Connect with us

Red Pill

News

The New York Times reveals that the oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple Russia’s economy and overthrow Syria’s Assad

The New York Times is reporting that the US and Saudi Arabia did indeed collude to drop the price of oil in an effort to punish Vladimir Putin and force Russia to withdraw its support for Assad and Syria.

Published

on

40 Views

A few days ago Obama admitted to CNN that the US engineered the entire coup in Ukraine.

Now the New York Times has revealed that the drastic oil price slump was done in collusion between the US and Saudi Arabia, all in an effort to weaken Putin and force his hand at dumping Assad in Syria…opening the way for Saudi and Qatari energy to transit to Europe.

When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that Ukraine did indeed shoot down MH-17?

Via Zerohedge…

While the markets are still debating whether the price of oil is more impacted by the excess pumping of crude here, or the lack of demand there, or if it is all just a mechanical squeeze by momentum-chasing HFT algos who also know to buy in the milliseconds before 2:30pm, we bring readers’ attention back to what several months ago was debunked as a deep conspiracy theory.

Back then we wrote about a certain visit by John Kerry to Saudi Arabia, on September 11 of all days, to negotiate a secret deal with the now late King Abdullah so as to get a “green light” in order “to launch its airstrikes against ISIS, or rather, parts of Iraq and Syria. And, not surprising, it is once again Assad whose fate was the bargaining chip to get the Saudis on the US’ side, because in order to launch the incursion into Syrian sovereign territory, it “took months of behind-the-scenes work by the U.S. and Arab leaders, who agreed on the need to cooperate against Islamic State, but not how or when. The process gave the Saudis leverage to extract a fresh U.S. commitment to beef up training for rebels fighting Mr. Assad, whose demise the Saudis still see as a top priority.”

Said otherwise, the pound of flesh demanded by Saudi Arabia to “bless” US airstrikes and make them appear as an act of some coalition, is the removal of the Assad regime. Why? So that, as we also explained last year, the holdings of the great Qatar natural gas fields can finally make their way onward to Europe, which incidentally is also America’s desire – what better way to punish Putin for his recent actions than by crushing the main leverage the Kremlin has over Europe?

… while we understand if Saudi Arabia is employing a dumping strategy to punish the Kremlin as per the “deal” with Obama’s White House, very soon there will be a very vocal, very insolvent and very domestic shale community demanding answers from the Obama administration, as once again the “costs” meant to punish Russia end up crippling the only truly viable industry under the current presidency.

As a reminder, the last time Obama threatened Russia with “costs”, he sent Europe into a triple-dip recession.

It would truly be the crowning achievement of Obama’s career if, amazingly, he manages to bankrupt the US shale “miracle” next.

For those that still believe the US/Saudi engineered oil price slump is merely conspiracy theory…

It was conspiratorial, that is, until today, when thanks to the far less “tinfoil” NYT one more conspiracy theory becomes conspiracy fact, following a report that “Saudi Arabia has been trying to pressure President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia to abandon his support for President Bashar al-Assad of Syria, using its dominance of the global oil markets at a time when the Russian government is reeling from the effects of plummeting oil prices.”

Saudi Arabia and Russia have had numerous discussions over the past several months that have yet to produce a significant breakthrough, according to American and Saudi officials. It is unclear how explicitly Saudi officials have linked oil to the issue of Syria during the talks, but Saudi officials say — and they have told the United States — that they think they have some leverage over Mr. Putin because of their ability to reduce the supply of oil and possibly drive up prices.”

As we predicted, correctly, in September: it was all about Syria.

The New York Times Reports…

“If oil can serve to bring peace in Syria, I don’t see how Saudi Arabia would back away from trying to reach a deal,” a Saudi diplomat said. An array of diplomatic, intelligence and political officials from the United States and Middle East spoke on the condition of anonymity to adhere to protocols of diplomacy.

The Saudi deal deal to Russia is simple…Putin must announcement that Syria’s leader Bashar is no longer a strategic ally of Russia, and the oil can rise again. Of course Assad would then be torn apart and Puntin discredited and humiliated, but that seems to be the plan hatched by Kerry and the KSA Kings.

Any weakening of Russian support for Mr. Assad could be one of the first signs that the recent tumult in the oil market is having an impact on global statecraft. Saudi officials have said publicly that the price of oil reflects only global supply and demand, and they have insisted that Saudi Arabia will not let geopolitics drive its economic agenda. But they believe that there could be ancillary diplomatic benefits to the country’s current strategy of allowing oil prices to stay low — including a chance to negotiate an exit for Mr. Assad.

“Russia has been one of the Syrian president’s most steadfast supporters, selling military equipment to the government for years to bolster Mr. Assad’s forces in their battle against rebel groups, including the Islamic State, and supplying everything from spare parts and specialty fuels to sniper training and helicopter maintenance.”

So, will Putin relent? Zerohedge has some insight on that question…

“Mr. Putin, however, has frequently demonstrated that he would rather accept economic hardship than buckle to outside pressures to change his policies. Sanctions imposed by the United States and European countries have not prompted Moscow to end its military involvement in Ukraine, and Mr. Putin has remained steadfast in his support for Mr. Assad, whom he sees as a bulwark in a region made increasingly volatile by Islamic extremism.”

Actually that’s not it: Syria, as we have been explaining for nearly two years is the critical transit zone of a proposed natural gas pipeline, originating in Qatar, and one which would terminate somewhere in central Europe. The same Qatar which was the “mystery sponsor of weapons and money to Syrian mercenary rebels” who eventually became ISIS. The same Qatar which is now directly funding ISIS. Of course, if Putin were to handover Syria to the Saudi princes (and to Qatar), he would effectively shoot himself in the foot by ending any leverage Gazprom has over Europe.

This too is very well known to Putin. For now he has shown that he has no intention of abdicating Syria, and losing critical leverage when it comes to being the provider of last resort of European gas:

The Saudis have offered economic enticements to Russian leaders in return for concessions on regional issues like Syria before, but never with oil prices so low. It is unclear what effect, if any, the discussions are having. While the United States would support initiatives to end Russian backing for Mr. Assad, any success by the Saudis to cut production and raise global oil prices could hurt many parts of the American economy.

After the meeting in Moscow in November between Prince Saud al-Faisal, the Saudi foreign minister, and Sergey V. Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, Mr. Lavrov rejected the idea that international politics should play a role in setting oil prices.

“We see eye to eye with our Saudi colleagues in that we believe the oil market should be based on the balance of supply and demand,” Mr. Lavrov said, “and that it should be free of any attempts to influence it for political or geopolitical purposes.”

Which, in retrospect puts the Ukraine conflict, and the western isolation of Russia in a very simple spotlight – the whole point is to inflict as much pain as possible, so Putin has no choice but to hand over Syria.

Russia is feeling financial pain and diplomatic isolation because of international sanctions stemming from its incursion into Crimea and eastern Ukraine, American officials said. But Mr. Putin still wants to be viewed as a pivotal player in the Middle East. The Russians hosted a conference last week in Moscow between the Assad government and some of Syria’s opposition groups, though few analysts believe the talks will amount to much, especially since many of the opposition groups boycotted them. Some Russia experts expressed skepticism that Mr. Putin would be amenable to any deal that involved removing support for Mr. Assad.

Saudi Arabia’s leverage depends on how seriously Moscow views its declining oil revenues. “If they are hurting so bad that they need the oil deal right away, the Saudis are in a good position to make them pay a geopolitical price as well,” said F. Gregory Gause III, a Middle East specialist at Texas A&M’s Bush School of Government and Public Service.

As for Assad, the Syrian president “has shown no inclination to step aside. He said in a recent interview with Foreign Affairs magazine that the true threat in Syria comes from the Islamic State and Qaeda-affiliated groups that, in his words, make up the “majority” of rebellion. American and Arab officials said that even if Russia were to abandon Mr. Assad, the Syrian president would still have his most generous benefactor, Iran. Iranian aid to the Syrian government has been one of the principal reasons that Mr. Assad has been able to hold power as other autocrats in the Middle East have been deposed.

And as a major oil producer, Iran would benefit if Saudi Arabia helped push up oil prices as part of a bargain with Russia.

“You are going to strengthen your enemy whether you like it or not, and the Iranians are not showing any flexibility here,” said Mustafa Alani, an analyst at the Gulf Research Center who is close to the Saudi royal family.

But the military aid that Russia provides to Syria is different enough from what Damascus receives from Iran, its other major supplier, that if “Russia withdrew all military support, I don’t think the Syrian Army could function,” a senior Obama administration official said.

The conclusion:

A number of Arab nations have been pushing for the Saudis and Russians — polar extremes in their positions toward Mr. Assad — to find common ground on the matter as a step toward ending the carnage of Syria’s civil war, now almost four years old. But, as one Arab diplomat put it, “This decision is ultimately in Putin’s hands.”

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is what the great oil collapse of 2014/2015 is all about. For those who want to know when to buy oil, the answer is simple: just after (or ideally before) Putin announces he will no longer support the Assad regime. If, that is, he ever does because that act will effectively destroy all leverage Putin may ever have over Europe, and in the process, also end – quite prematurely – his career.

Until then, every single HFT-induced spike in oil is one to be ultimately faded, because as the past few months have shown, it is the Saudis who set the price, and they will not take no for an answer, even if it means crippling the entire US shale, and energy, industry in the process.

References:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-03/another-conspiracy-theory-becomes-fact-entire-oil-collapse-all-about-crushing-russia

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/04/world/middleeast/saudi-arabia-is-said-to-use-oil-to-lure-russia-away-from-syrias-assad.html?_r=1

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
85 Comments

85
Leave a Reply

avatar
85 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
41 Comment authors
mandolin pickscm59x4ctxckw54mtdfsgw9j5nwmtxm845wctfkdijtfdhskdsftrg83yrermxdgecn5tbbn7w4bvt7xwn3554c5ytc8n75s5tsndxcrsfsfcscjkfsk Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
johnjoechad
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: The New York Times reveals that oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple #Russia’s economy http://t.co/P…

johnjoechad
Guest

http://t.co/2MQCzerVHn The US admits that it staged the Coup in Ukraine. This Shocking stuff will lead Europe to WW3.

TeraEuro
Guest

RT @johnjoechad: http://t.co/2MQCzerVHn The US admits that it staged the Coup in Ukraine. This Shocking stuff will lead Europe to WW3.

WardAlandavid
Guest

@redpilltimes Who is Nice systems.. Israeli(mossad) intel op? http://t.co/JpmtCB3PxI
http://t.co/UF18826q97
https://t.co/4hvj8VuzZ1

WardAlandavid
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: The New York Times reveals that oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple #Russia’s economy http://t.co/P…

joeman42
Guest

RT @johnjoechad: http://t.co/2MQCzerVHn The US admits that it staged the Coup in Ukraine. This Shocking stuff will lead Europe to WW3.

belantozorius
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: The New York Times reveals that oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple #Russia’s economy http://t.co/P…

smarteet
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: The New York Times reveals that oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple #Russia’s economy http://t.co/P…

isodera
Guest

RT @johnjoechad: http://t.co/2MQCzerVHn The US admits that it staged the Coup in Ukraine. This Shocking stuff will lead Europe to WW3.

ChristophHeer52
Guest

When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBstbJAP

donegalclaret
Guest

RT @ChristophHeer52: When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBs…

etominusipi
Guest

RT @ChristophHeer52: When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBs…

chezmik
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: The New York Times reveals that oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple #Russia’s economy http://t.co/P…

mowoodd
Guest

RT @ChristophHeer52: When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBs…

fvdstadt
Guest

RT @ChristophHeer52: When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBs…

News_World_
Guest

#The New York Times reveals that the oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi… http://t.co/PCB0lFaakj #notizie #news http://t.co/7q2DPtI8JW

fp4ge
Guest

RT @johnjoechad: http://t.co/2MQCzerVHn The US admits that it staged the Coup in Ukraine. This Shocking stuff will lead Europe to WW3.

johnjoechad
Guest

http://t.co/2MQCzerVHn @rtenews . RTE here are some facts for your illinformed idiot reporters. Why is RTE lying to licence fee payers.

mags340
Guest

RT @johnjoechad: http://t.co/2MQCzerVHn @rtenews . RTE here are some facts for your illinformed idiot reporters. Why is RTE lying to licen…

clouzot_alive
Guest

RT @News_World_: #The New York Times reveals that the oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi… http://t.co/PCB0lFaakj #notizie #news http://t.…

mkj1951
Guest

RT @ChristophHeer52: When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBs…

Szemkoek
Guest

RT @ChristophHeer52: When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBs…

maryfloor
Guest

RT @ChristophHeer52: When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBs…

klara1112
Guest

RT @ChristophHeer52: When will the final shoe drop…that being the revelation that #Ukraine did indeed shoot down #MH17?

http://t.co/MRGBs…

NewsCoverUp
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: The New York Times reveals that oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple #Russia’s economy http://t.co/P…

sloth4800
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: The New York Times reveals that oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple #Russia’s economy http://t.co/P…

Khan_SHEGOG
Guest

RT @redpilltimes: The New York Times reveals that oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple #Russia’s economy http://t.co/P…

QuaintAlien
Guest

@redpilltimes @NewsCoverUp NYT has lied too often, making it hard to believe that they write the truth now.

DeriaTURKEY
Guest

@QuaintAlien @NewsCoverUp @redpilltimes because they wont.dont worry its just another set up

Strvdrockfracs1
Guest

“For those who want to know when to buy oil, the answer is simple: just after (or ideally before) Putin announces… http://t.co/onilXA6E1C

hotleadenema
Guest

The New York Times reveals that the oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple… http://t.co/Xda9laViCt

Mare_Vostrum
Guest
AamirAliQureshi
Guest

For those that still believe the US/Saudi engineered oil price slump is merely conspiracy theory… http://t.co/d9svDmgwJe

ATHE1STP0WER
Guest

http://t.co/ZXOdLT6axy Oil price drop linked to Russia & Syria

MilconAlex
Guest

RT @ATHE1STP0WER: http://t.co/ZXOdLT6axy Oil price drop linked to Russia & Syria

annaganda
Guest
annaganda

“Whoever does not miss the Soviet Union has no heart. Whoever wants it back has no brain.”
-Vladimir Putin

annaganda
Guest
annaganda

“Whoever does not miss the Soviet Union has no heart. Whoever wants it back has no brain.”
-Vladimir Putin

elouise_mia
Guest

The oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple Russia’s economy and overthrow Syria’s Assad http://t.co/yQr7OJauIL

HassanDeedaur
Guest

US/Saudi agreement to cripple Russia’s economy and overthrow Syria’s Assad http://t.co/m4lkE9go6L

redsoxcyr
Guest

The New York Times reveals that the oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple… http://t.co/EigQl7I55U

rainmjarmitage
Guest

US/Saudi agreement to cripple Russia http://t.co/w0J4p74sto

achilleaschrist
Guest

New York Times:Oil price drop was indeed a US/Saudi agreement to cripple Russia’s economy and overthrow Syria’s Assad http://t.co/Kc8VLNngTB

TyHealey
Guest

New York Times reveals oil price drop was a US/Saudi agreement to cripple Russia’s economy & overthrow Syria’s Assad http://t.co/M1HU5uzmR5

runtodaylight
Guest

RT @TyHealey: New York Times reveals oil price drop was a US/Saudi agreement to cripple Russia’s economy & overthrow Syria’s Assad http://t…

earwulf
Guest

RT @TyHealey: New York Times reveals oil price drop was a US/Saudi agreement to cripple Russia’s economy & overthrow Syria’s Assad http://t…

trackback

Whispering Misty

So sorry you can skip the workshop!

trackback

Third Flower

My wife and that i are actually now delighted that Albert could execute his scientific studies as a result of the strategies he had through your web page. It is every now and then perplexing to only generally be freely giving actions which some people…

trackback

Thorn of Girl

Excellent information and facts could be located on this world wide web weblog.

trackback

The Ships’s Voyages

I feel technologies just makes it even worse. Now there’s a channel to never treatment, now there is not going to become a opportunity for them to find.

trackback

Souls in the Waves

Excellent Early morning, I just stopped in to visit your site and believed I’d say I enjoyed myself.

Latest

Is Silicon Valley Morphing Into The Morality Police?

Who gets to define what words and phrases protected under the First Amendment constitute hate — a catchall word that is often ascribed to any offensive speech someone simply doesn’t like?

The Duran

Published

on

Authored by Adrian Cohen via Creators.com:


Silicon Valley used to be technology companies. But it has become the “morality police,” controlling free speech on its platforms.

What could go wrong?

In a speech Monday, Apple CEO Tim Cook said:

“Hate tries to make its headquarters in the digital world. At Apple, we believe that technology needs to have a clear point of view on this challenge. There is no time to get tied up in knots. That’s why we only have one message for those who seek to push hate, division and violence: You have no place on our platforms.”

Here’s the goliath problem:

Who gets to define what words and phrases protected under the First Amendment constitute hate — a catchall word that is often ascribed to any offensive speech someone simply doesn’t like?

Will Christians who don’t support abortion rights or having their tax dollars go toward Planned Parenthood be considered purveyors of hate for denying women the right to choose? Will millions of Americans who support legal immigration, as opposed to illegal immigration, be labeled xenophobes or racists and be banned from the digital world?

Yes and yes. How do we know? It’s already happening, as scores of conservatives nationwide are being shadow banned and/or censored on social media, YouTube, Google and beyond.

Their crime?

Running afoul of leftist Silicon Valley executives who demand conformity of thought and simply won’t tolerate any viewpoint that strays from their rigid political orthodoxy.

For context, consider that in oppressive Islamist regimes throughout the Middle East, the “morality police” take it upon themselves to judge women’s appearance, and if a woman doesn’t conform with their mandatory and highly restrictive dress code — e.g., wearing an identity-cloaking burqa — she could be publicly shamed, arrested or even stoned in the town square.

In modern-day America, powerful technology companies are actively taking the role of the de facto morality police — not when it comes to dress but when it comes to speech — affecting millions. Yes, to date, those affected are not getting stoned, but they are being blocked in the digital town square, where billions around the globe do their business, cultivate their livelihoods, connect with others and get news.

That is a powerful cudgel to levy against individuals and groups of people. Wouldn’t you say?

Right now, unelected tech billionaires living in a bubble in Palo Alto — when they’re not flying private to cushy climate summits in Davos — are deciding who gets to enjoy the freedom of speech enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and who does not based on whether they agree with people’s political views and opinions or not.

You see how dangerous this can get — real fast — as partisan liberal elites running Twitter, Facebook, Google (including YouTube), Apple and the like are now dictating to Americans what they can and cannot say online.

In communist regimes, these types of folks are known as central planners.

The election of Donald Trump was supposed to safeguard our freedoms, especially regarding speech — a foundational pillar of a democracy. It’s disappointing that hasn’t happened, as the censorship of conservative thought online has gotten so extreme and out of control many are simply logging off for good.

A failure to address this mammoth issue could cost Trump in 2020. If his supporters are blocked online — where most voters get their news — he’ll be a one-term president.

It’s time for Congress to act before the morality police use political correctness as a Trojan horse to decide our next election.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Paul Craig Roberts: The Disintegration of Western Society

Feminists brought this madness onto themselves.

Paul Craig Roberts

Published

on

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts:


Radical feminists are now being banned by Twitter not because they hate men, which is perfectly OK as far as Twitter is concerned, but because they object to “transwomen.”

What is a “transwoman?” As far as I can understand, a “transwoman” is a male with a penis who declares himself to be a women and demands his right to use women’s toilette facilities along with the women who are using them.

The feminist, Meghan Murphy, twittered a statement and a question:

“Men are not women.”

“How are transwomen not men? What is the difference between men and transwomen?”

Twitter described this as “hateful conduct” and banned Meghan Murphy. https://quillette.com/2018/11/28/twitters-trans-activist-decree/

There you have it. Yesterday it was feminists who were exercising their special society-bestowed privileges to censor. Today it is the feminists who are being censored. As this insanity of “Western Civilization” continues, tomorrow it will be the transwomen who are censored and banned.

What precisely is afoot?

My readers, who have partially and some wholly escaped from The Matrix, understand that this is the further fragmentation of American society. Identity Politics has set men, women, blacks, Jews, Asians, Hispanics, and white people against one another. Identity Politics is the essence of the Democratic Party and the American liberal/progressive/left. Now, with the creation of “new” but otherwise nonexistent “genders,” although they are honored as real by the controlled whores who masquerade as a “Western media,” we witness radical feminists being silenced by men pretending to be women.

I sympathize with Meghan Murphy, but she brought this on herself and on the rest of us by accepting Identity Politics. Identity Politics gave Meghan a justification for hating men even, as she failed to realize, it provided the basis for moving her into the exploitative class that must be censored.

Where does this end?

It has already gone far enough that the American population is so divided and mutually hostile that there is no restraint by “the American people” on government and the elite oligarchs that rule. “The American people” are no longer a reality but a mythical creature like the unicorn.

The film, The Matrix, is the greatest film of out lifetime. Why? Because it shows that there are two realities. A real one of which only a few people are aware, and a virtual one in which eveyone else lives.

In the United States today, and throughout “Western Brainwashed Civilization,” only a handful of people exist who are capable of differentiating the real from the created reality in which all explanations are controlled and kept as far away from the truth as possible. Everything that every Western government and “news” organization says is a lie to control the explanations that we are fed in order to keep us locked in The Matrix.

The ability to control people’s understandings is so extraordinary that, despite massive evidence to the contrary, Americans believe that Oswald, acting alone, was the best shot in human history and using magic bullets killed President John F. Kenndy; that a handful of Saudi Arabians who demonstratively could not fly airplanes outwitted the American national security state and brought down 3 World Trade Center skyscrapers and part of the Pentagon; that Saddam Hussein had and was going to use on the US “weapons of mass destruction;” that Assad “used chemical weapons” against “his own people;” that Libya’s Gaddifi gave his soldiers Viagra so they could better rape Libyan women; that Russia “invaded Ukraine;” that Trump and Putin stole the presidential election from Hillary.

The construction of a make-believe reality guarantees the US military/security complex’s annual budget of $1,000 billion dollars of taxpayers’ money even as Congress debates cutting Social Security in order to divert more largess to the pockets of the corrupt military/security complex.

Readers ask me what they can do about it. Nothing, except revolt and cleanse the system, precisely as Founding Father Thomas Jefferson said.

Is Thomas Jefferson Alive and Well In Paris?

If this report is correct, pray the revolt spreads to the US.

https://www.infowars.com/video-french-police-remove-helmets-in-solidarity-with-yellow-vest-protesters/

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Google Employees debated burying conservative media in search

Google engineer Scott Byer falsely labeled The Daily Caller and Breitbart as “opinion blogs” and urged his coworkers to reduce their visibility in search results.

The Daily Caller

Published

on

Via The Daily Caller


  • Google employees debated whether to bury The Daily Caller and other conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election
  • “Let’s make sure that we reverse things in four years,” one engineer wrote in a thread that included a Google vice president
  • Google employees similarly sought to manipulate search results to combat Trump’s travel ban

Google employees debated whether to bury conservative media outlets in the company’s search function as a response to President Donald Trump’s election in 2016, internal Google communications obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation reveal.

The Daily Caller and Breitbart were specifically singled out as outlets to potentially bury, the communications reveal.

Trump’s election in 2016 shocked many Google employees, who had been counting on Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton to win.

Communications obtained by TheDCNF show that internal Google discussions went beyond expressing remorse over Clinton’s loss to actually discussing ways Google could prevent Trump from winning again.

“This was an election of false equivalencies, and Google, sadly, had a hand in it,” Google engineer Scott Byer wrote in a Nov. 9, 2016, post reviewed by TheDCNF.

Byer falsely labeled The Daily Caller and Breitbart as “opinion blogs” and urged his coworkers to reduce their visibility in search results.

“How many times did you see the Election now card with items from opinion blogs (Breitbart, Daily Caller) elevated next to legitimate news organizations? That’s something that can and should be fixed,” Byer wrote.

“I think we have a responsibility to expose the quality and truthfulness of sources – because not doing so hides real information under loud noises,” he continued.

“Beyond that, let’s concentrate on teaching critical thinking. A little bit of that would go a long way. Let’s make sure that we reverse things in four years – demographics will be on our side.”

Some of Byer’s colleagues expressed concern that manipulating search results could backfire and suggested alternative measures

One Google engineer, Uri Dekel, identified himself as a Clinton supporter but argued that manipulating search results was the wrong route to take.

“Thinking that Breitbart, Drudge, etc. are not ‘legitimate news sources’ is contrary to the beliefs of a major portion of our user base is partially what got us to this mess. MSNBC is not more legit than Drudge just because Rachel Maddow may be more educated / less deplorable / closer to our views, than, say Sean Hannity,” Dekel wrote in a reply to Byer.

“I follow a lot of right wing folks on social networks you could tell something was brewing. We laughed off Drudge’s Instant Polls and all that stuff, but in the end, people go to those sources because they believe that the media doesn’t do it’s job. I’m a Hillary supporter and let’s admit it, the media avoided dealing with the hard questions and issues, which didn’t pay off. By ranking ‘legitimacy’ you’ll just introduce more conspiracy theories,” Dekel added.

“Too many times, Breitbart is just echoing a demonstrably made up story,” Byer wrote in a reply to his original post. He did not cite any examples.

“That happens at MSNBC, too. I don’t want a political judgement. The desire is to break the myth feedback loop, the false equivalency, instead of the current amplification of it,” Byer added.

“What I believe we can do, technically, that avoids the accusations of conspiracy or bias from people who ultimately have a right and obligation to decide what they want to believe, is to get better at displaying the ‘ripples’ and copy-pasta, to trace information to its source, to link to critiques of those sources, and let people decide what sources they believe,” another Google engineer, Mike Brauwerman, suggested.

“Give people a comprehensive but effectively summarized view of the information, not context-free rage-inducing sound-bytes,” he added.

“We’re working on providing users with context around stories so that they can know the bigger picture,” chimed in David Besbris, vice president of engineering at Google.

“We can play a role in providing the full story and educate them about all sides. This doesn’t have to be filtering and can be useful to everyone,” he wrote.

Other employees similarly advocated providing contextual information about media sources in search results, and the company later did so with a short-lived fact check at the end of 2017.

Not only did the fact-check feature target conservative outlets almost exclusively, it was also blatantly wrong. Google’s fact check repeatedly attributed false claims to those outlets, even though they demonstrably never made those claims.

Google pulled the faulty fact-check program in January, crediting TheDCNF’s investigation for the decision.

A Google spokeswoman said that the conversation did not lead to manipulation of search results for political purposes.

“This post shows that far from suppressing Breitbart and Daily Caller, we surfaced these sites regularly in our products. Furthermore, it shows that we value providing people with the full view on stories from a variety of sources,” the spokeswoman told TheDCNF in an email.

“Google has never manipulated its search results or modified any of its products to promote a particular political ideology. Our processes and policies do not allow for any manipulation of search results to promote political ideologies.”

The discussion about whether to bury conservative media outlets isn’t the first evidence that some Google employees have sought to manipulate search results for political ends.

After Trump announced his initial travel ban in January 2017, Google employees discussed ways to manipulate search results in order to push back against the president’s order.

A group of employees brainstormed ways to counter “islamophobic, algorithmically biased results from search terms ‘Islam’, ‘Muslim’, ‘Iran’, etc,” as well as “prejudiced, algorithmically biased search results from search terms ‘Mexico’, ‘Hispanic’, ‘Latino’, etc.”

WATCH:

Trump speculated to The Daily Caller in September that Google and Facebook are trying to affect election outcomes.

“I think they already have,” Trump said, responding to questions about potential election interference by Google and Facebook.

“I mean the true interference in the last election was that — if you look at all, virtually all of those companies are super liberal companies in favor of Hillary Clinton,” he added.

“Maybe I did a better job because I’m good with the Twitter and I’m good at social media, but the truth is they were all on Hillary Clinton’s side, and if you look at what was going on with Facebook and with Google and all of it, they were very much on her side,” Trump continued.

Google this month corrected a “knowledge panel” about a Republican women’s group that labeled them “enablers.”

Google cited Wikipedia for the disparaging description, though a similar change made to Wikipedia’s page for the women’s group was corrected almost immediately. Google left up the digital vandalism for three weeks.

Google apologized in May after search results for the California Republican Party falsely listed “Nazism” as one of the state party’s ideologies.

Then, too, Google blamed manipulation of the party’s Wikipedia page for the inaccurate and disparaging description.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending