in ,

US set to become BIGGEST oil producing nation

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

For decades, the common thought about the United States was that its glory days of being the number one producer of oil were long over. Indeed, the current narrative in the US about gas prices is usually based on the uptick or downtick of suppliers from the OPEC cartel.

Support The Duran – Browse our Shop >>

A report from the Bloomberg news service on July 11 indicated a surprising prediction: that the US is set to become the world’s largest oil producing nation once again:

The U.S. government sees oil production further climbing next year even amid transportation logjams in the country’s most prolific shale play.

The Energy Information Administration sees U.S. crude output averaging 11.8 million barrels a day in 2019, up from its 11.76 million barrel a day estimate in the June outlook.

“In 2019, EIA forecasts that the United States will average nearly 12 million barrels of crude oil production per day,” said Linda Capuano, Administrator of the EIA. “If the forecast holds, that would make the U.S. the world’s leading producer of crude.”

U.S. crude output has remained above the 10-million-barrel a day mark since February. That’s while Saudi Arabia told OPEC it pumped about 10.5 million barrels of crude a day last month as the kingdom sought to cap rallying prices by ramping up output, according to people familiar with the matter.

Concerns linger over the worsening bottleneck in the biggest U.S. shale region, the Permian Basin, and how that might affect domestic output in the second half of the year. Due to limited pipeline transportation in the region, production may start to slow in the area, according to Scott Sheffield, the chairman of Pioneer Natural Resources Co. “We will reach capacity in the next 3 to 4 months,” he said in June.

The EIA left its average domestic output forecast for this year unchanged at 10.79 million barrels a day, above the 1970 record of 9.6 million a day, according to the agency’s Short-Term Energy Outlook released on Tuesday. Its global crude production forecast for next year was raised to 102.54 million barrels a day from a previous forecast of 102.21 million a day. The agency’s world demand growth estimate for 2019 was lowered.

EIA revised forecast for US crude oil output into 2019.

This news has gotten international attention, since oil is such an extremely important commodity. China’s Xinhua news network also remarked on this prediction:

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) crude oil production averaged 31.9 million barrels per day in June.

Although the OPEC and non-OPEC participants agreed on November last year to extend the production cuts through the end of 2018 in order to reduce global oil inventories, tightening market conditions led the group to relax the production cuts starting this month.

EIA expected that OPEC crude oil output will decrease by less than 0.1 million barrels per day on average in 2019, which reflects crude oil production increases from some producers that mostly make up for expected declines of more than 1.0 million barrels per day in Iran and Venezuela combined.

Meanwhile, EIA forecasts that total U.S. crude oil and petroleum product net imports will fall from an annual average of 3.7 million barrels per day in 2017 to an average of 2.4 million barrels per day in 2018 and to an average of 1.6 million barrels per day in 2019, which would be the lowest level of net imports since 1958.

This prediction amounts to a greater than 50% reduction in oil imported to the US, and this also marks a major step towards the vaunted goal of American energy independence.

Report

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of this site. This site does not give financial, investment or medical advice.

What do you think?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Charles Pettibone
Charles Pettibone
September 5, 2018

I’m glad The Duran posted this article. It’s good to see a piece favorable to the US, as an American nationalist who admires Russia and Putin and wants to see a restrained foreign policy predicated on realism and national interest rather than liberal ideology. Unfortunately, on the international scene, I see many folks conflating US foreign policy since 2001 with the US as a nation. America is a great nation and Americans love their nation just like Russians and Chinese love theirs. What Americans want is a healthy and productive economy with a long future. It’s odd to see Duran… Read more »

Daisy Adler
Daisy Adler
September 5, 2018

So what?
US consumes more energy than it produces.
In 2018, the US exports 7,818,000 barrels per day, but imports 10,312,000 barrels per day.
Deficit: 2,494,000 barrels per day
https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_wkly_dc_NUS-Z00_mbblpd_4.htm

ghartwell
September 5, 2018

American energy independence means that they can leave the rest of the world alone and still maintain their auto-driving life style, run their air conditioners and leave the lights on.

paz_y_justicia
paz_y_justicia
September 5, 2018

THE SHALE OIL PONZI SCHEME EXPLAINED: How Lousy Shale Economics Will Pull Down The U.S. Economy

Few Americans realize that the U.S. economy is being propped up by the Shale Oil Industry. However, the shale oil industry is nothing more than a Ponzi Scheme, so when it collapses, it will take down the U.S. economy with it. Unfortunately, the reason few Americans understand how lousy the economics are in producing shale oil and gas is due to the misinformation and propaganda being put out by the industry and energy analysts.

Nicole Temple
Nicole Temple
September 5, 2018

Here is an interesting look at the link between Big Banking and Big Oil:

http://viableopposition.blogspot.ca/2018/05/how-banks-invest-in-dirty-energy.html

Despite their protestations and promises to reduce their carbon footprint, the global banking sector has not shied away from lending to projects that will increase the global output of extreme fossil fuels, including shale oil, that are responsible for increased greenhouse gas output.

hestroy
hestroy
September 5, 2018

This article has very poor quality. Repeating of official propaganda.

Hamletquest
Hamletquest
September 5, 2018

Yes. The future’s bleak the future’s fracking orange. With Agent Orange telling the Germans to buy more US LNG and pay more for the pleasure of that and the Empires increased tribute payments up 100% to 4% of GDP for NATO cover. Which has always translated to paying for the privilege of making yourself a target shield for Uncle Sam. Welcome to the Hotel POTUS where deals are made and dreams [well they’re for the rich] he sure knows how to strike a tariff deal. All those really low paid sweatshop jobs coming home from China? While the cheep stuff… Read more »

John Mason
John Mason
September 5, 2018

Obviously the US doesn’t care about the environmental damage fracking creates and when the US can’t produce any safe agriculture and their meat industry is also polluted then what. Invade other countries and turn their territory into a lunar landscape? The global community needs to resist this shale oil from the US because in the long run when the US runs out of shale then who is the next victim?

Vladimir Putin’s basic disagreement with the West

For some Western leaders, the Cold War never ended