Connect with us
//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Latest

US-Russia clash in Syria following Al-Qaeda assault on Russian military police

Russian Special Forces repel US planned attack in Syria, denounce USA, and issue a stark warning

The Saker

Published

on

This article, republished with the author’s permission, was first published by The Saker

Something rather unprecedented just happened in Syria: US backed “good terrorist” forces attempted a surprise attack against Syrian government forces stationed to the north and northeast of the city of Hama.

What makes this attack unique is that it took place inside a so-called “de-escalation zone” and that it appears that one of the key goals of the attack was to encircle in a pincer-movement and subsequently capture a platoon of Russian military police officers deployed to monitor and enforce the special status of this zone.

The Russian military police forces, composed mainly of soldiers from the Caucasus region, fought against a much larger enemy force and had to call for assistance.  For the first time, at least officially, Russian special operations forces were deployed to rescue and extract their comrades.

At the same time, the Russians sent in a number of close air support aircraft who reportedly killed several hundred “good” terrorists and beat back the attack (Russian sources speak of the destruction of 850 fighters, 11 tanks, three infantry fighting vehicles, 46 armed pickup trucks, five mortars, 20 freighter trucks and 38 ammo supply points; you can see photos of the destroyed personnel and equipment here).

What also makes this event unique is the official reaction of the Russians to this event.

Head of the Main Operations Department at Russia’s General Staff Colonel General Sergei Rudskoi declared that:

Despite agreements signed in Astana on September 15, gunmen of Jabhat al-Nusra and joining them units that don’t want to comply with the cessation of hostilities terms, launched a large-scale offensive against positions of government troops north and northeast of Hama in Idlib de-escalation zone from 8 am on September 19 (…) According to available data, the offensive was initiated by American intelligence services to stop a successful advance of government troops east of Deir ez-Zor“.

(bold italics added)

Today, other Russian officials have added a not-so-veiled threat to this accusation.  The Russian Defense Ministry’s spokesman, Major General Igor Konashenkov has declared that:

Russia unequivocally told the commanders of US forces in Al Udeid Airbase (Qatar) that it will not tolerate any shelling from the areas where the SDF are stationed (…)  Fire from positions in regions [controlled by the SDF] will be suppressed by all means necessary.

(bold italics added)

This is unprecedented on many levels.

First, the Russians clearly believe that this attempt to kill or capture a platoon of the Russian military police was planned by the United States.  The fact that they are making this accusation officially shows the degree of irritation felt by the Russians about the duplicity of the Americans.

Second, this is the first time, at least to my knowledge, that Russian Spetsnaz forces had to be sent in to rescue a surrounded Russian subunit.  All Spetsnaz operators survived, but three of them were wounded in the operation (the Russians are not saying how badly).  The close air support by very low flying SU-25 aircraft was obviously coordinated by Spetsnaz forward air controllers and probably saved the day.

In other words, this was a close call and things could have ended much more badly (just imagine what the Takfiri crazies would have done, on video, to any captured Russian serviceman!).

Finally, a US-organized attack on what was supposed to be a “de-confliction” zone combined with an attempt to capture Russian soldiers raises the bar for American duplicity to a totally new level.

The big question now is “do the Russians mean it?” or are they just whining with real determination to hit back if needed.

There are a couple of problems here.  First, objectively, the Russian contingent in Syria is a tiny one if compared to the immense power of CENTCOM, NATO and the ever-present Israelis.  Not only that, but in any US-Russian confrontation, Russia as a country is objectively the weaker side by any measure except a full-out nuclear exchange.  So the Russians are not in a position of force.  Furthermore, for historical and cultural reasons, Russians are much more concerned by the initiation of any incident which could lead to all-out war than the Americans who always fight their wars in somebody else’s country. This might seem paradoxical, but the Russians fear war but they are ready for it.  In contrast to the Russians, the Americans don’t fear war, but neither are they ready for it.  In practical terms this means that an American miscalculation could very well lead to a Russian military response which would stun the Americans and force them to enter an escalatory spiral which nobody would control.

Remember how Hillary promised that she would unilaterally impose a so-called “no-fly” zone over Syria?  She promised not only to deploy US aircraft above Russian forces in Syria, but she also promised that she would force the Russian Aerospace forces out of the Syrian skies.  Thank God, this crazy witch was not elected, but it appears that folks with the same arrogant and,frankly, completely irresponsible point of view are now back in power under Trump.

My fear now is that the incompetent, arrogant, not too bright and generally ignorant commanders at the Pentagon and the CIA will simply ignore clear warning signs coming from the Russians, including the public announcement that the Kremlin has given the authority to use force to protect Russian personnel to the local Russian commanders in Syria.  In plain English, this means that if they are attacked the Russians in Syria do not need to consult with Moscow before using force to protect themselves.  By the way, such rules of engagement are pretty common, there is nothing earth shattering here, but the fact that they were made public is, again, a message to the AngloZionist and the “good” terrorist they use to try to conquer Syria.

This time around we (the world) were lucky.  The Syrians fought hard and the “good” terrorists were probably surprised by the ruthless determination of the Russian military police forces (in reality, mostly Chechen special forces) and of the Spetsnaz operators.  It is one thing to fight Syrian conscripts, quite another to deal with these hardened warriors.  But the next time around the outcome could be different.

The bigger picture is also one which gives me a great deal of concern.  The Syrians, with Iranian, Hezbollah and Russian help, have freed Deir ez-Zor and have crossed the Euphrates river and are moving further East.  In plain English this means that the US and Daesh have lost the war and that the last region of Syrian from which the AngloZionists can hope to partition the country (their current “plan B”) and establish a permanent US military presence is now threatened by the Syrian advance.

The distance between the US forces currently deployed in northeastern Syria and Syrian, Iranian, Hezbollah and Russian forces is becoming shorter and shorter each day.  I can just imagine how, say, Iranian or Hezbollah forces which are already “smelling” the nearby presence of US forces are drooling with hunger for the moment they will finally be able to get their hands on their old and most hated foe.  I feel sincerely sorry for the first US unit to make contact with the Iranians or Hezbollah forces.

Right now the Americans are hiding behind the Kurds, but sooner or later the Iranians or Hezbollah will find them.  As for the Kurds, their situation in Syria is precarious, to put it mildly: they are surrounded on all sides by the Turks, the Syrians and the Iranians and their only more or less stable zone of control is in Iraq.  The Americans understand that perfectly, hence their desperate attempts to stop the Syrians.

This is a very dangerous situation: even though CENTCOM and NATO are by far the “biggest guys on the block”, in Syria the Americans are cornered, their corner is shrinking fast and it remains entirely unclear how this process can be stopped.  Hence the attack on the de-confliction zone we just witnessed.

I hope that eventually the Americans will do what they did in al-Taif and simply pack, declare victory and leave.  That would be the only rational thing to do.  But after listening to Trump at the UN I don’t get the feeling that being rational is at the top of the US priority list.  That’s all rather frightening.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement //pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
christianblood
Guest
christianblood

No turning back. Russia, SAA, Iran and Hezbollah should stand their ground and fight the terrorists and their U$ neocon allies even if it is going to lead to WW3.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

A little late, but an excellent analysis.

Tommy Jensen
Guest
Tommy Jensen

We have been under way on a long road.
The day will come where PNAC either will break USA or PNAC will smash the world. Whether its this time or later doesnt matter, everybody should just be prepared.

No normal human can live with this grotesque comedy in Washington whoever pull the strings.

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

It’s far past time that the idiots controlling Washington are STOPPED by whatever means are necessary before they destroy our world.

Wayne Blow
Guest
Wayne Blow

Time to shoot !!!

tapatio
Guest
tapatio

So long as it doesn’t go nuclear.

André De Koning
Guest
André De Koning

Very good report and time indeed that it is made public how duplicitous the USA is and how right it is for the Russians to go ahead and act. Lavrov spoke good words about Trump’s intention not to attack sovereign countries, but obviously Trump is not in charge and does not even know about what is happening on the ground in Syria.

dago dingo
Guest
dago dingo

Well done Russia! The pathetic Americans have simply lost their collective minds. Please just collapse & die in a corner somewhere, the world is sick to death of the wars & misery you bring to our planet.

Pointing&Laughing
Guest
Pointing&Laughing

You misunderstand who controls America. It’s not the citizens; not anymore. It’s the arms merchants and manufacturers, backed by the banks, with the media as propagandists. U.S. citizens go out to vote, and the elite in charge pretend to pay attention, then go on about their imperialistic business. I love my country, and will fight for it; however, I hate my government, and will resist as much as my old bones will allow. Please don’t confuse the U.S. government with America. If anything, pray for us.

Wayne Blow
Guest
Wayne Blow

You sir are a breath of fresh air, thank you !!!

dago dingo
Guest
dago dingo

Unfortunately for the good American people, which I believe are plenty, your country has been hijacked by the Zionist Israeli scum sucking leeches & it gets you to send American soldiers to fight it’s illegal wars. Your congress is a den of Zionist controlled filth that continually inflicts death & starvation to countries which won’t bow to it’s hegemonic rule. America is the point of the new axis of evil and unless the good American people start waking from their television induced coma & marching on Washington, then I truly feel sorry for the gross embarrassment your filthy, disgusting politicians… Read more »

Rex drabble
Guest
Rex drabble

All of which the American people have allowed and enjoyed the spoils of these wars.They deserve the corrupt govt they have.ZERO sympathy for the americans,murderous fuckers they are!

Pointing&Laughing
Guest
Pointing&Laughing

I’m not murderous. I can be, if myself, my family, etc. are attacked, as I would expect from any peace loving human. You seem to have a tiny worldview, when you blame the crowd for the few.

Rex drabble
Guest
Rex drabble

When was American soil attacked.Dont tell me about the fake 911 which your OWN govt did!

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

“Please don’t confuse the U.S. government with America.”

The day that CITIZENS of America actually get off their derrieres, stop playing their Xbox and put down their cell phone babble and actually make it known to their elites that they WILL NOT STAND for what their government is doing in their name, I MIGHT be willing to accept your statement. I doubt it though, as polling done there indicates that the majority of Americans are pro-war, even if they cannot find the country their regime is conducting wars in or threatening to, on a world map.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/47344.htm
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-04-17/war-works-trump-favorability-hits-50-highest-2-months
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-08/us-has-been-war-over-220-241-years
https://mondediplo.com/openpage/america-at-war-since-9-11
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2017/04/15/americans-no-different-than-germans-were-and-are.html

Putin's baby
Guest
Putin's baby

The rest of the world can see their vile duplicity. Well done Syrian and Russian forces, I hope you killed a few yank “advisors”.

lickeyleaks
Guest
lickeyleaks

“Yank advisors”? Makes me laugh to imagine this, who would trust advisors from a country that have not won a war since 1945, and that was with assistance..

Seán Murphy
Guest
Seán Murphy

Which war did they win in 1945?

tiredofthemedialies
Guest
tiredofthemedialies

The one that Henry Ford was decorated for by Adolph Hitler. Keeping the Wehrmach firing on all cylinders.

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

The Soviets entirely destroyed the Wehrmacht and the Luftwaffe.
If the “Yanks” had entered Europe at the beginning of WW2 the Germans would have wiped them into the North Sea. And they knew that.
Henry Ford had nothing to do with the Wehrmacht.

lickeyleaks
Guest
lickeyleaks

As i said,with assistance from UK Commomwealth,and they were invited which makes a change!!

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

Given that it was US corporate and Elite money that armed and funded the Third Reich, I am not sure how the USA can be said to have won?

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

NONE of the allies won the war…..The Soviets (ally in name only) did!!
What happened to the British at Dunkirk in May 1940?…Wat where they doing there? Seems like German intelligence was right…i.e that Britain would invade Germany either via Holland/Belgium/France which is why the Netherlands who was not involved in WW1 was invaded….

lickeyleaks
Guest
lickeyleaks

My dad could tell you about Dunkirk,he was there before going to N Africa and Italy for the duration, he always swore about the yanks in italy,swaning off into cities with chocolate & stockings for girlies when they should be chasing the jerries..
I put what i did because that is the general western verdict that without the yanks,UK would have lost..

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Well the UK/France with indirect encouragement from Washington started this war and, we learn that German intelligence was right in that Britain intended to invade Germany via Holland/Belgium or France.
The Canadians weren’t much better than the Yanks. Churchill singlehandedly lost the empire and destroyed Europe. The RAF flew their bombers nightly over my house, accompanied by sirens, search lights and anti aircraft batteries popping as they flew to Germany and carpet bombed it. The Soviets destroyed the Wehrmacht and the Luftwaffe at the cost of 27 million Russian lives. Nothing what we are made to believe is in fact so.

ruca
Guest
ruca

They didn’t really win in 1945.

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

The Yanks did not win WW2….the Soviets did…2.5 years later Normandy landing took place for the mop up action and to make sure the Soviets would not overrun Europe.

gbardizbanian
Guest
gbardizbanian

Russia should launch a vast PR campaign in the US to show the average American what his leaders are up to in Syria.

David Schultz
Guest
David Schultz

They have. It is called RT. It is up against a bigger opposing one called CNN.

Wayne Blow
Guest
Wayne Blow

They are trying, via RT, Sputnik, the Duran etc. !!!

samo war
Guest
samo war

route 666 ??

louis robert
Guest
louis robert

“Finally, a US-organized attack on what was supposed to be a “de-confliction” zone combined with an attempt to capture Russian soldiers raises the bar for American duplicity to a totally new level.” —– Please, Saker. Let’s stop moaning and groaning. Nothing here is frightening. Duplicity I s only business as usual. The Empire and its accomplices need be confronted head on. For the nth time, this is total war in the making by said Empire begging for it. It will NOT simply go away… It cannot be avoided. Russia must stand its ground against the treacherous Empire. Empire WILL back… Read more »

junktex
Guest
junktex

DC is infested with neocons

Wayne Blow
Guest
Wayne Blow

You know it’s time to stop the “bull shit”, no more warnings to US and coalition, time to start shooting down aircraft (Israeli, US and others} no more warnings shoot first !!!!

Stavros Hadjiyiannis
Guest
Stavros Hadjiyiannis

The fact that US & co. have far more military capabilities and firepower in the broader ME region, does not necessarily give them the advantage when it comes to specific theaters such as those in Syria. Whatever the US has parked all over its CENTCOM area of operations, the Russians can negate under extreme scenarios of escalation. Even though I am no military expert, I can reason that any craziness on the part of the Americans can be retaliated against by using Russia’s missile systems in and around Syria. Things like the Kalibr cruise missile or the Iskander ballistic missile… Read more »

Ron Rushburg
Guest
Ron Rushburg

Russia has the Caspian Sea fleet which is insulated, remote, and untouchable; no other navy there, excepting Iran of course. They have already proven the capability of missiles sent from there.
This alone should make the Zionists think twice.

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

“no other navy there, excepting Iran of course”

China’s navy is also in the Mediterranean.

Ron Rushburg
Guest
Ron Rushburg

gonzo, you missed the gist of my post; I referred to the Caspian Sea, not the Med.

Russia has the Caspian Sea fleet which is insulated, remote, and untouchable; no other navy there, excepting Iran of course.

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

Understood

Gonzogal
Guest
Gonzogal

“Iraq and Turkey are another 2 major powers in the region that the US cannot count on and will either stay neutral or even take Russia’s side ”

Iraq has ALREADY taken its side and it is SYRIA and RUSSIA!
http://www.rt.com/news/316592-russia-syria-islamic-state/
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43239.htm
http://russia-insider.com/en/how-fuel-endless-war-us-allies-now-fighting-cia-backed-rebels-syria/ri12832
http://theduran.com/sectarian-iraq-has-helped-save-tolerant-secular-syria/
http://theduran.com/syria-iraq-now-allies-isis-us/

As for Turkey, it seems to most that it has taken the decision to support Syria/Russia in its war and has turned its back on the US….the coming weeks will offer proof one way or another.

Kubrickian
Guest
Kubrickian

Blame Hilary Clinton for her ‘it’s the Russians’ smokescreen to hide the John Podesta Pedogate. That prevented Trump from being able to work with Putin.

Lord Snooty
Guest
Lord Snooty

They killed a Russian Lt.-General yesterday by means of a mortar attack.

Now who done gone and told told them all that Russian Lt.-General was in the vicinity?

BobValdez
Guest
BobValdez

Link?

Lord Snooty
Guest
Lord Snooty
BobValdez
Guest
BobValdez

Thank you.

Latest

Trump Has Gifted “No More Wars” Policy Position To Bernie Sanders (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 148.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

RT CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle and The Duran’s Alex Christoforou discuss how US President Donald Tump appears to have ceded his popular 2016 ‘no more wars’ campaign message and policy position to Bernie Sanders and any other US 2020 candidate willing to grad onto a non-interventionist approach to the upcoming Democrat primaries.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

“Is Bernie Stealing Trump’s ‘No More Wars’ Issue?” by Patrick J. Buchanan…


The center of gravity of U.S. politics is shifting toward the Trump position of 2016.

“The president has said that he does not want to see this country involved in endless wars… I agree with that,” Bernie Sanders told the Fox News audience at Monday’s town hall meeting in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania.

Then turning and staring straight into the camera, Bernie added:

“Mr. President, tonight you have the opportunity to do something extraordinary: Sign that resolution. Saudi Arabia should not be determining the military or foreign policy of this country.”

Sanders was talking about a War Powers Act resolution that would have ended U.S. involvement in the five-year civil war in Yemen that has created one of the great humanitarian crises of our time, with thousands of dead children amidst an epidemic of cholera and a famine.

Supported by a united Democratic Party on the Hill, and an anti-interventionist faction of the GOP led by Sens. Rand Paul and Mike Lee of Utah, the War Powers resolution had passed both houses of Congress.

But 24 hours after Sanders urged him to sign it, Trump, heeding the hawks in his Cabinet and National Security Council, vetoed S.J.Res.7, calling it a “dangerous attempt to weaken my constitutional authorities.”

With sufficient Republican votes in both houses to sustain Trump’s veto, that should be the end of the matter.

It is not: Trump may have just ceded the peace issue in 2020 to the Democrats. If Sanders emerges as the nominee, we will have an election with a Democrat running on the “no-more-wars” theme Trump touted in 2016. And Trump will be left defending the bombing of Yemeni rebels and civilians by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia.

Does Trump really want to go into 2020 as a war party president?

Does he want to go into 2020 with Democrats denouncing “Trump’s endless wars” in the Middle East? Because that is where he is headed.

In 2008, John McCain, leading hawk in the Senate, was routed by a left-wing first-term senator from Illinois, Barack Obama, who had won his nomination by defeating the more hawkish Hillary Clinton, who had voted to authorize the war in Iraq.

In 2012, the Republican nominee Mitt Romney, who was far more hawkish than Obama on Russia, lost.

Yet, in 2016, Trump ran as a different kind of Republican, an opponent of the Iraq War and an anti-interventionist who wanted to get along with Russia’s Vladimir Putin and get out of these Middle East wars.

Looking closely at the front-running candidates for the Democratic nomination of 2020 — Joe Biden, Sanders, Kamala Harris, Beto O’Rourke, Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker — not one appears to be as hawkish as Trump has become.

Trump pulled us out of the nuclear deal with Iran negotiated by Secretary of State John Kerry and reimposed severe sanctions.

He declared Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization, to which Iran has responded by declaring U.S. Central Command a terrorist organization. Ominously, the IRGC and its trained Shiite militias in Iraq are in close proximity to U.S. troops.

Trump has recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, moved the U.S. Embassy there, closed the consulate that dealt with Palestinian affairs, cut off aid to the Palestinians, recognized Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights seized from Syria in 1967, and gone silent on Bibi Netanyahu’s threat to annex Jewish settlements on the West Bank.

Sanders, however, though he stands by Israel, is supporting a two-state solution and castigating the “right-wing” Netanyahu regime.

Trump has talked of pulling all U.S. troops out of Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan. Yet the troops are still there.

Though Trump came into office promising to get along with the Russians, he sent Javelin anti-tank missiles to Ukraine and announced a pullout from Ronald Reagan’s 1987 INF treaty that outlawed all land-based intermediate-range nuclear missiles.

When Putin provocatively sent 100 Russian troops to Caracas — ostensibly to repair the S-400 anti-aircraft and anti-missile system that was damaged in recent blackouts — Trump, drawing a red line, ordered the Russians to “get out.”

Biden is expected to announce next week. If the stands he takes on Russia, China, Israel and the Middle East are more hawkish than the rest of the field, he will be challenged by the left wing of his party, and by Sanders, who voted “no” on the Iraq War that Biden supported.

The center of gravity of U.S. politics is shifting toward the Trump position of 2016. And the anti-interventionist wing of the GOP is growing.

And when added to the anti-interventionist and anti-war wing of the Democratic Party on the Hill, together, they are able, as on the Yemen War Powers resolution, to produce a new bipartisan majority.

Prediction: By the primaries of 2020, foreign policy will be front and center, and the Democratic Party will have captured the “no-more-wars” political high ground that Candidate Donald Trump occupied in 2016.

Do You Appreciate Reading Our Emails and Website? Let us know how we are doing – Send us a Thank You Via Paypal!

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Over 200 killed, hundreds injured in series of blasts at Sri Lankan hotels & churches

A series of bombings hit churches and hotels across Sri Lanka on Easter Sunday, killing more than 200 people.

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT…


A series of eight explosions rocked Catholic churches and luxury hotels in Sri Lanka as Christians began Easter Sunday celebrations, with over 200 killed and hundreds injured, media reported, citing police.

The blasts started at around 8:45am local time at St. Anthony’s Church in Colombo and St. Sebastian’s Church in Negombo, a Catholic-majority town outside of the capital. The Zion Church in Batticaloa on the eastern coast was also targeted. At around the same time, the Shangri-La, Cinnamon Grand and Kingsbury five-star hotels were also hit, police confirmed.

Two more explosions happened later in the day, targeting two more locations in Colombo. All attacks appear to have been coordinated.

At least 207 people were killed, Reuters reported, citing police. More than 450 were injured in the attacks.

Alleged footage of the aftermath, shared on social media, showed chaos and large-scale destruction inside at least one of the churches.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Mike Pompeo reveals true motto of CIA: ‘We lied, we cheated, we stole’ (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 147.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris take a look at a Texas A&M University speech, and subsequent interview, with US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo.

The former CIA Director admitted, ‘as an aside’ to the question asked, that the Intelligence agency he headed up before being appointed as the top US Diplomat had a motto “we lied, we cheated, we stole”…which, according to Pompeo, contained entire CIA training courses based on ‘lying, cheating and stealing.’

Pompeo finally speaks some truth.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Videos

Trending