Ukraine has been caught red handed trying to organize a terrorist attack in Crimea, which is a terrorist attack against Russia.
While western mainstream media is in damage control mode trying to call Russia’s proof of Ukraine’s attack as nothing more than fantasy. The fact is that the Russian Federation would never level such claims unless it’s evidence was rock solid. And it is rock solid, with the ringleader Yevgeny Panov, a resident of Ukraine’s Zaporozhye, captured and undergoing interrogation at this very moment.
Russian President Vladimir Putin condemned the attack and called out Ukraine’s “President” Poroshenko for what he really is, a US puppet, as well as warning the US and EU that Russia “will not let such things pass”.
Unlike the majority of western leaders, Vladimir Putin means what he says, and says what he means (Video below).
The timing of Ukraine’s botched terrorist attack against Russia leaves more questions than answers. The Duran’s Alexander Mercouris notes…
Might there have been any other purpose to this Ukrainian sabotage mission other than to create the appearance of instability in Crimea during the tourist season and during the coming election season? Putin in the joint press conference he held in Moscow following his meeting with Armenian President Sargsyan linked the incident to the attempted murder of Igor Plotnitsky, the leader of the Lugansk People’s Republic. If true that would suggest that having despaired of a military victory the government in Kiev is now turning to assassination and sabotage tactics in order to keep the struggle with Russia going and to achieve its political goals. Alternatively it could be that the Ukrainians have carried out these operations in preparation for the summer offensive in the Donbass that has been much talked about but which has yet to happen, though it is not clear how planting bombs in Crimea could aid a military offensive in the Donbass. Yet another explanation is that the Ukrainians might be sensing a weakening in European support and might have launched the operation in order to heighten tensions and to rally support and to further undermine the Minsk II peace process.
My own opinion is that the most likely explanation for this frankly reckless action – which will cause serious embarrassment to some of Ukraine’s European backers even if they are not prepared to say so publicly – is the chaotic condition of the Ukrainian power structure and the perennial infighting that goes on there. Given the luridly romantic language many members of the Maidan movement customarily like to indulge in I can easily see how the sabotage operation in Crimea and the murder attempt on Plotnitsky – if the two are indeed connected – might have been planned by individuals in Kiev who might think that the success of such operations would increase their credibility and popularity within the Maidan movement and therefore their chances of achieving political success in Ukraine.
US President Barack Obama and his EU partners may be urging Ukraine to stop such reckless behavior behind the scenes, but Hillary Clinton and her neocon supporters are foaming at the mouth for any conflict with Russia. The Duran reported yesterday…
Obama certainly does not want another defeat in Ukraine in the middle of a US Presidential election campaign on his hands, especially since this would probably play into the hands of Donald Trump, though unfortunately the same cannot be said of some of the more psychopathic individuals who support Hillary Clinton, who seem to be yearning for confrontation with Russia on just about any pretext. More to the point I just cannot imagine that Angela Merkel, facing criticism in Germany for her open-door refugee policy and with her anti-Russian policy coming under growing criticism from the SPD, the CSU and the German business community, wants another debacle in Ukraine on her hands
Fort Russ reports that the timing of such a provocation cannot be simply left to chance, as a Russia-Ukraine “conflict” may place Trump in a difficult position, as well as deflect attention away from Obama’s recent ISIS failures, and a new onslaught of Hillary email scandals that are destroying the Clinton campaign.
The US also may have timed the provocation itself, perhaps to escalate tensions with Russia in the run-up to the elections. It would perhaps bode poorly for Trump if a heated or even hot exchange with Russia made Ukraine a major focus, and was the focus of media during an election where clearly Clinton is favored among imperialists and hawks.
This would certainly distract from the US failures to topple the government in Syria, and would also detract from Russia’s successes against terrorist groups there, which the US (despite their actual aims at arming said terrorists) has apparently ‘failed’ to make any traction against.
Peter Lavelle writes that the “Ukraine card” may simply be too good for the US hawks, lead by Queen Hillary, to pass up.
Ukraine’s corrupt president Poroshenko would only be too wiling to accommodate the Clinton-Progressive-Neocon war machine if the price was right, and we know that when it comes to paying off world leaders, the Democrats and Hillary Clinton know how the game is played, better than anyone else on the planet.
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko is said to be a very corrupt “oligarch” who has profited from his country’s extreme economic woes. He declared war against his own people in the eastern part of the country (where ethnic Russians and Russian speakers live). He likes to play the role of Ukrainian mascot when western leaders convene. He is also Washington’s man in Kiev. And he is in the position to offer some favors. I am betting he will deliver.
Since Trump is designated as Putin’s American agent, then playing the “Ukraine card” is a logical assumption for an “October Surprise.” The Trump campaign is wary of sending more military assistance to Ukraine – remember Ukraine is not a member of NATO and the situation in Ukraine in no way threatens America’s security, nor that of Europe’s. But in the world politics facts hardly get in the way of personal ambitions. Poroshenko and his government have been waging a low-level war of skirmishes and cross border attacks on Crimea and the breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine. The American public is already well conditioned to accept all of this is Russia’s fault. What is now needed and is probably being planned is a manufactured incident to make it look like Russia attacked and invaded Ukraine. The American public will be rallied with the usual mantra “something must be done” and the Trump campaign will be left flat footed, red faced, and denounced. Joe McCarthy will smile with glee from the grave.
One thing is certain, Hillary and the Democrats will use anything they can to derail a Trump presidency, even if that means picking a conflict with Russia.
We are confident that CNN, MSNBC and the myriad of other pro-Hillary/pro-war media outlets, are writing the “blame Russia” narrative in advance.