Connect with us

Red Pill

News

Nude celebrity iCloud photos take three

Another week, another batch of nude JLaw pics hit the internet. Joining Lawrence in “The Fappening 3” are model Cara Delevingne, actress Anna Kendrick and T-Mobile ad star and top model Carly Foulkes. Other celebrity nudes include three-time Olympic gold medalist Misty May-Treanor, a host of soap opera stats and more movie actresses.

Published

on

520 Views

How many nude photos of herself did Jennifer Lawrence take? Just when you thought every nude pic of every young hollywood celebrity was leaked to the public, we find out that even more photos have been released on Reddit and 4chan, making this the “third round” of nude photo leaks.
My god ladies, do you have no self control, because you sure as hell have no understanding how technology works or what uploading to the cloud means.
This new batch of tech idiot celebrities include model Cara Delevingne, actress Anna Kendrick and T-Mobile ad star and top model Carly Foulkes. Other celebrities exposed include three-time Olympic gold medalist Misty May-Treanor, a host of other soap opera and movie actresses – and topping that are, of course, 55 more images of Jennifer Lawrence.
Better yet, the Friday leak was accompanied by a circulating online video, showing off what’s yet to come. An anonymous narrator is heard saying that there are “plenty of links left,” as numerous rows of presumably yet-to-be-leaked files appear onscreen.
While the first nude picture batch came as a shock to many fans, it appears that the reaction to new leaks is getting milder. Some people sarcastically described it as ‘The Fappening 3,’ a word play on the 2009 thriller movie referring to a slang term for male masturbation.
Of course the women cannot be held accountable for their dumb actions, (taking nude photos of oneself and uploading them online is monumentally stupid) so who better to blame for everything than Apple’s iCloud storage.
The ongoing investigation taking place can’t logically touch iCloud, as the only real criticism one can place on the iCloud service is that that you can try getting to the password an infinite number of times by trying out endless combinations of security question answers…like any other username and password driven site on the web.
White knights and feminists will have none of that password hacking nonsense as “experts” and “critics” continue to try and place full blame on Apple’s online storage service, because, once again, none of these unicorn starlets could ever have been at fault for having their nude images all over the net. Feminism; all the benefits society can offer, with none of the accountability.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
28 Comments

28
Leave a Reply

avatar
28 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
4 Comment authors
alexwadjaredpillvideosooopatldroutsideSV Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
alexwadja
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Nude celebrity iCloud photos take 3. Starlets having trouble understanding what uploading to the cloud means http://t.co/…

outsideSV
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Nude celebrity iCloud photos take 3. Starlets having trouble understanding what uploading to the cloud means http://t.co/…

ooopatldr
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Nude celebrity iCloud photos take 3. Starlets having trouble understanding what uploading to the cloud means http://t.co/…

redpillvideos
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: Nude celebrity iCloud photos take 3. Starlets having trouble understanding what uploading to the cloud means http://t.co/…

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 42191 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb
[…]Here is a good Weblog You may Obtain Interesting that we Encourage You[…]

trackback

xcn5bsn5bvtb7sdn5cnvbttecc
[…]just beneath, are many totally not related internet sites to ours, even so, they are certainly worth going over[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 38210 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

Title
[…]we came across a cool site that you simply might take pleasure in. Take a search in case you want[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 90860 more Infos: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Informations here: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

Title
[…]check beneath, are some absolutely unrelated web-sites to ours, having said that, they are most trustworthy sources that we use[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

Title
[…]usually posts some really fascinating stuff like this. If you are new to this site[…]

trackback

Title
[…]one of our guests a short while ago suggested the following website[…]

trackback

… [Trackback]
[…] Informations on that Topic: redpilltimes.com/nude-celebrity-icloud-photos-take-three/ […]

trackback

Title
[…]we came across a cool internet site which you may enjoy. Take a search when you want[…]

trackback

Title
[…]always a major fan of linking to bloggers that I like but don’t get a great deal of link love from[…]

Latest

Lori Loughlin’s daughter was aboard USC official’s yacht in Bahamas when mom was charged

Lori Loughlin’s daughter was on the yacht of USC’s Board of Trustees when her mom was accused in scheme.

The Duran

Published

on

Via Fox News


Lori Loughlin’s daughter Olivia Jade Giannulli was spending spring break on a University of Southern California official’s yacht when her mother was accused Tuesday of involvement in a college admissions scheme, reports said.

Giannulli, 19, was on Rick Caruso’s luxury yacht Invictus in the Bahamas, a report said. Caruso is chairman of USC’s Board of Trustees.

Giannulli, who currently attends USC, was with Caruso’s daughter Gianna and several other friends, the outlet reported.

“My daughter and a group of students left for spring break prior to the government’s announcement yesterday,” Caruso told TMZ. “Once we became aware of the investigation, the young woman decided it would be in her best interests to return home.”

Loughlin’s daughter has since returned to Los Angeles to face the allegations that could result in her getting expelled from USC.

USC’s Board of Trustees will not decide the status of Giannulli and the other students involved in the case, but rather, the university’s president will make the decisions, according to TMZ.

Business deals in jeopardy?

Giannulli is a YouTube beauty vlogger and social media star, but in the midst of her mother’s charges, she may lose the lucrative brand-sponsorship deals she has landed over the years, Variety reported.

HP, having cut ties with Giannulli, said in a statement, “HP worked with Lori Loughlin and Olivia Jade in 2017 for a one-time product campaign. HP has removed the content from its properties.”

Giannulli also cut brand deals with partners including Amazon, Dolce & Gabbana, Lulus, Marc Jacobs Beauty, Sephora, Smashbox Beauty Cosmetics, Smile Direct Club, Too Faced Cosmetics, Boohoo, and Unilever’s TRESemmé, the report said.

Giannulli’s rep declined to comment, Variety reported. Estée Lauder Companies, which owns Smashbox and Too Faced, also declined to comment, while the other brands or companies the magazine reached out to did not immediately respond to their requests for comment.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

$250M Lawsuit Against CNN Imminent; Covington High MAGA Student Suffered “Direct Attacks”

CNN will be the second MSM outlet sued over their reporting of the incident, after Sandmann launched a $250 million lawsuit against the Washington Post in late February. 

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


CNN is about to be sued for more than $250 million for spreading fake news about 16-year-old Covington High School student Nicholas Sandmann.

Sandmann was viciously attacked by left-leaning news outlets over a deceptively edited video clip from the January March for Life rally at the Lincoln Memorial, in which the MAGA-hat-wearing teenager appeared to be mocking a Native American man beating a drum. Around a day later, a longer version of the video revealed that Sandmann did absolutely nothing wrong – after the media had played judge, jury and executioner of Sandmann’s reputation.

CNN will be the second MSM outlet sued over their reporting of the incident, after Sandmann launched a $250 million lawsuit against the Washington Post in late February.

Speaking with Fox News host Mark Levin in an interview set to air Sunday, Sandmann’s attorney, L. Lin Wood, said “CNN was probably more vicious in its direct attacks on Nicholas than The Washington Post. And CNN goes into millions of individuals’ homes. It’s broadcast into their homes.”

They really went after Nicholas with the idea that he was part of a mob that was attacking the Black Hebrew Israelites, yelling racist slurs at the Black Hebrew Israelites,” continued Wood. “Totally false. Saying things like that Nicholas was part of a group that was threatening the Black Hebrew Israelites, that they thought it was going to be a lynching.”

Why didn’t they stop and just take an hour and look through the internet and find the truth and then report it?” Wood asked. “Maybe do that before you report the lies. They didn’t do it. They were vicious. It was false. CNN will be sued next week, and the dollar figure in the CNN case may be higher than it was [against] The Washington Post.”

Watch: 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Rand Paul refuses to support emergency declaration, deepening problem

Rand Paul gives a principled reason for his refusal, and he cannot be faulted for that, but it leaves the borders open and unsafe.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

Senator Rand Paul indicated he will vote to terminate President Trump’s National Emergency Declaration on Sunday. This continues a story that seems to want no resolution.

Weeks ago, the seed to this news piece started this way:

One 35-day partial government shutdown and almost three weeks later, the debate over a statistically tiny amount of money in the US budget for the building of a border wall drags on with no solution. On February 15th, if there is no agreement that is to President Trump’s satisfaction, the government will once again descend into a partial shutdown.

And on February 15th, the President signed a continuing resolution to keep the government open through the rest of the fiscal year. This CR gave sharply limited authority of funds with regards to the border wall. This prompted the President to take it a step farther and declare a National Emergency.

This is because very few people in the US government actually desire a solution to close and secure the American-Mexican border. In fact, what we see is a government that is largely aligned against the will of its citizens.

President Trump has made repeated statements and speeches in which he outlines a fair array of facts concerning the problems experienced in the US by illegal border crossings of both people and controlled substances.

However, the issue of border security remains something that Congress only supports with words. We saw this in action both last week and the week before with the Democrat led House of Representatives voting 245-182 to terminate the National Emergency declaration. While this was to be expected in the House, on March 3rd, libertarian Senator Rand Paul, a known strong supporter of President Trump, nonetheless penned an Op-Ed piece on Fox News in which he said he planned to also vote against the National Emergency in the Republican-led Senate (emphasis added):

In September of 2014,  I had these words to say: “The president acts like he’s a king. He ignores the Constitution.  He arrogantly says, ‘If Congress will not act, then I must.’

Donald J. Trump agreed with me when he said in November 2014 that President Barack Obama couldn’t make a deal on immigration so “now he has to use executive action, and this is a very, very dangerous thing that should be overridden easily by the Supreme Court.”

I support President Trump. I supported his fight to get funding for the wall from Republicans and Democrats alike, and I share his view that we need more and better border security.

However, I cannot support the use of emergency powers to get more funding, so I will be voting to disapprove of his declaration when it comes before the Senate.

Every single Republican I know decried President Obama’s use of executive power to legislate. We were right then. But the only way to be an honest officeholder is to stand up for the same principles no matter who is in power…

There are really two questions involved in the decision about emergency funding:

  • First, does statutory law allow for the president’s emergency orders,
  • and, second, does the Constitution permit these emergency orders?

As far as the statute goes, the answer is maybe — although no president has previously used emergency powers to spend money denied by Congress, and it was clearly not intended to do that.

But there is a much larger question: the question of whether or not this power and therefore this action are constitutional. With regard to the Constitution, the Supreme Court made it very clear in Youngstown Steel in 1952, in a case that is being closely reexamined in the discussion of executive power.  In Youngstown, the Court ruled that there are three kinds of executive order: orders that carry out an expressly voiced congressional position, orders where Congress’ will is unclear, and, finally, orders clearly opposed to the will of Congress.

To my mind, like it or not, we had this conversation.  In fact, the government was shut down in a public battle over how much money would be spent on the wall and border security.  It ended with a deal that Congress passed and the president signed into law, thus determining the amount.

Congress clearly expressed its will not to spend more than $1.3 billion and to restrict how much of that money could go to barriers.  Therefore, President Trump’s emergency order is clearly in opposition to the will of Congress.

Moreover, the broad principle of separation of powers in the Constitution delegates the power of the purse to Congress.  This turns that principle on its head.

Some are attempting to say that there isn’t a good analogy between President Obama’s orders or the Youngstown case. I disagree. Not only are the issues similar, but I think Youngstown Steel implications are even more profound in the case of emergency appropriations. We spent the last two months debating how much money should be spent on a wall, and Congress came to a clear conclusion: $1.3 billion. Without question, the president’s order for more wall money contradicts the will of Congress and will, in all likelihood, be struck down by the Supreme Court.

In fact, I think the president’s own picks to the Supreme Court may rebuke him on this.

Regardless, I must vote how my principles dictate. My oath is to the Constitution, not to any man or political party. I stand with the president often, and I do so with a loud voice. Today, I think he’s wrong, not on policy, but in seeking to expand the powers of the presidency beyond their constitutional limits. I understand his frustration. Dealing with Congress can be pretty difficult sometimes. But Congress appropriates money, and his only constitutional recourse, if he does not like the amount they appropriate, is to veto the bill.

This statement by Rand Paul is extremely – and painfully – fair. It marks not the actions of a liberal but of someone who is trying to do things truly “by the book.” He cannot be faulted for this.

But his “Nay” is very poorly placed because it comes in the context of a Congress that is full of people far less committed to the vision of America and its sovereignty than he or the President are. One of the reasons stated for lax border security is that cutting off illegal immigration also cuts off very cheap labor for several industries. Some of those industry leaders donate lavishly to political campaigns, ergo, corruption.

Rand Paul, in trying to fight for what is right by the letter of the law, may be correct, but in the short term it appears to exacerbate the problem of the porous US-Mexico border.

President Trump is trying to do the right thing in the company of a Congress who does not want this, for various reasons. Some of it is because some Congressmen and women are petty, Nancy Pelosi and Charles Schumer being the crabby National Grandparents in this aspect. But add to the “resist Trump because he is Trump” lobby those people who gain from illegal immigration in the short term, and those like the new socialist crop of Congressional members who are ready to change the very nature of the United States into something like their cannabis-induced dream of Sweden (which didn’t even work in Sweden!) and we see that border security is every bit the uphill climb that President Trump has shown it to be.

The government shutdown did one very good thing: It got the American focus on the border and some opinions on the matter moved – at least among the American people.

But since when did our representatives and senators really represent us, the American people?

It has been a long, long time.

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending