Connect with us

Latest

News

Staff Picks

Newly released UN “Nazi Holocaust archives” show US & UK colluded with Third Reich to destroy Soviet Union

Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

24,891 Views

As Victory Day (May 9) approaches in Russia to commemorate the defeat of Hitler’s Nazi army, new United Nations archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust have finally been released, amid protests from the US and UK. Why?

The archives “damningly” show state collusion between the US, UK, and the Third Reich. The end goal between their collusion was not to end the Nazi Holocaust, but to defeat Soviet Union.

The parallels between WW2 history, as evidenced in the archive release, and how the US/EU and NATO are working with ISIS and neo-nazi Ukraine in order to destroy Russia, is proof to the point that the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Russia has been, and always will be, the eternal enemy of the western globalist elite.

The perpetuous war against Russia against the backdrop of the historic UN Nazi Holocaust archives, are discussed in a post entitled, “The Deep History of US, Britain’s Never-Ending Cold War On Russia” from the Strategic Culture on-line journal (www.strategic-culture.org), the


After decades of delaying, the United Nations finally released archives from the Second World War-era war crimes commission investigating the Nazi Holocaust. The source of those archives on Nazi war crimes were Western governments, including those in exile at the time of the war, such as the Belgian, Polish and Czechoslovakian. The time period covered is 1943-1949. Washington and London had long sought to halt the release. Why?

Notably, the landmark publication of the files last month was given scant Western media coverage. Surprisingly, perhaps, because the story that can be gleaned from the documents tells of a hidden history of the Second World War, namely the systematic collusion between the American and British governments and the Nazi Third Reich.

As a report in Deutsche Welle remarked on the released archives: «The files make clear that [Western] Allied forces knew more about the Nazi concentration camp system before the end of the war than has generally been thought».

This revelation points to more than just «knowledge» among the Western allies of Nazi-era crimes; it points more damningly to state collusion. This would also explain why Washington and London have been reluctant to make the UN war crimes files publicly available.

There has long been a controversial debate among Western nations about why the US and Britain in particular did not do more to bomb the Nazi infrastructure of death camps and railroads. Washington and London have often made the claim that they did know the full extent of the horror being perpetrated by the Nazis until the very end of the war when extermination centers such as at Auschwitz and Treblinka were liberated – by the Soviet Red Army, it should be noted too.

However, what the latest release of UN Holocaust files shows is that Washington and London were indeed well aware of the Nazi Final Solution in which millions of European Jews and Slavic people were being systematically worked to death or exterminated in gas chambers. So the question again is: why did the US and Britain not direct more of their aerial bombing campaign to destroy the Nazi infrastructure?

One possible answer is that these Western allies had a callous disregard for the Nazi victims. Washington and London establishments were themselves accused of harboring antisemitic prejudices, as can be seen from the scandals when both these governments spurned thousands of European Jewish refugees during the Second World War, in effect sending many of them to their deaths under the Nazi regime.

Not excluding the above factor of Western racist insouciance, there is a second more disturbing factor. That the Western governments, or at least powerful sections, were loath to hamper the Nazi war effort against the Soviet Union. Notwithstanding that the Soviet Union was a nominal «ally» of the West for the defeat of Nazi Germany.

This perspective harks to a radically different conception of the Second World War in contrast to that narrated in official Western versions. In this alternative historical account, the rise of the Nazi Third Reich was deliberately fomented by American and British rulers as a bulwark in Europe against the spread of communism. Adolf Hitler’s rabid anti-Semitism was matched only by his detest of Marxism and the Slavic people of the Soviet Union. In the Nazi ideology, they were all «Untermenschen» (subhumans) to be exterminated in a «Final Solution».

So, when Nazi Germany was attacking the Soviet Union and carrying out its Final Solution from June 1941 until late 1944, little wonder then that the US and Britain showed a curious reluctance to commit their military forces fully to open up a Western Front. The Western allies were evidently content to see the Nazi war machine doing what it was originally intended to do: to destroy the primary enemy to Western capitalism as represented by the Soviet Union. This is not to say that all American and British political leaders shared or were even aware of this tacit strategic vision. Leaders like President Franklin Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill appeared to be genuinely committed to defeating Nazi Germany. Nevertheless, their individual views must be set against a background of systematic collusion between powerful Western corporate interests and Nazi Germany.

As American author David Talbot documented in his book, The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA and the Rise of America’s Secret Government (2015), there were massive financial links between Wall Street and the Third Reich, going back several years before the outbreak of the Second World War.

Allen Dulles, who worked for the Wall Street law firm Sullivan and Cromwell and who later headed up the American Central Intelligence Agency, was a key player in the linkage between US capital and German industry. American industrial giants, such as Ford, GM, ITT and Du Pont were invested heavily in German industrial counterparts like IG Farben (manufacturer of Zyklon B, the poisonous gas used in the Holocaust), Krupp Steel and Daimler. American capital, as well as British, was thus integrated into the Nazi war machine and the latter’s dependence on the system of slave labor as provided by the Final Solution.

This would explain why the Western allies did so little to disrupt the Nazi infrastructure with their undoubted formidable aerial bombing capacity. Far more damning than mere inertia or indifference owing to racist prejudice towards the Nazi victims, what emerges is that the Americans and British capitalist elite were invested in the Third Reich. Mainly for the purpose of eliminating the Soviet Union and any kind of genuinely socialist global movement. Bombing Nazi infrastructure would have been tantamount to deleting Western assets.

To this end, as the war was drawing to a close and the Soviet Union looked poised to roll up the Third Reich singlehandedly, the Americans and British belatedly stepped up their war efforts from western and southern Europe. The goal was one of salvaging Western assets remaining in the Nazi regime. Allen Dulles, the director of the-soon-to-be-formed American Central Intelligence Agency, extricated top Nazis and their gold looted from Europe in secret surrender deals known as Operation Sunrise. Britain’s military intelligence MI6 was also involved in the clandestine American effort to salvage Nazi assets via ratlines. The bad faith on display to the Soviet «allies» heralded the chill of the ensuing Cold War that immediately followed the Second World War.

Significant and damning testimony of what was going down was given recently in a BBC interview by Ben Ferencz, the most senior surviving US prosecutor from the Nuremberg trials. At age 98, Ferencz was still able to lucidly recall how scores of Nazi war criminals were let off the hook by the American and British authorities. Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy». Patton’s candid expression of deeper animosity towards the Soviet Union than towards Nazi Germany was consistent with how the US and British ruling class had been colluding with Hitler’s Third Reich in a geo-strategic war against the Soviet Union and worker-led socialist movements arising across Europe and America.

In other words, the Cold War which the US and Britain embarked on after 1945 was but a continuation of hostile policy towards Moscow that was already underway well before the Second World War erupted in 1939 in the form of a build up of Nazi Germany. For various reasons, it became expedient for the Western powers to liquidate the Nazi war machine, along with the Soviet Union. But as can be seen, the Western assets residing in the Nazi machine were recycled into American and British Cold War posture against the Soviet Union. It is a truly damning legacy that American and British military intelligence agencies were consolidated and financed by Nazi crimes.

The recent release of UN Holocaust files – in spite of American and British prevarication over many years – add more evidence to the historical analysis that these Western powers were deeply complicit in the monumental crimes of the Nazi Third Reich. They knew about these crimes because they had helped facilitate them. And the complicity stemmed from Western hostility towards Russia as a perceived geopolitical rival.

This is not a mere historical academic exercise. Western complicity with Nazi Germany also finds a corollary in the present-day ongoing hostility from Washington, Britain and their NATO allies towards Moscow. The relentless build up of NATO offensive forces around Russia’s borders, the endless Russophobia in Western propagandistic news media, the economic blockade in the form of sanctions based on tenuous claims, are all deeply rooted in history.

The West’s Cold War towards Moscow preceded the Second World War, continued after the defeat of Nazi Germany and persists to this day regardless of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer exists. Why? Because Russia is a perceived rival to Anglo-American capitalist hegemony, as is China or any other emerging power that undermines that desired unipolar hegemony.

American-British collusion with Nazi Germany finds its modern-day manifestation in NATO collusion with the neo-Nazi regime in Ukraine and jihadist terror groups dispatched in proxy wars against Russian interests in Syria and elsewhere. The players may change over time, but the root pathology is American-British capitalism and its hegemonic addiction.

The never-ending Cold War will only end when Anglo-American capitalism is finally defeated and replaced by a genuinely more democratic system.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
cortisol
Guest
cortisol

That is correct. USA/UK swooped in only in the very late stage, waiting as long as possible for SU to absorb maximum losses without the risk of German collapse. In this sense it was a timing game. Another thing is that USA had a plan to drop atomic bombs and firebomb Russian cities soon after the war end, only prevented by the lack of them. By 1950 it was too late with the advance in rocketry and first Soviet bomb. To date they have this plan, if there was no deterrent, they would do it immediately. Why they didn’t do… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I only came across the knowledge and links recently, but, look who fully supported Hitler, up until the Soviet Union sent him back to Berlin? The US and this is going to be a long winded ramble. Isn’t Hitler also part of the Rothschild family and whatever did happen to his frozen sperm, whilst Planned Parenthood and Josef Mengel were tweaking around with their eugenic’s programmes? I wonder how many leaders in the EU can be traced back to the sperm banks of elite NAZIs? WORST KEPT SECRETS OF THE BUMBLING BEAR – the CIA/NAZI marriage URL for this article:… Read more »

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

Nutter

Obama
Guest
Obama

The USA did not invent nukes. Germany had invented atomic bombs, but did not use it in Europe due to side effects. That was the reason, why the US could not bomb the Soviet Union immediately. The United States is the only country in the world that used nukes, namely Little Boy and Fat Man in order to defeat the powerful German ally “Japan”.

Max Werner
Guest
Max Werner

Why is Japan in quotes haha

Obama
Guest
Obama

Because I like Nippon!

strav
Guest
strav

The mere fact that france and uk retreated in 2weeks without putting up resistance is proof enough! Then staying out of europe for over 3yrs whilst the nazis were busy with the russians is the clincher!

al p
Guest
al p

They retreated because they got their asses kicked. Its what armies do in such circumstances. The real suspicions fact is why didn’t Hitler go in for the kill at Dunkirk? Because he was an Anglophile with wet dreams of dividing the globe between Germany & Britain

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

Hitler should have known that the zionists controlled Britain.

Edmund burke326
Guest
Edmund burke326

Don’t forget the collaboration of others like the Catholic Church who assisted the Ustasha in murdering Serbian people. A good reference is the “Falsifiers of History” published in 1948 by the USSR, which was an attempt to counteract a fresh wave of US/UK/French anti-Soviet propaganda that appeared in the western media following the seizure of Nazi documentation by the US.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

I remember that book

Laika Lammerink
Guest
Laika Lammerink

Occupied Germany – since 1918, and their boogieman/cannon fodder project Nazi Germany, was simply an affiliate of the Roth-child run British Empire and their U$ (1913/Fed). They did not control Stalin’s Russia.
They own and control the ‘money’ press, and therefore virtually the entire system, companies, (Protestant) churches, politicians (cr-ISIS actors), the ‘education’ system, media, whatever.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Wasn’t Lenin also related to the Rothschilds?

Who had a hissy fit when Tsar Alexander II lent a helping hand to Abraham Lincolne, when Great Britain and France were wanting to invade the US? Who then went on to take out the Royal Family of Russia?

How many children and grandchildren of both the Bolshevik and NAZI elite, can now be found in various positions of authority, either on various political stages or running, Government funded private schemes/organisations/institutions?

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

Like all bankers who got upended at the rise of the Bolsheviks, Sir Walter Rothschild would be despondent had he fallen into their hands. If there was a foreign connection when it comes to Lenin, that was a German one and it pertained to what seemed a mutual interest to Germany and the Russians: peace on the Eastern front. The difference was in the terms that each side had in mind. As for the Imperial Romanov dynasty, it has only itself to blame for its downfall. Moreover, many people are ignorant of the fact that the Bolsheviks were politically insignificant… Read more »

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Treaty 1213 – The Vatican owns most of the planet. At the time, Great Britain was bankrupt and cut a deal with the Vatican, where the Crown handed over Great Britain and her colonies (including those that are now independent). The Treaty was never revoked.

The Vactican – Religious Capital.
Washington DC – Military Capital.
City of London – Economic Capital.

WWI – League of Nations
WWII – United Nations
WWIII – NWO Full Spectrum Domination

Treaty of 1213 – The Beginning of the Lie… http://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/treaty-1213-beginning-lie

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City… http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

john mason
Guest
john mason

So what this article is hinting at is for the world to be free of these global terrorists, US and UK is to annihilate them? Destroy the elite, Rothschild, Clinton, Blair, Bush and the like. Can live with that ideology.

Constantine
Guest
Constantine

That’s what the article suggested. Not the destruction of entire countries.

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

long live marxism-leninism-maoism, long live the people’s war

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

The Rotschilds would like that.

seby
Guest
seby

So the nazis were the isis of those times?

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

yep you got it pal. Same as how the “savage Injuns” were the ISIS of 19th century or the Savage Muslesm were the ISIS of the 13th, 14th, 15,th century. Nothing ever changes.

seby
Guest
seby

I didn’t know Anglo-American capitalism existed back then. Didn’t it start with the pilgrims landing on Plymouth Rock?

I think you’ve got confused about mercenary proxy armies or been reading Ripley’s Believe it or Not rather than real history books or UN archives. Maybe you’re a relative of louise mensch?

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Check out each Empire, each war and just who was behind them all and what they wanted. Whatever century you look into. New faces, new names, but, same old characters.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

Bingo! We have a winner.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Bolsheviks, NAZIs, ISIS, Taliban – you can never keep up with the name changes, but, all run on the same ideology, with the same masters pulling the strings.

Aussie battler
Guest
Aussie battler

Churchill grand strategic plan was for Russia And Germany
To bleed each other white and destroy each others forces ,
With the few divisions left fighting in the Ural Mountains .
The Brits would step in and take over the whole of Europe
like some ripe low hanging fruit,hence the desperation and
Panic when the Russians smashed the Germans in Kursk
With the ensuing retreat,that’s what promoted the US and
UK second Front,not to help the Russians but to stop them
From conquering the whole of Germany.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis

Let’s not forget that Britain was begging on its knees for financial help from the U.S.

hestroy
Guest
hestroy

Gas chambers? Total bullshit.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

What gets me, is the fact, that nobody notices 27 million lost lives from the Soviet Union, together with Japan on the verge of surrender, when WWII was over and Washington DC goes an uses the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Negasaki. Whatever Stalin or Hitler did, not condoning, but, that was nothing, compared to two Japanese Islands being vapourised.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

Good article – needed to be expressed and presented to the western public

seby
Guest
seby

Another good article on subject of WW2 from November last year. No relation to the illuminati brigade who’ve charged into the comments section here.

Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2016/11/29/why-the-west-falsifies-the-history-of-world-war-ii.html

All reminds me of an excellent history lesson given by the wise Vladimir Putin to the Polish head who tried vainly to embarrass him and Russian/Soviet history a few years ago. Very worthwhile viewing, only a few minutes.

Dennis W Rowntree
Guest
Dennis W Rowntree

I shall read the article ‘Why the West Falsifies the History of World War II’ with great interest. Thank you for passing that on to me. Regarding the video, yes, I have seen that. But I am always glad to see it again on how Putin instructs the ignorant public on facts. I admire Putin’s character in that he doesn’t lower himself to putting other people down but simply informs and correct the false accusations – Putin, the best statesman on this planet. How I wish the ignorant Sheeple could see the lies and demonization that western corporate mainstream media… Read more »

Herbert Dorsey
Guest
Herbert Dorsey

What this article leaves out is the large influence of the Catholic Church in assisting the fascists rise to power in Europe, leading to World War II, which is well documented in books like “The Vatican’s Holocaust”, “The Secret History of the New World Order” and “The Secret History of the Jesuits”. World War II was just another battle in the Jesuit’s long war against non-Catholics or heretics.

Rastislav Veľká Morava
Member
Rastislav Veľká Morava

also “Crimen Magnus”

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

I have just replied to a similar comment.

Three Corporations run the world: City of London, Washington DC and Vatican City
http://www.sinhalanet.net/three-corporations-run-the-world-city-of-london-washington-dc-and-vatican-city

Together with the link to the Treaty of 1213.

comment image

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

The Zyklon B was used to treat the lice infestation among the prisoners.

tiger
Guest
tiger

Zyklon B (& A) contain HCN, which kills anything that breathes. There are better ways to treat lice. Your excuse is poor.

Shawn5676
Guest
Shawn5676

So please share with me what they did used to treat the lice infestation’s in the work/prison camps.

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

Antoni Jaromin Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.. https://www.google.pl/?gws_rd=ssl

antobojar
Guest
antobojar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Unthinkable

Churchill planned war with Soviet Union in 1945.. using Wehrmacht on allies side as well.

Nadia Dennis
Guest
Nadia Dennis
batavian01
Guest
batavian01

Yes. Operation Unthinkable.

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

Alex! PAR 5 Should be ‘perpetual’.
Such a good article.
Typos deface it.

plamenpetkov
Guest
plamenpetkov

oh color me shocked.
Of course the whole point of WWII was to get Germany and The Soviet Union to fight so they can weaken each other and USA then to come in and take over. USA did the same thing with Iran and Iran war of 1980.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

Chalk that one up as an additional item to celebrate on Purim.

Brian Johnston
Guest
Brian Johnston

A superficial and misleading article, which completely fails to identify the true enemy of Christian civilization. The enemy in this “never ending war” is not Anglo-American capitalism, but the synagogue of Satan.

Tim Webb
Guest
Tim Webb

Ah, how we love a nice smelly trail of red herrings and unsubstantiated allegations. It’s fascinating to see how the holohoax is put centre stage in Mr Christoforou’s fantasy version of history, as if the sufferings of der juden should somehow have been made the primary motivating force behind western geopolitical manoueverings during WW2; even assuming that they existed as a result of the “monumental crimes and rabid antisemitism” which he lays at Germany’s door, which no-one seems to have claimed until long after the war was over. No. The simplest explanation for this period of history boils down to… Read more »

Franz Kafka
Guest
Franz Kafka

I enjoyed your reply. But I think many elements of Mr Christoforou’s article are consonant with yours.
Your weakest point is your final one. To deny that Russia has stood in the way of Anglo (later Anglo-zionist hegemony) is to deny reality. Russia has been thwarting plans since the Great Game was announced (at least). Or the time of Catherine the Second. One of the most productive buttons installed in the heads of Westerners (for their various ruling Gestapos) is the Russophobe button.

MH
Guest
MH

I’ve posted this before and am grateful for the opportunity to post it again. Perhaps one person will read it and take it to heart and understand the implications of it for our past and our future on this planet. Shortly after the war ended a German official, a ministerial official being interrogated was asked if he felt they could really have defeated the Allies and if not, what was the point of fighting. He replied that “the purpose of the war was to reduce the Slavic populations by some 30,000,000 – millions”. So, it seems there was a public… Read more »

hell0m0t0
Guest
hell0m0t0

essentially, yes, under capitalism people are reduced to a factor of production (labor) rather than actual humans marxist works go into this in good detail if you’re interested (any negative feelings you have about the term is due to the ideology being dangerous to the ruling class, just in case) i need to read up on how genocide factors in specifically to imperialist capitalism, but my hunch is that by reducing the population they can reduce the labor force, and thus reduce production figures in the affected country, making them more prone to shortages in food, consumer goods, and hampering… Read more »

Steve Golf
Guest
Steve Golf

total baloney regarding marxism. Marxism is a critique used to enable communism.

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

You’re referring to the Hongerplan, explained in detail by Tooze in The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy, London: Allen Lane, 2006. ISBN 0-7139-9566-1 – I recommend it.

kolokol
Guest
kolokol
Sep 2017 Calendar
Guest

It’s alluring not just engaging!

Rick0Shea
Guest
Rick0Shea

I figured this out for myself years ago.

cap960
Guest
cap960

And now US/UK are in Ukraine supporting yet again NAZI fanatics. This time though the world is been fooled to believe Russia is the enemy.

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

Not all the world, just the masses, who know no better.

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

“Ferencz cited US General George Patton who remarked just before the final surrender of the Third Reich in early May 1945, as saying: «We’re fighting the wrong enemy».” I beg to differ with this Ferencz as Patton had been disgusted by the stench of those ‘victims’ for whom, he wrote to his wife, he was forced to evict decent, civilsed Germans from their homes. As well as having to join Eisenhower at a synagogue where he added, the stench from the Rabbis caused him to lose his dinner that night. He was referring to the fake-Jews who were fleeing Russia.… Read more »

Suzanne Giraud
Guest
Suzanne Giraud

It was General MacArthur who was hand-in-hand with these degenerates:
https://geopolitics.co/2012/02/02/the-last-senseless-war/

AMHants
Guest
AMHants

This might come across off topic, but, in a random way it fits in. Why is Israel funding politicians that are also fully supportive of the NAZI Party in Ukraine? How do they compliment each other Mr Engel? Also, have a look at how much they receive from the agricultural industry. Now why would the agricultural industry of the United States, be so interested in stopping Russia from being the leading grain exporter and what has that got to do with North Korea? THE US BILL H.R. 1644 TO KILL RUSSIAN FOOD EXPORT AND CHINESE TRADE… Author of the bill:… Read more »

hvaiallverden
Guest
hvaiallverden

Jesus f….. christ I am feed up with this Nazi this and Nazi that, and if you continue I simply dont bother to come here anymore, like RT and the so called Not the fake news” aka the PC/Sore-ass infested and run MSM in Norway, you somehow never talk or writes about the total picture, only 50 shades of manure, and this “articles” is always followed by Israel is going to do something.

But hey. we live in an “free world” dont we, the choice is yours.

peace

John Bull
Guest
John Bull

The “historians” of the west don’t want you to know that the Jews essentially started the war against Hitler with a worldwide boycott of German goods in an effort to tank the German economy and only after did Hitler respond with a boycott of his own. The grandfathers of George H.W. Bush, J.P. Morgan, Henry Ford et. al. helped to finance and rearm Hitler as a hedge against Bolshevism. The German Army had Ford trucks. There is huge list of complicit acts by the west no one wants us to know.

JDESQ
Guest
JDESQ

This report fails to distinguish between the support given by FDR to Stalin’s call for a second front and Churchill’s repeated attempts to stall its opening. This was made clear by Elliott Roosevelt, who was eyewitness to those discussions, in “As He Saw it,” which should be required reading for all students of American History. Likewise, the role of Churchill, who feared as US-USSR condominium to decolonize the Asia and Africa, in enjoining a pliable Harry S. Truman into the Cold War, is essential to understanding the role of the UK and its intelligence services in today’s world.

etniks
Guest
etniks

The well researched book by Antony Sutton called WALL STREET AND THE RISE OF HITLER since the seventies has come to the same conclusion. The actual outcome is the REAL NAZIS were not German, but those financiers who pushed with their money to support Hitler and the Nazi regime. According to the research, the current European Monarchies were scared sh —less of what happened to their cousin the Russian Czar and his family all assassinated by the Soviet soldiers, and wanted to collapse the Soviet Union to stop the “bad example” given to their own European citizens. The current hate… Read more »

lossarrow57
Guest
lossarrow57

USSR and Germany were the best friends and allies until June 22, 1941, and Russia has benefited from this friendship and cooperation. https://www.facebook.com/KonradKrzysztofKowalski/posts/1809607946032326?hc_location=ufi 1. The truth is that the USSR (Russia) – made unprovoked, brutal and criminal aggression on Poland on September 17 (co-operation Germany-USRR lasted from 1 September: guiding aircraft and pursuing Polish submarines), – The Red Army made numerous war crimes during the aggression – The NKVD worked closely with the Gestapo for the next 1.5 years – The Soviet Union committed crimes on the Polish population from 1931 to 1941 – Katyn crimes have no other precedent… Read more »

Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz
Guest
Abdullahi Edward Tomasiewicz

This historic article could have been a bit easier to swallow if had stuck to the original premise – the coalition of the mentioned parties against the Russian and eliminate all those references, to Gas Chambers, Final Solution and millions and all the rest of the established agenda taking points that one is prevented to question.

SteveLaudig
Guest

” perpetuous”? you mean perpetual. Get a native English language editor, it’ll help your cred.

Philadelphian
Guest
Philadelphian

Exact opposite of historical reality. Look up Malta conference, and whom attended and how they divided up ALL of Europe.

RJohn
Guest

In his books Wall Street and the rise of Hitler and Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Anthony Sutton documents how Corporate America, (with U.S. Government blessing), made it all possible…people must understand, Wall Street bears allegiance to no-one but profit…All wars are Banker’s wars…alliances change…but only superficially. Dig a little deeper and you’ll find a most peculiar pattern.

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

The ” Nazi death Camp” story does not stand up to scrutiny it may well be true that the Yanks and Brits double-crossed the Nazis, it fits their style. The age old “let’s you and him fight” theme. Why did Hess fly to England? Why was he murdered in Spandau? Why did Hitler allow the Brits to escape via Dunkirk? Why did Hitler go to war against England with fighter aircraft that were only good for twenty minutes of flight time over England? Whats with the ridiculous gas chamber stories and zyklon-B? “When American and British forces overran western and… Read more »

Tommy Prince
Guest
Tommy Prince

For more on this I suggest reading Yehudi Menuhin’s excellent book “Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil”.

al p
Guest
al p

OK so the Soviet Union was targeted and rightly so…separating the horrific suffering of the people murdered under Stalin by both the Nazis and the Soviets, Stalin was an inhumane douchebag who also received billions of dollars of capitalist funding.

So this articles attempt to demonize anti-soviet efforts blurs the line between reality and fiction.

The very imposition of Bolshevism upon Russia was an Imperial British conspiracy and the mass murder of the Czars family among hundreds of thousands other Slavic peoples was genocide on a massive scale far outlasting Hitler’s few years on the global stage.

brad kahn
Guest
brad kahn

The Holocaust wasn’t just the German Solution… It was the Capitalist Solution..! International Financiers.. Big Industrialists The real bourgeoisie.. Always planned to use fascism as a battering ram against Communism. Before and After the war..! Hence, all the fascists Allan Foster Dulles put in power. Duh. Interestingly, After the war… When the fascist clique around Tojo Was disgorged and disassembled.. The Japanese ruling class used the Yakusa for the exact same purposes. In case you were wondering how an enormously powerful criminal apparatus could be formed in Japan… and yet…you can’t find a cigarette butt on the sidewalk anywhere in… Read more »

Philip Andrews
Guest
Philip Andrews

Yes, there was collusion between the US and UK as per Mackinder, to help Germany and the SU destroy each other through military and economic exhaustion. This notion has been gaining ground for some years now thanks to the writings of the late Antony Sutton. However, having grown up entirely in the CW, I still would not have wanted the Red Army at the Channel, in France. No thank you. I’m glad the US got in when it did and met the Red Army on the Elbe. Would not have wanted the Soviet system in Western Europe.

Putin's baby
Guest
Putin's baby

No surprises here then…

Attrition47
Guest
Attrition47

I’m afraid that all this is old hat as can be demonstrated from contemporary records. Churchill broadcast to denounce nazi atrocities and promise vengeance long before D Day. Bombing murder factories was a non-starter, what could the Allies use, Bomber Command which area bombed in default of adequate night navigation and target finding devices and was out of range of Auschwitz? US day bombers based in Italy from 1943? Bombers that were so inaccurate they sometimes bombed the wrong country? Mosquito bombers? They could get to Auschwitz in 1943 but there were only about 30 in Italy and most were… Read more »

Latest

Beijing Threatens “Severe” Retaliation Against Canada If Huawei CFO Is Not Released

China’s warning marks an escalation in Beijing’s rhetoric as investors worry that the arrest could cause the shaky trade detente between the US and China to devolve into acrimony.

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


Canada’s extraordinary arrest one week ago of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou, the daughter of Huawei founder and billionaire executive Ren Zhengfei, and its decision to charge her with “multiple” counts of fraud – a preamble to her likely extradition to the US to face charges of knowingly violating US and EU sanctions on Iran – has elicited widespread anger in Beijing, which declared Meng’s detention a “violation of human rights” during a bail hearing for the jailed executive on Friday.

That anger has apparently only intensified after the hearing adjourned without a decision (it will resume on Monday, allowing Meng’s defense team to argue for why she should be released on bail, contrary to the wishes of government attorneys who are prosecuting the case).

And with Canada insisting that it will prosecute Meng to the full extent of the law over allegations that she mislead banks about the true relationship of a Huawei subsidiary called Skycom, angry Chinese officials have decided to issue an ultimatum directly to the Canadian ambassador, who was summoned to a meeting in Beijing on Saturday and told in no uncertain terms that Canada will face “severe consequences” if Meng isn’t released, according to the Wall Street Journal.

China’s foreign ministry publicized the warning in a statement (though Canadian officials have yet to comment):

Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Le Yucheng summoned Canada’s ambassador to Beijing, John McCallum, on Saturday to deliver the warning, according to a statement from the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

The statement doesn’t mention the name of Huawei’s chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, though it refers to a Huawei “principal” taken into custody at U.S. request while changing planes in Vancouver, as was Ms. Meng. The statement accuses Canada of “severely violating the legal, legitimate rights of a Chinese citizen” and demands the person’s release.

“Otherwise there will be severe consequences, and Canada must bear the full responsibility,” said the statement, which was posted online late Saturday.

Phone calls to the Canadian Embassy rang unanswered while the Canadian government’s global affairs media office didn’t immediately respond to an email request for comment.

The warning marks an escalation in Beijing’s rhetoric as investors worry that the arrest could cause the shaky trade detente between the US and China to devolve into acrimony. A federal judge issued a warrant for Meng’s arrest back in August. Though after she was made aware of the warrant, Meng avoided travel to the US. She was arrested in Vancouver last Saturday while traveling to Mexico.

Aside from breaking off trade talks, some are worried that Beijing could seek to retaliate in kind by arresting a notable US executive. While the threats of Chinese bureaucrats might not amount to much in the eyes of US prosecutors, threatening a US executive with long-term detention in a Chinese “reeducation camp” just might.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

The trials of Julian Assange

Eresh Omar Jamal interviews Italian journalist Stefania Maurizi in relation to the situation of Julian Assange.

The Duran

Published

on

Authored by Eresh Omar Jamal for The Daily Star (Bangladesh):


Stefania Maurizi is an investigative journalist working for the Italian daily La Repubblica. She has worked on all WikiLeaks releases of secret documents and partnered with Glenn Greenwald to reveal the Snowden Files about Italy. She has authored two books—Dossier WikiLeaks: Segreti Italiani and Una Bomba, Dieci Storie. In an exclusive interview with Eresh Omar Jamal of The Daily Star, Maurizi talks about the continued arbitrary detention of Julian Assange, why powerful governments see WikiLeaks as an existential threat, and the implications for global press freedom if Assange is prosecuted for publishing secret government documents.

You recently had the chance to visit Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. When was this and can you describe the state he is in?

I was able to visit him on November 19, after 8 months of failed attempts, because last March the Ecuadorian authorities cut off all his social and professional contacts, with the exception of his lawyers, and in the preceding 8 months, I had asked for permission to visit him nine times without success—the Ecuadorian authorities didn’t reply at all to my requests.

When I was finally granted permission to visit the WikiLeaks founder at the Ecuadorian embassy in London last November, I was literally shocked to see the huge impact his isolation has had on his health. Because I have worked as a media partner with him and his organisation, WikiLeaks, for the last nine years, I have met him many times and can tell when there are any changes in his body and mind. I wondered how his mind could keep working; but after talking to him in the embassy for two hours, I have no doubt that his mind is working fine. I still wonder how that’s possible after six and a half years of detention without even one hour of being outdoors. I would have had a physical and mental breakdown after just 6 months, not after 6 years.

Detention and isolation are killing him slowly, and no one is doing anything to stop it. The media reports, the commentators comment, but at the end of the day, he is still there; having spent the last six and a half years confined to a tiny building with no access to sunlight or to proper medical treatment. And this is happening in London, in the heart of Europe. He is not sitting in an embassy in Pyongyang. It is truly tragic and completely unacceptable. And I’m simply appalled at the way the UK authorities have contributed to his arbitrary detention, and have opposed any solution to this intractable legal and diplomatic quagmire.

Having bravely defended Assange for years, the Ecuadorian government in late March cut off almost all his communications with the outside world. What prompted this turnabout and what is its purpose?

Politics has completely changed in Ecuador, and more in general, in Latin America, since 2012, when Ecuador granted Julian Assange asylum. I have never had any interviews with the current Ecuadorian President, Mr Lenin Moreno, but based on his public declarations, it’s rather obvious to me that he does not approve of what Julian Assange and WikiLeaks do.

With all his problems, Rafael Correa (former president of Ecuador) protected Assange from the very beginning, whereas Lenin Moreno considers him a liability. Moreno is under pressure from the right-wing politicians in Ecuador, and also from very powerful governments, like the US and UK governments, who will leave no stones unturned to jail Assange and destroy WikiLeaks. I am not sure how long Lenin Moreno will hold out against this immense pressure, provided that he wants to hold out at all.

Assange was vindicated not so long ago as to why he cannot leave the embassy when the US Department of Justice “accidentally” revealed in November that the founder of WikiLeaks had been secretly charged in the US. What do you think those charges are for?

It’s hard to say unless the charges get declassified and I really appreciate how the US organisation, Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, is fighting before the court in the Eastern District of Virginia, US, to have the charges declassified.

There is no doubt whatsoever that the US authorities have always wanted to charge him for WikiLeaks’ publications. They have wanted to do so from the very beginning, since 2010, when WikiLeaks released its bombshell publications like the US diplomatic cables.

But the US authorities have been unable to do so due to the fact that WikiLeaks’ publication activities enjoy constitutional protection thanks to the First Amendment. So it will be very interesting to see how they will get around this constitutional protection in order to be able to charge him and other WikiLeaks journalists and put them all in jail.

Why have some of the most powerful governments and intelligence agencies invested so much resources to attack Assange and WikiLeaks?

You have to realise what it meant for the US national security complex to witness the publication of 76,000 secret documents about the war in Afghanistan, and then another 390,000 secret reports about the war in Iraq; followed by 251,287 US diplomatic cables and 779 secret files on the Guantanamo detainees; and to watch WikiLeaks save Edward Snowden, while the US was trying everything it could do, to show the world that there is no way of exposing the NSA’s secrets and keep your head attached to your neck having done so.

You have to realise what this means in an environment like that of the US, where even the most brilliant national security reporters didn’t dare to publish the name of the head of the CIA Counterterrorism Center, Michael D’Andrea, even though his name and the abuses committed by his centre were open secrets within their inner circles. Although the New York Times finally did, later on. But this was and still is the reality in the US, and even though it may not be as bad in the UK, it’s still quite bad. Look at what happened with the arrest of Glenn Greenwald’s husband, David Miranda, at the Heathrow Airport during the publication of the Snowden Files. Look at what happened with The Guardian being forced to destroy its hard drives during the publication of those files.

There are different levels of power in our societies and generally in our western democracies, criticism against the low, medium and high levels of power via journalistic activities is tolerated. Journalists may get hit with libel cases, have troubles with their careers; however, exposing those levels is permitted. The problem is when journalists and media organisations touch the highest levels, the levels where states and intelligence agencies operate.

WikiLeaks is a media organisation that has published secret documents about these entities for years, and Julian Assange and his staff have done this consistently, not occasionally like all the other media organisations do. You can imagine the anger these powerful entities have towards WikiLeaks—they perceive WikiLeaks as an existential threat and they want to set an example that says, “Don’t you dare expose our secrets and crimes, because if you do, we will smash you.”

If Assange is prosecuted, what impact might it have on other publishers and journalists and on press freedom globally?

It will have a huge impact and that is why organisations like the American Civil Liberties Union are speaking out. Never before in the US has an editor and media organisation ended up in jail for publishing information in the public interest. If Julian Assange and the WikiLeaks’ staff end up in jail, it will be the first time in US history and will set a devastating precedent for attack on press freedom in the US, but actually, not only in the US. Because if a country like the US, in which the activities of the press enjoy constitutional protection, treats journalists this way, you can imagine how other countries where the press doesn’t enjoy such strong protection will react. It will send a clear message to them: “Your hands are free.”

At the end of the day, I think there are two sides to this Assange and WikiLeaks saga: the US-UK national security complex, but more in general, I would say, the people within the national security complex, who want to destroy Julian Assange and WikiLeaks to send a clear message to journalists: “Don’t mess with us if you don’t want your lives to be destroyed.” While on the other side, there are the freedom of the press guys, meaning journalists like me, who want to demonstrate the exact opposite: that we can expose power at the highest levels, we can expose the darkest corners of governments and come out alive and well. And actually, we must do this, because real power is invisible and hides in the darkest corners.

Eresh Omar Jamal is a journalist for The Daily Star (Bangladesh). You can find him on Twitter: @EreshOmarJamal and Stefania Maurizi: @SMaurizi

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Diplomacy a Waste of Time with Washington

Trump’s JCPOA pullout and threatened INF Treaty withdrawal show Washington can never be trusted.

The Duran

Published

on

Authored by Stephen Lendman:


The US is a serial lawbreaker, operating by its own rules, no others.

Time and again, it flagrantly breaches international treaties, Security Council resolutions, and other rule of law principles, including its own Constitution.

Diplomacy with Republicans and undemocratic Dems is an exercise in futility.

Trump’s JCPOA pullout and threatened INF Treaty withdrawal show Washington can never be trusted.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova’s proposed US outreach to discuss INF Treaty bilateral differences is well intended – despite knowing nothing is accomplished when talks with Washington are held, so why bother.

It’s just a matter of time before the US breaches another promise. They’re hollow when made. Kremlin good intentions aren’t enough to overcome US duplicity and implacable hostility toward Russia.

“We are ready to continue the dialogue in appropriate formats on the entire range of problems related to this document on the basis of professionalism and mutual respect, without putting forward unsubstantiated accusations and ultimatums. Our proposals are well known and remain on the negotiating table,” said Zakharova, adding:

“We have admitted (US) documents for further consideration. This text again includes accusations in the form of unfounded and unsubstantiated information about Russia’s alleged violations of this deal.

Comments to Washington like the above and similar remarks are like talking to a wall. The US demands all countries bend to its will, offering nothing in return but betrayal – especially in dealings with Russia, China, Iran, and other sovereign independent governments it seeks to replace with pro-Western puppet ones.

Not a shred of evidence suggests Russia violated its INF Treaty obligations. The accusation is baseless like all others against the Kremlin.

“No one has officially or by any other means handed over to Russia any files or facts, confirming that Russia breaches or does not comply with this deal,” Zakharova stressed, adding:

“We again confirm our consistent position that the INF Treaty is one of the key pillars of strategic stability and international security.”

It’s why the Trump regime intends abolishing it by pulling out. Strategic stability and international security defeat its agenda. Endless wars and chaos serve it.

The US, UK, France, Israel, and their imperial partners get away with repeated international law breaches because the EU, UN, and rest of the world community lack backbone enough to challenge them.

It’s how it is no matter how egregious their actions, notably their endless wars of aggression, supporting the world’s worst tinpot pot despots, and failing to back the rights of persecuted Palestinians and other long-suffering people.

The only language Republicans and Dems understand is toughness. Putin pretends a Russian/US partnership exists to his discredit – a show of weakness, not strength and responsible leadership.

In response to the Trump regime’s intention to withdraw from the INF Treaty, he said Russia will “react accordingly” – precisely what, he didn’t say.

A few suggestions, Mr. President.

  • Recall your ambassador to Washington. Expel the Trump regime’s envoy from Moscow and other key embassy personnel.
  • Arrest US spies in Russia you long ago identified. Imprison them until the US releases all Russian political prisoners. Agree to swap US detainees for all of them, no exceptions.
  • Install enough S-400 air defense systems to cover all Syrian airspace. Warn Washington, Britain, France and Israel that their aircraft, missiles and other aerial activities in its airspace will be destroyed in flight unless permission from Damascus is gotten – clearly not forthcoming.
  • Publicly and repeatedly accuse the above countries of supporting the scourge of ISIS and likeminded terrorists they pretend to oppose.
  • Warn them in no uncertain terms that their aggression against the Syrian Arab Republic no longer will be tolerated. Tell them the same goes if they dare attack Iran.
  • Stop pretending Mohammad bin Salman didn’t order Jamal Khashoggi’s murder, along with ignoring the kingdom’s horrendous human rights abuses domestically and abroad – including support for ISIS and other terrorists.
  • Put observance of rule of law principles and honor above dirty business as usual with the kingdom and other despotic regimes for profits.
  • Do the right things at all times and damn the short-term consequences – including toughness on Washington, the UK, Israel, and their imperial partners in high crimes of war and against humanity.

VISIT MY NEW WEB SITE: stephenlendman.org (Home – Stephen Lendman). Contact at [email protected].

My newest book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: How the US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.”

www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending