JayTe
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
by Vera SharavAlliance for Human Research Protection
Dr. Meryl Nass has uncovered a hornet’s nest of government sponsored Hydroxychloroquine experiments that were designed to kill severely ill, Covid-19 hospitalized patients. On June 14th Dr. Nass first identified two Covid-19 experiments in which massive, high toxic doses – four times higher than safe of hydroxychloroquine were being given to severely ill hospitalized patients in intensive care units.
- Solidarity was being conducted by the World Health Organization, on 3500 Covid-19 patients at 400 hospitals, across 35 countries. The trial was suspended following the fraudulent Surgisphere report in The Lancet that claimed 35% higher death rates in patients receiving Hydroxychloroquine. But when The Lancet retracted the report, the WHO resumed the Solidarity trialMore than 100 countries expressed interest in participating in the trial.
- Recovery experiment used very similar doses. It was sponsored by the Wellcome Trust (GlaxoSmithKline) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK government. The experiment was conducted at Oxford University, on 1,542 patients of these 396 patients (25.7%) who were in the high dose Hydroxychloroquine arm, died.
Update: After Dr. Nass’ discovery was publicly disseminated, the WHO suspended the trial on Wednesday June 17th.
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Credit where credit is due: good article, sound facts behind it. More like this!! I had posted several times before that the toxicity claims re hydroxychloroquine must be unfounded since it is a go to choice for pregnant women when other meds cannot be prescribed. This shows the bad medicine and bad science behind the experiments, to the point of being criminally negligent. Especially in light of the fact that the loading dose has already been proven unsafe and potentially lethal, in the 70s. Even the recommended treatment dose after the loading dose is questionable. “Dosing fails to take… Read more »
This was obvious immediately when the articles were published. The experiment was designed to kill them and it should have been obvious to the reviewers . The whole lot of them should lose their liscences and be persecuted for Murder One.