Connect with us

Latest

News

Staff Picks

Newly released UN “Nazi Holocaust archives” show US & UK colluded with Third Reich to destroy Soviet Union

Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

25,311 Views

As Victory Day (May 9) approaches in Russia to commemorate the defeat of Hitler’s Nazi army, new United Nations archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust have finally been released, amid protests from the US and UK. Why?

The archives “damningly” show state collusion between the US, UK, and the Third Reich. The end goal between their collusion was not to end the Nazi Holocaust, but to defeat Soviet Union.

The parallels between WW2 history, as evidenced in the archive release, and how the US/EU and NATO are working with ISIS and neo-nazi Ukraine in order to destroy Russia, is proof to the point that the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Russia has been, and always will be, the eternal enemy of the western globalist elite.

The perpetuous war against Russia against the backdrop of the historic UN Nazi Holocaust archives, are discussed in a post entitled, “The Deep History of US, Britain’s Never-Ending Cold War On Russia” from the Strategic Culture on-line journal (www.strategic-culture.org), the


After decades of delaying, the United Nations finally released archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust. The source of those archives on Nazi war crimes were Western governments, including those in exile at the time of the war, such as the Belgian, Polish and Czechoslovakian. The time period covered is 1943-1949. Washington and London had long sought to halt the release. Why?

Notably, the landmark publication of the files last month was given scant Western media coverage. Surprisingly, perhaps, because the story that can be gleaned from the documents tells of a hidden history of the Second World War, namely the systematic collusion between the American and British governments and the Nazi Third Reich.

As a report in Deutsche Welle remarked on the released archives: «The files make clear that [Western] Allied forces knew more about the Nazi concentration camp system before the end of the war than has generally been thought».

This revelation points to more than just «knowledge» among the Western allies of Nazi-era crimes; it points more damningly to state collusion. This would also explain why Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

There has long been a controversial debate among Western nations about why the US and Britain in particular did not do more to bomb the Nazi infrastructure of death camps and railroads. Washington and London have often made the claim that they did know the full extent of the horror being perpetrated by the Nazis until the very end of the war when extermination centers such as at Auschwitz and Treblinka were liberated – by the Soviet Red Army, it should be noted too.

However, what the latest release of UN Holocaust files shows is that Washington and London were indeed well aware of the Nazi Final Solution in which millions of European Jews and Slavic people were being systematically worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers. So the question again is: why did the US and Britain not direct more of their aerial bombing campaign to destroy the Nazi infrastructure?

One possible answer is that these Western allies had a callous disregard for the Nazi victims. Washington and London establishments were themselves accused of harboring antisemitic prejudices, as can be seen from the scandals when both these governments spurned thousands of European Jewish refugees during the Second World War, in effect sending many of them to their deaths under the Nazi regime.

Not excluding the above factor of Western racist insouciance, there is a second more disturbing factor. That the Western governments, or at least powerful sections, were loath to hamper the Nazi war effort against the Soviet Union. Notwithstanding that the Soviet Union was a nominal «ally» of the West for the defeat of Nazi Germany.

This perspective harks to a radically different conception of the Second World War in contrast to that narrated in official Western versions. In this alternative historical account, the rise of the Nazi Third Reich was deliberately fomented by American and British rulers as a bulwark in Europe against the spread of communism. Adolf Hitler’s rabid anti-Semitism was matched only by his detest of Marxism and the Slavic people of the Soviet Union. In the Nazi ideology, they were all «Untermenschen» (subhumans) to be exterminated in a «Final Solution».

So, when Nazi Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and carrying out its Final Solution from June 1941 until late 1944, little wonder then that the US and Britain showed a curious reluctance to commit their military forces fully to open up a Western Front. The Western allies were evidently content to see the Nazi war machine doing what it was originally intended to do: to destroy the primary enemy to Western capitalism as represented by the Soviet Union. This is not to say that all American and British political leaders shared or were even aware of this tacit strategic vision. Leaders like President Franklin Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill appeared to be genuinely committed to defeating Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, their individual views must be set against a background of systematic collusion between powerful Western corporate interests and Nazi Germany.

As American author David Talbot documented in his book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA and the Rise of America’s Secret Government (2015), there were massive financial links between Wall Street and the Third Reich, going back several years before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Allen Dulles, who worked for the Wall Street law firm Sullivan and Cromwell and who later headed up the American Central Intelligence Agency, was a key player in the linkage between US capital and German industry. American industrial giants, such as Ford, GM, ITT and Du Pont were invested heavily in German industrial counterparts like IG Farben (manufacturer of Zyklon B, the poisonous gas used in the Holocaust), Krupp Steel and Daimler. American capital, as well as British, was thus integrated into the Nazi war machine and the latter’s dependence on the system of slave labor as provided by the Final Solution.

This would explain why the Western allies did so little to disrupt the Nazi infrastructure with their undoubted formidable aerial bombing capacity. Far more damning than mere inertia or indifference owing to racist prejudice towards the Nazi victims, what emerges is that the Americans and British capitalist elite were invested in the Third Reich. Mainly for the purpose of eliminating the Soviet Union and any kind of genuinely socialist global movement. Bombing Nazi infrastructure would have been tantamount to deleting Western assets.

To this end, as the war was drawing to a close and the Soviet Union looked poised to roll up the Third Reich singlehandedly, the Americans and British belatedly stepped up their war efforts from western and southern Europe. The goal was one of salvaging Western assets remaining in the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles, the director of the-soon-to-be-formed American Central Intelligence Agency, extricated top Nazis and their gold looted from Europe in secret surrender deals known as Operation Sunrise. Britain’s military intelligence MI6 was also involved in the clandestine American effort to salvage Nazi assets via ratlines. The bad faith on display to the Soviet «allies» heralded the chill of the ensuing Cold War that immediately followed the Second World War.

Significant and damning testimony of what was going down was given recently in a BBC interview by Ben Ferencz, the most senior surviving US prosecutor from the Nuremberg trials. At age 98, Ferencz was still able to lucidly recall how scores of Nazi war criminals were let off the hook by the American and British authorities. Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy». Patton’s candid expression of deeper animosity towards the Soviet Union than towards Nazi Germany was consistent with how the US and British ruling class had been colluding with Hitler’s Third Reich in a geo-strategic war against the Soviet Union and worker-led socialist movements arising across Europe and America.

In other words, the Cold War which the US and Britain embarked on after 1945 was but a continuation of hostile policy towards Moscow that was already underway well before the Second World War erupted in 1939 in the form of a build up of Nazi Germany. For various reasons, it became expedient for the Western powers to liquidate the Nazi war machine, along with the Soviet Union. But as can be seen, the Western assets residing in the Nazi machine were recycled into American and British Cold War posture against the Soviet Union. It is a truly damning legacy that American and British military intelligence agencies were consolidated and financed by Nazi crimes.

The recent release of UN Holocaust files – in spite of American and British prevarication over many years – add more evidence to the historical analysis that these Western powers were deeply complicit in the monumental crimes of the Nazi Third Reich. They knew about these crimes because they had helped facilitate them. And the complicity stemmed from Western hostility towards Russia as a perceived geopolitical rival.

This is not a mere historical academic exercise. Western complicity with Nazi Germany also finds a corollary in the present-day ongoing hostility from Washington, Britain and their NATO allies towards Moscow. The relentless build up of NATO offensive forces around Russia’s borders, the endless Russophobia in Western propagandistic news media, the economic blockade in the form of sanctions based on tenuous claims, are all deeply rooted in history.

The West’s Cold War towards Moscow preceded the Second World War, continued after the defeat of Nazi Germany and persists to this day regardless of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists. Why? Because Russia is a perceived rival to Anglo-American capitalist hegemony, as is China or any other emerging power that undermines that desired unipolar hegemony.

American-British collusion with Nazi Germany finds its modern-day manifestation in NATO collusion with the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine and jihadist terror groups dispatched in proxy wars against Russian interests in Syria and elsewhere. The players may change over time, but the root pathology is American-British capitalism and its hegemonic addiction.

The never-ending Cold War will only end when Anglo-American capitalism is finally defeated and replaced by a genuinely more democratic system.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
cortisol
Guest
cortisol

That is correct. USA/UK swooped in only in the very late stage, waiting as long as possible for SU to absorb maximum losses without the risk of German collapse. In this sense it was a timing game. Another thing is that USA had a plan to drop atomic bombs and firebomb Russian cities soon after the war end, only prevented by the lack of them. By 1950 it was too late with the advance in rocketry and first Soviet bomb. To date they have this plan, if there was no deterrent, they would do it immediately. Why they didn’t do… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I only came across the knowledge and links recently, but, look who fully supported Hitler, up until the Soviet Union sent him back to Berlin? The US and this is going to be a long winded ramble. Isn’t Hitler also part of the Rothschild family and whatever did happen to his frozen sperm, whilst Planned Parenthood and Josef Mengel were tweaking around with their eugenic’s programmes? I wonder how many leaders in the EU can be traced back to the sperm banks of elite NAZIs? WORST KEPT SECRETS OF THE BUMBLING BEAR – the CIA/NAZI marriage URL for this article:… Read more »

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

Nutter

Obama
Guest
Obama

The USA did not invent nukes. Germany had invented atomic bombs, but did not use it in Europe due to side effects. That was the reason, why the US could not bomb the Soviet Union immediately. The United States is the only country in the world that used nukes, namely Little Boy and Fat Man in order to defeat the powerful German ally “Japan”.

Max Werner
Guest
Max Werner

Why is Japan in quotes haha

Obama
Guest
Obama

Because I like Nippon!

strav
Guest
strav

The mere fact that france and uk retreated in 2weeks without putting up resistance is proof enough! Then staying out of europe for over 3yrs whilst the nazis were busy with the russians is the clincher!

al p
Guest
al p

They retreated because they got their asses kicked. Its what armies do in such circumstances. The real suspicions fact is why didn’t Hitler go in for the kill at Dunkirk? Because he was an Anglophile with wet dreams of dividing the globe between Germany & Britain

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

Hitler should have known that the zionists controlled Britain.

Edmund burke326
Guest
Edmund burke326

Don’t forget the collaboration of others like the Catholic Church who assisted the Ustasha in murdering Serbian people. A good reference is the “Falsifiers of History” published in 1948 by the USSR, which was an attempt to counteract a fresh wave of US/UK/French anti-Soviet propaganda that appeared in the western media following the seizure of Nazi documentation by the US.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

I remember that book

Laika Lammerink
Guest
Laika Lammerink

Occupied Germany – since 1918, and their boogieman/cannon fodder project Nazi Germany, was simply an affiliate of the Roth-child run British Empire and their U$ (1913/Fed). They did not control Stalin’s Russia.
They own and control the ‘money’ press, and therefore virtually the entire system, companies, (Protestant) churches, politicians (cr-ISIS actors), the ‘education’ system, media, whatever.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Wasn’t Lenin also related to the Rothschilds?

Who had a hissy fit when Tsar Alexander II lent a helping hand to Abraham Lincolne, when Great Britain and France were wanting to invade the US? Who then went on to take out the Royal Family of Russia?

How many children and grandchildren of both the Bolshevik and NAZI elite, can now be found in various positions of authority, either on various political stages or running, Government funded private schemes/organisations/institutions?

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

Like all bankers who got upended at the rise of the Bolsheviks, Sir Walter Rothschild would be despondent had he fallen into their hands. If there was a foreign connection when it comes to Lenin, that was a German one and it pertained to what seemed a mutual interest to Germany and the Russians: peace on the Eastern front. The difference was in the terms that each side had in mind. As for the Imperial Romanov dynasty, it has only itself to blame for its downfall. Moreover, many people are ignorant of the fact that the Bolsheviks were politically insignificant… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Treaty 1213 – The Vatican owns most of the planet. At the time, Great Britain was bankrupt and cut a deal with the Vatican, where the Crown handed over Great Britain and her colonies (including those that are now independent). The Treaty was never revoked.

The Vactican – Religious Capital.
Washington DC – Military Capital.
City of London – Economic Capital.

WWI – League of Nations
WWII – United Nations
WWIII – NWO Full Spectrum Domination

Treaty of 1213 – The Beginning of the Lie… http://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City… http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

john mason
Guest
john mason

So what this article is hinting at is for the world to be free of these global terrorists, US and UK is to annihilate them? Destroy the elite, Rothschild, Clinton, Blair, Bush and the like. Can live with that ideology.

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

That’s what the article suggested. Not the destruction of entire countries.

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

long live marxism-leninism-maoism, long live the people’s war

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

The Rotschilds would like that.

seby
Guest
seby

So the nazis were the isis of those times?

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

yep you got it pal. Same as how the “savage Injuns” were the ISIS of 19th century or the Savage Muslesm were the ISIS of the 13th, 14th, 15,th century. Nothing ever changes.

seby
Guest
seby

I didn’t know Anglo-American capitalism existed back then. Didn’t it start with the pilgrims landing on Plymouth Rock?

I think you’ve got confused about mercenary proxy armies or been reading Ripley’s Believe it or Not rather than real history books or UN archives. Maybe you’re a relative of louise mensch?

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Check out each Empire, each war and just who was behind them all and what they wanted. Whatever century you look into. New faces, new names, but, same old characters.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

Bingo! We have a winner.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Bolsheviks, NAZIs, ISIS, Taliban – you can never keep up with the name changes, but, all run on the same ideology, with the same masters pulling the strings.

Aussie battler
Guest
Aussie battler

Churchill grand strategic plan was for Russia And Germany
To bleed each other white and destroy each others forces ,
With the few divisions left fighting in the Ural Mountains .
The Brits would step in and take over the whole of Europe
like some ripe low hanging fruit,hence the desperation and
Panic when the Russians smashed the Germans in Kursk
With the ensuing retreat,that’s what promoted the US and
UK second Front,not to help the Russians but to stop them
From conquering the whole of Germany.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

Let’s not forget that Britain was begging on its knees for financial help from the U.S.

hestroy
Guest
hestroy

Gas chambers? Total bullshit.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

What gets me, is the fact, that nobody notices 27 million lost lives from the Soviet Union, together with Japan on the verge of surrender, when WWII was over and Washington DC goes an uses the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Negasaki. Whatever Stalin or Hitler did, not condoning, but, that was nothing, compared to two Japanese Islands being vapourised.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

Good article – needed to be expressed and presented to the western public

seby
Guest
seby

Another good article on subject of WW2 from November last year. No relation to the illuminati brigade who’ve charged into the comments section here.

Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/11/29/why-the-west-falsifies-the-history-of-world-war-ii.html

All reminds me of an excellent history lesson given by the wise Vladimir Putin to the Polish head who tried vainly to embarrass him and Russian/Soviet history a few years ago. Very worthwhile viewing, only a few minutes.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

I shall read the article ‘Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II’ with great interest. Thank you for passing that on to me. Regarding the video, yes, I have seen that. But I am always glad to see it again on how Putin instructs the ignorant public on facts. I admire Putin’s character in that he doesn’t lower himself to putting other people down but simply informs and correct the false accusations – Putin, the best statesman on this planet. How I wish the ignorant Sheeple could see the lies and demonization that western corporate mainstream media… Read more »

Herbert Dorsey
Guest
Herbert Dorsey

What this article leaves out is the large influence of the Catholic Church in assisting the fascists rise to power in Europe, leading to World War II, which is well documented in books like “The Vatican’s Holocaust”, “The Secret History of the New World Order” and “The Secret History of the Jesuits”. World War II was just another battle in the Jesuit’s long war against non-Catholics or heretics.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

also “Crimen Magnus”

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I have just replied to a similar comment.

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City
http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

Together with the link to the Treaty of 1213.

comment image

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

The Zyklon B was used to treat the lice infestation among the prisoners.

tiger
Guest
tiger

Zyklon B (& A) contain HCN, which kills anything that breathes. There are better ways to treat lice. Your excuse is poor.

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

So please share with me what they did used to treat the lice infestation’s in the work/prison camps.

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

Antoni Jaromin Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.. https://www.google.pl/?gws_rd=ssl

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable

Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis
batavian01
Guest
batavian01

Yes. Operation Unthinkable.

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

Alex! PAR 5 Should be ‘perpetual’.
Such a good article.
Typos deface it.

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

oh color me shocked.
Of course the whole point of WWII was to get Germany and The Soviet Union to fight so they can weaken each other and USA then to come in and take over. USA did the same thing with Iran and Iran war of 1980.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

Chalk that one up as an additional item to celebrate on Purim.

Brian Johnston
Guest
Brian Johnston

A superficial and misleading article, which completely fails to identify the true enemy of Christian civilization. The enemy in this “never ending war” is not Anglo-American capitalism, but the synagogue of Satan.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Ah, how we love a nice smelly trail of red herrings and unsubstantiated allegations. It’s fascinating to see how the holohoax is put centre stage in Mr Christoforou’s fantasy version of history, as if the sufferings of der juden should somehow have been made the primary motivating force behind western geopolitical manoueverings during WW2; even assuming that they existed as a result of the “monumental crimes and rabid antisemitism” which he lays at Germany’s door, which no-one seems to have claimed until long after the war was over. No. The simplest explanation for this period of history boils down to… Read more »

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

I enjoyed your reply. But I think many elements of Mr Christoforou’s article are consonant with yours.
Your weakest point is your final one. To deny that Russia has stood in the way of Anglo (later Anglo-zionist hegemony) is to deny reality. Russia has been thwarting plans since the Great Game was announced (at least). Or the time of Catherine the Second. One of the most productive buttons installed in the heads of Westerners (for their various ruling Gestapos) is the Russophobe button.

MH
Guest
MH

I’ve posted this before and am grateful for the opportunity to post it again. Perhaps one person will read it and take it to heart and understand the implications of it for our past and our future on this planet. Shortly after the war ended a German official, a ministerial official being interrogated was asked if he felt they could really have defeated the Allies and if not, what was the point of fighting. He replied that “the purpose of the war was to reduce the Slavic populations by some 30,000,000 – millions”. So, it seems there was a public… Read more »

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

essentially, yes, under capitalism people are reduced to a factor of production (labor) rather than actual humans marxist works go into this in good detail if you’re interested (any negative feelings you have about the term is due to the ideology being dangerous to the ruling class, just in case) i need to read up on how genocide factors in specifically to imperialist capitalism, but my hunch is that by reducing the population they can reduce the labor force, and thus reduce production figures in the affected country, making them more prone to shortages in food, consumer goods, and hampering… Read more »

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

total baloney regarding marxism. Marxism is a critique used to enable communism.

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

You’re referring to the Hongerplan, explained in detail by Tooze in The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy, London: Allen Lane, 2006. ISBN 0-7139-9566-1 – I recommend it.

kolokol
Guest
kolokol
Sep 2017 Calendar
Guest

It’s alluring not just engaging!

Rick0Shea
Guest
Rick0Shea

I figured this out for myself years ago.

cap960
Guest
cap960

And now US/UK are in Ukraine supporting yet again NAZI fanatics. This time though the world is been fooled to believe Russia is the enemy.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Not all the world, just the masses, who know no better.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

“Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy».” I beg to differ with this Ferencz as Patton had been disgusted by the stench of those ‘victims’ for whom, he wrote to his wife, he was forced to evict decent, civilsed Germans from their homes. As well as having to join Eisenhower at a synagogue where he added, the stench from the Rabbis caused him to lose his dinner that night. He was referring to the fake-Jews who were fleeing Russia.… Read more »

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

It was General MacArthur who was hand-in-hand with these degenerates:
https://geopolitics.co/2012/02/02/the-last-senseless-war/

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

This might come across off topic, but, in a random way it fits in. Why is Israel funding politicians that are also fully supportive of the NAZI Party in Ukraine? How do they compliment each other Mr Engel? Also, have a look at how much they receive from the agricultural industry. Now why would the agricultural industry of the United States, be so interested in stopping Russia from being the leading grain exporter and what has that got to do with North Korea? THE US BILL H.R. 1644 TO KILL RUSSIAN FOOD EXPORT AND CHINESE TRADE… Author of the bill:… Read more »

hvaiallverden
Guest
hvaiallverden

Jesus f….. christ I am feed up with this Nazi this and Nazi that, and if you continue I simply dont bother to come here anymore, like RT and the so called Not the fake news” aka the PC/Sore-ass infested and run MSM in Norway, you somehow never talk or writes about the total picture, only 50 shades of manure, and this “articles” is always followed by Israel is going to do something.

But hey. we live in an “free world” dont we, the choice is yours.

peace

John Bull
Guest
John Bull

The “historians” of the west don’t want you to know that the Jews essentially started the war against Hitler with a worldwide boycott of German goods in an effort to tank the German economy and only after did Hitler respond with a boycott of his own. The grandfathers of George H.W. Bush, J.P. Morgan, Henry Ford et. al. helped to finance and rearm Hitler as a hedge against Bolshevism. The German Army had Ford trucks. There is huge list of complicit acts by the west no one wants us to know.

JDESQ
Guest
JDESQ

This report fails to distinguish between the support given by FDR to Stalin’s call for a second front and Churchill’s repeated attempts to stall its opening. This was made clear by Elliott Roosevelt, who was eyewitness to those discussions, in “As He Saw it,” which should be required reading for all students of American History. Likewise, the role of Churchill, who feared as US-USSR condominium to decolonize the Asia and Africa, in enjoining a pliable Harry S. Truman into the Cold War, is essential to understanding the role of the UK and its intelligence services in today’s world.

etniks
Guest
etniks

The well researched book by Antony Sutton called WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER since the seventies has come to the same conclusion. The actual outcome is the REAL NAZIS were not German, but those financiers who pushed with their money to support Hitler and the Nazi regime. According to the research, the current European Monarchies were scared sh —less of what happened to their cousin the Russian Czar and his family all assassinated by the Soviet soldiers, and wanted to collapse the Soviet Union to stop the “bad example” given to their own European citizens. The current hate… Read more »

lossarrow57
Guest
lossarrow57

USSR and Germany were the best friends and allies until June 22, 1941, and Russia has benefited from this friendship and cooperation. https://www.facebook.com/KonradKrzysztofKowalski/posts/1809607946032326?hc_location=ufi 1. The truth is that the USSR (Russia) – made unprovoked, brutal and criminal aggression on Poland on September 17 (co-operation Germany-USRR lasted from 1 September: guiding aircraft and pursuing Polish submarines), – The Red Army made numerous war crimes during the aggression – The NKVD worked closely with the Gestapo for the next 1.5 years – The Soviet Union committed crimes on the Polish population from 1931 to 1941 – Katyn crimes have no other precedent… Read more »

Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz
Guest
Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz

This historic article could have been a bit easier to swallow if had stuck to the original premise – the coalition of the mentioned parties against the Russian and eliminate all those references, to Gas Chambers, Final Solution and millions and all the rest of the established agenda taking points that one is prevented to question.

SteveLaudig
Guest

” perpetuous”? you mean perpetual. Get a native English language editor, it’ll help your cred.

Philadelphian
Guest
Philadelphian

Exact opposite of historical reality. Look up Malta conference, and whom attended and how they divided up ALL of Europe.

RJohn
Guest

In his books Wall Street and the rise of Hitler and Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Anthony Sutton documents how Corporate America, (with U.S. Government blessing), made it all possible…people must understand, Wall Street bears allegiance to no-one but profit…All wars are Banker’s wars…alliances change…but only superficially. Dig a little deeper and you’ll find a most peculiar pattern.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

The ” Nazi death Camp” story does not stand up to scrutiny it may well be true that the Yanks and Brits double-crossed the Nazis, it fits their style. The age old “let’s you and him fight” theme. Why did Hess fly to England? Why was he murdered in Spandau? Why did Hitler allow the Brits to escape via Dunkirk? Why did Hitler go to war against England with fighter aircraft that were only good for twenty minutes of flight time over England? Whats with the ridiculous gas chamber stories and zyklon-B? “When American and British forces overran western and… Read more »

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

For more on this I suggest reading Yehudi Menuhin’s excellent book “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”.

al p
Guest
al p

OK so the Soviet Union was targeted and rightly so…separating the horrific suffering of the people murdered under Stalin by both the Nazis and the Soviets, Stalin was an inhumane douchebag who also received billions of dollars of capitalist funding.

So this articles attempt to demonize anti-soviet efforts blurs the line between reality and fiction.

The very imposition of Bolshevism upon Russia was an Imperial British conspiracy and the mass murder of the Czars family among hundreds of thousands other Slavic peoples was genocide on a massive scale far outlasting Hitler’s few years on the global stage.

brad kahn
Guest
brad kahn

The Holocaust wasn’t just the German Solution… It was the Capitalist Solution..! International Financiers.. Big Industrialists The real bourgeoisie.. Always planned to use fascism as a battering ram against Communism. Before and After the war..! Hence, all the fascists Allan Foster Dulles put in power. Duh. Interestingly, After the war… When the fascist clique around Tojo Was disgorged and disassembled.. The Japanese ruling class used the Yakusa for the exact same purposes. In case you were wondering how an enormously powerful criminal apparatus could be formed in Japan… and yet…you can’t find a cigarette butt on the sidewalk anywhere in… Read more »

Philip Andrews
Guest
Philip Andrews

Yes, there was collusion between the US and UK as per Mackinder, to help Germany and the SU destroy each other through military and economic exhaustion. This notion has been gaining ground for some years now thanks to the writings of the late Antony Sutton. However, having grown up entirely in the CW, I still would not have wanted the Red Army at the Channel, in France. No thank you. I’m glad the US got in when it did and met the Red Army on the Elbe. Would not have wanted the Soviet system in Western Europe.

Putin's baby
Guest
Putin's baby

No surprises here then…

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

I’m afraid that all this is old hat as can be demonstrated from contemporary records. Churchill broadcast to denounce nazi atrocities and promise vengeance long before D Day. Bombing murder factories was a non-starter, what could the Allies use, Bomber Command which area bombed in default of adequate night navigation and target finding devices and was out of range of Auschwitz? US day bombers based in Italy from 1943? Bombers that were so inaccurate they sometimes bombed the wrong country? Mosquito bombers? They could get to Auschwitz in 1943 but there were only about 30 in Italy and most were… Read more »

Latest

Here’s Where America’s Imported Oil Comes from: Venezuela Is Currently the 4th-Largest

Saudi Arabia used to be the top foreign source of oil imported into the US, but now it’s only a very weak second-place to Canada.

Eric Zuesse

Published

on

Originally posted at strategic-culture.org:


At the present time, the latest month for which the US Department of Energy publishes the number of barrels per day (bpd) of oil that’s exported to the US is November 2018. Here are the rankings:

1. Canada        142,206 bpd

2. Saudi Arabia  30,028

3. Mexico        18,020

4. Venezuela     16,889

5. Iraq          11,767

6. Colombia      7,769

7. Russia        7,611

8. Ecuador       5,866

9. Nigeria       5,392

10. Algeria      4,848

11. UK           4,653

12. Norway       4,073

13. Kuwait       3,027

14. Brazil       2,777

15. Belgium      2,075

16. S. Korea     1,927

17. Netherlands  1,462

18. Egypt        1,405

19. UAE          1,771

20. China        1.268

21. France       1,239

22. Singapore    1,232

23. Indonesia    1,204

24. Argentina    1,101

25. Peru         1,061

26. Denmark      1,000

27. Brunei       961

28. Spain        846

29. Angola       833

Here were the top 10 for the entire year of 2015 as reported by Bloomberg Finance at Forbes. For comparison to today, the country’s sales and rank in November 2018 is also indicated [between brackets]”

1. Canada        3.2 million bpd  [1. Canada 142,206]

2. Saudi Arabia  1,1 [2. Saudi Arabia 30,028]

3. Venezuela     780,000 bpd [4. Venezuela 16,889]

4. Mexico        690,000 [3. Mexico 18,020]

5. Colombia      370,000 [6. Colombia 7,769]

6. Iraq          230,000 [5. Iraq 11,767]

7. Ecuador       225,000 [8. Ecuador 5,866]

8. Kuwait        210,000 [13. Kuwait 3,027]

9. Brazil        190,000 [14. Brazil 2,777]

10. Angola       190,000 [29. Angola, 833]

Clearly, the figures change over time. Whereas Angola was #10 in 2015, it’s #29 now; and whereas Russia, Nigeria, and Algeria, weren’t in the top 10 in 2015, they now are.

US President Donald Trump is bringing down the latest Venezuelan monthly number from 16,889 to close to zero. On 25 August 2017, Reuters headlined two stories, “Trump slaps sanctions on Venezuela; Maduro sees effort to force default” and “Venezuela says US sanctions designed to push Venezuela to default”. The first of those reported that, “US President Donald Trump signed an executive order that prohibits dealings in new debt from the Venezuelan government or its state oil company on Friday in an effort to halt financing that the White House said fuels President Nicolas Maduro’s ‘dictatorship’.” The second reported that Venezuela’s Government daid that Trump’s action “essentially forces the closure of its US refining unit Citgo,” which means bringing an end to Venezuela’s oil exports to the US

Venezuela’s socialized oil company, PDVSA, of which Citgo is the US distributor, had never prepared for the measures that Trump is now imposing, and Reuters’s report said, “As a result, it will be it tricky for PDVSA to refinance its heavy debt burden.” The Reuters report continued:

“Maduro may no longer take advantage of the American financial system to facilitate the wholesale looting of the Venezuelan economy at the expense of the Venezuelan people,” US Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said on Friday.

PDVSA, the financial engine of Maduro’s government, is already struggling due to low global oil prices, mismanagement, allegations of corruption and a brain drain.

However, the likely failure of Venzuela’s oil company is due not only to the lowered price of oil, but to the fact that Venezuela’s oil is among the two costliest in the world to produce, because it’s from the dirtiest source, tar sands, much like Canada’s oil is. The difference between Canada and Venezuela is twofold: first, that whereas Canada is a vassal-state of the US empire and so its aristocracy is allied with America’s aristocracy (which controls America’s Government), Venezuela isn’t. And, second, that whereas Venezuela has a monoeconomy that’s based on oil (which accounts for around 95% of Venezuela’s exports), Canada does not.

Saudi Arabia used to be the top foreign source of oil imported into the US, but now it’s only a very weak second-place to Canada in this, exporting only 21% as much oil to the US as does Canada. This is a huge decline for the Sauds.

Whereas Saudi oil is the world’s most “light” or cleanest and least-costly to produce and therefore has the lowest “carbon footprint” of any oil, Canada and Venezuela have the most “heavy” or dirtiest and most-costly to produce and therefore have the highest “carbon footprint” of all the world’s oils.

(NOTE: There are many different ranking-systems for the ‘average’ cost per barrel of oil produced, such as this and this and these, but all tend to vastly underestimate in order to continue the case for fossil fuels. The BBC once noted that its calculation-system “only covers the cost of production, not the cost of exploration and development.” And it also ignored the cost of transit. It also ignored environmental costs. It also ignored the costs to taxpayers for the many subsidies they pay in order for the fossil-fuels investors to continue investing in those companies. The environmental site “The Energy Mix” headlined in April 2018, “Ditched Bitumen Desperately Seeks True Commitment” and reported that fewer and fewer investors were continuing to trust the industry’s reported numbers regarding the costs of tar-sands oils. Also, on 11 February 2019, they headlined “Trans Mountain’s Fee Plan for Fossil Customers Represents $2-Billion Taxpayer Subsidy”. But, mostly, the heavy taxpayer subsidizations to the fossil-fuels industries are ignored, both by consumers and by investors. Realistically, the tar-sands oils in both Canada and Venezuela are costing far more than any per-barrel oil price that’s below $100. They are money-losers, but bring lots of money to the ‘right’ people.)

So: the US is replacing the world’s cleanest oil with the world’s filthiest oil, and that’s not only from Canada but also from Venezuela. However, because the US aristocracy want to take over Venezuela, the US Government now is set to zero-out oil imports from Venezuela, so as to increase the pressure on Venezuela’s Government to place in charge there a leader who will do America’s bidding. Canada has been working right alongside the US to achieve that objective, and will probably be supplying to the US much (if not all) of the 16,889 bpd oil that currently has been supplied by the other producer of very dirty oil: Venezuela. The US produces fracked oil, which is dirty but not as dirty as that from Canada and Venezuela. The US, Canada, and Venezuela, have been committed to ignoring the global warming problem. To the extent that the problem becomes globally recognized, the oil-production in all three of those countries will decline in its marketable price even more than will the oil-production in other countries (especially than Saudi Arabia’s oil-production, since that’s the cleanest); and, so, the profits from those dirty oils will quickly (especially for Canada and Venezuela, where it has already happened) turn into losses. All three governments — Venezuela, Canada, and US — are trying to postpone that, till as late a time as possible.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

While Pompeo Pouts In Poland, Putin Pushes Peace In Syria

In the end, the Neocons in D.C. and Tel Aviv are showing real desperation in summoning everyone to Poland while having almost no support for the intended policy, war with Iran.

Published

on

Authored by Tom Luongo:


If there was ever a Valentine’s Day which highlight the stark differences to diplomacy between the U.S. and Russia it is this one.

In Warsaw, the U.S. cajoled some sixty countries, many of them Arab, to send representatives only to be scolded like schoolchildren by Vice President Mike Pence for undermining the drive for war with Iran.

Mike Pompeo, for his part, showed no signs of shame or remorse after his public rebuke by Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto.

Szijjarto retorted to Pompeo’s lecturing that “the world is not going to be a better place if some countries spend their time intervening in the internal political affairs of other countries.” He insisted that Budapest can have transparent relations with Moscow and Beijing and the West, and said it was an “enormous hypocrisy” that Hungary is singled out for its ties with Moscow.

He then went to Poland with the intention of whipping up support for a war with Iran. But not to actually call it that. Until Benjamin Netanyahu arrived with fever dreams on his lips.

As Moon of Alabama pointed out, this was a huge slap for Pompeo, whose staff kept trying to downplay the anti-Iran nature of the Poland fiasco to make it more palatable for media consumption.

By claiming that the conference is about waging war on Iran Netanyahoo is not only embarrassing the State Department and Secretary Mike Pompeo. He also makes it extremely difficult for other attendees to justify their presence. The Arabs will be especially furious that they are shown in such an open alliance with Israel and its hostility against Iran. Scheming with Israel in the dark is fine. But being publicly associated with a war mongering Israel is difficult to sell to their people. It would be unsurprising to see some of them leave.

The entire Warsaw meeting was designed to impress upon everyone how seriously they should take U.S. and Israeli desires for regime change in Iran. And how committed they are to keeping everyone in the fold on all matters pertaining to the Trump administration’s hostility towards Iran, Russia, and China.

This is part of a wider set of actions, taken broadly, designed to hit the headlines all at the same time:

  • U.S. is openly pushing for regime change in Venezuela and drumming up international support for it.
  • It is also urging EU Parliamentarians to push through new pipeline rules as part of changes to the EU’s Third Energy Package to try and stop the Nordstream 2 pipeline from being completed.
  • New sanctions were placed on Russia a few days after Moody’s had to accede to reality and upgrade Russian government debt to investment grade, which will only accelerate foreign capital inflows into Russia.

Pompeo and Netanyahu were putting the world on notice that they are not only 1) insane but 2) committed to their path to braying for war While, as Elijah Magnier points out, the entire dog and pony show in Warsawa was for Netanyahu’s re-election bid amidst cabinet resignations and corruption scandals.

At the same time, Russian President Vladimir Putin met with his Iranian and Turkish counterparts in Sochi to discuss the next phase of bringing peace to Syria.

These three countries continue moving the ball forward pragmatically and diplomatically to resolve the issues left by the U.S.’s insistence on staying in Syria.

Putin, with the iron fist firmly in his velvet glove, said two things that are important in his post-meeting remarks .

The first will give the frothing red-baiting, Trump-hating buffoons in the U.S. media and foreign policy establishments a fit of the vapors.

“President Trump is quite actively working on fulfilling his election campaign promises, which in practice rarely happens in the US political life. The withdrawal of the American troops from Syria was one of those promises,” Putin said.

Think of the thirteen different ways Rachel Maddow will spin this simple statement of truth by Putin. He’s got the goods on Trump. Putin wouldn’t say this if Trump were working for the U.S. Yadda Yadda Yadda.

This type of naked stupidity used to be frowned upon now it is openly encouraged at every level of the U.S. and European narrative machines.

But regardless of that, Putin is right to encourage Trump to fulfill that campaign promise because that is the quickest path to peace in Syria, a U.S. troop withdrawal.

Putin continued, “If that happens the only right decision in terms of security would be handing over those territories under the control of the Syrian armed forces.”

And that is his way of saying that he has control of Turkish President Erdogan and will not let the Syrian Kurds be attacked. Syrian President Bashar al-Assad will not make reconciliation between his government and the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Council easy. But it will be better than anything Erdogan would offer them.

But, then again, they lost their gambit for independence the day Barzani’s Peshmerga forces were destroyed in Erbil, Iraq last year by the Iraqi militia known as the Popular Mobilization Unit.

Erdogan’s biggest worry is the U.S. leaving the Kurds weapons after leaving to be a constant annoyance on Turkey’s border. That’s the Bolton way of doing things.

Putin also stressed that Erdogan’s pet terrorists in Idlib province are to be wiped out as part of the plan to stabilize Syria. These are all wins for Syria diplomatically, establishing Turkey as Russia’s subordinate in the power structure to reshape the Middle East.

The fact that Erdogan was not in Warsaw with his NATO allies but rather at a high level summit with the Russian and Iranian presidents tells you all you need to know about where he feels his future lies.

Then again, I’ve taken for granted that Erdogan is still a NATO member in name only for a couple of years now, so I wasn’t surprised by this.

Lastly, don’t overlook the Saudi’s offer to Putin recently about creating a new OPEC+ cartel with Russia and Saudi Arabia leading it. Trump’s own plans for Middle East peace rest on the Saudis keeping the rest of the Gulf States in line, which is why there was nothing on the agenda about ending the conflict in Yemen.

In the end, the Neocons in D.C. and Tel Aviv are showing real desperation in summoning everyone to Poland while having almost no support for the intended policy, war with Iran.

You can only hold onto people for so long through fear of retribution. Eventually, they realize you can’t attack everyone at once all the time, though Trump and company are certainly willing to give it the old college try.

As each instance of disobedience occurs and punishment is ineffective – Erdogan is still in power despite a coup attempt and a currency attack, for example – the bolder allies will become in their own defiance.


Join my Patreon and subscribe to the Gold Goats ‘n Guns Newsletter for exclusive commentary and investment ideas.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Deep State coup d’état against Trump confirmed by Andrew McCabe

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 84.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

RT CrossTalk host Peter Lavelle and The Duran’s Alex Christoforou take a quick look at Andrew McCabe’s 60 minute interview, where the disgraced FBI Deputy Director admitted that DOJ officials were considering the removal of President-elect Donald Trump from office in a brazen coup attempt, by invoking the 25th amendment.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via RT


President Trump has lashed out at former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe, after McCabe said he investigated Trump out of concern the case might “vanish.” McCabe also revealed Justice Department plans to remove Trump from office.

“Disgraced FBI Acting Director Andrew McCabe pretends to be a ‘poor little Angel’ when in fact he was a big part of the Crooked Hillary Scandal & the Russia Hoax,” Trump tweeted on Wednesday. “McCabe is a disgrace to the FBI and a disgrace to our Country. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!”

Trump savaged McCabe for his handling of the ‘Russiagate’ investigation, branded a “witch hunt” by the president. A report by the Justice Department’s Inspector General last year found that the FBI acted improperly during the investigation. McCabe, according to text messages examined by the IG, discussed developing an “insurance policy” against Trump with two other FBI employees in 2016.

Trump described the message at the time as “treason,” and said it laid bare an FBI plot to work against him once elected.

The president also accused McCabe of giving “Hillary a pass,” after the agency cleared Hillary Clinton of wrongdoing in its investigation into her email misuse, overseen by McCabe.

In her 2015 campaign for Virginia’s state Senate, McCabe’s wife Jill had taken donations from Terry McAuliffe, a prominent Virginia Democrat “with long-standing ties to Bill and Hillary Clinton.” McCabe allegedly leaked information to the press about an FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation, to deflect attention from his own ties with the Clinton family and push back against the narrative that he was therefore impartial.

Although referencing old events, Trump’s latest attack on McCabe comes as the former FBI #2 embarks on a tour to promote his new book. Titled ‘The Threat,’ the book is a passionate paean to the three-letter agency and a diatribe against Trump.

In an interview with CBS, McCabe said Trump’s firing of then-FBI Director James Comey in 2017 prompted McCabe to open an investigation into Trump as quickly as possible.

“I was very concerned that I was able to put the Russia case on absolutely solid ground, in an indelible fashion,” McCabe told CBS’ Scott Pelley, in an interview due to air on Sunday. “That were I removed quickly, or reassigned or fired, that the case could not be closed or vanish in the night without a trace.”

McCabe did not explain the agency’s rationale for opening the investigation, beyond unsubstantiated rumors of “collusion.” He did not present any new evidence to back up the oft-repeated but still-unproven accusation.

Wearing a wire
Instead, Trump himself seemed to be the problem. Pelley said that McCabe described panic at FBI headquarters after Comey’s firing, as “the highest levels of American law enforcement were trying to figure out what to do with the president.”

Among the ideas circulated was that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein would wear a wire to surreptitiously record the president, gathering evidence that he was unfit for office, and triggering his eventual removal under the 25th Amendment. The New York Times reported this plan last year, citing an anonymous cabinet member, but Rosenstein dismissed the story as false.

Now, McCabe told Pelley that the plan was real. Rosenstein came up with the idea himself, and “it was so serious that he took it to the lawyers at the FBI to discuss it,” Pelley said.

McCabe’s investigation was handed over to Special Counsel Robert Mueller eight days after Comey’s firing and has been ongoing since. Over a year later, the investigation has not found any evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, and is reportedly close to wrapping up.

McCabe himself was fired by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions last March, after the Inspector General’s report concluded he lied to FBI agents about his disclosures to the press regarding the Clinton Foundation investigation.

 

 

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending