Connect with us
//pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Latest

Newly released UN “Nazi Holocaust archives” show US & UK colluded with Third Reich to destroy Soviet Union

Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

As Victory Day (May 9) approaches in Russia to commemorate the defeat of Hitler’s Nazi army, new United Nations archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust have finally been released, amid protests from the US and UK. Why?

The archives “damningly” show state collusion between the US, UK, and the Third Reich. The end goal between their collusion was not to end the Nazi Holocaust, but to defeat Soviet Union.

The parallels between WW2 history, as evidenced in the archive release, and how the US/EU and NATO are working with ISIS and neo-nazi Ukraine in order to destroy Russia, is proof to the point that the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Russia has been, and always will be, the eternal enemy of the western globalist elite.

The perpetuous war against Russia against the backdrop of the historic UN Nazi Holocaust archives, are discussed in a post entitled, “The Deep History of US, Britain’s Never-Ending Cold War On Russia” from the Strategic Culture on-line journal (www.strategic-culture.org), the


After decades of delaying, the United Nations finally released archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust. The source of those archives on Nazi war crimes were Western governments, including those in exile at the time of the war, such as the Belgian, Polish and Czechoslovakian. The time period covered is 1943-1949. Washington and London had long sought to halt the release. Why?

Notably, the landmark publication of the files last month was given scant Western media coverage. Surprisingly, perhaps, because the story that can be gleaned from the documents tells of a hidden history of the Second World War, namely the systematic collusion between the American and British governments and the Nazi Third Reich.

As a report in Deutsche Welle remarked on the released archives: «The files make clear that [Western] Allied forces knew more about the Nazi concentration camp system before the end of the war than has generally been thought».

This revelation points to more than just «knowledge» among the Western allies of Nazi-era crimes; it points more damningly to state collusion. This would also explain why Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

There has long been a controversial debate among Western nations about why the US and Britain in particular did not do more to bomb the Nazi infrastructure of death camps and railroads. Washington and London have often made the claim that they did know the full extent of the horror being perpetrated by the Nazis until the very end of the war when extermination centers such as at Auschwitz and Treblinka were liberated – by the Soviet Red Army, it should be noted too.

However, what the latest release of UN Holocaust files shows is that Washington and London were indeed well aware of the Nazi Final Solution in which millions of European Jews and Slavic people were being systematically worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers. So the question again is: why did the US and Britain not direct more of their aerial bombing campaign to destroy the Nazi infrastructure?

One possible answer is that these Western allies had a callous disregard for the Nazi victims. Washington and London establishments were themselves accused of harboring antisemitic prejudices, as can be seen from the scandals when both these governments spurned thousands of European Jewish refugees during the Second World War, in effect sending many of them to their deaths under the Nazi regime.

Not excluding the above factor of Western racist insouciance, there is a second more disturbing factor. That the Western governments, or at least powerful sections, were loath to hamper the Nazi war effort against the Soviet Union. Notwithstanding that the Soviet Union was a nominal «ally» of the West for the defeat of Nazi Germany.

This perspective harks to a radically different conception of the Second World War in contrast to that narrated in official Western versions. In this alternative historical account, the rise of the Nazi Third Reich was deliberately fomented by American and British rulers as a bulwark in Europe against the spread of communism. Adolf Hitler’s rabid anti-Semitism was matched only by his detest of Marxism and the Slavic people of the Soviet Union. In the Nazi ideology, they were all «Untermenschen» (subhumans) to be exterminated in a «Final Solution».

So, when Nazi Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and carrying out its Final Solution from June 1941 until late 1944, little wonder then that the US and Britain showed a curious reluctance to commit their military forces fully to open up a Western Front. The Western allies were evidently content to see the Nazi war machine doing what it was originally intended to do: to destroy the primary enemy to Western capitalism as represented by the Soviet Union. This is not to say that all American and British political leaders shared or were even aware of this tacit strategic vision. Leaders like President Franklin Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill appeared to be genuinely committed to defeating Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, their individual views must be set against a background of systematic collusion between powerful Western corporate interests and Nazi Germany.

As American author David Talbot documented in his book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA and the Rise of America’s Secret Government (2015), there were massive financial links between Wall Street and the Third Reich, going back several years before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Allen Dulles, who worked for the Wall Street law firm Sullivan and Cromwell and who later headed up the American Central Intelligence Agency, was a key player in the linkage between US capital and German industry. American industrial giants, such as Ford, GM, ITT and Du Pont were invested heavily in German industrial counterparts like IG Farben (manufacturer of Zyklon B, the poisonous gas used in the Holocaust), Krupp Steel and Daimler. American capital, as well as British, was thus integrated into the Nazi war machine and the latter’s dependence on the system of slave labor as provided by the Final Solution.

This would explain why the Western allies did so little to disrupt the Nazi infrastructure with their undoubted formidable aerial bombing capacity. Far more damning than mere inertia or indifference owing to racist prejudice towards the Nazi victims, what emerges is that the Americans and British capitalist elite were invested in the Third Reich. Mainly for the purpose of eliminating the Soviet Union and any kind of genuinely socialist global movement. Bombing Nazi infrastructure would have been tantamount to deleting Western assets.

To this end, as the war was drawing to a close and the Soviet Union looked poised to roll up the Third Reich singlehandedly, the Americans and British belatedly stepped up their war efforts from western and southern Europe. The goal was one of salvaging Western assets remaining in the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles, the director of the-soon-to-be-formed American Central Intelligence Agency, extricated top Nazis and their gold looted from Europe in secret surrender deals known as Operation Sunrise. Britain’s military intelligence MI6 was also involved in the clandestine American effort to salvage Nazi assets via ratlines. The bad faith on display to the Soviet «allies» heralded the chill of the ensuing Cold War that immediately followed the Second World War.

Significant and damning testimony of what was going down was given recently in a BBC interview by Ben Ferencz, the most senior surviving US prosecutor from the Nuremberg trials. At age 98, Ferencz was still able to lucidly recall how scores of Nazi war criminals were let off the hook by the American and British authorities. Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy». Patton’s candid expression of deeper animosity towards the Soviet Union than towards Nazi Germany was consistent with how the US and British ruling class had been colluding with Hitler’s Third Reich in a geo-strategic war against the Soviet Union and worker-led socialist movements arising across Europe and America.

In other words, the Cold War which the US and Britain embarked on after 1945 was but a continuation of hostile policy towards Moscow that was already underway well before the Second World War erupted in 1939 in the form of a build up of Nazi Germany. For various reasons, it became expedient for the Western powers to liquidate the Nazi war machine, along with the Soviet Union. But as can be seen, the Western assets residing in the Nazi machine were recycled into American and British Cold War posture against the Soviet Union. It is a truly damning legacy that American and British military intelligence agencies were consolidated and financed by Nazi crimes.

The recent release of UN Holocaust files – in spite of American and British prevarication over many years – add more evidence to the historical analysis that these Western powers were deeply complicit in the monumental crimes of the Nazi Third Reich. They knew about these crimes because they had helped facilitate them. And the complicity stemmed from Western hostility towards Russia as a perceived geopolitical rival.

This is not a mere historical academic exercise. Western complicity with Nazi Germany also finds a corollary in the present-day ongoing hostility from Washington, Britain and their NATO allies towards Moscow. The relentless build up of NATO offensive forces around Russia’s borders, the endless Russophobia in Western propagandistic news media, the economic blockade in the form of sanctions based on tenuous claims, are all deeply rooted in history.

The West’s Cold War towards Moscow preceded the Second World War, continued after the defeat of Nazi Germany and persists to this day regardless of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists. Why? Because Russia is a perceived rival to Anglo-American capitalist hegemony, as is China or any other emerging power that undermines that desired unipolar hegemony.

American-British collusion with Nazi Germany finds its modern-day manifestation in NATO collusion with the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine and jihadist terror groups dispatched in proxy wars against Russian interests in Syria and elsewhere. The players may change over time, but the root pathology is American-British capitalism and its hegemonic addiction.

The never-ending Cold War will only end when Anglo-American capitalism is finally defeated and replaced by a genuinely more democratic system.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement //pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/js/adsbygoogle.js (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
cortisol
Guest
cortisol

That is correct. USA/UK swooped in only in the very late stage, waiting as long as possible for SU to absorb maximum losses without the risk of German collapse. In this sense it was a timing game. Another thing is that USA had a plan to drop atomic bombs and firebomb Russian cities soon after the war end, only prevented by the lack of them. By 1950 it was too late with the advance in rocketry and first Soviet bomb. To date they have this plan, if there was no deterrent, they would do it immediately. Why they didn’t do… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I only came across the knowledge and links recently, but, look who fully supported Hitler, up until the Soviet Union sent him back to Berlin? The US and this is going to be a long winded ramble. Isn’t Hitler also part of the Rothschild family and whatever did happen to his frozen sperm, whilst Planned Parenthood and Josef Mengel were tweaking around with their eugenic’s programmes? I wonder how many leaders in the EU can be traced back to the sperm banks of elite NAZIs? WORST KEPT SECRETS OF THE BUMBLING BEAR – the CIA/NAZI marriage URL for this article:… Read more »

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

Nutter

Obama
Guest
Obama

The USA did not invent nukes. Germany had invented atomic bombs, but did not use it in Europe due to side effects. That was the reason, why the US could not bomb the Soviet Union immediately. The United States is the only country in the world that used nukes, namely Little Boy and Fat Man in order to defeat the powerful German ally “Japan”.

Max Werner
Guest
Max Werner

Why is Japan in quotes haha

Obama
Guest
Obama

Because I like Nippon!

strav
Guest
strav

The mere fact that france and uk retreated in 2weeks without putting up resistance is proof enough! Then staying out of europe for over 3yrs whilst the nazis were busy with the russians is the clincher!

al p
Guest
al p

They retreated because they got their asses kicked. Its what armies do in such circumstances. The real suspicions fact is why didn’t Hitler go in for the kill at Dunkirk? Because he was an Anglophile with wet dreams of dividing the globe between Germany & Britain

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

Hitler should have known that the zionists controlled Britain.

Edmund burke326
Guest
Edmund burke326

Don’t forget the collaboration of others like the Catholic Church who assisted the Ustasha in murdering Serbian people. A good reference is the “Falsifiers of History” published in 1948 by the USSR, which was an attempt to counteract a fresh wave of US/UK/French anti-Soviet propaganda that appeared in the western media following the seizure of Nazi documentation by the US.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

I remember that book

Laika Lammerink
Guest
Laika Lammerink

Occupied Germany – since 1918, and their boogieman/cannon fodder project Nazi Germany, was simply an affiliate of the Roth-child run British Empire and their U$ (1913/Fed). They did not control Stalin’s Russia.
They own and control the ‘money’ press, and therefore virtually the entire system, companies, (Protestant) churches, politicians (cr-ISIS actors), the ‘education’ system, media, whatever.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Wasn’t Lenin also related to the Rothschilds?

Who had a hissy fit when Tsar Alexander II lent a helping hand to Abraham Lincolne, when Great Britain and France were wanting to invade the US? Who then went on to take out the Royal Family of Russia?

How many children and grandchildren of both the Bolshevik and NAZI elite, can now be found in various positions of authority, either on various political stages or running, Government funded private schemes/organisations/institutions?

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

Like all bankers who got upended at the rise of the Bolsheviks, Sir Walter Rothschild would be despondent had he fallen into their hands. If there was a foreign connection when it comes to Lenin, that was a German one and it pertained to what seemed a mutual interest to Germany and the Russians: peace on the Eastern front. The difference was in the terms that each side had in mind. As for the Imperial Romanov dynasty, it has only itself to blame for its downfall. Moreover, many people are ignorant of the fact that the Bolsheviks were politically insignificant… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Treaty 1213 – The Vatican owns most of the planet. At the time, Great Britain was bankrupt and cut a deal with the Vatican, where the Crown handed over Great Britain and her colonies (including those that are now independent). The Treaty was never revoked.

The Vactican – Religious Capital.
Washington DC – Military Capital.
City of London – Economic Capital.

WWI – League of Nations
WWII – United Nations
WWIII – NWO Full Spectrum Domination

Treaty of 1213 – The Beginning of the Lie… http://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City… http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

john mason
Guest
john mason

So what this article is hinting at is for the world to be free of these global terrorists, US and UK is to annihilate them? Destroy the elite, Rothschild, Clinton, Blair, Bush and the like. Can live with that ideology.

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

That’s what the article suggested. Not the destruction of entire countries.

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

long live marxism-leninism-maoism, long live the people’s war

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

The Rotschilds would like that.

seby
Guest
seby

So the nazis were the isis of those times?

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

yep you got it pal. Same as how the “savage Injuns” were the ISIS of 19th century or the Savage Muslesm were the ISIS of the 13th, 14th, 15,th century. Nothing ever changes.

seby
Guest
seby

I didn’t know Anglo-American capitalism existed back then. Didn’t it start with the pilgrims landing on Plymouth Rock?

I think you’ve got confused about mercenary proxy armies or been reading Ripley’s Believe it or Not rather than real history books or UN archives. Maybe you’re a relative of louise mensch?

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Check out each Empire, each war and just who was behind them all and what they wanted. Whatever century you look into. New faces, new names, but, same old characters.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

Bingo! We have a winner.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Bolsheviks, NAZIs, ISIS, Taliban – you can never keep up with the name changes, but, all run on the same ideology, with the same masters pulling the strings.

Aussie battler
Guest
Aussie battler

Churchill grand strategic plan was for Russia And Germany
To bleed each other white and destroy each others forces ,
With the few divisions left fighting in the Ural Mountains .
The Brits would step in and take over the whole of Europe
like some ripe low hanging fruit,hence the desperation and
Panic when the Russians smashed the Germans in Kursk
With the ensuing retreat,that’s what promoted the US and
UK second Front,not to help the Russians but to stop them
From conquering the whole of Germany.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

Let’s not forget that Britain was begging on its knees for financial help from the U.S.

hestroy
Guest
hestroy

Gas chambers? Total bullshit.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

What gets me, is the fact, that nobody notices 27 million lost lives from the Soviet Union, together with Japan on the verge of surrender, when WWII was over and Washington DC goes an uses the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Negasaki. Whatever Stalin or Hitler did, not condoning, but, that was nothing, compared to two Japanese Islands being vapourised.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

Good article – needed to be expressed and presented to the western public

seby
Guest
seby

Another good article on subject of WW2 from November last year. No relation to the illuminati brigade who’ve charged into the comments section here.

Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/11/29/why-the-west-falsifies-the-history-of-world-war-ii.html

All reminds me of an excellent history lesson given by the wise Vladimir Putin to the Polish head who tried vainly to embarrass him and Russian/Soviet history a few years ago. Very worthwhile viewing, only a few minutes.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

I shall read the article ‘Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II’ with great interest. Thank you for passing that on to me. Regarding the video, yes, I have seen that. But I am always glad to see it again on how Putin instructs the ignorant public on facts. I admire Putin’s character in that he doesn’t lower himself to putting other people down but simply informs and correct the false accusations – Putin, the best statesman on this planet. How I wish the ignorant Sheeple could see the lies and demonization that western corporate mainstream media… Read more »

Herbert Dorsey
Guest
Herbert Dorsey

What this article leaves out is the large influence of the Catholic Church in assisting the fascists rise to power in Europe, leading to World War II, which is well documented in books like “The Vatican’s Holocaust”, “The Secret History of the New World Order” and “The Secret History of the Jesuits”. World War II was just another battle in the Jesuit’s long war against non-Catholics or heretics.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

also “Crimen Magnus”

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I have just replied to a similar comment.

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City
http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

Together with the link to the Treaty of 1213.

comment image

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

The Zyklon B was used to treat the lice infestation among the prisoners.

tiger
Guest
tiger

Zyklon B (& A) contain HCN, which kills anything that breathes. There are better ways to treat lice. Your excuse is poor.

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

So please share with me what they did used to treat the lice infestation’s in the work/prison camps.

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

Antoni Jaromin Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.. https://www.google.pl/?gws_rd=ssl

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable

Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis
batavian01
Guest
batavian01

Yes. Operation Unthinkable.

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

Alex! PAR 5 Should be ‘perpetual’.
Such a good article.
Typos deface it.

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

oh color me shocked.
Of course the whole point of WWII was to get Germany and The Soviet Union to fight so they can weaken each other and USA then to come in and take over. USA did the same thing with Iran and Iran war of 1980.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

Chalk that one up as an additional item to celebrate on Purim.

Brian Johnston
Guest
Brian Johnston

A superficial and misleading article, which completely fails to identify the true enemy of Christian civilization. The enemy in this “never ending war” is not Anglo-American capitalism, but the synagogue of Satan.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Ah, how we love a nice smelly trail of red herrings and unsubstantiated allegations. It’s fascinating to see how the holohoax is put centre stage in Mr Christoforou’s fantasy version of history, as if the sufferings of der juden should somehow have been made the primary motivating force behind western geopolitical manoueverings during WW2; even assuming that they existed as a result of the “monumental crimes and rabid antisemitism” which he lays at Germany’s door, which no-one seems to have claimed until long after the war was over. No. The simplest explanation for this period of history boils down to… Read more »

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

I enjoyed your reply. But I think many elements of Mr Christoforou’s article are consonant with yours.
Your weakest point is your final one. To deny that Russia has stood in the way of Anglo (later Anglo-zionist hegemony) is to deny reality. Russia has been thwarting plans since the Great Game was announced (at least). Or the time of Catherine the Second. One of the most productive buttons installed in the heads of Westerners (for their various ruling Gestapos) is the Russophobe button.

MH
Guest
MH

I’ve posted this before and am grateful for the opportunity to post it again. Perhaps one person will read it and take it to heart and understand the implications of it for our past and our future on this planet. Shortly after the war ended a German official, a ministerial official being interrogated was asked if he felt they could really have defeated the Allies and if not, what was the point of fighting. He replied that “the purpose of the war was to reduce the Slavic populations by some 30,000,000 – millions”. So, it seems there was a public… Read more »

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

essentially, yes, under capitalism people are reduced to a factor of production (labor) rather than actual humans marxist works go into this in good detail if you’re interested (any negative feelings you have about the term is due to the ideology being dangerous to the ruling class, just in case) i need to read up on how genocide factors in specifically to imperialist capitalism, but my hunch is that by reducing the population they can reduce the labor force, and thus reduce production figures in the affected country, making them more prone to shortages in food, consumer goods, and hampering… Read more »

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

total baloney regarding marxism. Marxism is a critique used to enable communism.

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

You’re referring to the Hongerplan, explained in detail by Tooze in The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy, London: Allen Lane, 2006. ISBN 0-7139-9566-1 – I recommend it.

kolokol
Guest
kolokol
Sep 2017 Calendar
Guest

It’s alluring not just engaging!

Rick0Shea
Guest
Rick0Shea

I figured this out for myself years ago.

cap960
Guest
cap960

And now US/UK are in Ukraine supporting yet again NAZI fanatics. This time though the world is been fooled to believe Russia is the enemy.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Not all the world, just the masses, who know no better.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

“Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy».” I beg to differ with this Ferencz as Patton had been disgusted by the stench of those ‘victims’ for whom, he wrote to his wife, he was forced to evict decent, civilsed Germans from their homes. As well as having to join Eisenhower at a synagogue where he added, the stench from the Rabbis caused him to lose his dinner that night. He was referring to the fake-Jews who were fleeing Russia.… Read more »

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

It was General MacArthur who was hand-in-hand with these degenerates:
https://geopolitics.co/2012/02/02/the-last-senseless-war/

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

This might come across off topic, but, in a random way it fits in. Why is Israel funding politicians that are also fully supportive of the NAZI Party in Ukraine? How do they compliment each other Mr Engel? Also, have a look at how much they receive from the agricultural industry. Now why would the agricultural industry of the United States, be so interested in stopping Russia from being the leading grain exporter and what has that got to do with North Korea? THE US BILL H.R. 1644 TO KILL RUSSIAN FOOD EXPORT AND CHINESE TRADE… Author of the bill:… Read more »

hvaiallverden
Guest
hvaiallverden

Jesus f….. christ I am feed up with this Nazi this and Nazi that, and if you continue I simply dont bother to come here anymore, like RT and the so called Not the fake news” aka the PC/Sore-ass infested and run MSM in Norway, you somehow never talk or writes about the total picture, only 50 shades of manure, and this “articles” is always followed by Israel is going to do something.

But hey. we live in an “free world” dont we, the choice is yours.

peace

John Bull
Guest
John Bull

The “historians” of the west don’t want you to know that the Jews essentially started the war against Hitler with a worldwide boycott of German goods in an effort to tank the German economy and only after did Hitler respond with a boycott of his own. The grandfathers of George H.W. Bush, J.P. Morgan, Henry Ford et. al. helped to finance and rearm Hitler as a hedge against Bolshevism. The German Army had Ford trucks. There is huge list of complicit acts by the west no one wants us to know.

JDESQ
Guest
JDESQ

This report fails to distinguish between the support given by FDR to Stalin’s call for a second front and Churchill’s repeated attempts to stall its opening. This was made clear by Elliott Roosevelt, who was eyewitness to those discussions, in “As He Saw it,” which should be required reading for all students of American History. Likewise, the role of Churchill, who feared as US-USSR condominium to decolonize the Asia and Africa, in enjoining a pliable Harry S. Truman into the Cold War, is essential to understanding the role of the UK and its intelligence services in today’s world.

etniks
Guest
etniks

The well researched book by Antony Sutton called WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER since the seventies has come to the same conclusion. The actual outcome is the REAL NAZIS were not German, but those financiers who pushed with their money to support Hitler and the Nazi regime. According to the research, the current European Monarchies were scared sh —less of what happened to their cousin the Russian Czar and his family all assassinated by the Soviet soldiers, and wanted to collapse the Soviet Union to stop the “bad example” given to their own European citizens. The current hate… Read more »

lossarrow57
Guest
lossarrow57

USSR and Germany were the best friends and allies until June 22, 1941, and Russia has benefited from this friendship and cooperation. https://www.facebook.com/KonradKrzysztofKowalski/posts/1809607946032326?hc_location=ufi 1. The truth is that the USSR (Russia) – made unprovoked, brutal and criminal aggression on Poland on September 17 (co-operation Germany-USRR lasted from 1 September: guiding aircraft and pursuing Polish submarines), – The Red Army made numerous war crimes during the aggression – The NKVD worked closely with the Gestapo for the next 1.5 years – The Soviet Union committed crimes on the Polish population from 1931 to 1941 – Katyn crimes have no other precedent… Read more »

Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz
Guest
Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz

This historic article could have been a bit easier to swallow if had stuck to the original premise – the coalition of the mentioned parties against the Russian and eliminate all those references, to Gas Chambers, Final Solution and millions and all the rest of the established agenda taking points that one is prevented to question.

SteveLaudig
Guest

” perpetuous”? you mean perpetual. Get a native English language editor, it’ll help your cred.

Philadelphian
Guest
Philadelphian

Exact opposite of historical reality. Look up Malta conference, and whom attended and how they divided up ALL of Europe.

RJohn
Guest

In his books Wall Street and the rise of Hitler and Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Anthony Sutton documents how Corporate America, (with U.S. Government blessing), made it all possible…people must understand, Wall Street bears allegiance to no-one but profit…All wars are Banker’s wars…alliances change…but only superficially. Dig a little deeper and you’ll find a most peculiar pattern.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

The ” Nazi death Camp” story does not stand up to scrutiny it may well be true that the Yanks and Brits double-crossed the Nazis, it fits their style. The age old “let’s you and him fight” theme. Why did Hess fly to England? Why was he murdered in Spandau? Why did Hitler allow the Brits to escape via Dunkirk? Why did Hitler go to war against England with fighter aircraft that were only good for twenty minutes of flight time over England? Whats with the ridiculous gas chamber stories and zyklon-B? “When American and British forces overran western and… Read more »

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

For more on this I suggest reading Yehudi Menuhin’s excellent book “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”.

al p
Guest
al p

OK so the Soviet Union was targeted and rightly so…separating the horrific suffering of the people murdered under Stalin by both the Nazis and the Soviets, Stalin was an inhumane douchebag who also received billions of dollars of capitalist funding.

So this articles attempt to demonize anti-soviet efforts blurs the line between reality and fiction.

The very imposition of Bolshevism upon Russia was an Imperial British conspiracy and the mass murder of the Czars family among hundreds of thousands other Slavic peoples was genocide on a massive scale far outlasting Hitler’s few years on the global stage.

brad kahn
Guest
brad kahn

The Holocaust wasn’t just the German Solution… It was the Capitalist Solution..! International Financiers.. Big Industrialists The real bourgeoisie.. Always planned to use fascism as a battering ram against Communism. Before and After the war..! Hence, all the fascists Allan Foster Dulles put in power. Duh. Interestingly, After the war… When the fascist clique around Tojo Was disgorged and disassembled.. The Japanese ruling class used the Yakusa for the exact same purposes. In case you were wondering how an enormously powerful criminal apparatus could be formed in Japan… and yet…you can’t find a cigarette butt on the sidewalk anywhere in… Read more »

Philip Andrews
Guest
Philip Andrews

Yes, there was collusion between the US and UK as per Mackinder, to help Germany and the SU destroy each other through military and economic exhaustion. This notion has been gaining ground for some years now thanks to the writings of the late Antony Sutton. However, having grown up entirely in the CW, I still would not have wanted the Red Army at the Channel, in France. No thank you. I’m glad the US got in when it did and met the Red Army on the Elbe. Would not have wanted the Soviet system in Western Europe.

Putin's baby
Guest
Putin's baby

No surprises here then…

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

I’m afraid that all this is old hat as can be demonstrated from contemporary records. Churchill broadcast to denounce nazi atrocities and promise vengeance long before D Day. Bombing murder factories was a non-starter, what could the Allies use, Bomber Command which area bombed in default of adequate night navigation and target finding devices and was out of range of Auschwitz? US day bombers based in Italy from 1943? Bombers that were so inaccurate they sometimes bombed the wrong country? Mosquito bombers? They could get to Auschwitz in 1943 but there were only about 30 in Italy and most were… Read more »

Latest

Airline wars heat up, as industry undergoes massive disruption (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 145.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris examine the global commercial airline industry, which is undergoing massive changes, as competition creeps in from Russia and China.

Reuters reports that Boeing Co’s legal troubles grew as a new lawsuit accused the company of defrauding shareholders by concealing safety deficiencies in its 737 MAX planes before two fatal crashes led to their worldwide grounding.

The proposed class action filed in Chicago federal court seeks damages for alleged securities fraud violations, after Boeing’s market value tumbled by $34 billion within two weeks of the March 10 crash of an Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX.

*****

According to the complaint, Boeing “effectively put profitability and growth ahead of airplane safety and honesty” by rushing the 737 MAX to market to compete with Airbus SE, while leaving out “extra” or “optional” features designed to prevent the Ethiopian Airlines and Lion Air crashes.

It also said Boeing’s statements about its growth prospects and the 737 MAX were undermined by its alleged conflict of interest from retaining broad authority from federal regulators to assess the plane’s safety.

*****

Boeing said on Tuesday that aircraft orders in the first quarter fell to 95 from 180 a year earlier, with no orders for the 737 MAX following the worldwide grounding.

On April 5, it said it planned to cut monthly 737 production to 42 planes from 52, and was making progress on a 737 MAX software update to prevent further accidents.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via Zerohedge…

Step aside (fading) trade war with China: there is a new aggressor – at least according to the US Trade Rep Robert Lighthizer – in town.

In a statement on the USTR’s website published late on Monday, the US fair trade agency announced that under Section 301 of the Trade Act, it was proposing a list of EU products to be covered by additional duties. And as justification for the incremental import taxes, the USTR said that it was in response to EU aircraft subsidies, specifically to Europea’s aerospace giant, Airbus, which “have caused adverse effects to the United States” and which the USTR estimates cause $11 billion in harm to the US each year

One can’t help but notice that the latest shot across the bow in the simmering trade war with Europe comes as i) Trump is reportedly preparing to fold in his trade war with China, punting enforcement to whoever is president in 2025, and ii) comes just as Boeing has found itself scrambling to preserve orders as the world has put its orderbook for Boeing 737 MAX airplanes on hold, which prompted Boeing to cut 737 production by 20% on Friday.

While the first may be purely a coincidence, the second – which is expected to not only slam Boeing’s financials for Q1 and Q2, but may also adversely impact US GDP – had at least some impact on the decision to proceed with these tariffs at this moment.

We now await Europe’s angry response to what is Trump’s latest salvo in what is once again a global trade war. And, paradoxically, we also expect this news to send stocks blasting higher as, taking a page from the US-China trade book, every day algos will price in imminent “US-European trade deal optimism.”

Below the full statement from the USTR (link):

USTR Proposes Products for Tariff Countermeasures in Response to Harm Caused by EU Aircraft Subsidies

The World Trade Organization (WTO) has found repeatedly that European Union (EU) subsidies to Airbus have caused adverse effects to the United States.  Today, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) begins its process under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to identify products of the EU to which additional duties may be applied until the EU removes those subsidies.

USTR is releasing for public comment a preliminary list of EU products to be covered by additional duties.  USTR estimates the harm from the EU subsidies as $11 billion in trade each year.  The amount is subject to an arbitration at the WTO, the result of which is expected to be issued this summer.

“This case has been in litigation for 14 years, and the time has come for action. The Administration is preparing to respond immediately when the WTO issues its finding on the value of U.S. countermeasures,” said U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer.  “Our ultimate goal is to reach an agreement with the EU to end all WTO-inconsistent subsidies to large civil aircraft.  When the EU ends these harmful subsidies, the additional U.S. duties imposed in response can be lifted.”

In line with U.S. law, the preliminary list contains a number of products in the civil aviation sector, including Airbus aircraft.  Once the WTO arbitrator issues its report on the value of countermeasures, USTR will announce a final product list covering a level of trade commensurate with the adverse effects determined to exist.

Background

After many years of seeking unsuccessfully to convince the EU and four of its member States (France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom) to cease their subsidization of Airbus, the United States brought a WTO challenge to EU subsidies in 2004. In 2011, the WTO found that the EU provided Airbus $18 billion in subsidized financing from 1968 to 2006.  In particular, the WTO found that European “launch aid” subsidies were instrumental in permitting Airbus to launch every model of its large civil aircraft, causing Boeing to lose sales of more than 300 aircraft and market share throughout the world.

In response, the EU removed two minor subsidies, but left most of them unchanged.  The EU also granted Airbus more than $5 billion in new subsidized “launch aid” financing for the A350 XWB.  The United States requested establishment of a compliance panel in March 2012 to address the EU’s failure to remove its old subsidies, as well as the new subsidies and their adverse effects.  That process came to a close with the issuance of an appellate report in May 2018 finding that EU subsidies to high-value, twin-aisle aircraft have caused serious prejudice to U.S. interests.  The report found that billions of dollars in launch aid to the A350 XWB and A380 cause significant lost sales to Boeing 787 and 747 aircraft, as well as lost market share for Boeing very large aircraft in the EU, Australia, China, Korea, Singapore, and UAE markets.

Based on the appellate report, the United States requested authority to impose countermeasures worth $11.2 billion per year, commensurate with the adverse effects caused by EU subsidies.  The EU challenged that estimate, and a WTO arbitrator is currently evaluating those claims

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Mueller report takes ‘Russian meddling’ for granted, offers no actual evidence

RT

Published

on

By

Via RT…


Special counsel Robert Mueller’s ‘Russiagate’ report has cleared Donald Trump of ‘collusion’ charges but maintains that Russia meddled in the 2016 US presidential election. Yet concrete evidence of that is nowhere to be seen.

The report by Mueller and his team, made public on Thursday by the US Department of Justice, exonerates not just Trump but all Americans of any “collusion” with Russia, “obliterating” the Russiagate conspiracy theory, as journalist Glenn Greenwald put it.

However, it asserts that Russian “interference” in the election did happen, and says it consisted of a campaign on social media as well as Russian military intelligence (repeatedly referred to by its old, Soviet-era name, GRU) “hacking” the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), the DNC, and the private email account of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair, John Podesta.

As evidence of this, the report basically offers nothing but Mueller’s indictment of “GRU agents,” delivered on the eve of the Helsinki Summit between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in what was surely a cosmic coincidence.

Indictments are not evidence, however, but allegations. Any time it looks like the report might be bringing up proof, it ends up being redacted, ostensibly to protect sources and methods, and out of concern it might cause “harm to an ongoing matter.”

‘Active measures’ on social media

Mueller’s report leads with the claim that the Internet Research Agency (IRA) ran an “active measures” campaign of social media influence. Citing Facebook and Twitter estimates, the report says this consisted of 470 Facebook accounts that made 80,000 posts that may have been seen by up to 126 million people, between January 2015 and August 2017 (almost a year after the election), and 3,814 Twitter accounts that “may have been” in contact with about 1.4 million people.

Those numbers may seem substantial but, as investigative journalist Gareth Porter pointed out in November 2018, they should be regarded against the background of 33 trillion Facebook posts made during the same period.

According to Mueller, the IRA mind-controlled the American electorate by spending “approximately $100,000” on Facebook ads, hiring someone to walk around New York City “dressed up as Santa Claus with a Trump mask,” and getting Trump campaign affiliates to promote “dozens of tweets, posts, and other political content created by the IRA.” Dozens!

Meanwhile, the key evidence against IRA’s alleged boss Evgeny Prigozhin is that he “appeared together in public photographs” with Putin.

Alleged hacking & release

The report claims that the GRU hacked their way into 29 DCCC computers and another 30 DNC computers, and downloaded data using software called “X-Tunnel.” It is unclear how Mueller’s investigators claim to know this, as the report makes no mention of them or FBI actually examining DNC or DCCC computers. Presumably they took the word of CrowdStrike, the Democrats’ private contractor, for it.

However obtained, the documents were published first through DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0 – which the report claims are “fictitious online personas” created by the GRU – and later through WikiLeaks. What is Mueller’s proof that these two entities were “GRU” cutouts? In a word, this:

That the Guccifer 2.0 persona provided reporters access to a restricted portion of the DCLeaks website tends to indicate that both personas were operated by the same or a closely-related group of people.(p. 43)

However, the report acknowledges that the “first known contact” between Guccifer 2.0 and WikiLeaks was on September 15, 2016 – months after the DNC and DCCC documents were published! Here we do get actual evidence: direct messages on Twitter obtained by investigators. Behold, these “spies” are so good, they don’t even talk – and when they do, they use unsecured channels.

Mueller notably claims “it is clear that the stolen DNC and Podesta documents were transferred from the GRU to WikiLeaks” (the rest of that sentence is redacted), but the report clearly implies the investigators do not actually know how. On page 47, the report says Mueller “cannot rule out that stolen documents were transferred to WikiLeaks through intermediaries who visited during the summer of 2016.”

Strangely, the report accuses WikiLeaks co-founder Julian Assange of making “public statements apparently designed to obscure the source” of the materials (p.48), notably the offer of a reward for finding the murderer of DNC staffer Seth Rich – even though this can be read as corroborating the intermediaries theory, and Assange never actually said Rich was his source.

The rest of Mueller’s report goes on to discuss the Trump campaign’s contacts with anyone even remotely Russian and to create torturous constructions that the president had “obstructed” justice by basically defending himself from charges of being a Russian agent – neither of which resulted in any indictments, however. But the central premise that the 22-month investigation, breathless media coverage, and the 448-page report are based on – that Russia somehow meddled in the 2016 election – remains unproven.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Rumors of War: Washington Is Looking for a Fight

The bill stands up for NATO and prevents the President from pulling the US out of the Alliance without a Senate vote.

Avatar

Published

on

Authored by Philip Giraldi via The Strategic Culture Foundation:


It is depressing to observe how the United States of America has become the evil empire. Having served in the United States Army during the Vietnam War and in the Central Intelligence Agency for the second half of the Cold War, I had an insider’s viewpoint of how an essentially pragmatic national security policy was being transformed bit by bit into a bipartisan doctrine that featured as a sine qua non global dominance for Washington. Unfortunately, when the Soviet Union collapsed the opportunity to end once and for all the bipolar nuclear confrontation that threatened global annihilation was squandered as President Bill Clinton chose instead to humiliate and use NATO to contain an already demoralized and effectively leaderless Russia.

American Exceptionalism became the battle cry for an increasingly clueless federal government as well as for a media-deluded public. When 9/11 arrived, the country was ready to lash out at the rest of the world. President George W. Bush growled that “There’s a new sheriff in town and you are either with us or against us.” Afghanistan followed, then Iraq, and, in a spirit of bipartisanship, the Democrats came up with Libya and the first serious engagement in Syria. In its current manifestation, one finds a United States that threatens Iran on a nearly weekly basis and tears up arms control agreements with Russia while also maintaining deployments of US forces in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia and places like Mali. Scattered across the globe are 800 American military bases while Washington’s principal enemies du jour Russia and China have, respectively, only one and none.

Never before in my lifetime has the United States been so belligerent, and that in spite of the fact that there is no single enemy or combination of enemies that actually threaten either the geographical United States or a vital interest. Venezuela is being threatened with invasion primarily because it is in the western hemisphere and therefore subject to Washington’s claimed proconsular authority. Last Wednesday Vice President Mike Pence told the United Nations Security Council that the White House will remove Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro from power, preferably using diplomacy and sanctions, but “all options are on the table.” Pence warned that Russia and other friends of Maduro need to leave now or face the consequences.

The development of the United States as a hostile and somewhat unpredictable force has not gone unnoticed. Russia has accepted that war is coming no matter what it does in dealing with Trump and is upgrading its forces. By some estimates, its army is better equipped and more combat ready than is that of the United States, which spends nearly ten times as much on “defense.”

Iran is also upgrading its defensive capabilities, which are formidable. Now that Washington has withdrawn from the nuclear agreement with Iran, has placed a series of increasingly punitive sanctions on the country, and, most recently, has declared a part of the Iranian military to be a “foreign terrorist organization” and therefore subject to attack by US forces at any time, it is clear that war will be the next step. In three weeks, the United States will seek to enforce a global ban on any purchases of Iranian oil. A number of countries, including US nominal ally Turkey, have said they will ignore the ban and it will be interesting to see what the US Navy intends to do to enforce it. Or what Iran will do to break the blockade.

But even given all of the horrific decisions being made in the White House, there is one organization that is far crazier and possibly even more dangerous. That is the United States Congress, which is, not surprisingly, a legislative body that is viewed positively by only 18 per cent of the American people.

A current bill originally entitled the “Defending American Security from Kremlin Aggression Act (DASKA) of 2019,” is numbered S-1189. It has been introduced in the Senate which will “…require the Secretary of State to determine whether the Russian Federation should be designated as a state sponsor of terrorism and whether Russian-sponsored armed entities in Ukraine should be designated as foreign terrorist organizations.” The bill is sponsored by Republican Senator Cory Gardner of Colorado and is co-sponsored by Democrat Robert Menendez of New Jersey.

The current version of the bill was introduced on April 11th and it is by no means clear what kind of support it might actually have, but the fact that it actually has surfaced at all should be disturbing to anyone who believes it is in the world’s best interest to avoid direct military confrontation between the United States and Russia.

In a a press release by Gardner, who has long been pushing to have Russia listed as a state sponsor of terrorism, a February version of the bill is described as “…comprehensive legislation [that] seeks to increase economic, political, and diplomatic pressure on the Russian Federation in response to Russia’s interference in democratic processes abroad, malign influence in Syria, and aggression against Ukraine, including in the Kerch Strait. The legislation establishes a comprehensive policy response to better position the US government to address Kremlin aggression by creating new policy offices on cyber defenses and sanctions coordination. The bill stands up for NATO and prevents the President from pulling the US out of the Alliance without a Senate vote. It also increases sanctions pressure on Moscow for its interference in democratic processes abroad and continued aggression against Ukraine.”

The February version of the bill included Menendez, Democrat Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, Democrat Ben Cardin of Maryland and Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina as co-sponsors, suggesting that provoking war is truly bipartisan in today’s Washington.

Each Senator co-sponsor contributed a personal comment to the press release. Gardner observed that “Putin’s Russia is an outlaw regime that is hell-bent on undermining international law and destroying the US-led liberal global order.” Menendez noted that “President Trump’s willful paralysis in the face of Kremlin aggression has reached a boiling point in Congress” while Graham added that “Our goal is to change the status quo and impose meaningful sanctions and measures against Putin’s Russia. He should cease and desist meddling in the US electoral process, halt cyberattacks on American infrastructure, remove Russia from Ukraine, and stop efforts to create chaos in Syria.” Cardin contributed “Congress continues to take the lead in defending US national security against continuing Russian aggression against democratic institutions at home and abroad” and Shaheen observed that “This legislation builds on previous efforts in Congress to hold Russia accountable for its bellicose behavior against the United States and its determination to destabilize our global world order.”

The Senatorial commentary is, of course, greatly exaggerated and sometimes completely false regarding what is going on in the world, but it is revealing of how ignorant American legislators can be and often are. The Senators also ignore the fact that the designation of presumed Kremlin surrogate forces as “foreign terrorist organizations” is equivalent to a declaration of war against them by the US military, while hypocritically calling Russia a state sponsor of terrorism is bad enough, as it is demonstrably untrue. But the real damage comes from the existence of the bill itself. It will solidify support for hardliners on both sides, guaranteeing that there will be no rapprochement between Washington and Moscow for the foreseeable future, a development that is bad for everyone involved. Whether it can be characterized as an unintended consequence of unwise decision making or perhaps something more sinister involving a deeply corrupted congress and administration remains to be determined.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Videos

Trending