Alex Christoforou
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Over 40 years ago, scientists from 50 nations pivoted on a longstanding “global cooling” thesis that was going to blanket the earth in ice, and instead adopted what was then called the “CO2-climate problem” which would lead to theories on global warming, rising tides and economic catastrophe.
“Now, four decades later, a larger group of scientists is sounding another, much more urgent alarm,” according to Bloomberg.
Over 11,000 experts from around the world have banded together to call for solutions to the the ‘climate emergency,’ including population control – which “must be stabilized—and, ideally, gradually reduced—within a framework that ensures social integrity.”
The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.
Well they might have a point, maybe starting with all the alarmists and other BS artists. Then the psuedo scientiest and finally the journos who deliberately lie about the results. Seriously though a mass (re)education of facts and statistics and of history of the earth will go a very long way to dispell the tripe of these wannabe jane fonda’s. Global warming has not accellerated and has come and gone in cycles ever so many millenia (we’ve been here a few so far). Climate change isn’t new and while it is a legit concern, it isn’t irrevocable at any time… Read more »
Well said.
Perhaps we could start with those 11,000 Experts!We can always make them martyrs or sanctify them later!
Right! Kill the messenger: Problem solved.
As the founders of the global warming movement (take your re-branding and shove it where the sun don’t shine) were also committed eugenists, they will start with the stupid. And who you do suppose the people that perpetrated this new age myth will see as stupid? Figure it out.
Hey Alex, how about an interview with Dr. Tim Ball? Bet he would JUMP at the chance, considering the mainstream medias suppression of this story. I read his book long before the lawsuit.
https://climatechangedispatch.com/tim-ball-defeats-michael-mann-lawsuit/
If this is something you would like to see, vote it up.
Most scientists that publish any result of any experiment do so with a question. A good scientist expects retort and oft welcomes it. A poor one is convinced in absolutes. Ardent ones challenge any challenge, but psuedo-scientists swear down any heracy. Ultimately a true scientist projects context, a patent liar forbids it.
Anyone that is convinced in absolutes, is not, and cannot be a scientist. Absolutes are the earmark of religion. Its really that simple.
The only absolutes are that we live and die. That we are here but not for long, where ever here is. Everything else is a trueism and even they are questionable and all that is absolute achieves nothing, means everything and are only ends and beginnings.
and give us our daily Dharma…lol