Connect with us

RussiaFeed

News

Economy

Turbines and children are the latest targets of irrational western sanctions on Crimea

Latvia wants the names of its kids who dared to have fun in Crimea, while German giant Siemens demands Russia enforce sanctions against itself

Published

on

14 Views

Ostracism, as a political negotiating tool is increasingly today’s answer in negotiating what some call politically aligned settlements, or the “inclusive” world’s version of this millennium’s diplomacy. In short, it seems sanctions are necessary for fashionable progressive politicking. It is a pity that the main tool in international relations is pressure, not dialogue. It has no finesse and needs no professionalism.

Reminds me of my long-ago days in kindergarten when one child whose parents insisted he wear “appropriate” clothes (tie, white shirt, lace up shoes and a jacket) was instantly isolated into a hell of ridicule and banned from the sandbox by his fellow brats. It either toughened the child up, or broke him, flip or fly; it has a lasting legacy effect.

The progressive political effect caused by Western sanctions against Crimea have similarly succeeded in touching on the well-known children’s camp “Artek”, which has always been internationally oriented (www.Artek.org). This fall a scandal broke out in EU’s Latvia, when they learned that a number of children who lived in those countries vacationed at Artek this past summer!

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the EU’s Latvia then demanded information from the camp of the names of the children (and their parents) who attended from Latvia. Is this the new standard of behavior a parent would wish to pass on to children in our pugnaciously brave new world? The camp thankfully refused to comply with the Latvian “request”.

Since 1924, over more than nine decades of its existence, Artek has welcomed over 1.5 million children and teens from more than 150 countries. In 2016, they registered as a Russian legal entity headquartered in Crimea, in addition becoming a full member of the International Camping Fellowship (ICF).

The camp/center is increasingly becoming an international destination. In the last three years, from 2014 to 2016, 1,118 children from 45 countries visited Artek, including Argentina, Austria, Bahrein, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Mongolia, the Netherlands, Poland, Qatar, Serbia, Slovakia, United States, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the UAE.

The administration of the camp would like to see Artek ignored by these on-again-off-again political “blue plate specials” as their sole concern is providing a rich, wonderful development experience to kids from any country.

From the West’s viewpoint and with sanctions fever unabated, it will be tough for Artek. This because since 2014 Russia has provided the camp funds with which they could finally organize, get transparent, upgrade, modernize, build and further expand programs and facilities which were largely ignored since the late 1980’s. This and the fact that they have the temerity to be located in Crimea are all the reasons apparently needed to feel the bite of sanctions.

Map of international children’s camp “Artek”

The “constructive” effects of the anti-Russian/Crimean sanctions can also be appreciated in the now “scandalous” Siemens affair. Crimea has a resident population of roughly 2.5 million with several hundred thousand vacationers swelling that number over the summers. In 2015, Ukraine cut Crimea off from their electrical grid, and mainland water sources, no doubt with the kindest intentions and the bracing lessons “tough love” might achieve. They did not win back any hearts or minds among Crimeans.

The Russian company Technopromexport saw their way clear to supplying Crimea the needed gas turbines from a Russian company that built them (using Siemens Gas Turbines Technologies). This past January 10 the Moscow Arbitration Court considered and ruled on a lawsuit filed by Siemens demanding the return of those gas turbines delivered to the Crimea for their power plants. Furthermore, Siemens wanted the court to recognize the contract for their delivery as invalid. The arbitration court rejected these demands.

What is the ripple effect? For one, a precedent has been set in Russia, which shows that it is illegal to demand that Russian companies comply with US or EU sanctions within the territory of the Russian Federation. Throughout the course of this legal wrangle Siemens was attempting to ensure that Russian companies, and Russian courts, on Russian soil comply with the sanctions requirements of a foreign international organization – in this case the European Union – which would be direct interference with an independent sovereign government.

The above is the quick version, there is lots more detail to this story which is better researched independently on the internet should anyone have the time and wish to do so, but the key point I believe has been made.

Many Crimeans with whom I spoke, are indifferently disposed to the sanctions that were imposed against them since they voted themselves part of Russia. They feel that self-determination voiced through their referendum to rejoin Russia is a human right, not something granted from afar. They are however quite angry with the European Union, who officially considers them still part of Ukraine, and despite vaunted “human values” did nothing to support these people’s basic human rights when Ukraine cut off their electricity, and shut off water sources for both irrigation and drinking.

In 2015 when Ukraine cut off the electricity supply to Crimea, the peninsula received electricity from mobile power stations, generators and through quickly run electrical cables laid on the bottom of the sea from Russia. By early 2018, two new power plants should be up and running, after which Crimean’s will be able to meet their basic electricity needs, but only after several years of forced duress.

To put a cap on this continuing saga, on January 26, 2018 the Department of the US Treasury – Office for the Control of Foreign Assets (OFAC) – included in the new and improved Sanction List (SDN) three Russians who oversaw the supply of Siemens gas turbines to the Crimea.

This is Deputy Energy Minister Andrew Tcherezov, Director of the Department for Operational Control and Management in the Electric Power Industry Eugene Grabchak , as well as the general director of Tekhnopromexport (who is developing power plants in the Crimea and supplies turbines) Serge Topor-Gilka. The list also includes Alexei Mordashov, who is a minority shareholder in the Siemens Gas Turbine Technology factory in Russia, the supplier of the four gas turbine units sent to Crimea.

Now the assets of these individuals in the US will be frozen, they also will not be able to conduct any business with the United States. I cannot imagine most people in the US, EU, Russia or anywhere else see this as a win-win dialogue that has been positively negotiated for the benefit of all peoples concerned. It is telling to all but the most occluded that when doing the right thing earns a person the honor of being sanctioned, or as was said in another time only 60 years ago – blacklisted. Time for this witch-hunting frenzy to reassess motivations and get on with the business of living life.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of

Latest

Constantinople: Ukrainian Church leader is now uncanonical

October 12 letter proclaims Metropolitan Onuphry as uncanonical and tries to strong-arm him into acquiescing through bribery and force.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

The pressure in Ukraine kept ratcheting up over the last few days, with a big revelation today that Patriarch Bartholomew now considers Metropolitan Onuphy “uncanonical.” This news was published on 6 December by a hierarch of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church (running under the Moscow Patriarchate).

This assessment marks a complete 180-degree turn by the leader of the Orthodox Patriarchate of Constantinople, and it further embitters the split that has developed to quite a major row between this church’s leadership and the Moscow Patriarchate.

OrthoChristian reported this today (we have added emphasis):

A letter of Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople to His Beatitude Metropolitan Onuphry of Kiev and All Ukraine was published yesterday by a hierarch of the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church, in which the Patriarch informed the Metropolitan that his title and position is, in fact, uncanonical.

This assertion represents a negation of the position held by Pat. Bartholomew himself until April of this year, when the latest stage in the Ukrainian crisis began…

The same letter was independently published by the Greek news agency Romfea today as well.

It is dated October 12, meaning it was written just one day after Constantinople made its historic decision to rehabilitate the Ukrainian schismatics and rescind the 1686 document whereby the Kiev Metropolitanate was transferred to the Russian Orthodox Church, thereby, in Constantinople’s view, taking full control of Ukraine.

In the letter, Pat. Bartholomew informs Met. Onuphry that after the council, currently scheduled for December 15, he will no longer be able to carry his current title of “Metropolitan of Kiev and All Ukraine.”

The Patriarch immediately opens his letter with Constantinople’s newly-developed historical claim about the jurisdictional alignment of Kiev: “You know from history and from indisputable archival documents that the holy Metropolitanate of Kiev has always belonged to the jurisdiction of the Mother Church of Constantinople…”

Constantinople has done an about-face on its position regarding Ukraine in recent months, given that it had previously always recognized the Metropolitan of Kiev and All Ukraine of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church-Moscow Patriarchate as the sole canonical primate in Ukraine.

…The bulk of the Patriarch’s letter is a rehash of Constantinople’s historical and canonical arguments, which have already been laid out and discussed elsewhere. (See also here and here). Pat. Bartholomew also writes that Constantinople stepped into the Ukrainian ecclesiastical sphere as the Russian Church had not managed to overcome the schisms that have persisted for 30 years.

It should be noted that the schisms began and have persisted precisely as anti-Russian movements and thus the relevant groups refused to accept union with the Russian Church.

Continuing, Pat. Bartholomew informs Met. Onuphry that his position and title are uncanonical:

Addressing you as ‘Your Eminence the Metropolitan of Kiev’ as a form of economia [indulgence/condescension—OC] and mercy, we inform you that after the elections for the primate of the Ukrainian Church by a body that will consist of clergy and laity, you will not be able ecclesiologically and canonically to bear the title of Metropolitan of Kiev, which, in any case, you now bear in violation of the described conditions of the official documents of 1686.

He also entreats Met. Onuphry to “promptly and in a spirit of harmony and unity” participate, with the other hierarchs of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church, in the founding council of the new Ukrainian church that Constantinople is planning to create, and in the election of its primate.

The Constantinople head also writes that he “allows” Met. Onuphry to be a candidate for the position of primate.

He further implores Met. Onuphry and the UOC hierarchy to communicate with Philaret Denisenko, the former Metropolitan of Kiev, and Makary Maletich, the heads of the schismatic “Kiev Patriarchate” and the schismatic “Ukrainian Autocephalous Orthodox Church” respectively—both of which have been subsumed into Constantinople—but whose canonical condemnations remain in force for the canonical Ukrainian Orthodox Church.

The hierarchs of the Serbian and Polish Churches have also officially rejected the rehabilitation of the Ukrainian schismatics.

Pat. Bartholomew concludes expressing his confidence that Met. Onuphry will decide to heal the schism through the creation of a new church in Ukraine.

The Ukrainian Orthodox Church under Metropolitan Onuphry’s leadership is recognized as the sole canonical Orthodox jurisdiction in Ukraine by just about every other canonical Orthodox Jurisdiction besides Constantinople. Even NATO member Albania, whose expressed reaction was “both sides are wrong for recent actions” still does not accept the canonicity of the “restored hierarchs.”

In fact, about the only people in this dispute that seem to be in support of the “restored” hierarchs, Filaret and Makary, are President Poroshenko, Patriarch Bartholomew, Filaret and Makary… and NATO.

While this letter was released to the public eye yesterday, the nearly two months that Metropolitan Onuphry has had to comply with it have not been helped in any way by the actions of both the Ecumenical Patriarchate and the Ukrainian government.

Priests of the Canonical Church in Ukraine awaiting interrogation by the State authorities

For example, in parallel reports released on December 6th, the government is reportedly accusing canonical priests in Ukraine of treason because they are carrying and distributing a brochure entitled (in English): The Ukrainian Orthodox Church: Relations with the State. The Attitude Towards the Conflict in Donbass and to the Church Schism. Questions and Answers.

In a manner that would do any American liberal proud, these priests are being accused of inciting religious hatred, though really all they are doing is offering an explanation for the situation in Ukraine as it exists.

A further piece also released yesterday notes that the Ukrainian government rehabilitated an old Soviet-style technique of performing “inspections of church artifacts” at the Pochaev Lavra. This move appears to be both intended to intimidate the monastics who are living there now, who are members of the canonical Church, as well as preparation for an expected forcible takeover by the new “united Church” that is under creation. The brotherhood characterized the inspections in this way:

The brotherhood of the Pochaev Lavra previously characterized the state’s actions as communist methods of putting pressure on the monastery and aimed at destroying monasticism.

Commenting on the situation with the Pochaev Lavra, His Eminence Archbishop Clement of Nizhyn and Prilusk, the head of the Ukrainian Church’s Information-Education Department, noted:

This is a formal raiding, because no reserve ever built the Pochaev Lavra, and no Ministry of Culture ever invested a single penny to restoring the Lavra, and the state has done nothing to preserve the Lavra in its modern form. The state destroyed the Lavra, turned it into a psychiatric hospital, a hospital for infectious diseases, and so on—the state has done nothing more. And now it just declares that it all belongs to the state. No one asked the Church, the people that built it. When did the Lavra and the land become state property? They belonged to the Church from time immemorial.

With the massive pressure both geopolitically and ecclesiastically building in Ukraine almost by the day, it is anyone’s guess what will happen next.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Ukrainian leadership is a party of war, and it will continue as long as they’re in power – Putin

“We care about Ukraine because Ukraine is our neighbor,” Putin said.

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT…


Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has branded the Ukrainian leadership a “party of war” which would continue fueling conflicts while they stay in power, giving the recent Kerch Strait incident as an example.

“When I look at this latest incident in the Black Sea, all what’s happening in Donbass – everything indicates that the current Ukrainian leadership is not interested in resolving this situation at all, especially in a peaceful way,” Putin told reporters during a media conference in the aftermath of the G20 summit in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

This is a party of war and as long as they stay in power, all such tragedies, all this war will go on.

The Kiev authorities are craving war primarily for two reasons – to rip profits from it, and to blame all their own domestic failures on it and actions of some sort of “aggressors.”

“As they say, for one it’s war, for other – it’s mother. That’s reason number one why the Ukrainian government is not interested in a peaceful resolution of the conflict,” Putin stated.

Second, you can always use war to justify your failures in economy, social policy. You can always blame things on an aggressor.

This approach to statecraft by the Ukrainian authorities deeply concerns Russia’s President. “We care about Ukraine because Ukraine is our neighbor,” Putin said.

Tensions between Russia and Ukraine have been soaring after the incident in the Kerch Strait. Last weekend three Ukrainian Navy ships tried to break through the strait without seeking the proper permission from Russia. Following a tense stand-off and altercation with Russia’s border guard, the vessels were seized and their crews detained over their violation of the country’s border.

While Kiev branded the incident an act of “aggression” on Moscow’s part, Russia believes the whole Kerch affair to be a deliberate “provocation” which allowed Kiev to declare a so-called “partial” martial law ahead of Ukraine’s presidential election.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

When Putin Met Bin Sally

Another G20 handshake for the history books.

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


In the annals of handshake photo-ops, we just may have a new winner (much to the delight of oil bulls who are looking at oil treading $50 and contemplating jumping out of the window).

Nothing but sheer joy, delight and friendship…

…but something is missing…

Meanwhile, earlier…

Zoomed in…

And again.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending