Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

News

Trump Pardons Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Donald Trump has given control of US foreign policy to the military in exchange for support on domestic matters.

Published

on

1,420 Views

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Arizona was infamous for his tough approach to policing. At his prison facilities he gained notoriety for his tough regime of discipline without special privileges.

Recently, Arpaio was convicted of Contempt of Court for refusing to obey a court order designed to force Arpaio’s deputies from specifically targeting illegal aliens in its jurisdiction.

The maximum sentence for such a conviction would have been 6 months behind bars.

Today, Donald Trump announced that he has invoked his power of Presidential pardon to absolve Arpaio of any wrong doing.

Arpaio who was a strong Trump supporter during the campaign stated,

“I’m very appreciative of what the president has done.Right now, I have to thank the president for standing by me and standing by law enforcement. And I’m very humbled”.

As the White House is increasingly staffed by ex-military leaders, it is becoming increasingly clear that while US Foreign Policy is now mostly controlled by the Department of Defence rather than the President’s remaining civilian staff or the State Department, Trump is continuing to exercise his prerogative in domestic affairs through executive orders and special Presidential privileges deriving from the US Constitution.

The public may well be witnessing a kind of Faustian bargain in which Trump has largely surrendering his foreign policy campaign promises, resigning himself to allow the military to largely dictate the trajectory of foreign policy in exchange for military men backing up Trump’s personal decisions in domestic affairs, decisions which generally remain deeply unpopular among the neo-liberal dominated Democratic party and some Republicans.

If this is the case, a new coalition of military hawks and domestic policy makers who are more in line with ‘candidate Trump’ may emerge as the central power brokers of the White House. This would appear especially the case as General John F. Kelly consolidates his new role as Donald Trump’s White House Chief of  Staff.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
seby
Guest
seby

Maybe he can now get a job patrolling the White House, to make sure nobody who doesnt have their lips coated with bush the III’s excrement is allowed in.

charlie
Guest
charlie

They are both degenerate authoritarian nationalistic nazis…pair of thick cunts

ShermanRMcCoy
Guest
ShermanRMcCoy

And you are obviously a moron, which is why I am blocking you in three, two, one. Buh-Bye!

englishvinal
Guest
englishvinal

Lovely verbiage..
… such is always a distinct indication of superior intelligence and of a genteel upbringing!

N. A. R II
Guest
N. A. R II

Neither is socialist so they cant be Nazis. They believe the rule of law which pisses off criminals so if you are pissed….

ShermanRMcCoy
Guest
ShermanRMcCoy

Interesting theory. Although there is no question that America’s failure to enforce her immigration laws has been destroying the country from the inside, failure to reach better relations with Russia could result in the total destruction of the entire world.

Avramijevdan
Guest
Avramijevdan

Mr. Dumb surrounded himself with same kind of people from day one of his campaign. His words were also very clear to anyone knowing how to listen. Feigning surprise about his reign is expected but it will not work outside of Usadistia and in all reality Usadists do not need it since their understanding of reality is already convoluted as much as possible. It is great that Mr. Dumb decided to become the decider and is in charge of himself and his decisions. However it is not surprising he chosen to free that Joe Arpaio character, embodiment of Usadist patriot.… Read more »

englishvinal
Guest
englishvinal

Gee “Avramijevdan”.. you sure have made it clear that you are not “an American Nationalist”.. !!!
With a name like “Avramijevdan”.. you are not a native American either… so what IS your “claim to fame”???
Trump is a lot of nasty things but “dumb” is not one of them. He is sitting in the white house, and he got there using his “connections” and his “skills” (neither of which I admire), but he IS there, and YOU are sitting behind a keyboard in lower class middle US .. (or is it Afghanistan? or…???).. calling Trump “dumb”.

I think the circumstances speak for themselves….

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

Correct. This so called Serbian Speaking Swede posts the same shite over and over, like a broken record.

Avramijevdan
Guest
Avramijevdan

English, your eloquence, uncanny ability for observation and above all your timeless way of recognizing (non)quality of not only me but of the DOAT himself left me speechless.

Please feel free to provide some more of your wisdom for my reading pleasure.

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

It was the first POTUS. George Washington sent General Sullivan in 1779 to destroy the Iroquois towns. He established a precedent for the American presidency stronger than the two term limit.

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

And turd Trump didn’t have the balls to make the announcement other than during the hurricane hitting Texas, so people’s attention were focused on the natural disaster. Contemptible.

englishvinal
Guest
englishvinal

Does that matter ..??? Really.. ?? I don’t care a fig for Trump.. I certainly did NOT “vote” for him.. “voting is for suckers and mind dead” as far as I am concerned … for many reasons, all valid. That said, Trump has done at least ONE correct act, …. ….. he took Arpaio off the leftest meat hook where they conspired to hang him to bleed out.. an honest sincere man who was protecting the people of Arizona from the onslaught of ILLEGAL ALIENS… who suck the energy / blood right out of the veins of decent working people.… Read more »

Vera Gottlieb
Guest
Vera Gottlieb

Yes, honesty and integrity matter to me – perhaps not to you. The country is being divided more and more, pitting one group against the other. So much for the United States…

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

You nailed it Adam. It is like a really bad US movie with Morgan Freeman and Robert Redford.
A senile octagenarian instead of Trump’s base. He has chosen… badly.

Dennis Morrisseau
Guest

I DON’T think he has or should surrender to anything like an MIC directed
foreign policy…..nor to an Israeli directed one

S.M. De Kuyper
Guest
S.M. De Kuyper

I think that with the US Presidential powers now under the Trump Presidency, the President could take back his powers from the four Military powers surrounding him, easily.

S.M. De Kuyper
Guest
S.M. De Kuyper

“JUST DO IT!”

Simon
Guest
Simon

Never heard of Arpaio, and so would not normally care. But my interest was tickled – is this decision divisive, does it cause more passion, both outrage and support in the US, out of all proportion to its real consequence?
A quick review of the news and even the comments on this small site, would suggest – Yes, very much so.
Then great. More of the same please. Fuel for the fire.
Now get us another statue story and pass the popcorn.

richardstevenhack
Guest
richardstevenhack

Arpaio is a complete butthead fascist who deserves to be locked in a cell with the inmates he’s tortured for decades. This guy would be happy running Iraq’s infamous Abu Ghraib prison.

Trump becomes doubly a scumbag for pardoning this other scumbag. It’s in line with his favoring torture and killing the families of alleged terrorists, i.e., pretty much any Muslim.

N. A. R II
Guest
N. A. R II

Tortured, Really. If you believe the people in charge think that the families of alleged terrorists are pretty much any Muslims then you are an idiot and you are the islamophobe.

The tax payers of the US are tired of paying for criminals including those who think they have the right to illegally enter this the country.

They believe the rule of law which pisses off criminals so if you are pissed….

richardstevenhack
Guest
richardstevenhack

Obviously someone who approves of torture. Pretty much speaks for itself.

N. A. R II
Guest
N. A. R II

Only after the wusifaction of this country could any of these be deemed as torture. If he was in a rusdian,brazian,Mexican,etc prison he would face torture. You panty waste snowkemflake actually think it is acceptable to”convict” a patriot without a jury by his peers. This man openly ran his force like this and was elected 6 times. He refused to stand down while the “President” told the border patrol to stand down. That is closer to treason than this was to torture. No the whole purpose of this crap is to sell socialism and I’m sick of your idiocy.

richardstevenhack
Guest
richardstevenhack

The US has rules (more often acknowledged in the breach than the execution, admittedly) against “cruel and unusual punishment.”

He ignored them. He’s a scumbag, You’re a scumbag. ‘Nuff said.

N. A. R II
Guest
N. A. R II

Typical “educated” child living in mommies basement with no real world experience or worse just that mentality. Most websites refer to people like you as a snowflake but I will go with pajama boy. I have been in jail, fixed my life after having experienced life as an addict. Crawled back to improve my life through work and education. What you call cruel and unusual is absurd. What Sheriff Joe did was try to make his jail a place people did not repeat visit. If you have ever been jail most jails have people that basically live there. The prisoners… Read more »

richardstevenhack
Guest
richardstevenhack

I’m far older than you are and more experienced. And I was never an addict (I never even smoked normal cigarettes), but I was in the military for three years during the Vietnam war. Comparing prison to the military is asinine and insulting to the military.

Someday someone is going to remember their time in his jail and put a bullet in his head. Can’t wait to hear it. Hopefully that ex-con will get a medal. and a pardon from whoever is President.

N. A. R II
Guest
N. A. R II

Please not my comparison it was made by never mind …. “Someday someone is going to remember their time in his jail and put a bullet in his head. Can’t wait to hear it. Hopefully that ex-con will get a medal. and a pardon from whoever is President.” You are a whackadoo. After I called you Pajama boy I read some of your other posts you may not be in mommies basement but I am guessing your antisemitic crazy arse has a least a whole role of tin foil wrapped around your head.

richardstevenhack
Guest
richardstevenhack

“antisemitic”

Ah, I suspected you were a Zionist troll…confirmed…

colum
Guest
colum

This could be spun another way. If trump has truly gained directorship of domestic affairs it would be entertaing to see trump corral the like of Antifa and other violent liberals as well as fascists and extreme right under the stewardship of Mr Apraio. Granted this is just whimsy and improbable, but a shock to the system is really need right now to fuck over the establishment. Something short of full blown protest and riot by the hard working (and largely silent) public of America, and probably, the world.

Latest

Honest liberal says he is NOT INTERESTED in policy explanation [Video]

When news anchors try to act like prosecuting attorneys instead of actually interviewing people, we all lose.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

One characteristic of modern-day television “news reporting” is that the political news is not truly reported. Rather, if the interviewer disagrees with the one being interviewed, the session turns into interviewer grandstanding. Regrettably, this tactic is used by liberal and conservative journalists alike. However, it is usually not admitted, as the interviewer usually chooses to say things like “I want the truth” when he or she really wants to force the other person to admit the correctness of the interviewer.

Over the weekend, Fox News’ Chris Wallace grandstanded against White House Senior Policy Adviser Stephen Miller. However, Chris Wallace at least was honest about his wish:

STEPHEN MILLER: … At a fundamental level, we could go down into the details, and you know, Chris, I can go down into details as much as you want to, but the bottom line is this…

CHRIS WALLACE: Please don’t! (laughs)

This is a big problem. The responsibility of any good journalist is to get full and accurate information about a given topic. Isn’t it?

Not in the press of our day. Chris Wallace is a valued personality for the Fox News Channel. As a former CBS anchor for 60 Minutes, Wallace brings a well-known face and voice of the mainstream media to Fox, even though he is quite liberal politically, as are many in the entertainment and information professions.

The problem is that the topic here, the facts justifying President Trump’s National Emergency declaration on Friday over the still permeable US-Mexico border, are present in abundance. But Mr. Wallace did not want to know these facts, or perhaps worse, he did not want to let his viewing audience know this information, so he tried to prevent Mr. Miller from talking about those details.

Stephen Miller, thankfully, was not having it. He insisted on giving a full and informed response to Mr. Wallace’s questions, even though Wallace did not want to hear any information.

The rest of the interview is comprised of Mr. Miller trying to dissemimate information and Mr. Wallace trying to block it and refuse it in order to sustain his own preferred narrative.

Chris Wallace’ point of view is that the President called a National Emergency for no good reason, and that President Trump is breaking the law by appropriating money for the Border Wall, something which only the House of Representatives can do, legislatively.

However, the point of view expressed by Mr. Wallace and President Trump is that as Chief Executive of the United States of America, the President is responsible to preserve the country from invasion. For the President, the never-ending waves of illegals coming into the country and not being deported, but rather, released into the US pending trials that they often never attend years later, amounts to a slow invasion.

Strictly speaking, President Trump is correct. The illegals are not (usually) armed representatives of a foreign power, but neither do they become American citizens. Many of them take advantage of generous provisions and loopholes in the law (Mexico teaches them how to do this!) and they therefore earn money but usurp the country of resources.

It has been exceedingly difficult to move the level of interest in stopping illegal immigration in the US. Rush Limbaugh rightly stated in his program on Friday, February 15, what the problem is, and we include some of the details (as we should) for why Mr. Limbaugh says what he says here:

There is a limit on a number of detainees. There is limit on how much of border and fence can be built. There’s a limit on what kind can be built. There’s a limit on modernization. This bill is filled with congressional edicts telling the president of the United States what he cannot do. Now, it authorizes $23 billion for Homeland Security, but it specifies $1.375 billion for fencing and bordering.

But there are so many limits on this as to make this practically irrelevant — by design and on purpose, because I firmly believe that what members of Congress (both parties) actually want with this bill is to send a message that nothing is ever gonna happen as long as Donald Trump is President. The attempt in this budget deal is to send a message to you Trump voters that it’s worthless voting for him, that it is a waste of time supporting him, because they are demonstrating that he can’t get anything done.

This is Pelosi in the House and Schumer in the Senate getting together, because they know when it comes to illegal immigration, these parties are unified, folks. For the most part, the Republicans and Democrats are for open borders. There are exceptions on the Republican side. But there are a lot of Republicans that don’t want Trump to succeed even now. There are a lot of Republicans just after he was inaugurated who don’t want him to succeed. So they come up with a piece of legislation here that is outrageous.

It is outrageous in its denial of the existence of a genuine emergency at the border. They don’t care. They will deal with whatever mess they create. They don’t care how bad it gets because in their world, the only mess is Donald Trump — and since the Russian effort and the Mueller effort and everything else related to that has failed to get his approval numbers down (and that has been the objective from the get-go), this is the latest effort, and it won’t be long… You mark my words on this.

There is an emergency at the US-Mexico border. Last year almost half a million people were apprehended by the Border Patrol and ICE. Many, if not most, though, are still in the United States. They were not all sent back. Some were, and some of them probably have come back in yet again. The fact that our nation’s borders are unrestricted in this manner is absolute folly.

The more American people know the details about what is actually happening at the border, the more they support the wall’s construction and President Trump’s policies. We have seen evidence for this in polling even by liberal network outlets. President Trump managed to call attention to this topic and bring it into the center of the discussion of US domestic policy. Rasmussen reported that the level of approval of Trump’s work to close the border is high – at 59 percent, with only 33 percent disapproving.

The President made this an issue. Chris Wallace tried in his own program to deflect and dissuade information from being brought to the attention of the American viewers who watch his program.

This is not journalism. It is reinforcement of propaganda on Mr. Wallace’s part, defense against facts, and an unwillingness to let the American people have information and therefore to think for themselves.

Unfortunately, such practices are not limited to Mr. Wallace. Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and others all utilize this form of questioning, and it is a shame, because the news reporter no longer reports the news. When a talking head on TV or radio places himself or herself as the Gatekeeper to allow or prevent information from reaching the American people, this is highly presumptuous, ego driven and almost always, dishonest.

Worse, such an approach reinforces this message to American people: “You cannot think for yourself. It is too hard, so we will do your thinking for you. Trust us!”

This style of journalism became more and more popular over, under the “appearance” of “tough questioning.” However the usual course of “tough questioning” is ideologically aligned with whatever the journalist thinks, and not at all about what is actually important. Chris Wallace is notorious for doing this with conservatives, and he does aggravate them, but he reduces interviews to an argument between the journalist and the person interviewed.

And usually, this is not the story. This was made absolutely clear in the interview with Stephen Miller, even to the point that Mr. Wallace actually voiced the request, “please don’t (give us all the specifics of this issue.)” 

Good journalism respects the fact that different people have different points of view. Agreement or disagreement with these points is what Op-Ed writing is for. But when Op-Ed is treated as hard fact journalism, we all lose.

We included the whole interview video from the beginning here so that the viewer can take in the whole course of this discussion. It is well worth watching. And as it is well-worth watching, it is also well-worth each person’s own personal consideration. People are smarter than the media would like us to be.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Macron pisses off Merkel as he tries to sabotage Nord Stream 2 pipeline (Video)

The Duran – News in Review – Episode 177.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss an EU compromise for Nord Stream 2 where EU member states, the EU Parliament, and its Commission will give the bloc more oversight on gas pipelines, with one caveat…the Nord Stream 2 project with Russia will not be threatened by the new regulations in the agreement.

Macron pushed hard to have the new regulations include (and derail) Nord Stream 2, an action which annoyed Angela Merkel, who eventually got her way and delivered another blow to Macron’s failing French presidency.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via The Express UK

Angela Merkel hit back at Emmanuel Macron over Russia and Germany’s pipeline project, declaring it would “not be a one-sided dependency”. The German Chancellor explained that Germany will expand its gas terminals with “liquified gas”. Speaking at a press conference, Ms Merkel declared: “Do we become dependent on Russia because of this second gas pipeline? I say no, if we diversify. Germany will expand its gas terminals with liquefied gas.

“This means that we do not want to depend only on Russia, but Russia was a source of gas in the Cold War and will remain one.

“But it would not be one-sided dependency.”

Via DW

The EU parliament and its Council are set to adopt new regulations on gas pipelines connecting the bloc members with non-EU countries, the EU Commission announced early on Wednesday.

The upcoming directive is based on a compromise between EU member states and EU officials in Brussels. The bloc leaders agreed to tighten Brussels’ oversight of gas delivery and expand its rules to all pipelines plugging into the EU’s gas distribution network.

“The new rules ensure that… everyone interested in selling gas to Europe must respect European energy law,” EU Energy Commissioner Miguel Arias Canete said in a statement.

For example, owners of pipelines linking EU and non-EU countries would also be required to allow access for their competitors. Brussels would also have more power regarding transparency and tariff regulations.

Russian ambassador slams US

Brussels has repeatedly expressed concern over the controversial Nord Stream 2 project which would deliver Russian gas directly to Germany through a pipeline under the Baltic Sea. Many EU states oppose the mammoth project, and the US claims it would allow Moscow to tighten its grip on the EU’s energy policy.

Berlin has insisted that the pipeline is a “purely economic” issue.

Speaking to Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung daily, Russian ambassador to Berlin, Sergey Nechayev, slammed the US’ opposition as an attempt to “push its competition aside” and clear the way for American suppliers of liquefied gas.

“It’s hard to believe that a country that is destroying the rules of free and fair trade, that is imposing import tariffs on its competition, that is flying slogans like ‘America First’ on its flags and often threatens biggest European concerns with illegal sanctions, is now really concerned about European interests,” the Russian envoy said in remarks published in German on Wednesday.

Last week, France unexpectedly rebelled against the project, but Berlin and Paris soon reached a compromise. Thanks to their agreement, the latest deal is not expected to impede the ongoing construction of Nord Stream 2.

Citing sources from negotiators’ circles, German public broadcaster ARD reported that the deal left room for Germany to approve exceptions from the EU-wide rules.

According to the EU Commission, however, exceptions are “only possible under strict procedures in which the Commission plays a decisive role.”

The Gazprom-backed pipeline is set to be completed by the end of the year.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

UK Defence Secretary looking for a fight with both China and Russia (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 87.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss UK Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson’s idea to deploy hard power against China and Russia, starting with plans to send Britain’s new aircraft carrier to the tense sea routes in the South China Sea.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

“Britain’s Gavin Williamson places Russia & China on notice, I’m not joking,” authored by John Wight, via RT

UK Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson is itching for conflict with Russia and China. He’s not mad. Not even slightly. But he is stupid. Very.

Unlike former fireplace salesman Gavin Williamson, I am no military expert. But then you do not need to be one to understand that while Britain going to war with Russia and China might work as a video game, the real thing would be an exceedingly bad idea.

So why then in a speech delivered to the Royal United Services Institute in London, did Mr Williamson’s argument on the feasibility of the real thing elicit applause rather than the shrieks of horror and demands he be sacked forthwith it should have? This is a serious question, by the way. It is one that cuts through British establishment verbiage to reveal a country ruled not by the sober and doughty political heavyweights of years gone by, but by foaming fanatics in expensive suits

Placing to one side for a moment the insanity of the very concept of Britain deploying hard power against Russia and/or China, the prospect of fighting a war against two designated enemies at the same time is a recipe for disaster. Not satisfied with that, though, Mr Williamson is actually contemplating a conflict with three different enemies at the same time – i.e. against Russia, China, and the millions of people in Britain his government is currently waging war against under the rubric of austerity.

“Today, Russia is resurgent,” Mr Williamson said, “rebuilding its military arsenal and seeking to bring the independent countries of the former Soviet Union, like Georgia and Ukraine, back into its orbit.”

For Mr Williamson and his ilk a resurgent Russia is a bad thing. Much better in their eyes if Russia, after the Soviet era in the 1990s, had remained on its knees as a free market desert; its state institutions in a state of near collapse and tens of millions of its citizens in the grip of immiseration. Yes, because in that scenario Western ideologues like him would have had free rein to rampage around the world as they saw fit, setting fire to country after country on the perverse grounds of ‘saving them’ for democracy.

As it is, he and his still managed to squeeze in a considerable amount of carnage and chaos in the years it did take Russia to recover. The indictment reads as follows: Yugoslavia destroyed; Afghanistan turned upside down; Iraq pushed into the abyss; Libya sent to hell.

By the time they turned their attention to Syria, intent on exploiting an Arab Spring that NATO in Libya transformed into an Arab Winter, Russia had recovered and was able to intervene. It did so in concert with the Syrian Arab Army, Iran and Hezbollah to save the day – much to the evident chagrin of those who, like Gavin Williamson, prefer to see countries in ashes rather than independent of Western hegemony.

As to the facile nonsense about Russia trying to bring Georgia and Ukraine back into its orbit, both countries happen to share a border with Russia and both countries, in recent years, have been used by the UK and its allies as cat’s paws with the eastward expansion of NATO in mind.

It gets worse though: “The Alliance must develop its ability to handle the kind of provocations that Russia is throwing at us. Such action from Russia must come at a cost.”

“Provocations,” the man said. Since British troops have been taking part in exercises on Russia’s doorstep, not the other way round, one wonders if Gavin Williamson wrote this speech while inebriated.

It is Russia that has been on the receiving end of repeated provocations from NATO member states such as the UK in recent times, and it is Russia that has been forced to respond to protect its own security and that of its people where necessary. Furthermore, not only in Russia but everywhere, including the UK, people understand that when you have political leaders intoxicated by their own national myths and propaganda to such an extent as Britain’s Defence Secretary, danger ensues.

The most enduring of those national myths where London is concerned is that the British Empire was a force for good rather than a vast criminal enterprise, that Britain and America won the Second World War together alone, that Iraq had WMDs, and that international law and international brigandage really are one and the same thing.

Perhaps the most preposterous section of the speech came when Mr Williamson tried to fashion a connection between Brexit and Britain’s military strength: “Brexit has brought us to a moment. A great moment in our history. A moment when we must strengthen our global presence, enhance our lethality, and increase our mass.”

Reading this, you can almost hear Churchill turning in his grave. Britain’s wartime prime minister had such as Gavin Williamson in mind when he famously said, “He has all the virtues I dislike, and none of the vices I admire.”

Mr Williamson obviously misread the memo talking up not the opportunity for increased conflict with China after Brexit but trade.

This was not a speech it was a linguistic car crash, one that will forever command an honoured place in compendiums of the worst political speeches ever made. As for Gavin Williamson, just as no responsible parent would ever dream of putting an 10-year old behind the wheel of car to drive unsupervised, no responsible British government would ever appoint a man like him as its Defence Secretary.

In years past, he would have struggled to find employment polishing the brass plate outside the building.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending