Connect with us

Latest

Analysis

News

NATO attack on Serbian state TV wiped from record

The NATO missile assault killed 16 people, yet there was no international outcry such as what followed the Charlie Hebdo attack in 2015.

Shane Quinn

Published

on

5,569 Views

On 23 April 1999, a NATO missile attack on Radio Television of Serbia (RTS) headquarters killed 16 employees of the state broadcaster. The forgotten war crime occurred during the Kosovo War (March 1998-June 1999), and was part of NATO’s aerial campaign alongside the US-backed Kosovo Liberation army, in opposition to the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.

In the aftermath of the attack there were no great public campaigns launched for the 16 murdered journalists and employees, no outpouring of emotion for those killed, no calls for solidarity and togetherness in the face of aggression. On the contrary the West justified this grievous blow against freedom of expression, praised it even.

Tony Blair, Britain’s then Prime Minister, welcomed the killings when speaking at NATO’s 50th anniversary summit in Washington. Blair said the missile attack was “entirely justified… in damaging and attacking all these targets”, and that those murdered were part of the “apparatus of dictatorship and power of [Slobodan] Milosevic”.

Blair felt that, “the responsibility for every single part of this action lies with the man [Milosevic] who has engaged in this policy of ethnic cleansing and must be stopped”. Apparently Milosevic “must be stopped” by wiping out state journalists or what Blair describes as an “apparatus of dictatorship”.

According to one of the main leaders of the Western world, Milosevic must bear full responsibility for a NATO fighter plane firing a US-made missile on a state broadcasting service’s headquarters. Perhaps we shouldn’t be too surprised by Blair’s visions of justice, particularly when examining his key role in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis in the following decade.

Blair was not alone in praising this violation of international law. His Secretary of State for International development, Clare Short, said afterwards that, “the propaganda machine is prolonging the war and it’s a legitimate target”. Short is a Labour Party member and her official title today is The Right Honourable Clare Short. Defending these killings was neither right nor honourable one can assume.

NATO themselves commended the deliberate attack afterwards. NATO’s military spokesperson Air Commodore David Wilby declared RTS, “a legitimate target which filled the airways with hate and with lies over the years”. This followed on from a number of other NATO attacks on radio and television outlets in the country.

In the build up to the 2003 Iraq invasion, Cardiff University revealed that the BBC adopted the most pro-war stance of any British network. The official reasons for invading Iraq were based entirely on lies and misinformation. In this case was the BBC “the propaganda machine”, had it become “a legitimate target” too?

Pentagon spokesperson Kenneth Bacon also legitimised the war crime saying that, “Serb TV is as much a part of Milosevic’s murder machine as his military is”. Not to be outdone, the respected US diplomat and magazine editor Richard Holbrooke described the bombing of RTS as, “an enormously important and, I think, positive development”.

In the build up to the Iraq invasion American networks like Fox News were styling the illegal intervention as “Operation Iraqi Freedom”, with its correspondents and news anchors compelled to repeat that phrase. In addition a permanent American flag was fluttering in the top corner of the screen, and during the invasion itself the banner “war on terrorism” was unfurled.

Did this make Fox News and others like it, “a legitimate target which filled the airways with hate and lies”? Judging by the standards of Western elites, one would have to suggest so.

Meanwhile, a single person was charged for the attack on RTS: Dragoljub Milanovic, the Serbian network’s general manager, who received a 10-year jail term for failing to evacuate the building in time. Yet the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia concluded that NATO’s bombing of RTS was not a crime, noting that deaths were “unfortunately high, they do not appear to be clearly disproportionate”. Clearly disproportionate to the overall number of civilian deaths inflicted by NATO perhaps.

However, in January 2015 the Western reaction was somewhat different when 12 journalists from the Charlie Hebdo satirical newspaper were murdered by Islamic extremists – along with four Jewish men killed at a kosher supermarket shortly afterwards.

The British Prime Minister on this occasion, David Cameron, did not justify the killing of journalists and said, “We stand absolutely united with the French people against terrorism and against this threat to our values – free speech, the rule of law, democracy”. Cameron went on, “we should never give up the values we believe in… a free press, in freedom of expression, in the right of people to write and say what they believe”.

About two weeks later Blair, now a Middle East peace envoy, said of the thinking behind the Charlie Hebdo attacks, “this extremism is not natural, it’s taught and it’s learned and you have to un-teach it in the school systems”. Blair seems further unaware of his own role in creating “this extremism” by playing the junior partner role in invading Iraq, a crucial factor in the rise of ISIS.

In the aftermath of the Charlie Hebdo attacks, millions marched to honour the dead with the slogan “I am Charlie” becoming famous. When the Serbian journalists and employees were killed just over 15 years before, there was no international motto of “I am RTS”.

New York civil rights lawyer Floyd Abrams described the Charlie Hebdo shootings as, “the most threatening assault on journalism in living memory”. The perception of “living memory” appears to be a remarkably short one.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
1 Comment

1
Leave a Reply

avatar
10 Comment threads
24 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
19 Comment authors
my2CentsJetsVtranDarkEyesRADOMIR RISTIC Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Tom Welsh
Guest
Tom Welsh

Western governments, and all those who support them, have long ago abandoned all civilised standards of honesty, legality, morality or even plain decency. They lie and lie and lie – blatantly and unblushingly, in accordance with the principle of the Big Lie (which Goebbels and Hitler learned from Edward Bernays and his chums on Madison Avenue).

Seán Murphy
Guest
Seán Murphy

The Western hypocrisy is sickening. Blair should be behind bars.

AriusArmenian
Guest
AriusArmenian

…with Bush and Obama.

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

……Clinton…..

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

……all on trial for capital murder…

Vtran
Guest
Vtran

Unlikly … some say he has Rottenchild blood (not pure)

DarkEyes
Guest
DarkEyes

And he converted into a Roman Catholic. To be in time for his protection by pope, Jesuits and The Banksters.
That is why Mr. Tony the Phoney is still a “free man” and untouchable.

Hi Vtran, long time, nothing heard. Are you OK?

Vtran
Guest
Vtran

DE … thank you for the information

have some issues … banned as you know on FR (will return under a new ID …. but sits behind a number of other computer related tasks) … and health … damn immune system has collapsed, so picking up any “bug” doing the rounds ,,, need some time to “recharge” …

DE thank you for asking

DarkEyes
Guest
DarkEyes

You’r welcome. If you live in a state where medical cannibis is allowed to be used may be that might be of benefit for your health?

About the issues … yes I suspected it would be something like that.
Keep save, take care and become healthy asap, you hear.

Vtran
Guest
Vtran

going for a specialized type of acupuncture very soon ….. have great hopes

Thank you …. you take care too

SVESAMSHVATIO
Guest
SVESAMSHVATIO

NATO was actually too soft! NATO had prevented genocide of serbian terrorists over armless Albanian people with the help of the JNA, which which was usurped by the great-serbian genocidal criminals and dictator Milosevic.

RADOMIR RISTIC
Guest
RADOMIR RISTIC

Yeah… and Your Ustashas preemptively massacred a million Serbs during World War II. And for the same reason, the Serbian people was decimated during the First one – the so-called The Great War. The Turks preventively killed, assimilated or displaced Serbs (especially from today’s Kosovo) for five centuries. But, what else to say about ‘unarmed Albanians’ ?! You could not have met such a thing for centuries. Ah, did you hear that? And what else to say about ‘unarmed Albanians’ ?! You could not have met such a thing for centuries. And did You hear about the weapons stolen from… Read more »

Peter Bozich
Guest
Peter Bozich

Tony Blair unfortunately walks the earth a free man, how can this be ?
Now he is a middle east envoy, makes it even more insulting.
Thank you Russia for stopping this criminality continuing on into Syria, the neoconservative lunatics thought this destruction of Yugoslavia was the template for countries like Syria.
How can Tony Blair even show his war criminal face in public, he is a shameful blight on world history, a criminal who should be hung.

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

The British SAS were shooting Serbian policemen in the back during 1998 before the war to elicit a response by the state, which would inevitably be labelled “excessive” and cause for internationalization, as it was, a prelude to NATO’s war of aggression after General William Walkers false-flag.
The Bombing of RTS was the work of a British pilot.

Terry Ross
Guest
Terry Ross

Milosevic was fully exonerated of any wrongdoing..however this occurred posthumously to protect the reputations of his accusers.

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Don’t follow that logic….

Trauma2000
Guest
Trauma2000

Milosevic died in jail before being found innocent. He was denied medical treatment that most people would get in a maximum security jail. The findings of Milosevic’s trial found him INNOCENT. But those finding were buried on about page 1900 of a 2500 page report. A Spanish forensics team sent to Serbia to ‘exhume mass graves’ spent two years looking but said they ‘couldn’t find anything’ and then their statements were buried on 11pm nightly news and not follow up the next day. It was a whitewash. It was the first case that the International Criminal Court was supposed to… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Holy cow….I’m responding to Terry Ross comment which is daft and now get a lecture…like I dont know…oh well

Jets
Guest
Jets

Hi there, long time no hear (I’m well by the way).

Your daughter has probably heard a lot of Western propaganda. My neighbors are from Yugoslavia and so are many of their friends (I know most of them). There were hardline Muslim terrorists who indiscriminately killed women, children and elderly people. That set the the war machine in motion as I told my co-workers.

Say “Hi” to your daughter :-))

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Hi YOU….Good to hear you’re ok!! :-)) Yes, she has. When she visited the Yugoslav war crimes tribunal. She sat about 2 feet away from Milosevic…separated by Plexyglass wall. It was a very small room. She observed Milosovic so intensely that she expected him any time to give her “the evil eye” She found him to be extremely intelligent, far more so that the prosecutor and the judges combined. He had a wicked sense of humor and according to her would not be found guilty. She said that with a rather impish face as if to apologize for such a… Read more »

Jets
Guest
Jets

Hi G! My apologies for not replying to you any sooner. It has been a hectic year so far. Still a couple of months to go. Yes, our neighbors and friends are highly educated people and none of them is bloodthirsty (Slavic people!).I was working at the time as an IT-specialist at “the bank” in Diemen when the war broke out. All my co-workers were scolding on the people of Yugoslavia, but I set them straight. I told them about the Albanian people who were tolerated, but decided to have it their way and eat the cake too. That’s when… Read more »

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Hi my friend, Don’t you worry about a thing. As long as you’re ok. How many more “events” are scheduled? The whole situation was created by the U.S. to break up Yugoslavia. They paid these Muslims. The so-called Srebrenica massacre involving Dutchbat never took place. Dutchbat was sent by the U.N./and the Dutch Government as peace keepers, armed with small weapons…Instead it was a war zone. Dutchbat, as you know were taken hostage. They were accused of the massacre of 8000 Muslims. I was in Nederland during the hearings….2 members of Dutchbat committed suicide. So far no apologies to these… Read more »

Jets
Guest
Jets

3 events and counting down :-))

I will e-mail you this week.

Got to go :-))

my2Cents
Guest
my2Cents

Cool. Look forward to it😁

André De Koning
Guest
André De Koning

Blair was just meeting (kissing each other on the cheek) with Juncker: like all war criminals, whether from the UK, US or Israel, there will always be people who will defend them and find a few reasons to clear all wrongs. It all depends on which side the propaganda machine is working overtime. When Ben Gurion was asked if he was satisfied to have brought terrorism to the Middle East, he smiled and said:”…to the whole world”. Whole families were shot to smithereens in Operation Cast Lead in Israel and the people were cheering on the mountain to enjoy the… Read more »

TecumsehUnfaced
Guest
TecumsehUnfaced

I thought it was Menachem Begin. Ben Gurion just waved his hands.

spoint
Guest
spoint

Perhaps, US-made missile, but Jew sent missile.

AriusArmenian
Guest
AriusArmenian

NATO is a terrorist war criminal organization.
Note the NATO – OTAN displays.
NATO unconsciously shows its duplicity.

Daisy Adler
Guest
Daisy Adler

After the end of WWII, the United States was one of the first states to sign the Geneva Convention on the rules of war, which prohibited the deliberate or indiscriminate attack of civilians and civilian objects, EVEN if the area contained military objectives. Failure to do so would cause a higher civilian death toll resulting from bombardment by the attacking force and the defenders would be held responsible, criminally liable for those deaths. The US sits its big a$$ on international law and spits on its own signature, when it fits it, but cry to heaven when it suits its… Read more »

samo war
Guest
samo war

NATO is wheeeeere ?

Punisher 1
Guest
Punisher 1

So then after doing the deed. If Serbia was to announce that their secret service had now executed Blair for war crimes against the Serbian people. That would then be seen as totally acceptable in the West? Now to be honest,yes,it would be for me. He should have been brought to that justice years ago. But in this case I’m just trying to mimic the West’s thinking on what is correct or not. I think I have it down now.

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

Blair is a frontman, he amongst others must be tried to expose his owners. The only ones who would benefit from his death are the UK deep state.

Punisher 1
Guest
Punisher 1

He can never be tried in a World Court. He and his supporters have far too much power for that to ever happen. Thinking about trying him,which I hear all the time,is purely “feel good” propaganda. It just allows him to escape justice while people daydream that he will be punished.

Mr. Costelol
Guest
Mr. Costelol

True, most courts, commissions exist to bury the truth. I was hoping for something more impartial, but it’s unlikely. Nevertheless, I’m certain the little weasel would spill the beans with just a few whacks across the chin – his owners are the ones that need to be hunted.

Latest

Understanding the Holodomor and why Russia says nothing

A descendant of Holodomor victims takes the rest of us to school as to whether or not Russia needs to shoulder the blame.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

One of the charges that nationalist Ukrainians often lodge against their Russian neighbors is that the Russian government has never acknowledged or formally apologized to Ukraine for the “Holodomor” that took place in Ukraine in 1932-1933. This was a man-made famine that killed an estimated seven to 10 million Ukrainians , though higher estimates claim 12.5 million and lower ones now claim 3.3 million.

No matter what the total was, it amounts to a lot of people that starved to death. The charge that modern-day Russia ought to apologize for this event is usually met with silence, which further enrages those Ukrainians that believe that this issue must be resolved by the Russian acknowledgement of responsibility for it. Indeed, the prime charge of these Ukrainians is that the Russians committed a genocide against the Ukrainian people. This is a claim Russia denies.

To the outside observer who does not know this history of Russia and Ukraine’s relationship, and who does not know or understand the characteristics of the Soviet Union, this charge seems as simple and laid out as that of the Native Americans or the blacks demanding some sort of recompense or restitution for the damages inflicted on these societies through conquest and / or slavery. But we discovered someone who had family connections involved in the Holodomor, and who offers her own perspective, which is instructive in why perhaps the Russian Federation does not say anything about this situation.

Scene in Kharkiv with dead from the famine 1932-33 lying along the street.

The speaker is Anna Vinogradova, a Russian Israeli-American, who answered the question through Quora of “Why doesn’t Russia recognize the Holodomor as a genocide?” She openly admits that she speaks only for herself, but her answer is still instructive. We offer it here, with some corrections for the sake of smooth and understandable English:

I can’t speak for Russia and what it does and doesn’t recognize. I can speak for myself.

I am a great-granddaughter of a “Kulak” (кулак), or well-to-do peasant, who lived close to the Russia/Ukraine border.

The word “кулак” means “fist” in Russian, and it wasn’t a good thing for a person to be called by this label. A кулак was an exploiter of peasants and a class enemy of the new state of workers and poor peasants. In other words, while under Communism, to be called a кулак was to bring a death sentence upon yourself.

At some point, every rural class enemy, every peasant who wasn’t a member of a collective farm was eliminated one way or another.

Because Ukraine has very fertile land and the Ukrainian style of agriculture often favors individual farms as opposed to villages, there is no question that many, many Ukrainian peasants were considered class enemies like my great grandfather, and eliminated in class warfare.

I have no doubt that class warfare included starvation, among other things.

The catch? My great grandfather was an ethnic Russian living in Russia. What nationality were the communists who persecuted and eventually shot him? They were of every nationality there was (in the Soviet Union), and they were led by a Ukrainian, who was taking orders from a Georgian.

Now, tell me, why I, a descendant of an unjustly killed Russian peasant, need to apologize to the descendants of the Ukrainians who killed him on the orders of a Georgian?

What about the Russian, Kazakh golodomor (Russian rendering of the same famine)? What about the butchers, who came from all ethnicities? Can someone explain why it’s only okay to talk about Ukrainian victims and Russian persecutors? Why do we need to rewrite history decades later to convert that brutal class war into an ethnic war that it wasn’t?

Ethnic warfare did not start in Russia until after WWII, when some ethnicities were accused of collaboration with the Nazis and brutal group punishments were implemented. It was all based on class up to that time.

The communists of those years were fanatically internationalist. “Working people of all countries, unite!” was their slogan and they were fanatical about it.

As for the crimes of Communism, Russia has been healing this wound for decades, and Russia’s government has made its anticommunist position very clear.

This testimony is most instructive. First, it points out information that the charge of the Holodomor as “genocide!” neatly leaves out. In identifying the internationalist aspects of the Soviet Union, Ukraine further was not a country identified as somehow worthy of genocidal actions. Such a thought makes no sense, especially given the great importance of Ukraine as the “breadbasket” of the Soviet Union, which it was.

Secondly, it shows a very western-style of “divide to conquer” with a conveniently incendiary single-word propaganda tool that is no doubt able to excite any Ukrainian who may be neutral to slightly disaffected about Russia, and then after that, all Ukrainians are now victims of the mighty evil overlords in Moscow.

How convenient is this when the evil overlords in Kyiv don’t want their citizens to know what they are doing?

We saw this on Saturday – taken to a very high peak when President Petro Poroshenko announced the new leading “Hierarch” of the “Ukrainian National Church” and said not one single word about Christ, but only:

“This day will go down in history as the day of the creation of an autocephalous Orthodox church in Ukraine… This is the day of the creation of the church as an independent structure… What is this church? It is a church without Putin. It is a church without Kirill, without prayer for the Russian authorities and the Russian army.”

But as long as Russia is made the “problem”, millions of scandalized Ukrainians will not care what this new Church actually does or teaches, which means it is likely to teach just about anything.

Russia had its own Holodomor. The history of the event shows that this was a result of several factors – imposed socialist economics on a deeply individualized form of agrarian capitalism (bad for morale and worse for food production), really inane centralized planning of cropland use, and a governmental structure that really did not exist to serve the governed, but to impose an ideology on people who really were not all that interested in it.

Personal blame might well lay with Stalin, a Georgian, but the biggest source of the famine lay in the structures imposed under communism as a way of economic strategy. This is not Russia’s fault. It is the economic model that failed.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Mueller Finally Releases Heavily Redacted Key Flynn Memo On Eve Of Sentencing

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

Via Zerohedge


Having initially snubbed Judge Emmet Sullivan’s order to release the original 302 report from the Michael Flynn interrogation in January 2017, Special Counsel Robert Mueller has finally produced the heavily redacted document, just hours before sentencing is due to be handed down.

The memo  – in full below – details then-national security adviser Michael Flynn’s interview with FBI agents Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka, and shows Flynn was repeatedly asked about his contacts with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak and in each instance, Flynn denied (or did not recall) any such conversations.

The agents had transcripts of Flynn’s phone calls to Russian Ambassador Kislyak, thus showing Flynn to be lying.

Flynn pleaded guilty guilty last December to lying to the FBI agents about those conversations with Kislyak.

The redactions in the document seem oddly placed but otherwise, there is nothing remarkable about the content…

Aside from perhaps Flynn’s incredulity at the media attention…

Flynn is set to be sentenced in that federal court on Tuesday.

Of course, as Christina Laila notes, the real crime is that Flynn was unmasked during his phone calls to Kislyak and his calls were illegally leaked by a senior Obama official to the Washington Post.

*  *  *

Full document below…

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Don’t Laugh : It’s Giving Putin What He Wants

The fact of the matter is that humorous lampooning of western establishment Russia narratives writes itself.

Caitlin Johnstone

Published

on

Authored by Caitlin Johnstone:


The BBC has published an article titled “How Putin’s Russia turned humour into a weapon” about the Kremlin’s latest addition to its horrifying deadly hybrid warfare arsenal: comedy.

The article is authored by Olga Robinson, whom the BBC, unhindered by any trace of self-awareness, has titled “Senior Journalist (Disinformation)”. Robinson demonstrates the qualifications and acumen which earned her that title by warning the BBC’s audience that the Kremlin has been using humor to dismiss and ridicule accusations that have been leveled against it by western governments, a “form of trolling” that she reports is designed to “deliberately lower the level of discussion”.

“Russia’s move towards using humour to influence its campaigns is a relatively recent phenomenon,” Robinson explains, without speculating as to why Russians might have suddenly begun laughing at their western accusers. She gives no consideration to the possibility that the tightly knit alliance of western nations who suddenly began hysterically shrieking about Russia two years ago have simply gotten much more ridiculous and easier to make fun of during that time.

Couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the emergence of a demented media environment wherein everything around the world from French protests to American culture wars to British discontent with the European Union gets blamed on Russia without any facts or evidence. Wherein BBC reporters now correct guests and caution them against voicing skepticism of anti-Russia narratives because the UK is in “an information war” with that nation. Wherein the same cable news Russiagate pundit can claim that both Rex Tillerson’s hiring and his later firing were the result of a Russian conspiracy to benefit the Kremlin. Wherein mainstream outlets can circulate blatantly false information about Julian Assange and unnamed “Russians” and then blame the falseness of that reporting on Russian disinformation. Wherein Pokemon Go, cutesy Facebook memes and $4,700 in Google ads are sincerely cited as methods by which Hillary Clinton’s $1.2 billion presidential campaign was outdone. Wherein conspiracy theories that Putin has infiltrated the highest levels of the US government have been blaring on mainstream headline news for two years with absolutely nothing to show for it to this day.

Nope, the only possibility is that the Kremlin suddenly figured out that humor is a thing.

The fact of the matter is that humorous lampooning of western establishment Russia narratives writes itself. The hypocrisy is so cartoonish, the emotions are so breathlessly over-the-top, the stories so riddled with plot holes and the agendas underlying them so glaringly obvious that they translate very easily into laughs. I myself recently authored a satire piece that a lot of people loved and which got picked up by numerous alternative media outlets, and all I did was write down all the various escalations this administration has made against Russia as though they were commands being given to Trump by Putin. It was extremely easy to write, and it was pretty damn funny if I do say so myself. And it didn’t take any Kremlin rubles or dezinformatsiya from St Petersburg to figure out how to write it.

“Ben Nimmo, an Atlantic Council researcher on Russian disinformation, told the BBC that attempts to create funny memes were part of the strategy as ‘disinformation for the information age’,” the article warns. Nimmo, ironically, is himself intimately involved with the British domestic disinformation firm Integrity Initiative, whose shady government-sponsored psyops against the Labour Party have sparked a national scandal that is likely far from reaching peak intensity.

“Most comedy programmes on Russian state television these days are anodyne affairs which either do not touch on political topics, or direct humour at the Kremlin’s perceived enemies abroad,” Robinson writes, which I found funny since I’d just recently read an excellent essay by Michael Tracey titled “Why has late night swapped laughs for lusting after Mueller?”

“If the late night ‘comedy’ of the Trump era has something resembling a ‘message,’ it’s that large segments of the nation’s liberal TV viewership are nervously tracking every Russia development with a passion that cannot be conducive to mental health – or for that matter, political efficacy,” Tracey writes, documenting numerous examples of the ways late night comedy now has audiences cheering for a US intelligence insider and Bush appointee instead of challenging power-serving media orthodoxies as programs like The Daily Show once did.

If you wanted the opposite of “anodyne affairs”, it would be comedians ridiculing the way all the establishment talking heads are manipulating their audiences into supporting the US intelligence community and FBI insiders. It would be excoriating the media environment in which unfathomably powerful world-dominating government agencies are subject to less scrutiny and criticism than a man trapped in an embassy who published inconvenient facts about those agencies. It certainly wouldn’t be the cast of Saturday Night Live singing “All I Want for Christmas Is You” to a framed portrait if Robert Mueller wearing a Santa hat. It doesn’t get much more anodyne than that.

Russia makes fun of western establishment narratives about it because those narratives are so incredibly easy to make fun of that they are essentially asking for it, and the nerdy way empire loyalists are suddenly crying victim about it is itself more comedy. When Guardian writer Carole Cadwalladr began insinuating that RT covering standard newsworthy people like Julian Assange and Nigel Farage was a conspiracy to “boost” those people for the advancement of Russian agendas instead of a news outlet doing the thing that news reporting is, RT rightly made fun of her for it. Cadwalladr reacted to RT’s mockery with a claim that she was a victim of “attacks”, instead of the recipient of perfectly justified ridicule for circulating an intensely moronic conspiracy theory.

Ah well. People are nuts and we’re hurtling toward a direct confrontation with a nuclear superpower. Sometimes there’s nothing else to do but laugh. As Wavy Gravy said, “Keep your sense of humor, my friend; if you don’t have a sense of humor it just isn’t funny anymore.”

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending