow of international maritime trade, and to protect global maritime infrastructure. The IISS assesses that European NATO members would have to invest between US$94 billion and US$110bn to fill the capability gaps generated by this scenario.

The second scenario deals with the defence of European NATO territory against a state-level military attack. In this scenario, tensions between Russia and NATO members Lithuania and Poland escalate into war after the US has left NATO. Russia uses its ally Belarus to deploy troops in its territory.

Belarus (borders Poland and Lithuania) puts its armed forces on alert, its military and air-defence command and control (C2) structures are integrated into Russian networks, and there is a limited mobilisation of reserves. Russian logistic, airdefence and C2 units deploy to Belarus, as does the full 1st Guards Tank Army and an air-assault brigade.

This war results in the Russian occupation of Lithuania and some Polish territory seized by Russia. Invoking Article V, the European members of NATO direct the Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) to plan Operation Eastern Shield to reassure Estonia, Latvia and Poland, and other front-line NATO member states, by deterring further Russian aggression. European NATO also prepares and assembles forces for Operation Eastern Storm, a military operation to restore Polish and Lithuanian government control over their territories.

The IISS assesses that European NATO members would have to invest between US$288bn and US$357bn to fill the capability gaps generated by this scenario. These investments would establish a NATO Europe force level that would likely allow it to prevail in a limited regional war in Europe against a peer adversary.

The matter is some of the capabilities provided by US forces, such as logistics and sustainment for land forces, may be relatively straightforward if not cheap to replace.

However others are almost unique to the US, and it would be difficult to substitute European capabilities.

One of the implications of this research is the enduring importance of the US in military terms for the defence of Europe. This study provides a reality check for the ongoing debate on European strategic autonomy.

The IISS assesses that the recapitalisation across the military domains would take up to 20 years, with some significant progress around the ten- and 15-year marks.

Europe should also take into account that though this scenario is only hypothetical, in reality Russia and Belarus continue intensive military training. In October they are going to conduct massive joint military exercise Union Shield 2019 simulating joint military activity in case of armed conflict. There is concern that Europe has capabilities to appropriately react on such activities without the U.S.

In other words, the authors of the report demonstrate the direct dependence of the European countries on the U.S. in military sphere and even prescribe a certain path of action to be pursued by European NATO governments. If Europe really wants to be independent, it should start with increasing its capabilities and break a deep dependence on the U.S. and its money.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

What do you think?

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
6 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
RegulaVera GottliebjgarboSuch is Lifesquare Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
You Made Your Bed, Now.....
Guest
You Made Your Bed, Now.....

Can’t defend itself against what, Libyan boat armadas?

Bente Petersen
Guest
Bente Petersen

And who should Europe defend itself against ? this is all the usual NATO BS…

Such is Life
Guest
Such is Life

I think by now most of the world sees NATO for the bullcookie armada that it’s become.. It would make an excellent protagonist in a Samuel Becket sequel. “Waiting for Godot to Bestow Meaning Upon My Paranoid Delusions” and other surrealistic tales from the Theater of the Absurd.

square
Guest
square

Defend from who ? That is the question that needs to be addressed first.
The “enemy” with a record to prove it ,is the USA.

jgarbo
Guest
jgarbo

The only country threatening Europe is the US, its protector (?) However, one should trust the fairness of the IISS assessment (if one’s brains are mush).

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

I think what Europe needs is to defend itself FROM the US.

Regula
Guest
Regula

And from these think tanks that shill for the US war monger state.

Regula
Guest
Regula

A great NATO advertisement! And of course, just as the US wants, Europe should invest all its money into its military – that is NATO under the US and for the US, especially in its hegemony wars it can no longer afford. Let the Europeans pay for them.

Try diplomacy, it works for a fraction of the cost !

How Banks, Real Estate, and Insurance Companies Crush The People

Trump Attacks Military Industrial Complex and Calls for Infrastructure Investments in the Middle East