Connect with us

Latest

Hellenic Insider

Cyprus

EU prosperity? 12,000 Cypriot families rely on food banks this Orthodox Easter

Since joining the Eurozone, Cyprus has been plagued with bank deposit raids, business closings and poverty not seen on the island since the Turkish invasion of 1974. This Easter saw a sharp rise in Cypriot families making trips to food banks in order to pass the holidays.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

0 Views

Post originally appeared on Cyprus Mail.

Far more people have been in need of help this Easter compared to last year with numbers reaching at least 12,000 families who were relying on food banks and charities to pass the holiday, volunteer commissioner Yiannis Yiannaki said.

Volunteers at several food banks described the days leading up to the holiday as complete chaos. They said they were working 12-hour days to ensure that every family needing help received it.

Feelings were bittersweet while on one hand the level of donations was overwhelming the extent of poverty some Cypriots are facing is gut-wrenching, volunteer at Adopt a Family for Easter, Petroula Petrou said.

“Even though I’ve been doing this for 16 years there were still moments when ‘I couldn’t help but cry’.”

The numbers however are an indication that the economy is no way getting better, deputy director of the Pancyprian Volunteerism Coordinative Council Elias Demetriou said.

“A lot more people need help compared to last year and in no way are we over the crisis,” he added. He said he hated the fact that some people felt too humiliated to get help from charities.

“People have reached their breaking point so even though a lot of them hate it, the taboo is slowly going away because they have no other choice,” he said.

Petrou observed a similar pattern where people swallowed their pride not for themselves but for their children as they were left with no option. In some instances, she added, the organisation had received phone calls from neighbours or relatives of needy families, asking that they intervene because many refused to seek handouts.

The rules are pretty clear however in that applications need to be made directly to charities from the individuals in need, to avoid scams or people receiving aid from several different organisations across many towns.

In Larnaca, chaos ensued in the final days leading up to Easter, even with people not eligible for help standing outside desperately hoping for food.

A Cyprus Mail eyewitness who was visibly upset said he even saw children as young as seven years-old getting a small bag of potatoes and haggling for a few more.

“I have a child that age too and my stomach is churning at the thought. It’s terrible, absolutely terrible to see what conditions we’ve fallen to,” he said.

Food bank manager in Larnaca Kokos Yerasinou reiterated the same line most organisations used in other cities. “Things are getting worse.”

Particularly after the demise of Cyprus Airways, he has observed far more families are in need of support in Larnace, estimating them at over 600 people.

The food bank has helped about 2,500 people by offering bags of basic goods. Specifically one bag contains pasta, barley, rice, sugar and pourgouri and the second bag contains bread, milk, trahana, juice and halloumi.

People also received one kilo of meat per person, flaounes, toilet paper, oil, wine potatoes and a rich variety of vegetables. Families with more than six members are eligible to receive two bags with the second list of items.

Yerasinou however felt terrible that there were people he felt needed help but did not pass the criteria imposed by the social welfare committee.

“I will personally make sure that whatever food is left will go to these people. We don’t want to waste anything or keep any member of society hungry, especially these days.”

Evi Tsolaki from the Limassol food bank insists that there is not a single family in need of help that is being denied the necessities they need. “We only turn away people that we feel can make it without our help,” she said, citing an example of a retired woman that applied for help but was receiving €678 per month from the state.

Naturally, her application was rejected Tsolaki said, as although the amount may not have been adequate for many things, it was certainly enough to live on. She stressed that the role of the food bank was to help people that would resort to trawling through the garbage if it wasn’t for their help.

Tsolaki and several of the volunteers stressed that as much as people could, they should economise at home. “It looks bad if you’re trying to be eligible for aid but have a phone bill of €70. Why is it so high? Everyone should first try to manage their own finances.”

This of course would mean cutting back on pricey cigarettes, fancy hair treatments and flashy nails. Yerasinou stipulated.

The aid dispersed across the country needed to go wherever it was really needed, Tsolaki said citing a family of 11 people that had a monthly income of €500 as a real example of people who depended on – and received help.

As church bells chime and people light their candles, volunteers find comfort in that no matter how bleak the situation is, people’s hearts have not yet turned to stone and Cypriots are still offering their help to those in need.

An old man with a field delivered a bag of lemons, people donated their salary bonuses, producers freely gave lamb, milk, flaounes, tsourekia and bread and even hotels offered free meals to needy families.

Several well-known figures humbly offered donations opting to remain anonymous while political parties gave cheques under the glare of television cameras.

References:

http://cyprus-mail.com/2015/04/11/people-have-reached-breaking-point/

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
10 Comments

10
Leave a Reply

avatar
10 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
1 Comment authors
Abraham Seggfej Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Abraham Seggfej
Guest
Abraham Seggfej

The economic model of Germany just will not work in Cyprus, Greece, Portugal, Spain etc. why? Because these Nations have very different economies and are not in the same economic Cycle. I do not know why so many Nations are prepared to needlessly destroy their own populations for the sake of this failed EU project but, I now think that either a War or the complete collapse of this rotting Euro Currency is what it will take to get the docile populations of Europe to realise that this EU pantomime has failed and can never function. It’s time to end… Read more »

trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb

[…]here are some links to web sites that we link to because we consider they are worth visiting[…]

trackback

xcmwnv54ec8tnv5cev5jfdcnv5

[…]very couple of web-sites that transpire to become detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly properly really worth checking out[…]

trackback

Title

[…]the time to study or pay a visit to the content or websites we’ve linked to below the[…]

trackback

Title

[…]below you will discover the link to some web pages that we assume you’ll want to visit[…]

trackback

Title

[…]usually posts some incredibly exciting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[…]

trackback

Title

[…]Here is a great Blog You might Locate Intriguing that we Encourage You[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Find More here|Find More|Read More Infos here|There you will find 81307 more Infos|Infos on that Topic: hellenicinsider.com/eu-prosperity-12000-cypriot-families-rely-on-food-banks-this-orthodox-easter/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More on|Read More|Read More Infos here|Here you can find 85074 additional Infos|Informations on that Topic: hellenicinsider.com/eu-prosperity-12000-cypriot-families-rely-on-food-banks-this-orthodox-easter/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]

[…] Read More here|Read More|Find More Informations here|There you can find 37240 additional Informations|Informations to that Topic: hellenicinsider.com/eu-prosperity-12000-cypriot-families-rely-on-food-banks-this-orthodox-easter/ […]

Latest

High-ranking Ukrainian official reports on US interference in Ukraine

It is not usually the case that an American media outlet tells the truth about Ukraine, but it appears to have happened here.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

The Hill committed what may well have been a random act of journalism when it reported that Ukrainian Prosecutor General, Yuriy Lutsenko, told Hill.tv’s reporter John Solomon that the American ambassador to that country, Marie Yovanovitch, gave him a “do not prosecute” list at their first meeting.

Normally, all things Russia are covered by the American press as “bad”, and all things Ukraine are covered by the same as “good.” Yet this report reveals quite a bit about the nature of the deeply embedded US interests that are involved in Ukraine, and which also attempt to control and manipulate policy in the former Soviet republic.

The Hill’s piece continues (with our added emphases):

“Unfortunately, from the first meeting with the U.S. ambassador in Kiev, [Yovanovitch] gave me a list of people whom we should not prosecute,” Lutsenko, who took his post in 2016, told Hill.TV last week.

“My response of that is it is inadmissible. Nobody in this country, neither our president nor our parliament nor our ambassador, will stop me from prosecuting whether there is a crime,” he continued.

Indeed, the Prosecutor General appears to be a man of some principles. When this report was brought to the attention of the US State Department, the response was predictable:

The State Department called Lutsenko’s claim of receiving a do not prosecute list, “an outright fabrication.” 

“We have seen reports of the allegations,” a department spokesperson told Hill.TV. “The United States is not currently providing any assistance to the Prosecutor General’s Office (PGO), but did previously attempt to support fundamental justice sector reform, including in the PGO, in the aftermath of the 2014 Revolution of Dignity. When the political will for genuine reform by successive Prosecutors General proved lacking, we exercised our fiduciary responsibility to the American taxpayer and redirected assistance to more productive projects.”

This is an amazing statement in itself. “Our fiduciary responsibility to the American taxpayer”? Are Americans even aware that their country is spending their tax dollars in an effort to manipulate a foreign government in what can probably well be called a low-grade proxy war with the Russian Federation? Again, this appears to be a slip, as most American media do a fair job of maintaining the narrative that Ukraine is completely independent and that its actions regarding the United States and Russia are taken in complete freedom.

Hill.TV has reached out to the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine for comment.

Lutsenko also said that he has not received funds amounting to nearly $4 million that the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine was supposed to allocate to his office, saying that “the situation was actually rather strange” and pointing to the fact that the funds were designated, but “never received.”

“At that time we had a case for the embezzlement of the U.S. government technical assistance worth 4 million U.S. dollars, and in that regard, we had this dialogue,” he said. “At that time, [Yovanovitch] thought that our interviews of Ukrainian citizens, of Ukrainian civil servants, who were frequent visitors of the U.S. Embassy put a shadow on that anti-corruption policy.”

“Actually, we got the letter from the U.S. Embassy, from the ambassador, that the money that we are speaking about [was] under full control of the U.S. Embassy, and that the U.S. Embassy did not require our legal assessment of these facts,” he said. “The situation was actually rather strange because the funds we are talking about were designated for the prosecutor general’s office also and we told [them] we have never seen those, and the U.S. Embassy replied there was no problem.”

“The portion of the funds, namely 4.4 million U.S. dollars were designated and were foreseen for the recipient Prosecutor General’s office. But we have never received it,” he said.

Yovanovitch previously served as the U.S. ambassador to Armenia under former presidents Obama and George W. Bush, as well as ambassador to Kyrgyzstan under Bush. She also served as ambassador to Ukraine under Obama.

Former Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas), who was at the time House Rules Committee chairman, voiced concerns about Yovanovitch in a letter to the State Department last year in which he said he had proof the ambassador had spoken of her “disdain” for the Trump administration.

This last sentence may be a way to try to narrow the scope of American interference in Ukraine down to the shenanigans of just a single person with a personal agenda. However, many who have followed the story of Ukraine and its surge in anti-Russian rhetoric, neo-Naziism, ultra-nationalism, and the most recent events surrounding the creation of a pseudo-Orthodox “church” full of Ukrainian nationalists and atheists as a vehicle to import “Western values” into a still extremely traditional and Christian land, know that there are fingerprints of the United States “deep state” embeds all over this situation.

It is somewhat surprising that so much that reveals the problem showed up in just one report. It will be interesting to see if this gets any follow-up in the US press.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Bercow blocks Brexit vote, May turns to EU for lifeline (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 112.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss Theresa May’s latest Brexit dilemma, as House of Commons Speaker John Bercow, shocked the world by citing a 1604 precedent that now effectively blocks May’s third go around at trying to pass her treacherous Brexit deal through the parliament.

All power now rests with the Brussels, as to how, if and when the UK will be allowed to leave the European Union.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via Bloomberg


Theresa May claims Brexit is about taking back control. Ten days before the U.K. is due to leave the European Union, it looks like anything but.

House of Commons Speaker John Bercow’s intervention, citing precedent dating back to 1604, to rule out a repeat vote on May’s already defeated departure deal leaves the prime minister exposed ahead of Thursday’s EU summit in Brussels.

Bercow, whose cries of “Orrdurrr! Orrdurrr!’’ to calm rowdy lawmakers have gained him a devoted international following, is now the pivotal figure in the Brexit battle. May’s team privately accuse him of trying to frustrate the U.K.’s exit from the EU, while the speaker’s admirers say he’s standing up for the rights of parliament against the executive.

If just one of the 27 other states declines May’s summit appeal to extend the divorce timetable, then the no-deal cliff edge looms for Britain’s departure on March 29. If they consent, it’s unclear how May can meet Bercow’s test that only a substantially different Brexit agreement merits another vote in parliament, since the EU insists it won’t reopen negotiations.

Caught between Bercow and Brussels, May’s room for maneuver is shrinking. Amid rumblings that their patience with the U.K. is near exhaustion, EU leaders are girding for the worst.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

President Putin signs law blocking fake news, but the West makes more

Western media slams President Putin and his fake news law, accusing him of censorship, but an actual look at the law reveals some wisdom.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

The TASS Russian News Agency reported on March 18th that Russian President Vladimir Putin signed off on a new law intended to block distorted or untrue information being reported as news. Promptly after he did so, Western news organizations began their attempt to “spin” this event as some sort of proof of “state censorship” in the oppressive sense of the old Soviet Union. In other words, a law designed to prevent fake news was used to create more fake news.

One of the lead publications is a news site that is itself ostensibly a “fake news” site. The Moscow Times tries to portray itself as a Russian publication that is conducted from within Russian borders. However, this site and paper is really a Western publication, run by a Dutch foundation located in the Netherlands. As such, the paper and the website associated have a distinctly pro-West slant in their reporting. Even Wikipedia noted this with this comment from their entry about the publication:

In the aftermath of the Ukrainian crisis, The Moscow Times was criticized by a number of journalists including Izvestia columnist Israel Shamir, who in December 2014 called it a “militant anti-Putin paper, a digest of the Western press with extreme bias in covering events in Russia”.[3] In October 2014 The Moscow Times made the decision to suspend online comments after an increase in offensive comments. The paper said it disabled comments for two reasons—it was an inconvenience for its readers as well as being a legal liability, because under Russian law websites are liable for all content, including user-generated content like comments.[14]

This bias is still notably present in what is left of the publication, which is now an online-only news source. This is some of what The Moscow Times had to say about the new fake news legislation:

The bills amending existing information laws overwhelmingly passed both chambers of Russian parliament in less than two months. Observers and some lawmakers have criticized the legislation for its vague language and potential to stifle free speech.

The legislation will establish punishments for spreading information that “exhibits blatant disrespect for the society, government, official government symbols, constitution or governmental bodies of Russia.”

Insulting state symbols and the authorities, including Putin, will carry a fine of up to 300,000 rubles and 15 days in jail for repeat offenses.

As is the case with other Russian laws, the fines are calculated based on whether the offender is a citizen, an official or a legal entity.

More than 100 journalists and public figures, including human rights activist Zoya Svetova and popular writer Lyudmila Ulitskaya, signed a petition opposing the laws, which they labeled “direct censorship.”

This piece does give a bit of explanation from Dmitry Peskov, showing that European countries also have strict laws governing fake news distribution. However, the Times made the point of pointing out the idea of “insulting governmental bodies of Russia… including Putin” to bolster their claim that this law amounts to real censorship of the press. It developed its point of view based on a very short article from Reuters which says even less about the legislation and how it works.

However, TASS goes into rather exhaustive detail about this law, and it also gives rather precise wording on the reason for the law’s passage, as well as how it is to be enforced. We include most of this text here, with emphases added:

Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law on blocking untrue and distorting information (fake news). The document was posted on the government’s legal information web portal.

The document supplements the list of information, the access to which may be restricted on the demand by Russia’s Prosecutor General or his deputies. In particular, it imposes a ban on “untrue publicly significant information disseminated in the media and in the Internet under the guise of true reports, which creates a threat to the life and (or) the health of citizens, property, a threat of the mass violation of public order and (or) public security, or the threat of impeding or halting the functioning of vital infrastructural facilities, transport or social infrastructure, credit institutions, energy, industrial or communications facilities.”

Pursuant to the document, in case of finding such materials in Internet resources registered in accordance with the Russian law on the mass media as an online media resource, Russia’s Prosecutor General or his deputies will request the media watchdog Roskomnadzor to restrict access to the corresponding websites.

Based on this request, Roskomnadzor will immediately notify the editorial board of the online media resource, which is in violation of the legislation, about the need to remove untrue information and the media resource will be required to delete such materials immediately. If the editorial board fails to take the necessary measures, Roskomnadzor will send communications operators “a demand to take measures to restrict access to the online resource.”

In case of deleting such untrue information, the website owner will notify Roskomnadzor thereof, following which the media watchdog will “hold a check into the authenticity of this notice” and immediately inform the communications operator about the resumption of the access to the information resource.
The conditions for the law are very specific, as are the penalties for breaking it. TASS continued:

Liability for breaching the law

Simultaneously, the Federation Council approved the associated law with amendments to Russia’s Code of Administrative Offences, which stipulates liability in the form of penalties of up to 1.5 million rubles (around $23,000) for the spread of untrue and distorting information.

The Code’s new article, “The Abuse of the Freedom of Mass Information,” stipulates liability for disseminating “deliberately untrue publicly significant information” in the media or in the Internet. The penalty will range from 30,000 rubles ($450) to 100,000 rubles ($1,520) for citizens, from 60,000 rubles ($915) to 200,000 rubles ($3,040) for officials and from 200,000 rubles to 500,000 rubles ($7,620) for corporate entities with the possible confiscation of the subject of the administrative offence.

Another element of offence imposes tighter liability for the cases when the publication of false publicly significant information has resulted in the deaths of people, has caused damage to the health or property, prompted the mass violation of public order and security or has caused disruption to the functioning of transport or social infrastructure facilities, communications, energy and industrial facilities and banks. In such instances, the fines will range from 300,000 rubles to 400,000 rubles ($6,090) for citizens, from 600,000 rubles to 900,000 rubles ($13,720) for officials, and from 1 million rubles to 1.5 million rubles for corporate entities.

While this legislation can be spun (and is) in the West as anti-free speech, one may also consider the damage that has taken place in the American government through a relentless attack of fake news from most US news outlets against President Trump. One of the most notable effects of this barrage has been to further degrade and destroy the US’ relationship with the Russian Federation, because even the Helsinki Summit was attacked so badly that the two leaders have not been able to get a second summit together.

While it is certainly a valued right of the American press to be unfettered by Congress, and while it is also certainly vital to criticize improper practices by government officials, the American news agencies have gone far past that, to deliberately dishonest attacks, based in innuendo and everything possible that was formerly only the province of gossip tabloid publications. The effort has been to defame the President, not to give proper or due criticism to his policies, nor credit. It can be properly stated that the American press has abused its freedom of late.

This level of abuse drew a very unusual comment from the US president, who wondered on Twitter about the possibility of creating a state-run media center in the US to counter fake news:

Politically correct for US audiences? No. But an astute point?

Definitely.

Freedom in anything also presumes that those with that freedom respect it, and further, that they respect and apply the principle that slandering people and institutions for one’s own personal, business or political gain is wrong. Implied in the US Constitution’s protection of the press is the notion that the press itself, as the rest of the country, is accountable to a much Higher Authority than the State. But when that Authority is rejected, as so much present evidence suggests, then freedom becomes the freedom to misbehave and to agitate. It appears largely within this context that the Russian law exists, based on the text given.

Further, by hitting dishonest media outlets in their pocketbook, rather than prison sentences, the law appears to be very smart in its message: “Do not lie. If you do, you will suffer where it counts most.”

Considering that news media’s purpose is to make money, this may actually be a very smart piece of legislation.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending