in ,

Georgia and Ukraine Joining NATO Will Likely Have the Opposite Effect Against Russia

NATO Is Divided in Their Russia Policy

Submitted by InfoBrics, authored by Paul Antonopoulos, Research Fellow at the Center for Syncretic Studies…

Back in April, during a ministers of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) meeting in Washington, it was agreed that a package of measures to strengthen support for Georgia and Ukraine, particularly in the area of ​​maritime defense, would be made.

“We agreed on a package of measures to improve our situational awareness and to step up our support for both Georgia and Ukraine in areas such as the training of maritime forces and coast guards, port visits and exercises and sharing information,” NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg said, while NATO ships were simultaneously conducting naval exercises with Ukraine and Georgia in the Black Sea.

There is little doubt that there is the long-term goal of bringing Ukraine and Georgia into the NATO alliance as a three-pronged attack against Russia in the attempt to isolate and pressure the Eurasian Giant:

Both Ukraine and Georgia are Black Sea states, along with Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey who are already NATO members. The Black Sea is the location of Russia’s warmwater ports, i.e. its access for year-round trade with the international community.

Although Russia’s Kaliningrad Oblast is completely surrounded by NATO members Poland and Lithuania, and fellow NATO members Norway, Estonia and Latvia share small land borders with Russia, a Ukrainian admittance into the alliance will be the biggest encroachment by NATO against Russia since the infamous February 1990 promise made by then-U.S. Secretary of State James Baker who made “iron-clad guarantees” to Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO would not expand “one inch eastward,” if the Soviets supported the reunification of Germany. This was obviously a lie.

Georgia will become a Caucasian salient, on the fringes of where Europe becomes Asia, in the attempt to surround and isolate Russia.

However, both Ukraine and Georgia face significant obstacles as they have unresolved territorial dispute: Ukraine with the Lugansk People’s Republic and the Donetsk People’s Republic, and Georgia who does not recognize the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia despite the reality that these states have achieved sovereignty. So long as the sovereignty and independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, and the status quo of Donbass remains unresolved, there is little chance Ukraine and Georgia will be able to join NATO with European member states unwilling to go to war with Russia for the sake of these two countries.

As L. Todd Wood, a former special operations helicopter pilot, said in an opinion piece published in the Washington Times in November last year, “Ukrainians and Georgians are good people and deserve our support to realize their dreams. But it’s time to stop with the creeping borders of the alliance. Moscow […] declared that if Georgia or Ukraine joined NATO, Russia would be “forced to act.” I take that threat at face value. Frankly, they have no choice. Any self-respecting Russian leader would have to react or resign.”

Perhaps this is exactly what the U.S. wants though? The Soviet Union, the reason for the establishment of NATO to begin with, is long gone and will not return. This calls into question the purpose of NATO today, and it comes down to two U.S. self-serving reasons:

The desperate prevention of a new Multipolar World Order, which Russia plays a critical part in. It is for this reason that China has now also been identified by NATO as a “very strong competitor.” However, Russia’s defense of South Ossetia in 2008 and the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative has already indicated that the era of unipolarity has come to an end.

To ensure that the U.S. Military Industrial Complex maintains a monopoly on arms sales to the 29-member alliance. The addition of Georgia and Ukraine to NATO will force these countries to spend at least 2% of their GDP on their military, in which U.S. military manufacturers will benefit from.

Any Ukrainian-Georgian admittance into NATO will undoubtably create problems for Russia as it will have to increase its defense spending and it would signal the final eastward expansion onto large swathes of Russia’s European borders. Realistically though, NATO is fractured as never seen before. It is unlikely that Georgia and Ukraine will join the alliance anytime soon, especially as mentioned, it is unlikely European states will want to risk a conflict with Russia over them despite what Washington may want.

In turn, Moscow has its own options to utilize against Georgia and Ukraine such as deepening military support and ties to Donbass, Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Also, as done in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the local government of Sevastopol in 2014, referendums could be conducted in Donbass, Abkhazia and South Ossetia to determine if these republic’s want to join Russia. With this trump card (trump being used unironically), by Ukraine and Georgia joining NATO, they could be further weakened by the potential expansion of Russian territory through legal means.

In this light, although Georgia and Ukraine have the goal of joining NATO in the belief that it will help defend their interests against a so-called Russian aggression, it is likely to have the opposite outcome.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Duran.

What do you think?

8
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
4 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
TheCelotajsJohn BurnsSapere AudeThe Trilateral Commission turns Multi-PolarMe and My Vassal States Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
AM Hants
Member
AM Hants

Back in 1997, Ukraine tried to join NATO, but, could not, owing to the fact that Russia, Ukraine and Belarus have not ratified their borders, since the fall of the Soviet Union, back in 1991, in accordance with international law. The argument can be found in the Dale Stewart thesis, ‘1997 Russia Ukraine Friendship Treaty’ – page 63 provides the conclusion. Funnily though, the US has set up 13 bio-chemical weapon labs in Ukraine, with full diplomatic immunity. Now why does Bill Gates and his vaccination programme, together with heavy investments in Monsanto (also set up base in Ukraine) so… Read more »

Go Green, It's really Keen
Guest
Go Green, It's really Keen

My personal favorite is all of the SBUCIA troll farms that have sprout up all across Ukraine’s black earth. I’ll have mine with a bit of latte spumata, thank you.

frigga karl
Guest
frigga karl

I am waiting impatiently for a multipolar world . NATO is obsolete! Nobody in this Eurasian Area wants NATO ! Only the impoverished governments of ex USSR states hope for a future with dollars. But their governments are so corrupted and NATO speculate on it. This is the basis of NATO, what a shame!

Me and My Vassal States
Guest
Me and My Vassal States

USNATO’s the next best thing to a 19th century colonial empire. I’m surprised you would suggest it’s obsolete.

The Trilateral Commission turns Multi-Polar
Guest
The Trilateral Commission turns Multi-Polar

I look forward to the snowy winter day when I can cozy up in my PJs by the fire sipping cognac, my feet toasting on the ottoman while reading The Rise and Fall of USNATO, an idea ahead of its time and yet behind the times, as they are a’changin’.

Sapere Aude
Guest
Sapere Aude

Maybe if we all about turn To Buddhism.

John Burns
Guest

If it works out that these states combine with Georgia and together they facilitate an eastern front to open up a full-on war, they would find themselves marked for awful retribution from Russia. Who in his right mind would sign up for that fate?

TheCelotajs
Guest
TheCelotajs

The only thing NATO wants from Georgia and Ukraine i NATO for they both border on the Black Sea and NATO wants to build Naval Bases there so they can control the Inlet to Black Sea and bottle up the Russian Navel. Other then that they could careless about the country and its people. This has been NATO’s pattern all along to in circle Russia and cut it off from the rest of the world so when the United States and NATO attack Russia they can cut them apart.

Not all Brexit Scenarios are Equal

Syria considers suing Washington for Syrian oil theft and violating Syria’s sovereignty