Connect with us

Latest

News

Hillary Clinton goes on 15 city tour. Seats selling for $1,200

The tour you have been waiting for.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

2,028 Views

For those of you who simply can not get enough Hillary Clinton, the biggest loser in politics, the woman behind the Clinton Foundation Slush fund, and the Secretary of State who destroyed Libya and plundered Haiti, will go on a 15 city tour promoting her new book, “What Happened.”

“What Happened” hits bookstores on September 12.

“Hillary Clinton Live” begins on September 18 in Washington DC.

September 18, 2017 – Washington, D.C. – Warner Theatre
September 28, 2017 – Toronto, Canada – Enercare Centre
October 3, 2017 – Broward, Florida – Broward Center for the Performing Arts
October 9, 2017 – David, California – Jackson Hall
October 23, 2017 – Montreal, Canada – Palais des congrès de Montréal
October 24, 2017 – Ann Arbor, Michigan – Hill Auditorium
October 30, 2017 – Chicago, Illinois – Auditorium Theatre
November 1, 2017 – New York, New York – The Temple Emanu-El Streicker Center
November 9, 2017 – Milwaukee, Wisconsin – Riverside Theater
November 13, 2017 – Atlanta, Georgia – Fox Theatre
November 28, 2017 – Boston, Massachusetts – Boston Opera House
November 30, 2017 – Philadelphia, Pennsylvania – Kimmel Center Academy of Music
December 11, 2017 – Seattle, Washington – Paramount Theatre
December 12, 2017 – Portland, Oregon – Arlene Schnitzer Concert Hall
December 13, 2017 – Vancouver, Canada – Vancouver Convention Center

HRC will finally visit a the states she lost to President Trump, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida. Hillary promises to be open and forthcoming, letting her guard down during the tour, and telling the audience a ‘personal, raw, detailed and surprisingly funny story’.

Tickets will be selling for up to $1,200. Cheaper seats are available as well.

The website promoting the tour, HillaryClintonBookTour.com, features this quote from “Crooked” Hillary…

“In the past, for reasons I try to explain, I’ve often felt I had to be careful in public, like I was up on a wire without a net.  Now I’m letting my guard down.”

Via The Daily Mail

Sticking to blue areas within those states, she’ll head to Ann Arbor, Michigan on October 24, Milwaukee, Wisconsin on November 9 – exactly one year to the day that she gave her concession speech – and then head on to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on November 30.

Clinton is hitting up a trio of Canadian cities too, making appearances in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver.

Top-tier ticket packages in those cities cost $3,000 Canadian dollars for two seats, or, in American dollars, about $1,200 a pop.

There are cheaper seats in the states with tickets costing between $50 and $350 to see Clinton in Broward, Florida – another state that she lost to now-President Trump.

Clinton will also visit UC Davis, Chicago, New York, Atlanta, Boston, Seattle and Portland.

Sounds well worth $1,200, to listen to “Crooked Hillary” whine about her pathetic lose to President Trump, blaming it all on Russia, Comey and misogyny.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

avatar
  Subscribe  
Notify of
Voltaire
Guest
Voltaire

Crooked Hilary should be in jail FFS….

cortisol
Guest
cortisol

I said before the election that she’s going down to the 99 cent store level and Saudis and Wall Street banks will be happy for getting speeches from this major “intellectual” on huge discounts compared to that of before the election.

Cerberus79
Guest
Cerberus79

Will there be refunds if Hillary’s dementia kicks in and the tour is canceled?

Simon
Guest
Simon

So the book was called “What Happened? Hillary Clinton”
and the tour is “Hillary Clinton, live?”

Someone has to be doing this on purpose. Maybe her book publicist is a Russian mole.

Patsy Lowe
Guest
Patsy Lowe

If you live in one of the cities on her tour route, it will be an opportunity to protest.

Debbie Tolson
Guest
Debbie Tolson

My thoughts exactly

Pamela Borden
Guest
Pamela Borden

I checked, she isn’t coming close. But I really hope everyone takes to the streets shouting. Especially the Haitians.

ruca
Guest
ruca

Or assassinate.

WomanPatriot
Guest
WomanPatriot

I wouldn’t spend a penny to see that evil woman. Much less buy her book, which would just contain a continuation of her stream of lies. She’s an out-of-control psychopath with no respect or empathy for her fellow human beings…in fact, she’s made it very clear she despises us and the compassion we have for others.

JPH
Guest
JPH

Crowd sourcing legal action an option?

WomanPatriot
Guest
WomanPatriot

Of course, that’s always an option but it would have to generate a huge amount of money to fight her lawyers. She’s worth a few $billion

Christinamellis
Guest
Christinamellis

Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family!!!
On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
>>>http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash320TopValue/GetPay$97/Hour………

Larry Zamba
Guest
Larry Zamba

I see your claim to have “mastered critical thinking” is as exaggerated as your your imagination and your grasp of simple math. Hillary Clinton is not worth billions, but does have a net worth of $33.3 million, not “a few billion.” So let me help you out with some simple math. You see, one billion is the equivalent of a thousand million. So assuming a few is three, and you claim she’s worth $3 billion, then you subtract $33.3 million from $3 billion, and golly gee you’re only billions and hundreds of millions off. Now I’ll let you calculate precisely… Read more »

WomanPatriot
Guest
WomanPatriot

You obviously have no idea what you’re talking about. Bill and Hillary just transferred $1.8 BILLION dollars to Qatar. I don’t mean to be rude, but I don’t waste my time on the uneducated. Your brain is just able to keep up…

Larry Zamba
Guest
Larry Zamba

I think you’re getting her mixed up with Donald Trump, which is whom folks with your attitude have hammered Americans with.

WomanPatriot
Guest
WomanPatriot

No, folks of my intellect have mastered critical thinking and have done their due diligence on Hillary Clinton. I can see critical thinking is an anathema to you. I suggest you do your best to get a good education.

ajokete
Guest
ajokete

Anyone who pays to hear Hillary Clinton is either a fool or a criminal.

Lainy
Guest
Lainy

That’s why there is a $1000 fee. Greedy hillary keeping us rift raft out Why does she need to raise more money, hasn’t she stolen enough?.

tiger
Guest
tiger

The succubus is never sated.

Scott Robinson
Guest
Scott Robinson

“Hillary Clinton Live”…. Many would prefer to see Hillary Clinton “Dead”. (“We came, we saw, she died”).

Pamela Borden
Guest
Pamela Borden

agreed.

Abi Shah
Guest
Abi Shah

Hiliary Clinton on Colonel Gaddafi quote”we came,we saw he died”
my Quote on Hilary Clinton” we came,we saw and laughed so so much we died.

lickeyleaks
Guest
lickeyleaks

She would have to pay me more than that to go!!

Ann Johns
Guest
Ann Johns

It should be called the Cringeworthy Tour.

AM Hants
Member
AM Hants

Is this the start of her Pastor Clinton, rip off gig? Who on earth would pay to hear her speak? She could not be bothered to meet the people of on the election campaign, unless for a fund raiser. So now she thinks talking for a couple of hours, ‘It was all Russia’s fault and it was all Trump’s fault’, will bring the audiences out? I wonder how many free tickets she will give to her base?

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

It’s the kickoff of her NEXT Presidential run.

AnnMarieH
Guest
AnnMarieH

What is the Democratic Party doing? For six months, Hilllary will be spewing nonsense and reminding everyone of the most disastrous political loss in party history. We don’t need to hear her warped denial and deluded rationalizations. We don’t need to be reminded that our party lost to Trump–the presidential candidate who had the worst poll numbers in the history of presidential elections. We are approaching the 2018 midterm elections. Do we want to win or do we want Hillary Clinton to continue to destroy the party and tarnish our brand? She needs to disappear and the Democrats need to… Read more »

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

All politicians, R and D, do stand for something….Israel…not the USA….Zionist Israel.

ruca
Guest
ruca

Simple, precise and truthful.

ruca
Guest
ruca

You need to take another look at the 2 party system.

samo war
Guest
samo war

hillarry is alien from wc ?

Ivan Grozny
Guest
Ivan Grozny

Well. I will propose to get the 1200 (useless) $$ for NOT attending!!!!

Natasha Shealy-Bianchini
Guest
Natasha Shealy-Bianchini

We have been waiting for this?

7.62x54r
Guest
7.62x54r

Will she finally expalin, “al-Qeda is on OUR side in Syria.” ( Feb.12, 2012 email from Jake Sullivan, US Dept. of State )?

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

” telling the audience a ‘personal, raw, detailed and surprisingly funny story”

Is she going to tell them how she helped mossad set up hubby for sextortion and her role in 9/11 as NY Senator? I doubt the truth will escape those lying lips.

tjoes
Guest
tjoes

I heard Hillary say one truthful thing. She said: “If the people knew what I have done, they would hang me”…

She is referring to her role in 9/11

Mary Kay Baker
Guest
Mary Kay Baker

What a better sign that she only cares about the 1% than making sure they are the only ones who can afford to come.

Charlotte Erickson
Guest
Charlotte Erickson

Anyone stupid enough to pay that amount to hear her speak deserves the lost hour…..or less. She has NOTHING to say that I want to hear. What audacity to demand payment to promote HER own book.

ruca
Guest
ruca

Buy the book, get her to sign it, and proceed to bludgeon her with it.

Jazzenjohn
Guest
Jazzenjohn

Hillary Clinton “What Happened” …. OJ Simpson “If I did it”

tiredofthemedialies
Guest
tiredofthemedialies

Roll up roll up! Your chance to see a sociopath and compulsive liar live, and in the flesh! Listen avidly while she explains how her (and Bill’s) company sold Arkansas prison inmates and sex-workers contaminated blood to health services around the world, and gave their transfusion patients HIV and HCV (as well as many other hepatitis strains) Multiple thousands of folks died and are still dying from that venture, alone.. Then she really got started on her extinction of the species.. They came, they saw…They died.. The world, and my part in its downfall. Don’t miss it!

Z54
Guest
Z54

Why couldn’t she just tape a speech from her jail cell and leave it at that. There are a lot of morons out there who would pay $600 to listen to her incessant whining, whether in an arena or at home!

Larry Zamba
Guest
Larry Zamba

Why should anyone care what Hillary charges? That’s up to her and whatever she thinks she wants to get for a ticket. Author Alex Christoforou came up with a real crybaby pandering concept for an article this time. It’s people like him who’ve ruined the country because now we’ve got Donald Trump for a President. Anyhow, I wouldn’t worry too much about her selling too many tickets Alex – she couldn’t even fill an elementary school gym for free when she was running for president, so why would anyone pay to see her speak now?

dinesh
Guest
dinesh

Canadian border agents should not allow Hillary to enter Canada. And Canadians must not pay money to listen to her lies and filth.

Latest

FBI recommended Michael Flynn not have lawyer present during interview, did not warn of false statement consequences

Flynn is scheduled to be sentenced on Dec. 18.

Washington Examiner

Published

on

Via The Washington Examiner…


Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, who arranged the bureau’s interview with then-national security adviser Michael Flynn at the White House on Jan. 24, 2017 — the interview that ultimately led to Flynn’s guilty plea on one count of making false statements — suggested Flynn not have a lawyer present at the session, according to newly-filed court documents. In addition, FBI officials, along with the two agents who interviewed Flynn, decided specifically not to warn him that there would be penalties for making false statements because the agents wanted to ensure that Flynn was “relaxed” during the session.

The new information, drawn from McCabe’s account of events plus the FBI agents’ writeup of the interview — the so-called 302 report — is contained in a sentencing memo filed Tuesday by Flynn’s defense team.

Citing McCabe’s account, the sentencing memo says that shortly after noon on Jan. 24 — the fourth day of the new Trump administration — McCabe called Flynn on a secure phone in Flynn’s West Wing office. The two men discussed business briefly and then McCabe said that he “felt that we needed to have two of our agents sit down” with Flynn to discuss Flynn’s talks with Russian officials during the presidential transition.

McCabe, by his own account, urged Flynn to talk to the agents alone, without a lawyer present. “I explained that I thought the quickest way to get this done was to have a conversation between [Flynn] and the agents only,” McCabe wrote. “I further stated that if LTG Flynn wished to include anyone else in the meeting, like the White House counsel for instance, that I would need to involve the Department of Justice. [Flynn] stated that this would not be necessary and agreed to meet with the agents without any additional participants.”

Within two hours, the agents were in Flynn’s office. According to the 302 report quoted in the Flynn sentencing document, the agents said Flynn was “relaxed and jocular” and offered the agents “a little tour” of his part of the White House.

“The agents did not provide Gen. Flynn with a warning of the penalties for making a false statement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 before, during, or after the interview,” the Flynn memo says. According to the 302, before the interview, McCabe and other FBI officials “decided the agents would not warn Flynn that it was a crime to lie during an FBI interview because they wanted Flynn to be relaxed, and they were concerned that giving the warnings might adversely affect the rapport.”

The agents had, of course, seen transcripts of Flynn’s wiretapped conversations with Russian then-ambassador Sergey Kislyak. “Before the interview, FBI officials had also decided that if ‘Flynn said he did not remember something they knew he said, they would use the exact words Flynn used … to try to refresh his recollection. If Flynn still would not confirm what he said … they would not confront him or talk him through it,'” the Flynn memo says, citing the FBI 302.

“One of the agents reported that Gen. Flynn was ‘unguarded’ during the interview and ‘clearly saw the FBI agents as allies,'” the Flynn memo says, again citing the 302.

Later in the memo, Flynn’s lawyers argue that the FBI treated Flynn differently from two other Trump-Russia figures who have pleaded guilty to and been sentenced for making false statements. One of them, Alexander Van der Zwaan, “was represented by counsel during the interview; he was interviewed at a time when there was a publicly disclosed, full-bore investigation regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election; and he was given a warning that it is a federal crime to lie during the interview,” according to the memo. The other, George Papadopoulos, “was specifically notified of the seriousness of the investigation…was warned that lying to investigators was a ‘federal offense’…had time to reflect on his answers…and met with the FBI the following month for a further set of interviews, accompanied by his counsel, and did not correct his false statements.”

The message of the sentencing memo is clear: Flynn, his lawyers suggest, was surprised, rushed, not warned of the context or seriousness of the questioning, and discouraged from having a lawyer present.

That is all the sentencing document contains about the interview itself. In a footnote, Flynn’s lawyers noted that the government did not object to the quotations from the FBI 302 report.

In one striking detail, footnotes in the Flynn memo say the 302 report cited was dated Aug. 22, 2017 — nearly seven months after the Flynn interview. It is not clear why the report would be written so long after the interview itself.

The brief excerpts from the 302 used in the Flynn defense memo will likely spur more requests from Congress to see the original FBI documents. Both House and Senate investigating committees have demanded that the Justice Department allow them to see the Flynn 302, but have so far been refused.

In the memo, Flynn’s lawyers say that he made a “serious error in judgment” in the interview. Citing Flynn’s distinguished 30-plus year record of service in the U.S. Army, they ask the judge to go along with special counsel Robert Mueller’s recommendation that Flynn be spared any time in prison.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Macron offers crumbs to protestors in bid to save his globalist agenda (Video)

The Duran Quick Take: Episode 36.

Alex Christoforou

Published

on

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris take a quick look at French President Macron’s pathetic display of leadership as he offers protestors little in the way of concessions while at the same time promising to crack down hard on any and all citizens who resort to violence.

Meanwhile France’s economy is set for a deep recession as French output and production grinds to a halt.

Remember to Please Subscribe to The Duran’s YouTube Channel.

Follow The Duran Audio Podcast on Soundcloud.

Via Zerohedge


As if Brussels didn’t have its hands full already with Italy and the UK, the European Union will soon be forced to rationalize why one of its favorite core members is allowed to pursue populist measures to blow out its budget deficit to ease domestic unrest while another is threatened with fines potentially amounting to billions of euros.

When blaming Russia failed to quell the widespread anger elicited by his policies, French President Emmanuel Macron tried to appease the increasingly violent “yellow vests” protesters who have sacked his capital city by offering massive tax cuts that could blow the French budget out beyond the 3% budget threshold outlined in the bloc’s fiscal rules.

Given the concessions recently offered by Italy’s populists, Macron’s couldn’t have picked a worse time to challenge the bloc’s fiscal conventions. As Bloomberg pointed out, these rules will almost certainly set the Continent’s second largest economy on a collision course with Brussels. To be clear, Macron’s offered cuts come with a price tag of about €11 billion according to Les Echos, and will leave the country with a budget gap of 3.5% of GDP in 2019, with one government official said the deficit may be higher than 3.6%.

By comparison, Italy’s initial projections put its deficit target at 2.4%, a number which Europe has repeatedly refused to consider.

Macron’s promises of fiscal stimulus – which come on top of his government’s decision to delay the planned gas-tax hikes that helped inspire the protests – were part of a broader ‘mea culpa’ offered by Macron in a speech Monday night, where he also planned to hike France’s minimum wage.

Of course, when Brussels inevitably objects, perhaps Macron could just show them this video of French police tossing a wheelchair-bound protester to the ground.

Already, the Italians are complaining.  Speaking on Tuesday, Italian cabinet undersecretary Giancarlo Giorgetti said Italy hasn’t breached the EU deficit limit. “I repeat that from the Italian government there is a reasonable approach, if there is one also from the EU a solution will be found.”

“France has several times breached the 3% deficit. Italy hasn’t done it. They are different situations. There are many indicators to assess.”

Still, as one Guardian columnist pointed out in an op-ed published Tuesday morning, the fact that the gilets jaunes (yellow vest) organizers managed to pressure Macron to cave and grant concessions after just 4 weeks of protests will only embolden them to push for even more radical demands: The collapse of the government of the supremely unpopular Macron.

Then again, with Brussels now facing certain accusations of hypocrisy, the fact that Macron was pressured into the exact same populist measures for which Italy has been slammed, the French fiasco raises the odds that Rome can pass any deficit measure it wants with the EU now forced to quietly look away even as it jawbones all the way from the bank (i.e., the German taxpayers).

“Macron’s spending will encourage Salvini and Di Maio,” said Giovanni Orsina, head of the School of Government at Rome’s Luiss-Guido Carli University. “Macron was supposed to be the spearhead of pro-European forces, if he himself is forced to challenge EU rules, Salvini and Di Maio will jump on that to push their contention that those rules are wrong.”

While we look forward to how Brussels will square this circle, markets are less excited.

Exhausted from lurching from one extreme to another following conflicting headlines, traders are already asking if “France is the new Italy.” The reason: the French OAT curve has bear steepened this morning with 10Y yields rising as much as ~6bp, with the Bund/OAT spread reaching the widest since May 2017 and the French presidential election. Though well below the peaks of last year, further widening would push the gap into levels reserved for heightened political risk.

As Bloomberg macro analyst Michael Read notes this morning, it’s hard to see a specific near-term trigger blowing out the Bund/OAT spread but the trend looks likely to slowly drift higher.

While Macron has to fight on both domestic and European fronts, he’ll need to keep peace at home to stay on top. Remember that we saw the 10Y spread widen to ~80bps around the May ’17 elections as concerns of a move toward the political fringe played out in the markets, and the French President’s popularity ratings already look far from rosy.

And just like that France may have solved the Italian crisis.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

Latest

Watch: Democrat Chuck Schumer shows his East Coast elitism on live TV

Amazing moment in which the President exhibits “transparency in government” and shows the world who the Democrat leaders really are.

Seraphim Hanisch

Published

on

One of the reasons Donald Trump was elected to the Presidency was because of his pugnacious, “in your face” character he presented – and promised TO present – against Democrat policy decisions and “stupid government” in general.

One of the reasons President Donald Trump is reviled is because of his pugnacious, “in your face” character he presented – and promised TO present – in the American political scene.

In other words, there are two reactions to the same characteristic. On Tuesday, the President did something that probably cheered and delighted a great many Americans who witnessed this.

The Democrats have been unanimous in taking any chance to roast the President, or to call for his impeachment, or to incite violence against him. But Tuesday was President Trump’s turn. He invited the two Democrat leaders, presumptive incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, and then, he turned the cameras on:

As Tucker Carlson notes, the body language from Schumer was fury. The old (something)-eating grin covered up humiliation, embarrassment and probably no small amount of fear, as this whole incident was filmed and broadcast openly and transparently to the American public. Nancy Pelosi was similarly agitated, and she expressed it later after this humiliation on camera, saying, “It’s like a manhood thing for him… As if manhood could ever be associated with him.”

She didn’t stop there. According to a report from the New York Daily News, the Queen Bee took the rhetoric a step below even her sense of dignity:

Pelosi stressed she made clear to Trump there isn’t enough support in Congress for a wall and speculated the President is refusing to back down because he’s scared to run away with his tail between his legs.

“I was trying to be the mom. I can’t explain it to you. It was so wild,” Pelosi said of the Oval Office meet, which was also attended by Vice President Pence and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.). “It goes to show you: you get into a tinkle contest with a skunk, you get tinkle all over you.”

This represented the first salvo in a major spin-job for the ultra-liberal San Francisco Democrat. The rhetoric spun by Mrs. Pelosi and Chuck Schumer was desperate as they tried to deflect their humiliation and place it back on the President:

With reporters still present, Trump boasted during the Oval meeting he would be “proud” to shutdown the government if Congress doesn’t earmark cash for his wall before a Dec. 21 spending deadline.

Pelosi told Democrats that Trump’s boisterousness will be beneficial for them.

“The fact is we did get him to say, to fully own that the shutdown was his,” Pelosi said. “That was an accomplishment.”

The press tried to characterize this as a “Trump Tantrum”, saying things like this lede:

While “discussing” a budgetary agreement for the government, President Donald Trump crossed his arms and declared: “we will shut down the government if there is no wall.”

While the Democrats and the mainstream media in the US are sure to largely buy these interpretations of the event, the fact that this matter was televised live shows that the matter was entirely different, and this will be discomfiting to all but those Democrats and Trump-dislikers that will not look at reality.

There appears to be a twofold accomplishment for the President in this confrontation:

  1. The President revealed to his support base the real nature of the conversation with the Democrat leadership, because anyone watching this broadcast (and later, video clip) saw it unedited with their own eyes. They witnessed the pettiness of both Democrats and they witnessed a President completely comfortable and confident about the situation.
  2. President Trump probably made many of his supporters cheer with the commitment to shut down the government if he doesn’t get his border wall funding. This cheering is for both the strength shown about getting the wall finished and the promise to shut the government down, and further, Mr. Trump’s assertion that he would be “proud” to shut the government down, taking complete ownership willingly, reflects a sentiment that many of his supporters share.

The usual pattern is for the media, Democrats and even some Republicans to create a “scare” narrative about government shutdowns, about how doing this is a sure-fire path to chaos and suffering for the United States.

But the educated understanding of how shutdowns work reveals something completely different. Vital services never close. However, National Parks can close partly or completely, and some non-essential government agencies are shuttered. While this is an inconvenience for the employees furloughed during the shutdown, they eventually are re-compensated for the time lost, and are likely to receive help during the shutdown period if they need it. The impact on the nation is minimal, aside from the fact that the government stops spending money at the same frenetic pace as usual.

President Trump’s expression of willingness to do this action and his singling out of the Dem leadership gives the Democrats a real problem. Now the entire country sees their nature. As President Trump is a populist, this visceral display of Democrat opposition and pettiness will make at least some impact on the population, even that group of people who are not Trump fans.

The media reaction and that of the Democrats here show, amazingly, that after three years-plus of Donald Trump being a thorn in their side, they still do not understand how he works, and they also cannot match it against their expected “norms” of establishment behavior.

This may be a brilliant masterstroke, and it also may be followed up by more. The President relishes head-to-head conflict. The reactions of these congress members showed who they really are.

Let the games begin.

Liked it? Take a second to support The Duran on Patreon!
Continue Reading

JOIN OUR YOUTUBE CHANNEL

Your donations make all the difference. Together we can expose fake news lies and deliver truth.

Amount to donate in USD$:

5 100

Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Validating payment information...
Waiting for PayPal...
Advertisement

Advertisement

Quick Donate

The Duran
EURO
DONATE
Donate a quick 10 spot!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Advertisement

The Duran Newsletter

Trending